Men’s Rights subreddit regular Demonspawn (remember him?) is back again with some deliberately vague but definitely threatening talk about judges and politicians:
Not a lot of “plausible deniability” here, though I am sure various MRAs will try to excuse this as not being what it obviously is: a threat of violence against judges, politicians and others who work for the government.
He’s done this before; I wrote about it here.
And while we’re on the topic of Demonspawn, here’s a little followup comment of his from the thread we discussed the other day. It’s a giant wall of text, I know, but it contains gems like: “When women mouth off to men and get their faces bashed in, they’ll know equality.” At least this comment of his got as many downvotes as upvotes.
I’m banned from the Men’s Rights subreddit, of course, but Demonspawn, despite repeatedly violating the subreddit’s rules about posting comments advocating violence, continues to post away. See his comment history for more lovely thoughts on, among other things, why women are parasites who don’t deserve the vote.
You: parroting facts that are demonstratably false.
Me: Pointing out that they are false.
You: Angry at me for saying that false things are false.
I just want you to think about that for awhile. If you really want to pay attention to the world around you, why are you upset when you learn more about it?
Steinem at one point worked for the CIA. So did Julia Child; it doesn’t prove that French Cooking was a CIA plot.
The Rockefeller foundation is not owned or poerator by any bank or bank employee.
You also said that feminism was a Soviet plot, for which you haven’t even tried to offer evidence.
By that logic, all conspiracy theory websites and radio shows are also banker plots. You know who owns all those GOLD WHOLESALERS that advertise on Coast to Coast, right?
BAAAAAAAWW
why are people stupid jerks who point out the things my white whine idol actually believes
BAAAWWWW
Your exact argument was that the West will be destroyed because women have reproductive rights and thus have fewer children.
because he’s a self-important dipshit who desperately wants to be a victim
Joe. Guy on other thread. Advocating for government takeover of dating agency industry,
Actual person, explicitly arguing in favour of increasing the size and expense of government.
Why are you not taking him on?
Translation:
“But I won’t actually bother to explain why it is that you’re wrong. Because that would mean that I’d have to provide evidence for my claims. And that would require me actually having evidence, which I don’t. So instead of actually giving the reasons for why I think you are wrong, I’m just going to call you a moron instead, which will completely distract you all from the fact that I don’t actually have any evidence.This will act as a clear demonstration of my superior intellect.”
@Sharculese – I wouldn’t know, because I haven’t said that. Maybe you need new glasses?
And you don’t take me seriously, despite evidence presented (and not from MRA sites, but mainstream stuff) because it would just BURST your little belief bubble and that’s way too frightening for you to deal with.
He thinks the evil Illuminati conspirators who run the world are searching the internet for anyone who says “CIA” in order to better oppress those people, but despite being clever enough to secretly run the whole world, they are not clever enough to realize that a 1 kinda looks like an I, and thus he has brilliantly foiled their evil schemes.
I wish I were joking.
bedwetting bircher baby bust boffo bawls, bores billions
The NSA couls never see through such a clever ruse as spelling CIA as C1A! It would have to take some kind of genius to crack that code!
@SirStupidName – because it won’t ever happen?
Because I struggle really hard to take anyone seriously who uses the term “incel”?
BAAAAAWWWW
why won’t the sheeple bow down before my poorly documented self-important nonsense
WAAAAAAAAHHHHH
BAAAAAAAWWWWWWW
But everyone else here is typing CIA instead of C1A! So won’t the CIA still find you anyway, Joe, despite your C1A trick?
Oh noes!
protip joey
huffily demanding stuff isnt the same as proving it
@ Polliwog: I love it!
“Sir, we’ve found another person using our agency’s acronym on the Internet.”
“Is it another James Bond fan site?”
“I’m afraid so, sir.”
“Damn you Felix Leitner! Keep looking.”
“Uh, sir… Are you aware that there are literally thousands of anti-US and anti-government websites that proudly and explicitly proclaim their purpose? Couldn’t we, you know, keep tabs on some of them?”
“That hardly counts as spying, now, does it Agent Johnson?”
“Sorry sir. Don’t know what came over me.”
@Ugh –
I know this must be hard for you to grasp, so allow me to reiterate. what I’ve said before:
Yes, I think Western hegemony is soon to collapse.
Yes, I think feminism contributes/(ed) to that.
and yet, despite that likely consequence – I have NOT, and do NOT, and will NOT argue, as you do – that “women should have fewer rights”.
I’m using the classical understanding of “rights” here, as in the right to vote, the right to work, the right to bodily autonomy etc. etc.
These are rights EVERYONE should have. Therefore I do NOT advocate taking them away from anyone.
Joecakes, I want you to come clean for me, is it lizards?
So chicken little is going to reinforce his claims that everyone had to fight, and that I don’t understand history by invoking ‘feudalism’ (Which was really not a thing), and not only that, is going to invoke the people who were obligated to be militarily protected in that thing that sort of didn’t exist much at all…
Naval practices are a totally different kettle of fish, and navies traditionally make up much fewer warm bodies than armies.
A dude talking about feudalism as if it’s a thing is going to tell me this. Excuse me while I go have a wicked laugh.
@Joe
So you only think that women, by selfishly having rights, have doomed us all.
And here I was thinking you were a misogynist or something. Obviously believing that treating half the human race will lead to Soviet invasion is a completley normal and in no way influenced by hate point of view.
yo you know when reactionaries like you try to arbitrarily redefine words, nobody is fooled by it, right?
@Joe
You also never answered me earlier. Have you written to your conspiracy sites to express the same amount of anger at them lying to you in the first place that you;ve expressed t me for pointing out the lies?
‘i have a bunch of dubious, one-sided history that flatters my preconceived beliefs and you had better surrender to that. dammit, why is everyone laughing at me SOMEONE WITH A PENIS IS TALKING!”
SirStupidName? I shall consider myself ‘zinged’. I guess.
Honestly, though I wasn’t really expecting you to argue with the other fellow. After all, with MRAs its not really what you’re arguing that matters, is it? Not so much as who you’re arguing with. Thank you for proving this to my satisfaction.
@aworldanonymous – Wow. Your spectacular naievty would be touching, if it weren’t something shared by so many – which makes it dangerous, for everyone, because it allows those very sociopathic fucks to continue doing what they do. Here’s another book you should read: “McMafia” by Mischa Glenny.
@Sharculese – I proved the funding in previous threads with links. Not my fault if you have a goldfish’ memory. :p