So, yeah, I’ve been reading some more Roosh.
Just a little FYI. It’s probably not a good idea to take dating advice from a dude who writes shit like this:
Your fuck funnel is the series of steps you take from the approach all the way to sex. Most girls will drop out as they go through your funnel by losing interest, declaring they have a boyfriend, flaking out, throwing up, or a multitude of other reasons that prevent sex. This means that for ever one girl you fuck, you have to approach a lot of girls. This is the basic law of averages, where no man fucks every girl he interacts with (even serial rapists have a failure rate).
Or this:
The best sex I’ve had was from mediocre girls who let me treat their bodies like garbage receptacles.
Or this:
I could probably have raw dog sex with 95% of all white girls, regardless of socioeconomic background. I only have met one girl that was super serious about using condoms, but I eventually fucked her without a condom too, so actually I change that to 100%. I could bang every white girl who lives in the United States without a condom if I desired, within three dates. I’m not kidding. I could do most of them raw dog on the same night. Here’s how to do it. ….
At this point our intrepid dating guru explains his clever Assange-esque (allegedly) method for convincing women to have sex with him sans condom, which involves repeatedly sticking his condomless penis into his dates until they stop resisting.
Note: He followed this post with another one about how terrified he was that he might have contracted HIV.
Oh, Roosh, is it entirely by coincidence that your name rhymes with “douche?”
While I get the need to counter anti-feminists’ disparaging of feminist worries with bellow-the-belt pointlessness, I’m somewhat unsure where the immediate claims of “no, I’m not ugly” or “no, I have sex” leaves us (me?) lurkers who are indeed not exactly conventionally good-looking and on a years-long dry-spell.
I AM dateless and ugly. I also have feminist concerns. Problem?
I really have to wonder if he’s just making all this up. I really, really, hope he is. I just don’t get how someone who claims they pull this kind of crap *all the time* can possibly still be walking free.
Oh, wait.
It’s only somewhere between 60% – 90% of rapes that are reported and only 25% of those that are reported ever see a conviction.
2-D Man
And yes, it is disturbing that he takes this approach to sex.
I wouldn’t call what that guy does “sex”.
I’m late to this buuuuuut . . .
You know, I would say that I am a thin, relatively average-looking young woman who cannot get a date, but according to MRAs, thin, relatively average-looking young women who cannot get dates don’t exist, so . . . . there’s that. I mean, we can get tons of sex just by breathing, amirite?
Also, Roosh may not use condoms, but I think a personality like that is pretty effective birth control, in the long run. (Assuming he lies about his encounters, which I’m sure he mostly does– God, let’s hope so).
I’m sure you have a life and a personality though. So you’re two up on MRAs!
Some of the trolls like saying “you’re ugly”, “you’re dateless”, “you’re butch”, “women shouldn’t wear X” because the manboobzers respond by describing themselves, their sex life and their clothing. It helps the troll hoggle. (Where were those brain-bleachig corgi puppies, again?)
@wandarox
Well, yes. I guess I do have some of those.
Somewhat on topic, posts such as the “garbage disposal” loveliness actually makes me feel better about the dry spell thing: at least I don’t take the risk of coming across such types of… dudes.
I’m a fat man, but I’m FAB-U-LOUS. I’ll admit I wouldn’t hate to fuck more (roughly once a week, with the same partner), but that would cut into either work time or hobby time.
I find it amusing they always go for “fat, ugly, and dateless,” rather than, say, “stupid, mean, and evil.” I’d rather be fat, ugly, dateless, and a good person than a supermodel with six girlfriends and a nasty streak.
Oh for fucks sake.
How the hell can these all be in the same fucking post? “Middle class white girls are filthy because they don’t wear condoms. I fuck everyone without a condom at some point. I’m going to show you how to have sex with anyone bareback. Why aren’t we teaching anyone to use a condom? Why don’t girls use condoms with me?!?”
I’ll tell you why not. Rapist. That is all.
Roosh, not only are you basically a rapist, but by your own logic you are a moron and you are teaching your following to be morons.
Don’t even get me started on the doublethink where women who don’t insist on a condom are diseased, yet he coerces every woman into not wearing a condom, yet those women “disgust” him with their sex habits, yet men who don’t wear condoms are morons.
What the fuck is going on here?
If Roosh can get literally any white woman in the US to fuck him (without a condom no less)…that’s a lot of potential sex partners. If that was true (it isn’t), why would he feel the need to go anywhere else?
(I already know the answer to this, and it’s depressing – he thinks it’s easier to get away with rape in other countries.)
Funny thing is, if they charge us with being fat, ugly, or sexless, what happens if we then say how we aren’t any of those things? We become desperate to show that we aren’t losers, therefore we are losers. There is no winning here…
Heaven forbid we charge them with the same thing. That’d make us desperate losers because we’re trying to imply that their looks or sex life matters.
Cassandra: Apparently American women are all fat, entitled, ugly, masculine, flip-flop-wearing sluts.
…Man, if all it takes is wearing flipflops to get Roosh to stay away, I will wear SO MANY FLIPFLOPS.
I hate flip-flops, but hey, if they’re a magic Roosh-repelling device I may have to invest in some.
How is it that so many of the comments on that post are about how stupid you’d have to be to not wear a condom? And then congratulating Roosh on another fine post? I… don’t even… Urk.
The manboobzers who are fat, ugly, dateless (and in my case, stupid) still manage to love and find value in people, including themselves.
Maybe they figure that if he’s already HIV positive it’s too late to worry about condoms for him, and they don’t care how many women he infects if that’s the case?
Or it’s just the usual MRA thing where they refuse to disagree with each other.
*sigh*
I have a rant in moderation apparently. Too many swear words? God this makes me angry as a guy who recognizes this exact attitude to lesser degrees in “normal” dudes.
Also makes me angry at the blatant illogic. Normally contradictions aren’t this blaringly obvious… And the only way I could see someone holding those views honestly is if they have extraordinarily shitty worldviews about women (and men to a far lesser extent).
I’m dateless, but I don’t really care about that, I’d rather be celibate than follow Roosh’s tactics. And besides, I’m off to university this year, a chance to re-invent myself, meet completely new people, actually leave the house and make an effort towards remedying my social anxiety. I think my life is about to get significantly better than that of any PUA out there.
Congratulation kirbywrasp you get it, I post the comment and my self did not read the post of futrelle..
Self confident people would have not reply to me, because they know who they are and don’t bother with losers.
The ones that responded to me are the losers because they don’t know themself and where they want to go
@justaloser:
I would have had a snarky reply, but I see you’re taking your pseudonym self-depricatingly seriously.
I take it that all the MRAs who call feminists fat, ugly, dateless, stupid, etc. are losers as well? Including Roosh?
Yeah, as soon as you respond in any way to the “fat, ugly, dateless” comment, you’ve automatically lost.
Good God, kirbywarp, you really are a good little mangina-in-training, aren’t you?
Roosh reckons everyone here is a rape obsessed dyke, guys: http://www.rooshvforum.com/thread-14858.html
Read through that forum. It has massive traffic and is truly disgusting.
Oh dear, Steele is here now, I’m gonna go get some popcorn.