Categories
$MONEY$ a voice for men antifeminism creepy evil women men who should not ever be with women ever misandry misogyny MRA oppressed men pedophiles oh sorry ephebophiles rape rapey reddit the spearhead Tom Martin whores

Tom Martin, leading UK Men’s Rights Activist: “Pedophiles who pay children for sex are not really rapists, because the child … understand[s] the nature of the contract.”

Tom Martin, child rape apologist

[TRIGGER WARNING: Discussion of child rape]

Tom Martin is one of the most prominent Men’s Rights Activists in the UK. He’s best known for a failed lawsuit he launched against the London School of Economics, charging the school’s gender studies program with, you guessed it, misandry. The case was thrown out of court this March, and Martin celebrated his defeat by calling a lot of people whores on Twitter and, I am proud to say, in the comments here at Man Boobz.

While Martin, known perhaps ironically as @sexismbusters on Twitter, is clearly more famous in the UK than he is here in the states, this peculiar crusader against what he sees as sexism has been celebrated (and his defeat in court mourned) by numerous Men’s Rights sites on this side of the pond. He’s been discussed many times on the Men’s Rights subreddit, where one supporter declared:

And he’s gotten write-ups on an assortment of other MR sites from The Spearhead to MensActivism.org to one Man Boobz favorite, the now-defunct What Men Are Saying About Women. On the website of the National Coalition for Men, one enthusiastic commenter gushed:

Finaly a real man with balls !!! Not like the rest of us . Tom is my hero .

But the Men’s Rights site that has given Martin the most support has been A Voice for Men, which featured Martin on one of its “radio” shows, reposted an article on Martin’s crusade from his website that seems to have been written by Martin himself (in the third person), offered updates on his lawsuit, and even publicized a recent public debate of his in England. The site has also encouraged people to donate to Martin’s legal fund.

One wonders what these supporters will make of some of the strange and awful things Martin has been saying in the comments here on Man Boobz in recent days. (There is no question that it is really him; he confirmed his identity earlier by emailing me from the account associated with his website Sexismbusters.org, and anyone skeptical of any of this is invited to contact him directly through his website.)

Most of the comments he posted here during his first commenting binge were rather risibly misogynist, frequently punctuated with his favorite epithet “whore,” a designation he feels is an appropriate one for 97% of all women and (he had recently added) for 98% of Man Boobzers of either gender. You can see here or here for numerous examples of Martin’s wit and wisdom – including his argument that hard chairs are discriminatory towards men and his now famous declaration that “female penguins are whores.”

His more recent comments, though, haven’t been funny in the slightest. Martin’s new obsession? Child prostitutes – and why they aren’t victims so much as victimizers, willing participants in an activity that makes them big money. Let me put another TRIGGER WARNING here. This is some of the most repellant material I have ever featured on man Boobz.

Here’s Martin’s opening statement on the subject:

The latest establishment scam in the UK, is to describe child prostitutes as “vulnerable children groomed for sexual exploitation”, then talk about them being “passed around” etc, without mention of the fact that these young people agreed to be whores, and are getting paid for it.

In a followup, he elaborated on this logic:

“Yeah, she offered me a job as a prostitute abroad, which would involve me receiving lots of money for taking cock, so I accepted, became a prostitute, and therefor, according to the official fem definition, this makes me a sex slave”.

Grow up!

Even a 10 year old knows, if someone is paying you for sex, that makes you a whore.

And when he talks about ten year olds here, he means this literally; in his mind, trafficked ten year old children aren’t really victims, but economic actors making an economic choice:

I stand by my statement, that child prostitutes know what they are doing, and therefore deserve to be called prostitutes, not victims.

A progressive European country (either Holland or one of the Scandinavian countries, I remember hearing), introduced in the late 90s, the legal principle of no arbitrary minimum age for consent, rather, the legal requirement to ascertain whether lawful sex had taken place was to establish whether the child or young person ‘understands the meaning of consent’ …

Now, if a ten year old is for instance [specific sexual act redacted] for money up front, then there is very much less question whether that whore understands the meaning of consent or not.

In another comment, Martin suggests that ten-year-olds who have been the victims of what some people insist on calling “real rape” would be offended by anyone thinking that ten-year-old prostitutes suffer from rape – when, after all, the child prostitutes have “agreed” to it.

From the perspective of a child who has actually been raped by an adult, how must it seem, to hear the victim-feminist establishment conflate child rape with child prostitution? The raped child remembers having no choice about participating in the sexual activity, of being forced, and then is asked to consider his or her fate or level of agency as similar or the same as that of a child who marketed them self for sex to an adult, took payment, then performed the act.

I don’t think the average 10 year old genuine rape victim would buy the manboobz style analysis that all child prostitution is rape … .

Questions of genuine agency are complicated, but not complicated enough to pass a 10 year old genuine rape victim’s bullshitometer I posit.

Oh, Martin doesn’t actually think ten year olds should be prostitutes. He thinks they should wait a few years, until they’re at least 14.

Should child prostitution from the ages of 13 up be legal?

Nope. I think that prostitution is a potentially dangerous profession for which a basic qualification in health and safety be required, like an NVQ – and that kind of course would not be attainable until after the minimum of secondary school years are completed, so aged 14, 15, 16, 17 or even 18 or more depending on the country.

The real problem, in his mind, is that young girls try to enter into the business when they should be in school:

States with child prostitution problems should be forced to get these children back into schools to complete their education, and child prostitutes who persist should be treated as school truants, a misdemeanor, and given the carrot and stick approach to get them back on the straight and narrow or go to young offenders institutions. If they want to be prostitutes when they’re old enough, then they can go to the careers advise officer, where the pros and cons of the profession can be laid out, and an application for the training course and license can be given.

Martin mocks the very notion that child prostitutes are being exploited:

Imagine you caught your underage 15 year old daughter on the game, what would you say to her?

“Okay darling, obviously you played no part whatsoever in choosing to be a prostitute yourself, so mummy’s going to help catch the nasty pimp who put you up to this, because what you need to learn is when 15 year old girls accidentally suck cocks for money, they should be compensated, with a bit of victims of crime compensation, and, not forgetting, the original £12 cock-sucking bonanza from the punter. That’s right sweety. Double bubble time. Pass me the phone. Now how does this thing work?”

Or… would you ground the whore for 6 months until she passes all her GCSEs?

Well, given that approximately 98% of manboobzers are whores themselves, I’m guessing you’re probably going to want to blame it all on MRAs.

So prostitution should be legal. But since prostitutes are very bad, they should pay high taxes for the privilege of plying their trade, to keep them poor and in order to repay society for the damage they do:

Prostitutes need to be taxed and licensed so heavily, rendering the profession a relatively poor way of making money.

Anyone who practices as a prostitute without the necessary qualification and license, can go to young offenders institute/jail – just like any other persistent illegal unlicensed trader would.

Anyone working on the sly as an escort, should be hunted down by the taxwoman, and if caught, given a huge bill for tax evasion, as well as a fine, and prison for not having a license. Unlicensed tax-evading prostitutes should be hunted down (which would be easy enough).

Anyone choosing prostitution should pay the highest taxes, and know why those taxes are so high – because of the damage prostitution does to the prostitutes and their customers and their environment and the society.

In a followup comment, Martin sees a silver lining in the form of all the tax revenues that prostitution will bring in:

If licensed hookers pay for a massive license fee and heavy taxes, then some of that money can be ring-fenced to research how best to get women (and girls) to renounce prostitution in all its forms, because let’s face it, a lot of housewhores and princess wannabes could do with a little economic activity-inducing work ethic therapy themselves.

Meanwhile, the customers of underage prostitutes – in other words, the child rapists – should be treated gingerly:

[M]en who pay money to have sex with child prostitutes should not be criminalized – but taken out of circulation and treated compassionately for their condition. I’ve heard that most criminal activity peaks with testosterone levels, in the late teens, but paedophillia is the only crime that increases in frequency as these men get older, indicating a growing pathology for them rather than just a typical immature criminal act.

He offers this final summing up of his twisted argument:

[P]edophiles who pay children for sex are not really rapists, because the child consents, then performs the act, indicating they understand the nature of the contract. The elder is still a pedophiles, but the child prostitute is still a prostitute.

If the child is enslaved – it’s rape, or too young or stupid to know what he or she’s doing – rape. But poor, and in need of food? Not rape. A choice. Unwilling to do other hard labour paying 9 times less than the prostitution route? Not rape. A choice.

He then extends his argument to the rest of the alleged 97% of women who, in his mind, are whores:

Whatever your age, follow the golden rule, of never taking money for sex, then prostitution will be eradicated. Only the prostitute can stop charging for sex.

And of course, that means rejecting courtship gifts, engagement gifts, marriage gifts, divorce gifts, and government largess also.

I don’t think many of you are ready to renounce prostitution in all its forms. …

I know a whore when I see one.

He even returns momentarily to his earlier assertion that female penguins are whores:

Someone or other here said I was anthropomorphising human behaviour onto penguin behaviour by calling penguins whores or something.

But the point is, being a whore, is an animalistic trait, that human females should not need to resort to, given they’re at the top of the fucking food chain already. Google “nuptial gifts” and you can read studies about various animals granting sex to those males who provide the most food, or even the most glittery non-edible trinkets etc, or in the case of penguins, rocks to build nests and shelter with.

I’m saying women are better than penguins, or at least would be if they renounced prostitution in all its forms.

I’m sure the women of the world will be happy to hear that Mr. Martin thinks they are potentially better than penguins.

I doubt many of Mr. Martin’s American supporters are familiar with his elaborate apologia for child rape. I would like to invite Man Boobz readers to show this post, or at least some of the more repellant quotations from it, to the proprietors of the various MRA blogs and MRA forums I have mentioned above.

I wonder if any of his supporters will be willing to renounce him publicly once they know what he has said here – and apparently in some recent public debates as well. Surely no legitimate “human rights movement” would want to be associated with anyone who spouts filth like this.

Subscribe
Notify of
guest

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

807 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Nanasha
Nanasha
8 years ago

Oh and Tom, I wasn’t advocating that johns just start “taking” sex from prostitutes. That’s called rape. If people weren’t willing to use prostitute services, then there would be no prostitutes.

You’re not being forced to pay for sex, so why are you so against it if it’s no skin off your nose?

Tom Martin
8 years ago

Nanasha,

I was 10 once, and my brain was developed enough to know that Paula Docherty (also 10) was very gorgeous, and that it would be a very good idea to snog Paula at the school dance, and not the janitor. I could tell the difference between someone I was genuinely sexually attracted to, and a hypothetical pedo offering me sweets or money for instance.

“Don’t accept sweets from strangers!” Every kid knows, as soon as the bribes come out, the cock comes out.

Some of you still a bit unsure how to renounce prostitution in all its forms. Simply post a video on youtube, in which you say the following:

I [fill in name] renounce prostitution in all its forms.

Tom Martin
8 years ago

Incidentally, I bet Cuntrelle would never do an article highlighting my demand that feminists renounce prostitution in all its forms.

Bostonian
8 years ago

So, any video yet?

Sharculese
8 years ago

Incidentally, I bet Cuntrelle would never do an article highlighting my demand that feminists renounce prostitution in all its forms.

no that sounds hilarious. please make this happen, david.

Viscaria
Viscaria
8 years ago

I was 10 once, and my brain was developed enough to know that Paula Docherty (also 10) was very gorgeous, and that it would be a very good idea to snog Paula at the school dance, and not the janitor. I could tell the difference between someone I was genuinely sexually attracted to, and a hypothetical pedo offering me sweets or money for instance.

Holy fuck you’re fucking despicable. This is my reminder to myself to stop checking this thread. Self, if you’re reading this, stop. Watch this instead (everybody else should too, if they want):

Sharculese
8 years ago

like tom, i dunno if you noticed, but ‘tom martin yells about some made up shit’ is one of the mainstays of this place

Tom Martin
8 years ago

Bostonian,

The video is on its way.

Are you Dianne Boston by any chance?

Bostonian
8 years ago

Hard chairs are misandry, noticing Tom is bald is misandry,penguins are whores and Tom cannot make a video to save his life.

He can post horrifying screeds on how to punish child prostitutes and tenderly care for pedophiles though. That part he can do all night.

Sir Bodsworth Rugglesby III
Sir Bodsworth Rugglesby III
8 years ago

So 3% of women have already posted these videos then? Care to point some out?

Sharculese
8 years ago

tom can you make a video with peter-andrew:nolan(c)?

because i would watch hours of you two awkwardly mumbling into a camera

Bostonian
8 years ago

I was born in Boston. Hence the handle.

Seraph
Seraph
8 years ago

Incidentally, I bet Cuntrelle would never do an article highlighting my demand that feminists renounce prostitution in all its forms.

What possible difference do you think it would make if he did? How would that be a triumph for you? Do you think it would make you look better somehow? Nothing can make you look better. It is far, far too late for that.

Fembot
Fembot
8 years ago

@Tom

“Some of you still a bit unsure how to renounce prostitution in all its forms. Simply post a video on youtube, in which you say the following:

I [fill in name] renounce prostitution in all its forms.”

Yeah, we get that part. But what are “all its forms?” Do you even know? Or do you just like the phrase because you think it makes you sound smart?

Nanasha
Nanasha
8 years ago

I was 10 once as well. I also knew that if a person gets to the point where they’re trying to coerce you into sex acts, they don’t necessarily care if you live through it or not. When someone decides to predate on you, whether it’s sticking a gun in your face for your wallet or sticking a cock in your mouth when you didn’t want them to and threatening to tell your parents that you’re actually a “little whore” and then throwing some money at you when they’re done, it’s still the same kind of thing- it’s exploitation.

The person doing these horrible things KNOWS that they are doing horrible things to a child, they just don’t CARE. Why is it the child’s job to not be predated by the predator?

You might as well tell people that if they don’t want to be mugged, they need to give away all their money.

Criminals need to stop committing crimes and be held accountable for the ones that they commit. Victims can’t be expected to bear the brunt of the blame here- criminals are the ones who enact/provoke- let’s put the blame where it belongs.

You are actually suggesting that those who engage in criminal activity should be given a free pass- that the person stealing from the store or blowing up the bank is the one to be applauded and coddled while the people whose lives are destroyed by these horrible crimes are the people you are demonizing.

You are a truly illogical being.

themisanthropicmuse
themisanthropicmuse
8 years ago

“Yeah, we get that part. But what are “all its forms?” Do you even know? Or do you just like the phrase because you think it makes you sound smart?” Ding, Ding, Ding we have a winner! I wouldn’t hold my breath for an answer just like you’ll never get one explaining why he’s not a whore or why he’s obsessed with them.

Nanasha
Nanasha
8 years ago

How can you renounce something when you’ve never rightly been told what the thing you must renounce actually ENTAILS?

That’s like saying you should renounce your bagoogity without explaining what bagoogity ACTUALLY MEANS.

Shadow
Shadow
8 years ago

That’s like saying you should renounce your bagoogity without explaining what bagoogity ACTUALLY MEANS.

Feh, spoken like a true bagoogity apologist!!

Tom Martin
8 years ago

I’ve already explained it, but okay, I will make a video where I explain what precisely constitutes prostitution in all its forms, and where I get a few passers by to renounce it.

In the UK it may be technically illegal to call a woman a whore anyway (The Slander of Women Act, 1891), so, with this in mind you whores, instead what I’ll do, is ask a few questions to the passers by to measure their whorishness, then give them a whore percentage. As long as it’s less than 100%, I’m not saying they’re total whores, you total whores. If they admit they’re total whores, fine. I’ll then explain the benefits of renouncing said ideology, and see if they go for it.

This is an advanced and highly risky operation though, so will not be free to view, unlike the other two vids coming out on my sexismbusters youtube channel soon.

Bostonian
8 years ago

So the whore definition video will be a scam.

BigMomma
BigMomma
8 years ago

This is an advanced….operation

BWAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHA,

*wipes tears from eyes*

Fembot
Fembot
8 years ago

@Tom “Whore” Martin

“…so will not be free to view, ”

What? You mean it will cost MONEY? You whore!!!!!!!!! Whore Whore Whore Whore Whore Whore Whore Whore Whore Whore Whore Whore Whore Whore Whore Whore Whore Whore Whore Whore Whore Whore Whore Whore Whore Whore Whore Whore Whore Whore Whore Whore Whore Whore Whore Whore Whore Whore Whore Whore Whore Whore Whore Whore Whore Whore Whore Whore Whore Whore Whore Whore Whore Whore Whore Whore Whore Whore Whore Whore Whore Whore Whore Whore Whore Whore Whore Whore Whore Whore Whore Whore Whore Whore Whore Whore Whore Whore Whore Whore Whore Whore Whore Whore Whore Whore Whore Whore Whore Whore Whore Whore Whore Whore Whore Whore Whore Whore Whore Whore Whore Whore Whore Whore Whore Whore Whore Whore Whore Whore Whore Whore Whore Whore Whore Whore Whore Whore Whore Whore Whore Whore Whore Whore Whore Whore Whore Whore Whore Whore Whore Whore Whore Whore Whore Whore Whore Whore Whore Whore Whore Whore Whore Whore Whore Whore Whore Whore Whore Whore Whore Whore Whore Whore Whore Whore Whore Whore Whore Whore Whore Whore Whore Whore Whore Whore Whore Whore Whore Whore Whore Whore Whore Whore Whore Whore Whore Whore Whore Whore Whore Whore Whore Whore Whore Whore Whore Whore Whore Whore Whore Whore Whore Whore Whore Whore Whore Whore Whore Whore Whore Whore Whore Whore Whore Whore Whore Whore Whore Whore Whore Whore Whore Whore Whore Whore Whore Whore Whore Whore Whore Whore Whore Whore Whore Whore Whore Whore Whore Whore Whore Whore Whore Whore Whore Whore Whore Whore Whore Whore Whore Whore Whore Whore

Whew, my whore is tired from all the whoring. Have I typed whore as much as you now, whore? Maybe not. Oh well. Whore.

Fembot
Fembot
8 years ago

@Tom

“I’ve already explained it, but okay, I will make a video where I explain what precisely constitutes prostitution in all its forms,”

We don’t need a video. Besides, that will probably take you six years to complete (you cunts). Just type out a few (whore) sentences here explaining all the forms of whoredom. I think this is a perfectly reasonable request (whore).

Nanasha
Nanasha
8 years ago

Why does he have to do it in a video and cannot detail it in writing? It’s my guess that this guy has no actual points left beyond being an incoherent idiot.

Argenti Aertheri
Argenti Aertheri
8 years ago

Tom — are you going to renounce boop, you booping boop?

Seraph — w00t! I’m glad someone here gets it!

Everyone else — This’ll get the point across.

cloudiah
8 years ago

I am thinking it would be entertaining to moderate Tom’s posts that contain the words “whore(s)” and “prostitution” or “prostitute(s)” just to see if he can make his argument otherwise. Also because he has an extremely fucked up view of what those words mean…

WordSpinner
WordSpinner
8 years ago

I second cloudiah’s suggestion. At the very least it would force him to pick some new slang terms for sex workers–there seem to be an infinite variety, though whore tends to be the most common and most nasty.

Fembot
Fembot
8 years ago

I don’t know. I think if he couldn’t use the word “whore,” he might come up with something even worse.

WordSpinner
WordSpinner
8 years ago

Good point.

Tom Martin
8 years ago

How about whorebot?

Dracula
Dracula
8 years ago

Okay Tom, since we’ve established that you’re a toxic, hate-spewing ignorant con man, I have to ask: Why are you still flogging your shit here?

We’re not your target audience. Why not find other raving misogynists to scam? And I can promise you you’re not going to shame or bully anyone here into going with your “renunciation” bullshit. For that we’d have to accept both your premise and your authority. We accept neither, You’re premise is a crock of shit, and you yourself are a fucking clown. So why are you wasting your time?

And why don’t you answer anyone when they ask you if you plan on going public with your plan to decriminalize child rape? Could it be you know damn well the reaction you’d get, and facing up to it scares you shitless?

Dracula
Dracula
8 years ago

I must be tired, I used an incorrect “you’re” in there. To name one mistake.

WordSpinner
WordSpinner
8 years ago

No–he doesn’t want to decriminalize child rape. He wants to decriminalize it for the rapists and criminalize the children.

But yes, he does know the reaction he’d get.

Dracula
Dracula
8 years ago

Okay, so he doesn’t just want to decriminalize it.

WordSpinner
WordSpinner
8 years ago

Though Warren Farrell seems to want to decriminalize rape. From the quotes he selected to put on his website from the Myth of Male Power from the chapter on rape:

Spousal rape legislation is blackmail waiting to happen.

and

When a woman agrees to a date, she does not make a choice to be sexual, but she does make a choice to explore sexual possibilities.

and

The solution to all this is not criminalization but resocialization.

What does that even mean? We shouldn’t criminalize rape because it won’t eliminate it? Considering that he doesn’t seem to believe in date rape or marital rape… yeah.

WordSpinner
WordSpinner
8 years ago
Fembot
Fembot
8 years ago

@Tom

Whorebot has the word whore in it. Doh!

Rutee Katreya
8 years ago

Fucking hell, Farrell is a fucking shit onion. Every time you think you’re done, there’s another layer of shit. And this is the only ‘intellectual’ light they’ve got, for extremely loose values of the word.

CassandraSays
CassandraSays
8 years ago

Tom said…

“If child soldiers are forced into it, then it’s slavery. Even if they are volunteering for a paid wage, it should still be illegal to miss your minimum of schooling, and therefore illegal.”

Much like everything he has to say about child prostitution, these are the words of a man who has no understanding of the context in which people become child soldiers. Hint – if you are living in an environment in which there is mandatory schooling, and a system in place to efficiently ensure that kids get that schooling, you are very unlikely to become a child soldier. These are not scenarios that intersect very much.

Tulgey Logger
8 years ago

““Don’t accept sweets from strangers!” Every kid knows, as soon as the bribes come out, the cock comes out.”

Color me surprised— Tom is implying those children who get kidnapped by strangers offering them candy are actually precocious prostitutes.

What a sick man.

CassandraSays
CassandraSays
8 years ago

“This is an advanced and highly risky operation though, so will not be free to view, unlike the other two vids coming out on my sexismbusters youtube channel soon.”

Tom, when are you going to renounce prostitution in all its forms? That would of course including acting as a barker for your various money making schemes. Given that you’re still doing that, it seems that you have not agreed to renounce prostitution in all its forms yet.

Wetherby
Wetherby
8 years ago

You could always replace it with the word ‘Semprini’.

ShadetheDruid
ShadetheDruid
8 years ago

So now Tom is onto “kids should be able to do everything an adult can (as long as they get paid for it), but let’s make up some bullshit exceptions so I don’t sound too terrible. Except whores, who are just awful”. Fail, Tom, fail.

ShadetheDruid
ShadetheDruid
8 years ago

Hah, moderation. Brain reads David’s post, brain does not comprehend, brain forgets. 😀

Ithiliana
8 years ago

@David: I suggest running a find and replace in Tom’s moderated posts where the w-word is replaced with the word “goddess”…….ahahahahahahaha.

Ithiliana
8 years ago

Addressing the only part of Tom’s recent crap that doesn’t make me want to throw up on the keyboard: the way to renounce prostitution is through a video saying I renounce X?

SRS?

Tom, what is it about you and videos?

Even if somebody make that video, what does that even fucking mean? Somebody could make the video and go their merry way living the life that you see as so w-ish! It’s…..bizarre magical thinking.

Fourteen year old kids can make vids these days.

You think you are doing EXPERIMENTS with your stupidass videos?

This demand for an utterly meaningless speech act (I supposed you think it has the status of a contract) makes sense ONLY if you think that a woman doing what you tell her to do means something which, now that I think about it, probably happens so rarely that you’re desperate for it.

themisanthropicmuse
themisanthropicmuse
8 years ago

@Tom: “Instead what I’ll do, is ask a few questions to the passers by to measure their whorishness, then give them a whore percentage.”

Experiments loose all validity when the person conducting them goes in with a bias they are desperately trying to confirm. Why should anyone care about some scale you’ve concocted in your head that are derived from standards that are entirely personal to you? It’s too subjective for it to be considered anything more than a pointless vanity project.

A pointless vanity project you are e-begging for. A pointless vanity project you intend to make people pay to see. You are a joke. I also love how you keep trying to get views for your crappy youtube channel and website by stirring shit here and name dropping, offering video responses rather than a quick onsite comment… that desperate for traffic these days since you stopped being relevant once your lawsuit got thrown out?

Dani Alexis
Dani Alexis
8 years ago

By the way, there’s been a brain bleach drought so…rotate your owls.

OMG I DIED. OF LAUGHTER. OMFG I CANNOT STOP LAUGHING.

Rotate your owl…FOR SCIENCE!

pecunium
pecunium
8 years ago

Shadethedruid: You are not a Noob, you are one of the lucky 10,000