The dude who calls himself mayonesa on Reddit is a race-obsessed right winger who moderates (and provides much of the content for) several far-right subreddits devoted to “ethno-nationalism” and “scientific” racism. He’s also an MRA and a regular poster to the Men’s Rights subreddit. When he complains there about the terrible injustices allegedly faced by white men in academia, as he does here, he gets upvotes:
This, by contrast, got him a bunch of downvotes:
Defending hetero white dudes from the evil black lesbians that apparently control academia, a-ok! Suggesting that MRAs can’t get dates: heresy!
Dude, if this is war, do you really think it’s a smart idea to go over into enemy territory and explain your entire strategy?
It’s like a poem. A disjointed prose poem written by a bunch of spambots.
Mark – I admire your dedication. I haven’t read the entirety of your posts, but I can sense your passion. Keep it up!
Excuse me, Steele, but it’s not fun to mock you when we can tell you’re being intentionally dense.
Musta been the plenitude of “Men hate you, you cunts!” that gave it away.
Oh he has passion alright…passion to hate women…
Mark:
I don’t know that one, do they worship the version of Mega Man that appeared in Captain N?
LOL no, one of the big opponents of feminism are religious fundies who want to force women to have no rights.
The most honest men in society, priests? Is that why when that whole sexual abuse of children thing happened, all the priests involved just turned themselves in to the authorities and the church admitted it was wrong? Oh wait, the exact opposite happened. Being a priest means diddly squat in regards to someone’s honesty.
Yeah, David should feature the reasonable ones, like you.
LOL again, no. We don’t ignore the comments, we know they’re full of the same crap that Roissy posts and sometimes even worse.
Pffft, yeah right. No, women are not any more chaste, pure, or prone to monogamy than men, and nobody here is gonna say otherwise. That you believe that’s what’s said here just shows you don’t read the blog.
So you’ve convinced yourself that your misogyny is justified while at the same time convincing yourself that you’re never at fault ever. Yup, not at all like racism.
Yeah, you totally respected women, until one day you decided they were horrible subhuman people. It’s women who are to blame for you being an asshole.
If you’re an example of these best men, then I’d say it bodes very well for women, because they won’t have to deal with jackasses like you anymore.
Holy shit, no pun intended. Also, it’s a new development that many Christian priests and ministers and what have you dislike and look down on if not actively hate women? Has Mark been out of his house in the last 50 years? Or looked at a newspaper in the last 12 months?
This is the second time recently that a troll has dismissed something as “shaming” like that invalidates it when THAT’S THE ENTIRE POINT OF WHAT WAS SAID. Yes, it was shaming. That was the idea. *eyeroll*
I think it’s time for me to focus on the conversation I’m having with a friend about Captain America’s degree of sexual naivete. Far more entertaining.
@drst
….fondue?
😀
Comic book Captain America or movie Captain America?
Wow, again, that was hilarious. Mark, please don’t ever leave. We need a troll of the year for 2012, and right now you and Steele are neck and neck.
Sorry, NWOslave, but you just haven’t been bringing it. Where are this year’s superdogs?
Captain America (movie) is adorbs. I was gonna make a joke about how many times the word “GAME” was said in the second screed, but now I’m all distracted by thoughts of dat ass. 😀
(Wait, don’t you lose the Game when you think about it??)
Now Mark, it’s ok to be angry, but repeating yourself is silly. We understood you the first time, we know you are the reason we can’t have nice things.
Have a boppy and chill.
Mark – I admire your dedication.
You also admire NWOslave, so yeah.
Mark, if you’re going to post giant blocks of ragey bile, could you at least do it in a more readable format? Bullet points, dude.
“Wait, don’t you lose the Game when you think about it??”
Yes, and thus I have some choice words for you now (words negated by your knowing who my avatar is)
So Mark hates women, MRAs hate women (no shit) and he thinks hellkell is bellkell…didn’t we have a troll calling hellkell bellkell once already? (Was that a Pell Encounter? Are we having another one of those?)
“Is there a Godwin equivalent for comparing your hate group to anti-apartheid activists? Cause there should be.”
Godwin’s law is a specific form of a red herring fallacy, so yes —
Reductio ad Hitlerum (playing the Nazi card) – comparing an opponent or their argument to Hitler or Nazism in an attempt to associate a position with one that is universally reviled (See also – Godwin’s law)
TL;DR is also, more or less, a fallacy —
Proof by verbosity (argumentum verbosium, proof by intimidation) – submission of others to an argument too complex and verbose to reasonably deal with in all its intimate details. (See also Gish Gallop and argument from authority.)
“Well, I don’t know what you said, but if you’re angry and bitter enough to write long, boring posts about how much you hate women, you’re my kind of dude!”
Seriously, Steele, there has to be an easier way to make friends. Find a hobby.
(Wait, don’t you lose the Game when you think about it??)
…Captain America’s ass? Sounds like a game I don’t want to play.
Is it wrong to post dog parkour here? Because if it’s wrong, I don’t want to be right:
…katz hasn’t been infected yet? The Game.
In other things, that should be the SPC Foundation’s example of wtf memetic means.
Dude, I know the Game. I thought Bagelsan had invented a Captain America variant.
But, rereading, I suppose those two comments make more sense if I don’t assume they’re related.
if the game was about Captain America I’d just fucking forfeit. I spend too much time thinking about fictional characters lol
Hey, Argenti, nice to see you back!