Categories
a voice for men hate hypocrisy irony alert misogyny MRA oppressed white men racism reactionary bullshit reddit splc

Hey, MRAs: If you don’t want people to associate you with hatred, don’t associate yourself with hate groups

MRAs: digging their own hole.

Here’s a bit of advice for Men’s Rights redditors and MRAs in general: if you don’t want people to associate the Men’s Rights movement with hatred, you should probably not associate yourselves with hate groups.

Yesterday, a fellow called heiligenschein posted a link in the Men’s Rights subreddit to a relatively new subreddit called simply SPLC, a subreddit set up by enemies of the Southern Poverty Law Center and devoted to, as heiligenschein put it, “compiling the numerous criticisms of the [SPLC].” As he explained in a comment:

That’s a somewhat odd criticism for heiligenschein, one of the moderators of the SPLC subreddit, to make. If you look at the front page of this subreddit, you’ll discover that he and his pals are already doing a fine job of associating themselves with “neo nazi nutters” all by themselves.

If you scroll through the links, you’ll notice that Heiligenschein has posted links to several different articles from VDare.com, which the SPLC describes as an “anti-immigration hate website” which “regularly publishes articles by prominent white nationalists, race scientists and anti-Semites.” Note to MRAs: if you’re disinclined to take the word of the SPLC on anything, all you need to do to get a sense of VDare’s genteel racism is to do a search on the site for, well, the word “racism,” or “immigrant.” Or you can read VDare founder Peter Brimelow’s repulsive victim-blaming post on the “root causes” of the Sikh temple murders in Wisconsin.

Heiligenschein  also links to the virulently anti-immigrant American Patrol Report and a Confederacy-loving group called the Georgia Heritage Council; a quick glance at either group’s website will reveal what sort of organizations these are. He also links to a pretty hateful site called A Voice for Men, which some of you may have heard of already.

But the connection to the racist far-right goes beyond a couple of links. The five other moderators of the r/splc subreddit – mayonesa, dvance, Octuple, salsaverde, warkin – are also the moderators of reddit’s race-obsessed “new right” subreddit. Some of the submissions in that subreddit at the moment:

18% of marriages by Chinese and Japanese Americans are to Jews. Thoughts?

The poison of multiculturalism

USA Olympic athlete waves Mex flag: propaganda-bearing parasite prole being used as an infectious agent by the master parasite class?

The not-so-fab five also moderate a smaller subreddit called “alternative right,” a dog-whistle term amongst the far right for (pseudo) intellectual racism and so-called “human biological diversity.” Some of the submissions there, all of them submitted by moderator Mayonesa:

Emo neckbeards having hategasm over pro-white flyer

“I believe Europe to be the ‘white man’s country’. If they don’t want non-whites among them, I think it’s fair.”

Diversity perversity: Behind multicultural push is effort to degrade American culture

The West has been seriously damaged by Communist successes at memetic subversion.

The five run at least two more subreddits devoted to this kind of crap.

Just so you know, MRAs, these are the sort of people you end up hanging out with once you join the SPLC anti-fan club.

Naturally, the handful of comments I found in the r/mensrights discussion on the subject pointing out that the r/splc moderators were a bunch of race-obsessed far-right extremists — see here, here, and here —  all got downvotes from the regulars there.

You’re digging your own hole here, MRAs.

305 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Ugh
Ugh
12 years ago

Rappers frequently use the word queer. If you pay attention, you’ll see that they’re not referring to lesbians, or transmasculine genderqueers, or panromantic demisexual women; they use the word queer to attack men.

HAHA YES HIP HOP CULTURE ATTACKS MEN SO MUCH BUT NEVER ATTACKS WOMEN.

Have you noted that while many rappers attack women just for being women, they only ever attack men for having feminine characteristics? (bitch, queer, etc.) And have you noticed how often the attacks are actually just comparing them to women? Do you see the common theme here?

Ugh
Ugh
12 years ago

Yeah, reading further, my comment was kind of a derail. My bad, everyone.

Monsieur sans Nom
Monsieur sans Nom
12 years ago

People on the autistic spectrum (IMO)deserve their own category and shouldn’t be lumped in with those who actually are mentally or physically handicapped. We have our OWN issues that differentiate us from those people and when it comes to those with intellectual rather than social disabilities, we tend to have a better understanding of our place in this world and what others think about us than say, someone w/ downs syndrome. I daresay that autism is more analogous to a mental illness than a mental disability.

Falconer
12 years ago

@Toaster: Okay. So you want separate classes for spectrum students than for other non-neurotypical students. So support more money for schools so they can arrange for spectrum classes separate from general classes and other special ed. The important thing, of course, is not to call the spectrum classes “special ed” because that would create a link between them and the r*****s.

You do realize that new classes are not going to stop the neurotypical students stigmatizing you, right? Because you’re not in the general population = you’re other = you’re stupid.

Because children are bastards.

burgundy
burgundy
12 years ago

If I may expound a bit, and tie a couple of conversations together…

Some years ago, I (bisexual woman) was talking to my father (gay man) about the various umbrella terms, and he said that he disliked the alphabet-soup approach and thought we could just use “gay,” because lesbians are gay women, bisexuals only fall under the umbrella when we’re in a same-sex relationship, and trans people have separate issues entirely. I disagreed with this very strenuously, for a number of reasons. I like “queer” because to me it focuses on the central issue: our culture has very restrictive notions of what is “normal” or “acceptable” when it comes to gender and sexuality, and all of us who fall outside that box are “queer” and should a) stand together and b) work to dismantle the box, because the box is harmful.

Similarly, our culture has harmful and warped ideas about mental and physical (dis)ability, such as the idea that it’s a binary condition. (Example: in many ways, a paralympic athlete is more “able-bodied” than I am.) I think it’s short-sighted to fight over subcategorizations as though some kinds of non-typicalities are more or less legitimate than others, or should fundamentally be handled differently. Let’s address the social constructions of disability instead.

nwoslave
12 years ago

@David Futrelle
“Again, I don’t censor them for saying things that are offensive, because, again, the whole point of the blog is to expose this sort of hatred. I generally only moderate comments and people when they go after individuals in a hateful way, willfully misrepresent people, or go so far over the line that there is no point in letting them post any more.”

Dave, this is not your policy. Every single person here has gone after me in a hateful manner. In fact that is the only manner. As far as misrepresenting goes, the book-o-larnin is standard fare and an actual post by you which is totally misrepresentative of anything I’ve said.

You promote the hatred of Chirstianity, whiteness, men, anything considered traditional European and anything considered normal. Perhaps you might post a link on what marxist critical theory is in the sidebar. This way every will know that feminism, nihilism, gayism, socialism, lesbianism, ect stem from marxist critical theory with the sole goal of destroying western culture and replacing it with state control.

Feminism is the hatred of white, European, Christian men and their traditions. This is very defintion of marxism.

aworldanonymous
12 years ago

Umm, Scrapemind, I’m agendered, and biologically male, and I’d be perfectly fine with someone referring to me as queer so long as the intent wasn’t malicious.

lauralot89
12 years ago

Well then, Noms, it’s a damn good thing what you think has no bearing on the autistic subculture. I am proud to consider myself a part of the disabled community and I think you’re a vile lump of shit.

Same for you, scrapemind. I’m a woman who identifies as queer, and if that chaps your ass, you can build a bridge and get over yourself.

Polliwog
Polliwog
12 years ago

I daresay that autism is more analogous to a mental illness than a mental disability.

Dude, mental illnesses are disabilities. You seem to have just decided that “disabled” means “icky and bad” rather than being a morally neutral term solely indicating that something isn’t functioning as well as it could be. People with severe depression aren’t better or worse than people with Down syndrome, who aren’t better or worse than autistic people, who aren’t better or worse than people with schizophrenia, who aren’t better or worse than people with PTSD. They’re all just dealing with different obstacles, and being a douche to people with certain kinds of disabilities in order to prove that you’re not icky and bad like “those people” is shitty and pathetic.

eline
eline
12 years ago

Not sure if I would consider autism an illness in many cases. I’m more of the opinion it’s another kind of normality, just like being left-handed is. The brain can be “wired” in many ways and for autistic people it’s wired in a way that differs from the majority enough to be noticeable. It’s a disadvantage in a society where the majority is different and the society should accommodate just like we do for left-handed people, or people in wheelchairs or with any difference that can be a disadvantage, be it an illness or not.

Different human traits get medicalised way too much. A lot of “mental disorders” could be dealt with by adjusting the living environment and attitudes instead of giving drugs and medical treatment. Only if the “disorder” cannot be accommodated and thus causes an excessively negative impact on one’s life should it be medicalised. Support and acceptance can go a long way and could save a lot of children and their families a lot of grief and pain that a seemingly incurable diagnosis can cause.

hellkell
hellkell
12 years ago

NWO, no one is forcing you to post here. If you don’t like it, leave. You’re not saying anything new lately anyway.

Monsieur sans Nom
Monsieur sans Nom
12 years ago

@Toaster: Okay. So you want separate classes for spectrum students than for other non-neurotypical students. So support more money for schools so they can arrange for spectrum classes separate from general classes and other special ed. The important thing, of course, is not to call the spectrum classes “special ed” because that would create a link between them and the r*****s.

As it turns out, this is already being implemented. And I’m behind it 100%. For the most part, there are specialized schools for special needs children which have sections for autistic children. Perhaps its better for kids on the spectrum to be separate from neurotypical children through grade school. This will reduce the incidence of bullying and teasing they are subjected to and better prepare them for college.

Viscaria
Viscaria
12 years ago

MsN sure has lots of compassion for those young people who struggle with exactly what he struggled with. Anybody else, fair game to be called retards. Fucking lovely.

Viscaria
Viscaria
12 years ago

I’m impressed by how adeptly you removed yourself from the disabled community, so that you could stigmatize the rest of us without dealing with the splash back.

EEB
EEB
12 years ago

@pollliwog

Dude, mental illnesses are disabilities. You seem to have just decided that “disabled” means “icky and bad” rather than being a morally neutral term solely indicating that something isn’t functioning as well as it could be. People with severe depression aren’t better or worse than people with Down syndrome, who aren’t better or worse than autistic people, who aren’t better or worse than people with schizophrenia, who aren’t better or worse than people with PTSD. They’re all just dealing with different obstacles, and being a douche to people with certain kinds of disabilities in order to prove that you’re not icky and bad like “those people” is shitty and pathetic.

This, this, so much THIS. I was trying to figure out how to say this and couldn’t find the right words. You perfectly explained what I was feeling, much better than I could have. Thank you!

EEB
EEB
12 years ago

@nwo

Feminism is the hatred of white, European, Christian men and their traditions. This is very defintion of marxism.

Oooooo that’s so adorable! I just wanna coo at that comment and pinch its widdle cheeks and buy it a lolipop!

pecunium
pecunium
12 years ago

NWO: You lie about people, you say women should be slaves, you accuse those who disagree with you of being anti-christian (even when they are christians), say I’m a marxist (me… whose family owns a bookstore and sells things for profit. Me who spent a career in the Army. Me who engages in “wage slavery” because I enjoy the work. A Marxist? No. Something of a socialist, but far from a Marxist: though I wager I’ve read more Marx than you have. I’ll also wager I’ve read more of the Bible than you have, because I am well read).

You, to borrow a phrase, are reaping what you have sown. You deserve more scorn than you get.

Ithiliana
12 years ago

THe Queer nation Manifesto:

Why Queer?

Queer!

Ah, do we really have to use that word? It’s trouble. Every gay person has his or her own take on it. For some it means strange and eccentric and kind of mysterious. That’s okay; we like that. But some gay girls and boys don’t. They think they’re more normal than strange. And for others “queer” conjures up those awful memories of adolescent suffering. Queer. It’s forcibly bittersweet and quaint at best – weakening and painful at worst. Couldn’t we just use “gay” instead? It’s a much brighter word. And isn’t it synonymous with “happy”? When will you militants grow up and get over the novelty of being different?

Why Queer …

Well, yes, “gay” is great. It has its place. But when a lot of lesbians and gay men wake up in the morning we feel angry and disgusted, not gay. So we’ve chosen to call ourselves queer. Using “queer” is a way of reminding us how we are perceived by the rest of the world. It’s a way of telling ourselves we don’t have to be witty and charming people who keep our lives discreet and marginalized in the straight world. We use queer as gay men loving lesbians and lesbians loving being queer. Queer, unlike gay, doesn’t mean male.

And when spoken to other gays and lesbians it’s a way of suggesting we close ranks, and forget (temporarily) our individual differences because we face a more insidious common enemy. Yeah, queer can be a rough word but it is also a sly and ironic weapon we can steal from the homophobe’s hands and use against him.

Queer Theory

I am a queer woman.

For nearly thirty years, other people named/limited me through a heternormative system. I reject that, and claim my choice to name myself, to speak my truth.

Those who refuse to acknowledge my choice and my name, I name bigot.

EEB
EEB
12 years ago

@ polliwog

I’m in the chair because one of my legs doesn’t work right, and it’s pretty fucking infuriating to be treated like I ought to be playing Poor Little Brave Disabled Person all the time instead of just being a person with a full, complex life that has very little to do with the status of my leg

Yes, totally. I was in a wheelchair for a couple months, and I still need to use one of those scooter seats or a walker if I’m going to be walking a long distance, especially if it’s hot (or I’m having a bad day, those happen). It’s astonishing how free everyone seems to feel about boundaries with a woman on a scooter.* First I get scruitinized to see if I’m an acceptable disabled person–or am I just fat and lazy? I see them doing the little mental calculation, and sometimes it ends with people deciding it’s the latter and sneering or making a comment. (Last time I was at Costco and had to ride the scooter, I got three seperate variations on “If you walked around you would lose weight and feel so much better,” from three different people.) If they decide I’m the Poor Disabled, I get to look forward to both their condesention, their demands to know exactly what happened and how, and probably some version of, “I totally know how you feel! Once I pulled a muscle in my stomach during my pilates class!”

When did my body and medical history become subject to public scruitiny? Why do I lose my right to privacy when I sit in a scooter? And people wonder why I’ll rarely go out shopping with them anymore, even though I love it.

(* I said “woman” because I have talked to a couple of guys–one of whom is significantly larger than I am–if they ever got the same type of crap. Both were astonished. They’d had a couple kids make comments, but the parents quickly shushed them and apologized. The worst for one guy was a group of teens in the parking lot making cruel comments from far away. But women I’ve talked to in groups and forums for disabled women can all relate. Obviously this entirely anecdotal.)

funnyfaceking
12 years ago

I scrolled through the links. I also looked here:

http://www.reddit.com/user/heiligenschein/submitted/

I didn’t “notice” any links to vdare.com or american patrol report posted by /u/heiligenschein

maybe he deleted them

can you post a link to heiligenschein’s posting instead of saying “if you do this, you will notice”, etc.?

grampmk
grampmk
12 years ago

“This blog is not a safe space. This blog is about exposing misogynists and other assholes by quoting the hateful things they say — as someone famous once said, “fools are destroyed by their own words.” I also allow misogynists and other assholes to post comments here, and they frequently post things as hateful as the things I quote in the posts. Again, I don’t censor them for saying things that are offensive, because, again, the whole point of the blog is to expose this sort of hatred. I generally only moderate comments and people when they go after individuals in a hateful way, willfully misrepresent people, or go so far over the line that there is no point in letting them post any more. I also ban a very small number of slurs.”

That works for me Dave. That’s the whole purpose of your blog. isn’t it? If you only had a group of like minded people agreeing with each other all the time, that would make for a very dull blog.

1 5 6 7 8 9 13