It was, perhaps, inevitable, and now it has come to pass: obviously fed up with Men’s Rights Redditors questioning his wisdom (and his tactics, and his general narcissistic assholery) on a fairly regular basis, A Voice for Men Supreme Leader Paul Elam has started up his own Men’s Rights subreddit – r/mensrightsactivists –in which he can summarily ban all ”armchair activists” and “white knights” and “people who disagree with him.” Yep, that’s right: he’s made like a Trotskyist banana, and split.
Elam has long had a fairly strained relationship with Reddit MRAs. If you search through his comment history on Reddit, you can see evidence of numerous meltdowns on his part, which occur fairly regularly whenever anyone challenges him on pretty much anything, even when they are otherwise sympathetic to his views. On his own blog, he responds to such criticism by quickly banning the critics; on Reddit, he has tended to respond with schoolyard insults, digs at the masculinity of his critics, long recitations of his many fine accomplishments as a dedicated armchair activist, and the occasional rape joke.
Clearly the final straw for Elam was the reception given to a post of his on the poster controversy I wrote about here. Some samples from the discussion. Builtbro offers a substantive critique of Elam’s badly worded posters:
HolyCounsel is a bit more blunt:
And then there’s this edifying exchange:
The massive numbers of upvotes for Elam’s critics and downvotes for his, er, rebuttals seem to be at least partially the result of an invasion from r/SubredditDrama. Still, Elam seems to take each and every downvote personally, so the 238 net downvotes on his “Kleenex” comment must have stung.
In his new subreddit, threads like these clearly won’t be allowed to happen. As Elam explains in his less-than-welcoming “Welcome” message to new visitors:
While dissenters and the blue pill public will be welcome to post links and comment, trolls and other annoyances will be summarily booted with pleasure. This is an MRA dominated zone.
A couple of things to consider: Dissent, especially that which serves to further the improvement of the men’s movement, is welcome and appreciated. But if you want to post here, as a supposed MRA, telling others what is wrong with their work, you better have some MRA credentials.
Inactive, armchair quarterbacks, are not allowed here, unless their posts reflect genuine concern for improving and supporting the MRM and respect for those actually doing the work. If you want to ask questions so that you can learn, that is fine. But if you want to question, just so you can tear down, and you are not an MRA, then it will be adios for you. I’d sooner give a feminist the floor than a back seat driver.
R/mensrightsactivists: Come for the Elam-approved opinions, stay for the bans! Indeed, Elam devotes as much space in his “welcome” message to explaining whom he’ll ban as he does to actually spelling out what the subreddit will ostensibly do differently than good old r/mensrights.
Of course, this is not the first time that some angry MRA or two has decided to start another Men’s Rights subreddit designed to appeal to more, well, belligerent MRAs. Reddit already boasts an assortment of such subreddits, all of them fairly sparsely populated, including Rights4Men, Male Studies, and FeMRAs, a more obnoxious alternative to the already sparsely populated LadyMRAs. There’s even another subreddit devoted to MRA activism; it goes by the name of, well, MRAactivism. (There may be several more, but I can’t remember what they’re called.)
The Men’s Rights subreddit has nearly 45,000 subscribers; Elam’s new subreddit currently has 49, which is no doubt why he continues to post links to his blog in the original Men’s Rights subreddit. Whether Elam’s new subreddit succeeds and splits the MRM in two, or dies an inglorious death, one thing is sure: there will be plenty of new material for me here at Man Boobz.
*popcorn*
He’s so petulant it’s hard to tell whether it’s amusing or just sad.
So MRAs are all angry about the ways men are treated, and it’s somehow women’s fault, but have very little agreement on what exactly is wrong with how men are treated. Is men’s role in society being eroded by female intrusion? Are men being forced into a bad role in society by female dominance? Are men being taught that they have to act like wussy women? Are women forcing men into self-destructive hardass behavior? They largely don’t even realize there are different factions.
It is amazing that anyone in the MRM defends Elam’s decision about that Herald-Sun Interview.
“You have a chance to explain your ‘burgeoning social justice movement,’ in your own words, to a major media source. What do you say?”
“LOL I’M WATCHING AIR FORCE ONE LOL.”
Seriously, if I thought the MRM was a worthy cause, I would be pissed as hell that someone had fucked around like that with a major publicity opportunity. And yet there are people defending him.
Cults of personality are creepy.
Aw, Paul’s so cute when he fires up the Snitmobile and drives off into the sunset of his own subreddit.
Another meme…
http://www.quickmeme.com/meme/3qnqrf/
@aceofsevens: They certainly are the most disorganized organization I’ve ever come across.
I always figured that he’d eventually have a meltdown as soon as some other MRAs told him that he couldn’t be boss.
Joining fembot in the meme-play:
http://qkme.me/3qnqv4
You have to wonder, though – is builtbro so naive that he doesn’t realize that the implication he spotted in the poster was intentional? It’s not that Elam accidentally implied that he thinks women are responsible for their own abuse – it’s that he believes 100% that women are responsible for anything bad that happens to them. How is it that MRAs who consider themselves more moderate are just noticing this about him? It’s not like he’s been hiding it.
If any of you are on Reddit, could you please do a little upvoting? It’s REALLY helpful.
http://www.reddit.com/r/againstmensrights/duplicates/yxahb/splitsville_avoiceformen_starts_a_rival_mens/
And if you can think of other places to submit it, please do! Most subreddits, and most of those I usually submit to, don’t seem to like these sorts of drama related posts.
Does anyone have “MRA credentials”? As far as I can tell, there are only two steps on the hierarchy of MRA “realness”:
1) Posts angry comments online, but doesn’t have a blog.
2) Posts angry comments online, and has a blog.
It’s not like anyone there can claim to have done any more for men than that. “Posts angry comments online, and once stuck a poster to a telephone pole,” I guess. That must make you, like, eligible for the Nobel Prize in Men’s Rights, comparatively.
This is just so adorably childish that I almost want to pat him on the head, if he weren’t so awful and sleazy.
Woah, everyone’s a kitty!
Also, the thing I don’t get about cults of personality is that the personalities at the center of them are always really shitty. Why can’t there be cults of personality around people with really nice personalities?
I’ll be honest, I mostly just wanted to post today so I could join in the kitty train.
You don’t have many cults of personalities for nice people because nice people don’t take all the credit for everything and make people dependent on them.
Not quite everyone, there’s still a few holdouts! *Eyes them suspiciously*
Because people with nice personalities:
-admit to being wrong sometimes, and uncertain other times
-give credit to, and share the spotlight with, people who helped them in their projects
-would be horrified if they discovered they’d developed a cult of personality, and immediately seek to convince their followers that they were just an ordinary fallible person
It’ll be interesting to see how this turns out, redditors will be torn between their love for free speech, and their hatred of women.
Join us, Cliff. Jooooooiiiiin uuuussssss.
Yeah Cliff, I don’t know if I can value the opinions of a non-catvatar.
sorry i am now a guinea pig avatar i do not deal well with peer pressure :p
What statistic, put on a poster, will cause a significant number of men to believe they’re oppressed?
There’s actually a MRAactivism subreddit? Great, not only do they have subreddits for awful ideologies, they also name them after a pet peeve of mine: redundant words after acronyms. You know, like PIN number or ATM machine.
I like that maggie defended elam in the thread about the poster. XD
Elam told builtbro,
It’s funny that he thinks that simply getting attention in the news means you’ve accomplished something for your cause. Despite the saying, there really is such a thing as bad publicity. The Westboro Baptist Church gets referenced on the news sometimes, too, yet they’re not winning many converts from any of their publicity.