Categories
antifeminism evil fat fatties hypocrisy irony alert men who should not ever be with women ever misandry misogyny MRA oppressed men Tom Martin whores

The Lighter Side of Tom Martin (the repulsive British MRA)

Not Tom Martin

The other day we took a look at some of the more reprehensible opinions of Tom Martin, one of the UK’s most prominent Men’s Rights Activists and a man who evidently believes that child prostitutes are taking the easy way out to avoid having to get real jobs. He returned with even worse stuff, which I highlighted in my previous post.

Happily for all of us, not all of Martin’s views are this reprehensible. Many are merely ridiculous. So, today, let’s look at the Lighter Side of Tom Martin, as evidenced by some of his recent comments here on Man Boobz.

Martin apparently spent last Sunday working on a video project which involved him buttonholing passers-by on the streets of London and asking them questions in order to “prove” his various crackpot theories about gender. Here’s how he explained one aspect of his video research:

After shooting my video experiment tomorrow to discover who is more sexist on the street, women or women, I will be shooting another short, investigating if there is a correlation between unfunny women and prostitution ethic. I believe women could be as funny as men on average if they tried, but instead, invest in whoring strategies. I have a reliable street experiment to investigate this hypothesis also  …

If I can establish that women can be as funny as men (in a zero prostitution environment), then this video experiment will be released in a news piece, and used as a springboard to pre-sell the feature-length documentary it will form a part of, on a related topic.

Good luck with that!

Martin also took on the contentious (to him) subject of male baldness, a topic of intense interest to him, due to certain factors with regard to gender and misandry … er, long story short, he’s  bald. Sorry, balding.

After one commenter here suggested that Martin’s ambition was to become a sort of “Ann Coulter … with less hair and more swearing,” he took umbrage – not at the comparison to Coulter but at the bit about hair.

Well Cassandra, there are five new baldness treatments in the pipeline, but no drugs for treating a receding personality, so what are you going to do?

In a followup comment, the man whose favorite word in the English language is “whore,” used as an insult, declared we were being a bunch of evil meanies for even mentioning the whole (lack of) hair thing:

Cassandra, thanks to your receding personality (for which there is already a cure – renunciation therapy), I have decided for my filmed experiment tomorrow to also measure the degree to which each sex is prepared to make physical insults about the other sex.

Even if you specifically were fat for instance, and it was all your own fault because you refuse to get a job, I would never mention it in a debate with you. I debated an obese woman once. She ordered a pizza whilst we were still on stage, but I did not refer to it at the time, because of the most basic standards of decorum.

This I believe was an attempt at a joke.

How many manboobzers are prepared now to concur that Cassandra was being a douche by picking on an involuntary physiological characteristic of a debating opponent? And then encouraging others to do the same?

Of course, in Martin’s mind, mocking women as fat whores  is totally cool, because:

Fatness is a choice, ladies, and so is being a whore. Going bald (currently) is not, due to poor efficacy of available treatments, including transplants. That will change, if Aderans, Histogen, Replicel, Allergen and Tsuji-Lab among others have anything to do with it. All you need to do in the meantime is shut the fuck up until they sort it out. The apparent acceptability of attacking the bald though, is a great example of the lack of equality men have. People do not generally attack or humiliate women who are going bald – but when it’s a man…

Uh, yeah, that’s why virtually every bald or balding woman wears a hat or a wig, while bald or balding men just comb it over or shave it all off.

Evidently Martin feels that even a mention of his lack of hair is some kind of hate crime. Here, prominent Bald Rights Activist Larry David tries to convince authorities to investigate a similar hate crime against him.

Note to Martin: Larry David’s show, “Curb Your Enthusiasm,” is fictional.

(Note: Tom Martin has confirmed that this is indeed him posting comments here on Man Boobz by sending an email from the account associated with his website Sexismbusters.org. Also, he’s retweeted quotes from his comments here. Contact him via his web site if you are skeptical.)

651 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Shadow
Shadow
12 years ago

Martin- the jig’s up, buddy. I will be emailing Elam, Price, Bogen, and others with my suspicions.

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!! I CAN”T WAIT!!

captainbathrobe
12 years ago

So, Tom, tell us: is there any truth to the rumor that you’re a feminist mole–or any kind of a mole, for that matter?

captainbathrobe
12 years ago

OMFG! I’m beginning to think Steele is the feminist mole–either that, or the most talented performance artist since Andy Kaufman.

Dracula
Dracula
12 years ago

…is that statutory rape is not the same as forceable rape…

And raping someone by drugging them is not same as raping them at gunpoint, but they’re both still rape, Tom.

Dracula
Dracula
12 years ago

Oh Steele, you really are adorable sometimes.

captainbathrobe
12 years ago

In Tom Martin’s world, evil child prostitutes prey on innocent adult pedophiles–but only after forcing them to sit on hard chairs.

Crumbelievable
Crumbelievable
12 years ago

So you think Martin makes your movement look bad, but Paul Elam doesn`t? Oh that`s rich.

Fembot
Fembot
12 years ago

“Martin- the jig’s up, buddy. I will be emailing Elam, Price, Bogen, and others with my suspicions.”

Right here we have a competetion between Tom and Torvus running for Dumbest MRA on Earth. As soon as one seems to pull ahead, the other sinks even lower. Unbelievable! We need Paul Elam to come in and kick both your asses (I mean figuratively, I’m not condoning actual violence).

cloudiah
12 years ago

Statutory rape of a child is different from real child rape.

Wow. That may be the most disgusting sentence that was ever written.

Steele, at least tell me that you do indeed have a hyperbaric chamber.

CassandraSays
CassandraSays
12 years ago

This conversation officially just improved by 99% when the two MRAs stopped ignoring each other and started arguing. I wish I had some popcorn.

cloudiah
12 years ago

Varpole/Antimanboobz/Torvus Butthorn/Steele vs. Tom Martin: Domo de la Muerte match on pay-per-view.

Steele
Steele
12 years ago

Martin, and by the way, don’t give me your bullshit- you’re a sad sack of shit. A contemptible, vile misandrist- you heard me right. Rereading your posts I’m developing something approaching a conviction. You try to sabotage a burgeoning human rights movement for- what? Money? Sexual gratification? Or are you just a contemptible mangina?

Vile asswipe.

CassandraSays
CassandraSays
12 years ago

The Real World – Manboobz. What happens when MRAs stop being polite, and start accusing each other of not being True Scotsmen? Find out in the next 500 comments, 400 of which will be from Steele.

jumbofisch
jumbofisch
12 years ago

Statutory rape of a child is different from real child rape.

Rape is fucking rape you asshole.

jumbofisch
jumbofisch
12 years ago

Martin, and by the way, don’t give me your bullshit- you’re a sad sack of shit. A contemptible, vile misandrist- you heard me right. Rereading your posts I’m developing something approaching a conviction. You try to sabotage a burgeoning human rights movement for- what? Money? Sexual gratification? Or are you just a contemptible mangina?

AHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHA

I am making popcorn guys! This is gonna be fun!

Snowy
Snowy
12 years ago

Varpole/Butthorn/Steele can I make a suggestion? There’s this thing called a thesaurus, you can buy one or even find one online! Because your use of the word vile is starting to get really repetitive.

jumbofisch
jumbofisch
12 years ago

Tom what will you do?? He is calling you a feminist in disguise! D:

Dracula
Dracula
12 years ago

Tom Martin is a misandrist? Are you fucking kidding me?

Cliff Pervocracy
12 years ago

You try to sabotage a burgeoning human rights movement for- what? Money? Sexual gratification?

Oh, so now instead of just paying him off we’re sleeping with him too? This is getting elaborate.

Y’know, there are already feminist men. Why would we need to hire an outside agent? We could just stake one of our guys for the court costs and then we wouldn’t have to worry.

(Also this is hilariously wrong, and no feminist organization that has £37,000 on hand gives a shit about making MRAs look bad in the comments to some blog.)

Cliff Pervocracy
12 years ago

I do want Martin to start answering Tom, though. Like really want it. I’ll make popcorn.

Pam
Pam
12 years ago

Tom what will you do?? He is calling you a feminist in disguise! D:

AND he is calling him a prostitute, to boot!!

Shadow
Shadow
12 years ago

Martin, and by the way, don’t give me your bullshit- you’re a sad sack of shit. A contemptible, vile misandrist- you heard me right. Rereading your posts I’m developing something approaching a conviction. You try to sabotage a burgeoning human rights movement for- what? Money? Sexual gratification? Or are you just a contemptible mangina?

This. Is. Amazing!!!

Cliff Pervocracy
12 years ago

(Guys, gentle reminder that sex work is not a bad thing, and if we keep using “prostitute” the way we were previously using “w**re, we’re buying into the same attitudes.)

captainbathrobe
12 years ago

Come on, Tom, you’re not going to take that, are you? Fight back! What are you, some kind of mangina?

CassandraSays
CassandraSays
12 years ago

I predict that if Tom actually answers Steele this will be the best thread in Manboobz history.

1 8 9 10 11 12 27