[Trigger Warning: Child rape]
Tom Martin is doubling down on his own reprehensibleness. You may recall the utterly repellant things the prominent British Men’s Rights Activist – he’s the guy who sued the London School for Economics for “misandry” and got his case thrown out – has been saying in the comments here about child prostitutes, and which I highlighted in a recent post.
Now he has returned with some even worse comments. Here’s his “solution” to the problem of child prostitution. (Emphasis mine.)
Pedophiles should be removed from society and given compassionate treatment for their illness.
Child prostitutes should be put back in school, or if repeat offenders, prosecuted for attempting to profit by preying on the mentally ill pedo population.
Pedos have an incentive not to re-offend – to keep their liberty, and avoid a secure treatment unit.
Child prostitutes should face a choice between their freedom (apart from when at school), or, if they continue avoiding school to go whoring, then incarceration and school.
In another comment, Martin suggests that child prostitutes are economic free agents just maximizing their profit potential:
The child prostitutes say they’re not victims.
And the fact they take money off a punter for sex, says it’s not really rape.
Pimps are not controllers, they are in truth merely agents for the prostitute, so don’t blame them exclusively either.
I’m calling manboobzers human whores. A trait shared with animals, but one humans have the cognitive powers, awaredness, and choice to transcend.
If your 10 year old doesn’t know what a whore is, but is one, then something’s wrong with that kid’s education. Perhaps they’ve been reading manboobz articles and taking Cuntrelle literally in between poundings.
Tom Martin: Worst person in the world?
(Note: Tom Martin has confirmed that this is indeed him posting comments here on Man Boobz by sending an email from the account associated with his website Sexismbusters.org. Also, he’s retweeted quotes from his comments here. Contact him via his web site if you are skeptical.)
What. The. Fuckety. Fuck. Does he even listen to what comes out of his mouth? (so to speak)
What are the chances he is not being serious. Obviously he is a terrible person either way, but I wonder.
Thoughts? I’m honestly lost. I really can’t hardly tell anymore when these guys are joking.
He says he is not joking.
Has Tommy made his experiment/video thinger yet?
Pimps work for the child prostitutes?! But pimps are ADULTS, child prostitutes are CHILDREN. Of course adults are at fault for this problem, and children are not responsible. Their brains aren’t mature enough to be able to make good choices. Besides, no doubt an adult FORCED them into a life of prostitution. These pimps and pedophiles are evil for what they do to children.
I’m being censored, so won’t be commenting here.
Nobody is allowed to use a specific word for a while =/= you are being personally prevented from speaking.
Get the fuck over yourself.
“I’m being censored, so won’t be commenting here.”
What a convenient way to avoid criticism! Since Tom is not allowed to say one particular word (for which he could easily substitute a different, more polite one), he’s going to run off and find a place where people haven’t figured out that he’s a con artist to comment instead.
It’s not often that I say anything that’s sympathetic towards MRAs but seriously, guys, Tom Martin? Is trying to scam you out of money. Don’t fall for it.
Stopping you just filling posts with the “w” word =/= censoring. It’s not like David banned you for using the word “the”.
Ahaahahahahaha! You’ve said some truly rehensible shit up to this point Tom, I have doubts that David is censoring you now.
David, is he just whinging because he’s on moderation?
Ninjas! Also for = from.
Later Tommy, good luck prostitutin’ yourself to gullible MRA rubes to pay of the epic 37,000 loss fee.
Oh dear, what have I missed this time?
Whatever, scam I am.
He won’t even post a rambling cell phone video, and he wants money to condemn children who are being abused.
As far as I’m aware he can post what he likes – but anything containing a word of which he’s inordinately fond that begins with W and rhymes with ‘door’ will automatically get caught by the spam filter.
Evidently, Tom feels that he’s incapable of getting around this. Which probably isn’t surprising given that his recent Tweets consist of nothing other than shrieking that single word at people who don’t like him.
I guess I should go get the brain bleach out again, eh?
Oh, and as Viola points out, this ban applies to all of us, not just Tom.
Somehow I think we’ll cope.
A bossa nova/lounge cover of a Billy Idol song about masturbation.
Tom isn’t the only one. Bills are getting struck down that protect the kids. Here’s a blurb on the subject.
“Most states have laws making sexual contact with minors illegal, as minors are unable to legally consent to sexual activity. For example, minors under the age of sixteen cannot consent in the state of New York (See N.Y. Penal Law § 130.05). Despite their inability to consent, prostitution laws do not exempt minors from prosecution and district attorneys are not shy about prosecuting minors under these laws. See Harboring Concerns: The Problematic Conceptual Reorientation of Juvenile Prostitution Adjudication in New York, Shelby Schwartz. While U.S. law provides protection for foreign children trafficked into this country for the sex trade, American children are treated as criminals rather than victims. Additionally, most of the American children in the sex trade were wards of the state, which first failed to protect them from the clutches of pimps and then prosecutes them for crimes to which they cannot legally consent.”
http://www.americancriminallawreview.com/Drupal/blogs/blog-entry/prosecuting-juvenile-prostitution-11-17-2010
Drawing attention to this issue is a good thing, and documenting Tom specifically so that people can see what he’s about if they look him up is worthwhile. I appreciate this post, however disturbing.
I feel bad for everyone who has what must be a relatively common name and who now has to explain to everyone “but I’m not the one you might find if you Google me…”
That’s fine with me if Tom doesn’t comment here anymore. He refuses to answer any of my questions (like what is prostitution IN ALL ITS FORMS?) and he just spews the same Aaarglebaargle over and over again. I’m getting pretty tired of this shit weasle and his avoidance tactics. At least NWO will sometimes engage in a semi functional dialogue. Discussing with Tom is like talking to a turd.
You know what, I’m gonna go watch that ustream of the kittens.
Eivind Berge seems to be pretty common in Norway too.
Somehow I think we’ll cope. – Wetherby
As long as my brain doesn’t do what it did earlier. 😛 (If you’ll permit me a little storytime).
*As I read the comments backwards*
Me: Oh look, David put the “w” word in the filter.
Brain: Keep reading! I doubt we’ll need to use it anyway.
*Brain files that under “Meaningless Info” and deletes*
*Five minutes later*
Me: I think i’ll make a post commenting on Tom’s stupidity.
Brain: Oh! Yay!
Me: *Types out post*
Brain: By the way, you should totally use the “w” word.
Me: Sure.
*Post*
Me: Whyyyyyyyyyy!
Brain: Oh dear.