Categories
antifeminism crackpottery homophobia misogyny MRA paul elam reddit whaaaaa?

Men’s Rights Redditor on a Men’s Rights critic: “He is getting older and homosexual and … people like these tend to age like milk instead of wine.”

In yet another discussion of Arthur Goldwag’s latest post on the Southern Poverty Law Center’s Hatewatch blog (looking at MRAs bad-mouthing the men who lost their lives protecting their girlfriends in the Aurora shootings), longtime Men’s Rights Redditor Liverotto offers this intriguing take on what he sees as Goldwag’s motivations for criticizing the Men’s Rights movement:

Yeah, a dude actually wrote that, and a couple of people actually upvoted it.

I’m trying to understand the logic: Goldwag is growing older and more homosexual (do men usually become gay as they age?). But gay men age badly, which makes them mad at their “suitors.” So therefore Goldwag has come to hate the (mostly straight) men of the Men’s Rights movement?

Another highlight of the discussion: The r/mensrights regular who thinks I’m Paul Elam. No, really.

360 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
lowquacks
lowquacks
12 years ago

I don’t see any Clinton ads. What’s Bill Clinton even got to do with anything being sold today anyway?

kirbywarp
kirbywarp
12 years ago

@Ozy:

It’s not that it’s a religious ad, it’s that its a religious ad rehashing the same tired, disproved arguments as if it were some revelation placed on a skeptic site where those exact arguments have been addressed over and over. X_X

@Sharculese:

I doubt you can contact google. These things are determined by algorithm, and look at how much trouble Santorum has had in removing his google result. 😛

lowquacks
lowquacks
12 years ago

@David

Taylor Lautner. Also a stopped clock being right once a day.

katz
12 years ago

I always thought the “Was he really the Son of God?” ads were mostly Mormons, not that I’ve ever actually clicked on one and found out.

scrapemind
12 years ago

The obvious reason why someone wouldn’t want men playing female characters is that it’s men fetishizing women’s bodies and trying to control them by being them.

Sharculese
12 years ago

@david

he seriously brought up old women and taylor lautner in his first post.

hellkell
hellkell
12 years ago

David, he never changes, that’s how.

kirbywarp
kirbywarp
12 years ago

@David:

My guess? Al has tells that literally nobody else has. Hence whenever those topics come up at all, it’s probably him.

Sharculese
12 years ago

welp im gonna make a bunch of drunken phone calls asking someone if i can speak to google anyway because why not

lowquacks
lowquacks
12 years ago

“Hello, is the Google in?”

-how I imagine Drunk Sharculese

CassandraSays
CassandraSays
12 years ago

LOL! They may be listening to you, Kirby. Current ad says WILL THE RIGHT GOOGLE ADS FIND YOU?

Rutee Katreya
12 years ago

<blockquote"How do you know that they were male-identifying?"
Because I know the people in my monkeysphere, for one, and for the other, the typical response to being called gendered slurs against women is to affirm dudeliness. Were you going to ask something difficult?

Any victim of your invective could say, “I identify as a woman,”

That construction is amazingly unlikely, and your point of “All dudes want to play women” is not helped if the female characters are being played by women.

Also, would Ozy deserve invective if zie played a female character?

…would anyone? The point isn’t that dudes playing women is horrible, you insufferable git. It’s that for a thing you claim is so common and normal amongst everyone, it is loathed amongst dudes in general.

Also, if playing a female character isn’t an autogynephile thing, then why is it so ‘deserving’ of invective?

Scare quotes mine
Because people are misogynist and the dude in question has lowered himself to the status of woman.

Also, for a female player to play a male character may not be autoandrophilic, because male characters are the default, but if it’s a BL/yaoi game, surely it is.

AFAICT having sold yaoi, it’s watching two dudes go at it that is the main purpose, not being a dude oneself that is. You are projecting.

Sharculese
12 years ago

i spent thursday afternoon cold calling members of congress and i was very well behaved

i earned this

kirbywarp
kirbywarp
12 years ago

@Scrapemind:

No, it’s probably because of things like this (which I haven’t read, but good chance is its a flame war).

cloudiah
12 years ago

Sharculese, I hope you record those calls because I bet they’ll be hilarious!

lowquacks
lowquacks
12 years ago

@CassandraSays

That’s probably because of all the Google-Ad related content on this page now we’ve started talking about them. I’m getting that too.

CassandraSays
CassandraSays
12 years ago

Spoke to soon, Bill is back.

Sharculese
12 years ago

i play as female characters alot fwiw

my lotr online defender, let me show her to you

CassandraSays
CassandraSays
12 years ago

Too, dammit. Buttpole’s inability to write is rubbing off on me. Is there a cleaning product that helps with that?

lowquacks
lowquacks
12 years ago

@CassandraSays

Sounds like this “soon” guy is who Sharculese should look for then :p

Sharculese
12 years ago

FWIW, these are “wordads,” which are handled by wordpress.

that’s cool, i can swear at them too

Rutee Katreya
12 years ago

No, people being stupid and defending their ability to ogle nearly every fucking female champion is not the same as the special insults only players of female champions get when they fuck up in-game.

I mean, the former sucks, but it’s not the same as the latter. You pretty much have to be on the forums to deal with the former. The latter is for *everyone* who plays and is using a female character.

cloudiah
12 years ago

I still think Sharculese should drunk dial the Google, though.

Rutee Katreya
12 years ago

Seriously, it’s just Anivia and Kayle. It used to be “Anivia, Annie, and Kayle” but they added a sexualized teenager Annie skin. And they are angry because people dared to mention that hey, every female champ is sexualized.

1 8 9 10 11 12 15