Some threads on The Spearhead are virtual gold mines of crackpot misogyny. Today, from the same thread I drew upon for a post the other day, I present to you yet another long-winded antifeminist manifesto from a dude who doesn’t know shit about feminism. This time the dude in question is someone calling himself Darryl X.
Here’s his little screed:
There is only one kind of feminism. There is no first- or second-wave feminism. There is no ecofeminism or radical feminism or socialist feminism. There is no left and right. No conservative or liberal. (With which many feminists would hope to rationalize their egregious misconduct and criminal behavior – “Oh, but I’m not THAT kind of feminist.”) …
Feminism = the Borg
There is only feminism and it is evil and civilization depends upon its complete and utter elimination. Feminism is the product of false constructs and straw men and false flags and lies and fraud and is a political campaign of hate against men and children. Period.
And apparently Darryl loves the word “and.”
It has coopted our financial and legal and political and social institutions to affect the enslavement
[citation needed]
and murder
[citation needed]
and imprisonment and exile
[citation needed]
of men and the forcible separation of children from their fathers. It is responsible for the collapse of our economies worldwide and the fall of civilization.
[citation … oh, forget it. Every single thing he says needs a citation.
Feminists are comprised of mostly women but there are some men (manginas and white knights and other descriptions).
Manginas represent!
Feminists are psychopaths and malignant narcissists, without conscience and driven to do evil. They are solipsistic, manipulative, opportunistic, parasitic and predatory. They are compulsive pathological liars and deceptive and manipulative. They have no empathy, remorse, shame or guilt. They have no analytical skills and cannot plan ahead and are short-sighted. They are shallow of affect and are remorseless and are insincere and disingenuous. They are faithless and in the absence of any analytical skills, they do not have faith in the analytical skills of others, no matter how much evidence there is of its benefits. They are career and life-long con-artists.
Huh. Are you perhaps familiar with the psychological concept of “projection,” a defense mechanism whereby you project some of your own characteristics – particularly your most unsavory ones – onto someone else, or perhaps a group of people?
Just curious.
No matter how we define or relate to one another as men in the MRM, understanding the distinction between men in the MRM and feminists is more important. That is the enemy which must be destroyed. The other men in the MRM from which each of us are different are our brothers and the only important difference is that between men in the MRM and feminists. That’s the difference which defines us and on which civilization depends.
I’m going to go out on a limb here and say that the future of civilization doesn’t actually depend on a bunch of bitter, hateful dickwads grousing on the internet about how much ladies suck.
Oh wait, I forgot there is a third!
Woman on welfare: LAZY THUG ALPHA FUCKER WELFARE QUEEN LEECHING OFF BIG DADDY GUBMINT AND MY TAXES!!!!
Funny how they will object to any way possible for women to survive. Its almost as if they’d rather
Oh wait, I forgot there is a third!
Woman on welfare: LAZY THUG ALPHA FUCKER WELFARE QUEEN LEECHING OFF BIG DADDY GUBMINT AND MY TAXES!!!!
Funny how they will object to any way possible for women to survive. Its almost as if they’d rather we not exist or something…imagine that.
Oh, they want us to exist. They just don’t want us to be able to exist independently of them. If women have money and can buy their own shiny things* then how can men use shiny things in order to bribe women into having sex with them?
*The MRA idea of shiny things that women shouldn’t be allowed to have without asking a man for them seems to include both food and shelter.
Ah, if hair-removal is part of the package, then I feel less like I’m missing out – the one time I tried waxing at home was horrifying enough that it pretty much instantly landed on my “experiences I never ever ever need to have again” list.
Pedicures do sound nice, though. Maybe someday! And in the meantime, the new wastebasket actually is rather nice. 🙂
Wait just one second… I thought women got jobs out of spite? And now I hear women are spending the money they earn at their spiteful jobs buying spiteful things, like a place to live. And a means of transportation. Is there no end to the misandry?
And cats, part of my disposable spiteful income goes on my adorable cats. Who are all “fixed”.
And I bet none of it got spent on male-only homeless shelters.
“I’m not even completely sure what a spa treatment is, besides “something that people in my income bracket don’t get,” but it sounds like it’s probably nice.”
Idk if it counts as “spa treatment” but there’s a salon near-ish my parents that does mani-pedi with paraffin dip and massage for like $20. They also do waxing and it really doesn’t hurt nearly as much as either tweezing or ingrown razor burn (I have a silly high pain tolerance, so ymmv). Been a couple of years since I’ve gone though.
Last thing I purchased that wasn’t a food treat? The entirely boring item of “picked up prescription refill”, so let’s go with ice cream, because it was yummy. Last non-boring thing would be art supplies, but those were an early birthday gift from my mother because canvas was on sale 60% off (and canvas is not cheap, so that was rather exciting). Lol, last non-routine thing I actually purchased? A father’s day card for my grandfather.
“And I bet none of it got spent on male-only homeless shelters.”
I find that complaint extra infuriating — my last job was ### Street corner, but labelled as ### other Street — wtf was actually at that address was a men’s shelter, so I regularly had homeless men coming in asking if we were the shelter. No matter how annoyed they were at the mislabeling, I gave them directions and wished them a good day. But yeah, I must’ve really been seething with resentment or something, that’s it, I’m sure.
I would be curious to know the average level of donations to charity of feminists compared to MRAs. For those that donate time and not money, I think that multiplying the hours by the median adult wage would be an appropriate estimate of worth. I imagine that we come top.
*Sorry, that should read, for those earning under the median adult wage that donate time and not money. For those who earn more than the median adult wage, substitute in the hourly wage/salary.
I spend 100% of my income on scented fucking candles
@ozy: Typical women (AKA spoilt princesses), spending all of their money on steampunk octo…pi? Octopuses? My fluffy woman-brain can’t work out the plural of octopus. Too many scented fucking candles.
I haven’t bought any clothes for about a year. I’ve given away quite a few to the charity shops, though.
I haven’t been on vacation abroad since I used to go with my parents as a teenager and young adult and I’ve never been to a spa or had a pedicure or manicure in my entire life.
I also don’t have a steampunk octopus (sob) and I spend all of my money on bills, groceries, and dance classes (half-price because I volunteer for the dance company).
I just bought some jeans to replace an old pair that ripped. I mean, I bought them on eBay so they were cheap, but if I’d paid retail they’d have been at least $200 so…does that still count as evil lady spending?
It doesn’t matter. Any woman spending anything (unless she is buying something for a man?) is evil.
Actually, there’s a theoretical question! How about if I bought a pair of the dude version of those jeans for Mr C? Price would be similar. Is that then an example of how evil and frivolous women are with the money that we shouldn’t be allowed to earn?
That depends. Would these trousers be so tight that there’s a possibility they’d cause damage to his reproductive system? Because that would be an example of misandry. You should probably make him a pair of trousers from skratch in between cooking dinner and cleaning the house, then donate the money to a respectable charity for men. (Not Amnesty, please. They are against trafficking, which is misandry).
Skinny jeans for men are the ultimate feminist conspiracy – highlighting men’s sex appeal (and thus discriminating against men who’re less hot), and rendering them less fertile at the same time.
Boxer briefs are also misandry, since they keep the balls warmer than regular boxers do, thus potentially lowering sperm count.
Sorka: If the great Stephen Fry doesn’t let me down, I seem to remember the plural being “octopuses” or “octopodes”.
ShadetheDruid: Thanks! I prefer “octopodes”, think I’ll use that from now on.
Cassandra: It’s difficult sometimes to keep track of everything that constitutes misandry. I think it might be safer to say that we live in a misandric world, or a “gynocracy”, run by evil fembots (with or without laser-shooting nipples, the jury’s out on that one). This world is a little bit like an episode of Sex on the City on speed, but with sedan-carriers (male) instead of taxis. Oh, and scented fucking octopods.
Octopodes, damnit!
And there I was, thinking I was of no consequence to anyone. Turns out I’m part of a vast conspiracy against men in another country! 🙂 Just came back from a holiday wtih my Mum paid for with our GUMMINT PENSION MONEY, where we bought FRIVOLOUS STUFF and ATE CAKE and only talked to OTHER WOMEN (mostly)! To top it off, I’m sitting on my arse eating bon bons* and using those SCENTED FUCKING STICK THINGS, which must sure be even more girly than candles, right?
*actually chocolate, because I don’t know what bon bons are.
They’re kind of gross, actually, imo.
http://amongoodfriends.files.wordpress.com/2010/11/10-11-08-strawberry_bon_bons.jpg
Of course they’re also kind of testicle-shaped, so my saying that I don’t care for them is probably misandry.