Men’s Rights subreddit regular Demonspawn (remember him?) is back again with some deliberately vague but definitely threatening talk about judges and politicians:
Not a lot of “plausible deniability” here, though I am sure various MRAs will try to excuse this as not being what it obviously is: a threat of violence against judges, politicians and others who work for the government.
He’s done this before; I wrote about it here.
And while we’re on the topic of Demonspawn, here’s a little followup comment of his from the thread we discussed the other day. It’s a giant wall of text, I know, but it contains gems like: “When women mouth off to men and get their faces bashed in, they’ll know equality.” At least this comment of his got as many downvotes as upvotes.
I’m banned from the Men’s Rights subreddit, of course, but Demonspawn, despite repeatedly violating the subreddit’s rules about posting comments advocating violence, continues to post away. See his comment history for more lovely thoughts on, among other things, why women are parasites who don’t deserve the vote.
It affects less than .01% of workers, dude. It sucks, but it is not the widespread problem you are pretending it is.
I said it’s bad and actually common.
what, men as a class? No, because men as a class don’t. Your ‘92% of all workplace fatalities’ skims over the fact that those fatalities aren’t an issue for more than 99% of all workers.
If that’s the ‘sacrifice’ that men are expected to make, sign me up.
And we have barking, barking, barking, do I hear frothing? Frothing? Thank you, sir!
They do so in the context of DV, which is considerably more common than murder, and can produce considerably more problems than just that. This is your flagship, and it affects a tiny minority of men.
@Sharculese – I’m not fucking dodging, I used trhe word rights as it’s commonly understood, whereas you were all…
“Ooooh redifinition reactionary adjhdgaskfhgsl fgb” bullshit.
And now YOU are trying to dodge away from THAT being empty meaningless rhetoric. FAIL.
4.8 per 100 k is the annual rate.
3.8 per 100 k is the lifetime likelihood rate.
You’re comparing apples to oranges.
Learn to read.
The USA has over 300.000.000 people, dude. In comparison to that 5.500 deaths are insignificant. Heck, over 30.000 people die in traffic accidents every year, that’s nearly 6 times the number of workplace deaths.
Workplace deaths are related to corporate greed. Not a feminist issue per se, unless you acknowledge the pro-labor Mother Jones feminists. Doing so proves the opposite point, they are against death in the workplace.
Don’t know what deaths in the workplace have to do with anything.
Culturally society is still heavily divided between “men’s work” and “women’s work”. So more men are in those heavy industrial or dangerous positions. There are always women willing to do the same thing, the numbers are smaller due to pressure on them from inside those industries, and cultural pressure in general.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RkmihA8E674&feature=related
Just a wee example, but should open your mind a bit.
Hey guys are you aware that only one out of every 117 autoerotic asphyxiation fatalities is female?
Let’s all discuss this very important issue which is very important because it predominantly effects men. Otherwise we might be misandrist commie Jew lizard banker secret agents or whatever.
like i said, i’m sure that’s totally how your buddies on vdare tell you the word is used
i’m not sure why you’re getting so worked up about this?
How come that’s a link and not an embed? 🙁
@Ugh – 3.8 per 100K must be the ANNUAL rate, with total deaths of 5.5K per annum in a nation of 300,000,000. Learn to do maths. Moron.
Look there are ways to counter Joe’s bullshit, I’m thinking that “insignificant number” is not one of them, since I’m not prepared to concede that the number of people that die due to lack of reproduction rights is “insignificant”.
His whole men vs. women angle with the work related deaths is the problem.
per annum means annual, duder
@Sharculese – wtf is vdare?
@Myoo – “The USA has over 300.000.000 people, dude. In comparison to that 5.500 deaths are insignificant. Heck, over 30.000 people die in traffic accidents every year, that’s nearly 6 times the number of workplace deaths.”
But you care about women who are murdered in DV, right? Even though they are killed at a much, much lower rate. Those deaths matter to you don’t they, because they are women.
Whereas deaths at work (almost all men) and the vast majority of murder victims (mostly men) – you don’t give a fuck do you?
It’s not the numbers that you think are “insignificant” it’s the sex of the people who are killed that you think is business as usual.
@Joe fair enough, my bad.
@Joe
Name one feminist, just one, anywhere in the world, who has advocated AGAINST workplace safety and gender equality in dangerous professions.
Did he start with the anti-Semitism yet? Or did I miss that in the comments before the meltdown started?
Relative to his rhetoric, it is. I’m to pretend all men deserve credit for the ‘sacrifice’ of less than .01%? It’s like a modern day mammoth.
The number of people who die is not that high. Much like workplace injury, death is not the standard Bad Ending to this story
@Joe
Also, there’s a difference between people dying because they’re being murdered and dying because they chose to be truck drivers., in the same way that alcohol consumption is not considered to be a war.
Well when the CIA/KGB/UNCLE conspiracy crashes the economy through war with Iran (who are not in on the conspiracy, I guess?) then that’ll be great news for men! Less employment = fewer workplace deaths! Expensive oil + less driving to/from work = fewer traffic accidents!
And who wanted fewer traffic accidents? That kid from the Gammera movie, that;s who The whole thing is has flying turtle plot written all over it!!!1!
Wake up sheeple!
-UGH
Joe, do not ignore this. If you’re going to continue right now to post on and on, and have nowhere else to be, answer this. Don’t just keep answering the posts where it’s easy to be argumentative.
I asked about profits, and UGH is asking this question. Both of those questions speak directly to proving or disproving your points.
@Bodsworth
But, don’t you know, SovietAgencyCo is run by feminists, and feminists want NOTHING MORE than for men to monopolize all trades, driving work, and military service!
@ Ugh NO! That;s what the giant turtles WANT you to think!
@indiffentsky
Of course Joe will ignore it, he’s a coward.
Rutee, I see your point. When arguing for reproductive rights, the main point is not death. It’s still significant to me.
Also the sacrifice of these men is for other greedy men, that’s my main beef.