[Trigger Warning: Child rape]
Tom Martin is doubling down on his own reprehensibleness. You may recall the utterly repellant things the prominent British Men’s Rights Activist – he’s the guy who sued the London School for Economics for “misandry” and got his case thrown out – has been saying in the comments here about child prostitutes, and which I highlighted in a recent post.
Now he has returned with some even worse comments. Here’s his “solution” to the problem of child prostitution. (Emphasis mine.)
Pedophiles should be removed from society and given compassionate treatment for their illness.
Child prostitutes should be put back in school, or if repeat offenders, prosecuted for attempting to profit by preying on the mentally ill pedo population.
Pedos have an incentive not to re-offend – to keep their liberty, and avoid a secure treatment unit.
Child prostitutes should face a choice between their freedom (apart from when at school), or, if they continue avoiding school to go whoring, then incarceration and school.
In another comment, Martin suggests that child prostitutes are economic free agents just maximizing their profit potential:
The child prostitutes say they’re not victims.
And the fact they take money off a punter for sex, says it’s not really rape.
Pimps are not controllers, they are in truth merely agents for the prostitute, so don’t blame them exclusively either.
I’m calling manboobzers human whores. A trait shared with animals, but one humans have the cognitive powers, awaredness, and choice to transcend.
If your 10 year old doesn’t know what a whore is, but is one, then something’s wrong with that kid’s education. Perhaps they’ve been reading manboobz articles and taking Cuntrelle literally in between poundings.
Tom Martin: Worst person in the world?
(Note: Tom Martin has confirmed that this is indeed him posting comments here on Man Boobz by sending an email from the account associated with his website Sexismbusters.org. Also, he’s retweeted quotes from his comments here. Contact him via his web site if you are skeptical.)
I think those kittens are the new Manboobz pets/mascots.
Comedic Hockey brain bleach.
WTF??? “Compassionate treatment?”
Yes, ok, if they haven’t acted on their impulses. Then, sure, treatment is good. But if they’ve gone ahead and abused children then treat them after they’re out of prison.
TM, victim-blaming is a not good, very bad thing. Let’s see you defend Jerry Sandusky (UK or not you’ve heard about it).
And yes I saw him flounce already so this is rhetorical. @aworldanonymous, I’ll go watch the kittens too.
I’d say just looking at Don Cherry is comedic brain bleach. The tie!
Don Cherry is brilliant, he has a new suit made for every session of Hockey Night in Canada, and then he donates the suits to charity when he’s done with them.
Speaking sort-of of Eivind Berge, anything new with -him-?
To be fair to Tom, using the W word is basically 97% of his personality, so it really is censoring him.
@ Tulgey
Are you saying that Tom’s personality is…receding?
Tom can’t get around the filter?
Hmmm..Hoar!
Did that get past?
I know. Bore! Which is what Tom has become.
David, can we spend the rest of the thread finding amusing and creative ways around the filter? I mean, there are so many innovative ways to refer to seamstresses..hem,hem.
Mrs. Palm
Ladies of negotiable affection
ZE LADIES OF ZE NIGHT
(vhat sveet music zey make)
He’s not on moderation. I just put the word “wh*re” in the filter because some MBzers were growing tired of him calling people wh*res in pretty much every comment, and felt that the conversation that sometimes resulted ended up being insulting to (non-coerced, adult) sex workers.
But apparently Tom feels it’s impossible for him to communicate without being able to call people “wh*res.”
Mathematical brain bleach.
http://youtu.be/D2xYjiL8yyE
How about women of ill repute?
I think the best alternate to get past the spam filter would be s’mores.
@ Freitag
@CassandraSays
I’ve always been partial to archaic terms like Strumpet, harlot and dollymop.
I confess that I did not grasp the depth of depravity of the Tom Martins of the world until I listened to a pedophile explain that he was simply a victim, unable to resist the sexual power of the three year old that was “coming on to him”.
Tom just can’t stop using that one hoary word long enough to keep his train of thought going!
@CassandraSays: It might, but “S’mores” just doesn’t have the same impact.
I mean, if Tom were to just post
S’mores.
it would actually sound like he was enjoying life with other people in a warm, friendly environment rather than fruitlessly needling strangers on the internet into accepting his idiosyncratic definition of, and then renouncing publicly on youtube, prostitution.
Actually I wish there was a way to let Tom post what he wants, but automatically replace every incidence of “wh#$es” with “s’mores”, so that he would try really hard to insult people and end up sounding like he was offering them tasty snacks. And then he would stamp his feet in anger and the same thing would happen again.