So, yeah, I’ve been reading some more Roosh.
Just a little FYI. It’s probably not a good idea to take dating advice from a dude who writes shit like this:
Your fuck funnel is the series of steps you take from the approach all the way to sex. Most girls will drop out as they go through your funnel by losing interest, declaring they have a boyfriend, flaking out, throwing up, or a multitude of other reasons that prevent sex. This means that for ever one girl you fuck, you have to approach a lot of girls. This is the basic law of averages, where no man fucks every girl he interacts with (even serial rapists have a failure rate).
Or this:
The best sex I’ve had was from mediocre girls who let me treat their bodies like garbage receptacles.
Or this:
I could probably have raw dog sex with 95% of all white girls, regardless of socioeconomic background. I only have met one girl that was super serious about using condoms, but I eventually fucked her without a condom too, so actually I change that to 100%. I could bang every white girl who lives in the United States without a condom if I desired, within three dates. I’m not kidding. I could do most of them raw dog on the same night. Here’s how to do it. ….
At this point our intrepid dating guru explains his clever Assange-esque (allegedly) method for convincing women to have sex with him sans condom, which involves repeatedly sticking his condomless penis into his dates until they stop resisting.
Note: He followed this post with another one about how terrified he was that he might have contracted HIV.
Oh, Roosh, is it entirely by coincidence that your name rhymes with “douche?”
Steele’s Super-Efficient Clear Unbiased Critical Thinking Rhetorical Strategy: Trash talk and gendered slurs!
I WANT COOKIES
COOKIES FOR ALL MANGINAS
@Cassandra:
Amazingly enough I already have pasta with tomato/spinich/pepper/onion/zuccini sauce. I’m good. 🙂
There is also the fact that “mangina” has no history; it is a unique term coined by – I’m not sure – an early MRA, perhaps Angry Harry.
Actually I think that after all the nonsense he’s made us read Mikey owes us some cookies.
(I don’t have any, sorry, just chocolate.)
In other words, “mangina” is no different from feminists who use the term “dude” in a misandrous manner. You have no problem with that – you have made yourselves very clear.
Um. Insulting men by calling them women has a very long history.
You do remember how you’re the one who thinks misandry is institutional, right?
Awwwww. 🙁
*perks up* It’s okay! I have raspberry sorbet! I will share with everyone who thinks that it is wrong to rape people.
Or perhaps something……ummmmmmmm…… bacon-flavoured??
Steele, pretty much the entirety of everything the MRM complains about has no history. You gotta do better than that, dude.
(And yeah, “dude”? Misandrous? Get over yourself.)
Passing round my snack mix. It has pistachios, almonds, cranberries and white choc bits.
Hey, I do have these. You can have one if you can make an entire comment without using the words “excuse me”, “vile”, or “mangina”.
http://melona.com.ar/images/387.jpg
Also seconding what Tulgey said.
I’m sorry. Did we just get online negged by an idiot calling himself loser?
Try harder loser baby.
How dare you demand a proud MRA warrior of truthiness subsidize your cryto-misandro-feminist livehood with his hard-earned cookies?! Vile! VILE I SAY!
I don’t think having no history makes it less sexist. As far as I know, “mancunt” is an insult that has never been used before, but that doesn’t mean you should go about calling people mancunts.
@pillowinhell:
He called himself “loser” to get out of the “you’re a loser” insult scot free. “Yeah, I’m all those bad things you say, I named myself that so I don’t care. You’re all those things for even interacting with me.”
Please don’t, or I’ll think I’m reading Weeping Cock and be confused about where all the jerks came from.
I still don’t understand why Steele chose “dude” to get all huffy over. I mean, I get the huffiness, that’s par for the course, but why “dude?” “Kiddo” gets thrown around about as often, and that’s much more obviously dismissive.
Honestly, Steele, can’t you at least manage to whine in a way that makes sense?
Insulting men by calling them women has a very long history.
You misunderstand the term. “Mangina” refers to a man who is completely deferent to women and feminism. In other words, he is a “man to the gina”.
Wait wait wait. Dude is bad but “mangina” is A-OK? O.O
Man to the gina?
LERN 2 GRAMMAR PLZ.
@ Ozymandias – I don’t know how it would go as an insult “mancunt” puts me in mind of a 1970s TV cop show. “Now… Mancunt – in Colour!”
“Well, well. If it isn’t the legendary Sgt Jack “Mancunt” Strezleki. Why do they call you…”
“I really don’t like to talk about it.”
You’re reeeeaaaally reaching, dude.
That was my point, Ozy. 😛
Using dude misandrously arguably has the exact same amount of history (far as I know). Usually it’s not “dude,” though, it’s “doodz.”
@Steele:
No, it isn’t. That definition is there, but it’s the only one that doesn’t have citations. Everything else is about men with female features. Again, calling them women.