Categories
Uncategorized

The Al Jazeera English show I’m appearing on starts in a few minutes [UPDATED: It’s over. Will post a YouTube link shortly]

The Al Jazeera English show I’m appearing on starts in about 10 minutes, at 3:30 PM

You can watch a live stream of the show (TheStream) on the Al Jazeera website here.

Subscribe
Notify of
guest

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

419 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Sharculese
9 years ago

Exhibit Sharculese.

BAAAAAAAWWWW

my case was thrown out because women are conspiring to thwart a dummy who cant even put together a youtube video

BAAAAAAAAWWWWWW

captainbathrobe
captainbathrobe
9 years ago

But men are violent. Will men stop being violent if we pretend that they aren’t?

I can’t tell if you’ve been socialized to be this obtuse, or whether you were that way from birth. Either way, my condolences.

Ugh
Ugh
9 years ago

But men are violent.

For real, how did you learn long division?

“Men” as a group are not violent. Almost no men that I know are violent people. Some men are violent. Some women are also violent. Many societal messages say that it’s okay when those men are violent because “they can’t help themselves,” which anyone smart enough to do long division can figure out isn’t true, because the vast majority of men can and do help themselves.

The point is that society should stop excusing these people, because it isn’t fair to all the good mean and women out there.

Ugh
Ugh
9 years ago

*men

Shadow
Shadow
9 years ago

Exhibit Drst

Exhibit Sharculese

I can’t believe this argumentative genius could not win his court case. This is the clearest case of misandry I’ve seen since the last time I was turned down by a woman!!

captainbathrobe
captainbathrobe
9 years ago

Yes, Shadow, but were you forced to sit on a hard chair? Because that’s true misandry.

scrapemind
9 years ago

Some men are violent. Some women are also violent.

And yet if an MRA came here denying that rape and domestic violence were mostly male crimes and told you that, you wouldn’t buy it.

captainbathrobe
captainbathrobe
9 years ago

Most violence is committed by men, but most men are not violent. See? Not complicated.

Tom Martin
9 years ago

They refused to allow the court to even consider the analysis of why the text books were sexist at all, as submitted by me, and available on my website, in the evidence section.

They’re arguments were in effect, “academics can teach what they want”, and “a discriminatory policy which effects one sex differently should be something we have to be prepared to put up with”.

I refuted the relevance of the case law they used to justify their second defense. The judge “saved time” by simply agreeing entirely with the defense, choosing not to even explain, verbally, or in writing why he he disagreed with my contention of the validity of their case law.

A scam.

If they think they’re getting any money out of me, they’ve got some explaining to do, and in writing.

In the Columbia University Women’s Studies sex discrimination case, the judge was condescendingly dismissive, but at least they went into several pages of detail about why.

Judge Taylor I think. If LSE want their money, they should have him explain why in writing. Currently, I’m 5G up and LSE are 37G down, so whatever. I’m not fussed really.

indifferentsky
9 years ago

“And yet if an MRA came here denying that rape and domestic violence were mostly male crimes and told you that, you wouldn’t buy it.”

Yah, but aren’t they arguing with you about socialization? Also language is tricky. Do you just mean, “men are more violent than women” ? Because that might be a true generalization, but those kinds of statements seem to be wholly not useful for anything.

Sharculese
9 years ago

They refused to allow the court to even consider the analysis of why the text books were sexist at all, as submitted by me, and available on my website, in the evidence section.

i don’t know english evidence law, but somehow i doubt ‘self-serving rantings of an unhinged angry dude’ counts, so… the judge was probably right on that point

They’re arguments were in effect, “academics can teach what they want”,

sounds right

and “a discriminatory policy which effects one sex differently should be something we have to be prepared to put up with”.

sounds like something you made up

I refuted the relevance of the case law they used to justify their second defense. The judge “saved time” by simply agreeing entirely with the defense, choosing not to even explain, verbally, or in writing why he he disagreed with my contention of the validity of their case law.

so zie tossed out a bunch of shit you said that didnt make any sense? sounds right.

Judge Taylor I think. If LSE want their money, they should have him explain why in writing. Currently, I’m 5G up and LSE are 37G down, so whatever. I’m not fussed really.

tom martin: fighting for mens rights by being a cowardly deadbeat

Tom Martin
9 years ago

Sharculese,

There’s also this, correcting the Bindmans article:

http://sexismbusters.org/why1.html

I had a case, but on the day, the judge refused to go into detail about what parts of my argument were wrong and why.

“Get out of here and we’re not telling you why you’re wrong about their defense being spurious. Now pay £37,000.”

I don’t think Judge Taylor was really being serious. If he wants to present me with a bill that big, it sure as hell better be itemized. He can confirm it in writing if he was being serious. Whatever.

This is a statement of fact.

Tom Martin

Sharculese
9 years ago

If they think they’re getting any money out of me, they’ve got some explaining to do, and in writing.

they already did that, stupid. it’s called you lost and now you have to pay court costs. i’m a usian and even i know how uk law works on that point. if you didnt you probably should have figured that out before wasting your time and money on this nonsense.

Sharculese
9 years ago

There’s also this, correcting the Bindmans article:

http://sexismbusters.org/why1.html

i saw your whiny, citation free rant, dummy. that’s where i got the link from in the first place.

I had a case, but on the day, the judge refused to go into detail about what parts of my argument were wrong and why.

just because you couldnt fucking understand it doesnt mean he didn’t explain it, champ.

Sharculese
9 years ago

i mean, im sure the lse will never recover theyre costs, because you cant recover from a dude who’s never gonna have the money to pay, but they probably recognized that when they saw your initial public pratfall, and were counting on never getting the money back

kirbywarp
kirbywarp
9 years ago

Gee, it sure would be swell to see the original text of the judge’s decision. I don’t suppose you have it, Tom, do you? Cause I don’t trust your summary for a millisecond.

(Actually, It’d be grand to see a video of the court as well, sorta like watching Nolan’s video of his case.)

themisanthropicmuse
9 years ago

“I don’t think Judge Taylor was really being serious. If he wants to present me with a bill that big, it sure as hell better be itemized. He can confirm it in writing if he was being serious. Whatever.” Yes he was being serious. Judges don’t just throw out random numbers for the lulz.

kirbywarp
kirbywarp
9 years ago

130 people from 11 countries who donated money to the fighting fund didn’t think it was frivolous, nor quite a few journalists and commentators.

If I wanted to, I could probably start a kickstarter that would get 130 donations so I could buy some porn. Just saying… there’s a lot of people out on the internet. Of course, I’d like to see the type of person you call a “journalist” as well. Is it like that “expert psychologist” who called your method of asking random people on the street random questions “sound methodology?”

Tom Martin
9 years ago

The only dead beats round here are the ones that transpire immediately after a Sharculese. comment. She has the personality and usefulness of a lone buttress.

Myoo
Myoo
9 years ago

“a discriminatory policy which effects one sex differently should be something we have to be prepared to put up with”

I think what the judge probably said, before Tom mangled it into this atrocity of a sentence, is that since historically women were the ones discriminated against, it is expected that in a gender studies course there will be more attention paid to the issues affecting women, much like a course focusing on the issues of race would probably pay more attention to the issues facing non-white people.

Sharculese
9 years ago

awwwww, tom, don’t be bitter about the fact that i know this shit way better than a whiny quitter like you ever will

Sharculese
9 years ago

I think what the judge probably said, before Tom mangled it into this atrocity of a sentence, is that since historically women were the ones discriminated against, it is expected that in a gender studies course there will be more attention paid to the issues affecting women, much like a course focusing on the issues of race would probably pay more attention to the issues facing non-white people.

this was basically the lse’s argument, so probably

captainbathrobe
captainbathrobe
9 years ago

Buttress. Funny word, that. It’s, like, a female butt, or something. 🙂

kirbywarp
kirbywarp
9 years ago

@captainbathrobe:

Would that make a male butt “butter?”

Tom Martin
9 years ago

I think it’s a case of a wondering Buttress for hire.

heidihi
heidihi
9 years ago

Tom you are high, go make some spaghetti.

Shadow
Shadow
9 years ago

@captainbathrobe

Yes, Shadow, but were you forced to sit on a hard chair? Because that’s true misandry.

But of course, I didn’t even think to mention it because I thought that would be a given. After all, we live i a misandrist society.

Buttress. Funny word, that. It’s, like, a female butt, or something.

This is the first salvo in the gender war!! First they seperate ourbutts, then they seperate the rest of our bodies!! AntZ has won!!

Sharculese
9 years ago

yeah im not sure what the ‘lone buttress’ thing was about, but i love it when single minded mumbler tommy b dumb accuses other people of not having a personality

PosterformerlyknownasElizabeth
PosterformerlyknownasElizabeth
9 years ago

I don’t think Judge Taylor was really being serious. If he wants to present me with a bill that big, it sure as hell better be itemized. He can confirm it in writing if he was being serious. Whatever.

Fairly sure you will be getting a copy of the judgment against you eventually unless you are just posturing for us. Which is completely possible.

captainbathrobe
captainbathrobe
9 years ago

Feminism: I can’t believe it’s not butter!

Pear_tree
Pear_tree
9 years ago

Oooh, can I take the history department to court for mainly talking about men. What about the English department, oooh and the physics department. How about politics?

kirbywarp
kirbywarp
9 years ago

Feminism is not male butts. TIL.

indifferentsky
9 years ago

And yet Tom goes on and on with Sharculese and ignores other questions directed at him.

Tom Martin
9 years ago

If anyone wants the transcripts from the court it’s £15 a page.
I don’t need to read that shit again, but you’re welcome to it.

I think Judge Taylor might have to read it again if he ever wants to come up with the itemized bill he’ll need.

Thoroughly nice tie on the man, I will say that.

captainbathrobe
captainbathrobe
9 years ago

If courts in the U.K. are like those in the U.S., then that itemized list will start coming out of your paycheck before too long.

Sharculese
9 years ago

If anyone wants the transcripts from the court it’s £15 a page.

that’s not what we want, we want the judges opinion. we don’t need hundred dollars worth of you simpering about women of the night

I think Judge Taylor might have to read it again if he ever wants to come up with the itemized bill he’ll need.

why would lse’s court costs be discerned from the trial transcript. do you even know how trials work?

Sharculese
9 years ago

tom ‘my brains are escaping through my skullskin’ martin, apparently did not pay the least bit of attention during his own fucking lawsuit

or he’s just a moron

….

probably both

Tom Martin
9 years ago

I have had nothing from the court, just a bill from the defense.

Reading the law was… misandric in itself as all the discrimination laws talk about women as victims.

But then seeing the way the lawyers just faked everything was a real eye opener.

It’s a sad day, growing up when you realize the BBC can be full of shit sometimes, and the Times too, but finding out first hand that the British justice system can be so shit, really is disappointing.

There appears to be too much room for the judge to do whatever they like.

It is certainly what dissuaded me from appealing, in a court of law.

Tulgey Logger
Tulgey Logger
9 years ago

And for the whole transcript, it costs a troy ounce of gold.

Keep fucking that chicken, though, Tom. I’m sure the judge will see the error of the judgement once you point out that it was predicted by your color-coded list of male shaming whatever. Be sure to be righteously indignant while you do so.

kirbywarp
kirbywarp
9 years ago

I may be missing something, but £15 a page? Are we buying it from Tom? Is this how he’s gonna raise his court costs? Cause that’s absolutely absurd.

On the plus side, you only need to sell 2,466 pages to raise the money.

captainbathrobe
captainbathrobe
9 years ago

So, Tom is shocked, shocked to discover:

1. Lawyers can be pretty shitty at times.
2. Judges get to decide cases based on the law and the facts, not just according to how Tom wants them to decide.

I think Anglo-Saxon jurisprudence will survive, somehow.

Sharculese
9 years ago

I have had nothing from the court, just a bill from the defense.

that’s who you owe the money to. who did you expect was gonna bill you. im sure if you dont pay your debts tho, the courts will get involved again, just like with any other deadbeat.

Reading the law was… misandric in itself as all the discrimination laws talk about women as victims.

But then seeing the way the lawyers just faked everything was a real eye opener.

or.. you were just wrong, and your case was gibberish spouted by a dude who didnt know what he was talking about. it’s weird how you never consider that as a possibility.

Sharculese
9 years ago

@kirby

I may be missing something, but £15 a page? Are we buying it from Tom? Is this how he’s gonna raise his court costs? Cause that’s absolutely absurd.

trial transcripts usually cost money, to make up for the costs the court expends recording it and then printing it out for you (and because it’s the state’s property and they can do as they please with it). i know there are judges/court officials on here who can say better than me, but that doesnt sound unbelievable.

Sharculese
9 years ago

attention england: i know you used to use my home state as a debtors colony, but if and when tommyboy completely fails to pay what he owes, please please please dont ship him over here. we have enough angry woman hating illiterates already, thanks. (no seriously, thanks a lot, its your fucking fault)

kirbywarp
kirbywarp
9 years ago

@Sharculese:

I haven’t ever tried to buy a transcript, so I don’t know how expensive they are… but it sounded expensive to me. Ah well. The more you know™!

Shadow
Shadow
9 years ago

@kirby

Compared to earning it from sexismbusters films?

kirbywarp
kirbywarp
9 years ago

@Shadow:

Is Tom giving away transcripts to feminists who participate in his videoing? Hmm… Maybe I should reconsider Tom’s offer.

kirbywarp
kirbywarp
9 years ago

Tom tom tom… I think it’s getting late for ol’ kirbymallow.

Tom Martin
9 years ago

On cue TulgeyLogger, highlights a NEW anti-male shaming tactic. The bestiality charge:

“You fuck chickens!”

My arguments fuck your arguments TulgeyLogger.

Leave the chickens out of it.