Recently, a nameless commenter here asked “What exactly is “rapey” about Pick Up Artistry?” The post below should help to answer that question.
Hey, fellas! Say you’ve applied some state of the art Pickup Artistry on some HB 10 (“hot babe 10”) and you’re about to add another notch to your “girls I’ve totally had sex with” belt – and she has the gall to tell you “no.” Should you be worried?
Pickup artist Roosh Valizedah (whom we were talking about just yesterday) says, er, no. Apparently “no” (when the word is uttered by a girl you are groping) is actually a variant of “yes.” Who knew?
While every feminist likes to repeat the phrase “No means no,” it depends on context. Here’s a guide:
“No” when you try to take off her jeans or shirt means… “You need to turn me on a lot more.”
“No” when you try to take off her bra means… “Try again in five minutes.”
“No” when you try to take off her panties means… “Don’t give up now!”
I find the only word that means no is “stop.” If you hear that word then she’ll be asking you to leave soon after.
So just filter out everything she says other than the word “stop” and you’ll be fine. Oh, and if she actually starts punching you, that’s also a clue that she doesn’t want to have sex with you.
For every rape accusation I’d want to know at what stage of undress the girl was at before the supposed rape happened. If she was completely naked until saying no, and got there voluntarily, then I’d be reluctant to charge the man with rape unless there were signs of violence.
Gals need to remember, Roosh explains, that once a man gets a boner he’s pretty much helpless. His innate biological drives require that he either have sex with you (if you’re willing) or rape you (if you are unwilling and remember to say “stop” as well as “no”).
Women need to understand that men aren’t robots who can suddenly stop at the drop of a dime with all that testosterone pumping through their system. Therefore it would be prudent for them not to enter situations where the average man can’t stop due to his innate weaknesses as an animal whose entire existence depends on him successfully mating.
If it gets to that point, Roosh advises the ladies, you should just try to enjoy the rape as best you can – like it’s some sort of carnival ride.
Every roller coaster has a point while chugging up that first hill where’s there’s no turning back and you just need to hang on for the ride. In other words, don’t let a man on your bed unless you’re trying to get it.
So, In Roosh’s world, woman who merely say “no” shouldn’t complain about being raped, and men are basically slavering beasts controlled by their penises. What a lovely view of the world!
aworldanonymous, it’s an analogy. It’s showing how the taboo against generalization in this community leads to absurdity.
You can’t generalise that absurdity to the rest of the cases you’re using it as an analogy for.
trololololol
.
Oui, mais c’est aussi plutot hyperbolique, quelqu’un plus intelligent que moi pourrait facilement invertir votre point pour t’attaquer.
Uetray, uetray. Utbay ithey ishey otnay ikelay eway ereway akingtay Onsieurmay anssay Omnay eriouslysay anywayhey.
Airfay ointpay.
I’m imagining the conversation now.
Me: You’re a jerk!
Mr C: What? What did I do?
Me: No, silly, it’s a compliment. It means that you make women’s knickers wet.
Mr C: …why?
As to Om Nom, it’s simple – he’s not a misanthrope, just a sad angry little man who’s nursing a grudge against women because a woman was mean to him and hurt his feelings 5 years ago. Also, he doesn’t understand other humans (this does in fact appear to be the case), therefore he assumes that no one else does either, so we should treat human behavior like a chemistry experiment. Which will totally work because…it will, OK? This is the first step towards eliminating all the humans and replacing them with nice, safe, easy to understand robots. They’ll be nice to Om Nom!
What I don’t understand is, if Monsieur Sans Nom has such a dim view of humanity, how he expects these perfect robots to come around. I mean, they’ll have to be made and programmed by humans.
Robots will perfect themselves, because they will be malleable in a way that sociologists only wish humans were. Humans are the primordial slime that will get the ball rolling and allow the robots to pull themselves up by their bootstraps.
In the future, robots will circumvent the laws of physics and literally lift themselves over obstacles by pulling on their bootstraps.
They will still have bootstraps because they will know that bootstraps are perfect fashion.
Correct. I may not have much faith in humanity to change its behavior, but at least I have faith that some of humanity is smart enough to create robots that are not only sentient, but can program themselves.There seems to be a belief that future robots can only do what they’re programmed to do but cannot evolve, and that’s actually not true.
Okay, so robots created and programmed by humans will create and program other robots, and even evolve their programming, I get that. My question is, if humans are so shitty, why would the robots be any better?
What I want to know is, why the assumption that humans can’t change for the better? We’re just as capable of evolving as your imaginary magical soulbots will supposedly be.
@pecunium, i love and respect your work but the pedant in me is screaming to be heard. i humbly offer up in friendship to you that it’s quelle surprise, not qu’elle surprise.
We are apes, in defiance of feminists, who believe we are angels. We inherited original sin from our ape ancestors in the environment of evolutionary adaptedness.
Between French Titled Toolbox, Mikey the Sock, and Scrappy-Doo, the amount of “dumb college kid trying to sound smart” in our trollodex seems to have multiplied threefold.
Evolution takes time. A LOOOOOOOOOOONG time. And by that I mean millions of years. Do you not realize that biology imposes limitations on us? Many of which can never be overcome? The whole point of technology is to overcome our own biological limitations. Technology can do things which biology clearly cannot. Like travel to outer space for example. The tools people make are quickly approaching the complexity level of people themselves. And I see no reason for why they cannot eventually surpass us in complexity. Maybe it’s YOU who lacks a certain faith in humanity that I actually have! Computers already have the capacity, despite their limitations, to do things that the human brain cannot do.
A ball-peen hammer also has the capacity to do things that the human brain cannot do. What’s your point?
…I know, your point is that you can identify as a “misanthrope” and yet suspiciously only direct this misanthropy at specific people and groups you don’t like.
If you think humans are useless and stupid and soon-to-be-obsolete, start your criticism with yourself.
Between French Titled Toolbox, Mikey the Sock, and Scrappy-Doo, the amount of “dumb college kid trying to sound smart” in our trollodex seems to have multiplied threefold.
I’m sorry? I am a rising corporate executive and entrepreneur-on-the-side; I would ask that you at least show me the courtesy of acknowledging my station.
I have accomplished more in my young life than you ever will.
I kinda figured the answer would be some variation of “It’ll happen faster.” I fail to see how this translates to “It’ll work better.”
And this doesn’t actually address my question. I asked why you assume humanity cannot improve on its own, not whether you think machines would get the job done quicker.
And really, all this is ignoring the fact that evolution is an adaptive process, not a linear march toward perfection. So your assumption that sentient robots would rapidly evolve into flawless super-beings amounts to nothing more than blind faith.
Nomless… Correct. I may not have much faith in humanity to change its behavior, but at least I have faith that some of humanity is smart enough to create robots that are not only sentient, but can program themselves.
And a perfect faith that the people who program them won’t be utter shits… that’s some pretty stong cynicism you have.
That’s hard to do when we don’t know your location. Bakerloo? Columbus Circle? U Street? Belmont? Pershing Square?
Evolution takes time. A LOOOOOOOOOOONG time.
No.
Evolution takes generations. “Generation” varies between bacteria and elephants, you know.
Also, when I was in school, for a while I thought French Christmas was going to be way cooler than our Christmas. During the telling of the Christmas story I misheard “Jesus est venu parmi nous” as “Jesus est venu par minou” and I thought we were all getting kittens >.<
I’m sorry, I will not be disclosing personal information on this blog.
Mikey has to be a Poe, right? An exceptionally dedicated one, but still. Nobody could possibly be pretentious, stupid, and delusional enough to write that last comment in a non-satirical way.
Awww I have finally been critically hit by the Blockquote Fail Monster.