Over on The Spearhead, the regulars are discussing the three young men who sacrificed their own lives to save their girlfriends in the chaos of the Aurora theater shootings.
Needless to say, many of them aren’t too keen on any act of heroism that might benefit a woman.
Here are the two highest-rated comments in the comment thread. (I have bolded some of the more egregious stuff.)
Young Guy writes:
Sacrifice was once expected of men and women, but it has only been expected of men since the social contract between men and women was torn up by feminists. Most women have been told their entire lives they can have it all, and their happiness is the most important thing in the universe, so most women hate the thought of having to give up anything or putting other people before themselves. Most relationships today are one-sided, so don’t be shocked when men shun marriage or take up pumping and dumping. That might sound harsh to some people, but most women did it to themselves.
Why should I give every ounce of my being for a woman when she is one bad mood away from tossing me onto the scrap heap? I have heard the horror stories from men who worked hard to provide for their families, only for it to mean nothing to their ungrateful ex-wives. I have seen men risk life and limb to protect women they loved, only to have the women in their lives leave them or forget about their sacrifices. It has been said men have obligations while women have options in our modern world, I and agree with that statement. Most women think the world is their oyster, and everyone should cater to them. Most men understand the world is a harsh place, and no one is going to give them the benefit of the doubt.
Most women have done an excellent job pissing away all the goodwill men had towards them. I look at women my age, and I realize almost none of them are relationship material. Their entitlement is through the roof. They almost never say “thank you.” They demand chivalry even though they think they should never have to return the favor. They have been told any man who stands up for himself is guilty of abuse. It really is too much to ask of most women to be pleasant, keep the house clean, take care of the kids, and realize a relationship isn’t the Disney fairy-tale which they have been brainwashed with since birth.
Nietzsche (presumably not the ghost of the real Nietzsche) is a bit more concise:
They saved their lives so the girlfriends can be screwing other dudes in several months time…….. probably much less. Heroism is a suckers game.
These two comments each got nearly two dozen upvotes, even though the thread is still young.
Some other highlights of the thread:
Peter South agrees with Nietzsche’s assessment, but expects the girlfriends to move on even more quickly:
These young women will don black for the rest of their lives to mourn and commemorate the passing of these great fallen heroes.
Well ok they’ll be twittering, texting and yakking on their “smart phones” within a week about other guys…
But I think we can all agree that men generally make great meat shields.
Phil, meanwhile, derides the heroes as “suckers.”
Those boyfriends were suckers. These men were living in the past. The boyfriends were living in the 1700′s while modern day American women are living in feminist 2012. Modern day American women don’t live by the old social contract. The problem is men like these three don’t understand. These women will find new boyfriends and move on with their lives. The three men are dead. Gone forever. They died believing is something that doesn’t exist. It is tragic and disgusting.
Eric adds:
the grrlz who survived are probably moving on to the next cock even as we speak. And I’ll bet the types of guys they’re moving on to won’t be the type who’d take a bullet for them either.
Meanwhile, the lowest-rated comment in the thread, with more than two dozen downvotes and only 6 upvotes, is a comment from Georice81 praising the heroes, which starts off with:
The Bible says that there is no Greater Love than when a man gives up his life so that another man may live. I believe in this no matter what anyone may say, MRA or Feminist.
What these men did was heroic and defines what a true man should be. It isn’t a question of being a white knight. It is a question of being a brave man and a true man at that.
I guess the Spearheaders are only fans of traditionalism when it benefits them personally.
Omg, Wil, slow down, drink water, you’re going to explode
Indeed “fantazie” about it all the time.
you’re assuming Pell’s motives follow any sort of logic whatsoever
he is not really a man of narrative consistency, let’s just say that
im actually a recovered anorexic, dawg. (altho im still slim, because eatin much aint in my vocabulary)
Pell you explode the best, you need a best explosion reward.
Then get to a gym and lose the weight and get out there in to an alley and 2:00 am and make your dreams come true on your bucket list.
I’m not sure if this one is Pell yet – if it is, he’s at least getting better at disguising his writing style a little, even if he still inevitably ends up back at “FAT FAT YOU’RE ALL FAT PAY ATTENTION TO MEEEEEEEEEEEEE.”
i didnt cause that one tho, so its not the same. give me this, apparently im like a obese failure and stuff.
“Yes I know it is men getting raped in prison , fantazie about it ?”
You have the rest of us mistaken for Ruby, laughing at prison rape is her thing. I prefer to mock her myself.
Who are you talking to pell? No one asked how to lose weight.
With stretchy pants! And you poop in beds because…um…feminism?
You fantazie about being a lawyer?
HO DID YOU KNOW WINING THE WOLD SERIEC OF DICE IS ON MY BUCKET LISZT!?!?
i super dont want to be a lawyer
“he is not really a man of narrative consistency, let’s just say that”
This is very true.
Did Wil just reply to “im actually a recovered anorexic” with “Then get to a gym and lose the weight”? That’s more Tom Martin than Pell (maybe Pell also thinks anorexic is just something feminists made up and not nearly as bad as being FAT!! but yeah, that’s a Tom Martin)
And which troll that sounds like aside — fucking asshole, that shit is uncalled for.
U should fantazie about writing better. Commas are not belly buttons, they don’t go in the middle like , this.
So that’s what you got? A small sample size that revealed a tiny gap against you, and suddenly it’s injustice we’re all expected to care about? XD
Kids today. Steele, just fuck off already. You’re getting boring.
You’re a white dude, of course you’re a better judge of racism!
Stealbutt, your “friend” finds prison rape of men funny, got anything to say?
HAHAHAHAAHAHAHAAHAHAAHAHAHA!! This has been a historic moment and I’m glad I was here to witness it!
Have you confused your personas troll? Remember, you’re pretending to be a mostly blind gay man right now, so whining about how feminist women aren’t attractive in appearance to you is rather…well…hilarious. You fail at trolling and at life.
I thought Wil was just a bit thick and self centred. My bad.
So you think fat people are gross?
My god, this proves the hypothesis that I first came up with when Dealing with Tom ‘chairs are misandry’ Martin. Fat truly is an asshole repellent! Looks like I am going to have to run to the store for some Cheetoes.
And a lot of white people are self-serving fools. Like you!
*Eyeroll* You know, if this were pharyngula I’d go ahead and play these dozens, but as is, you’re ducking the evidence. Hiring and promotion gaps don’t just exist for women. F’rex,
http://scholar.harvard.edu/mullainathan/files/emilygreg.pdf
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1745-9125.2006.00044.x/abstract
off the top of my head. There’s plenty more where that came from. But go on, Rational Atheist Man. XD
I just need to point out that this is a lie. I mean sure, you probably believe that “mangina” is not misogynistic in any way because you direct it at men, but you know damn well what sort of genitalia it’s based on.
How many times do I have to repeat that I am not a lawyer I am an investigator