The sexy robot ladies are back! Not so much in real life, where they are still more scary than sexy, but in the fervid imagination of dudes who hate real ladies. Like Eric here, on The Spearhead:
When I first came to the MRM, there was a story in the news about a Japanese robotics engineer who had made a female android. It really wasn’t much more than a fairly realistic-looking doll; although there was quite a bit of discussion at the time for the potential to improve on the design. The main thing was that it’s invention caused a fury from the feminists. Even at that early stage in my MRA days, I could see the reason: for the first time women were looking the very real possibility that they could become expendable.
Well, “expendable” only if you view women as little more than support systems for their vaginas.
Personally, I’m more into foreign girls than virtual sex. But the same principle applies: as long as there are alternatives to feminists, the feminists are expendable. They don’t have the power to convert every woman on the planet; and even if they could they can’t stop men from building robots.
Please, build those robots, and lock yourselves away with them forever, and leave the rest of us alone.
Elsewhere in the same thread on The Spearhead we get some examples of why it’s a problem when Men Who Really Should Be Going Their Own way … don’t. A fellow calling himself Rmaxd apparently suggested that men who feel themselves to have been mistreated by the courts should: “Lynch a judge as you would any traitor or dictator.”
His comment was deleted, and heavily criticized — apparently for not being circumspect enough in his threatening language. After all, our dear friend JeremiahMRA got mostly upvotes on The Spearhead for a similarly threatening remark just the other day. And elsewhere in the very same thread as Rmaxd’s now-deleted comment we find a fellow called freebird suggesting that men who have allegedly suffered because of women should
share this pain with those inflicting it.
cue up “blood on the plow”
Meanwhile, again in the same thread, a commenter called walking in hell brings up the example of Thomas Ball, the MRA who self-immolated on the steps of a Keene, New Hampshire courthouse a year ago in hopes that his dramatic death would inspire other men to (quite literally) burn down police stations and courthouses using Molotov cocktails. (You can read Ball’s manifesto, complete with its call for MRA terrorism though without the specific instructions on how to make effective Molotov cocktails, on A Voice for Men, in its “activism” section; search the page for “burn” to go directly to his advocacy of terrorism.) Walking in hell also thinks family court judges should be “punished” for their alleged “crimes,” by which he means denying some fathers visitation.
[R]esponsibility for such heinous crimes against children can behold an individual to a special kind of punishment.
We see the nervous squirming by judges in the Australia case marked by the judge issuing an apology. We also see nervous squirming in the UK with the evildoers trying to issue fake political gestures to angry people.
The evildoers must smell something besides fire and brimstone. The sooner they get to the fire and brimstone, the better off children and fathers will be.
Apparently this vaguely threatening language was vague enough to pass muster on The Spearhead; this comment got more than a dozen upvotes.
The sooner you fuckers build those sexbots you like to talk about so much, the better for all of us.
Huh? No, I’m not going to scam MRAs. For shame! If I wanted to fleece the gullible, I may as well go and be a televangelist, there’s lots more money there.
My scheme has nought to do with MRAs. I am going to offer genuine content and put out a PayPal tip jar, and I’d heard something about forming a corporation to have a PayPal account. The PayPal website isn’t very helpful, and I wanted to talk to people what done it about how it works.
Viola, your sex sounds tame compared to mine. I have a dildo amongst other tools but I’m not exactly going to ask it to marry me and then lounge around the house with it spending non-sexual quality time with it. Get over yourself.
Oh look, another “imma here just to dis random people” troll.
Who the hell is Cathrine Tate?
Um…. you first.
I’m in agreement that mras and fras are asshats, yet all of you here seem to have no issue dissing me for my opinions and you all certainly started it. So who exactly is/are the trolls here? Seriously don’t make me start thinking mras/fras have you all pegged correctly as overly PC sensitive dumbfucks.
*Snorts* I give you a 2/5 for effort. Would’ve been a 1 because of all the fail, but you made me snort with laughter at the “no, you” response to something I didn’t even say.
Guys, arguing stuff is super fun! I want a go!
It could be argued that, if we don’t leave bowls of peanut butter out every night for the squirrels, they will revolt and destroy us all!
It could be argued that, unless we grow larger sweet potato crops, their rarity will send prices through the roof. Pubs that serve sweet potato fries will start making money hand over fist, driving all competing eateries out of business, and will eventually form their own world pub government!
It could be argued that, if Fah Lo Suee stops saying ridiculous sex-negative bullshit, monkeys will fly out of zir ass!
“You don’t all automatically agree with MEEEE!”
Therefore we are dumbfucks?
Or maybe we just don’t see a problem with what consenting adults spend their money on, provided its not hurting anyone?
I give you a zero for relevance. Have fun with that.
Muzolf: In case you’re too lazy to read what Ball wrote (here http://www.avoiceformen.com/activism-page/tom-ball-murdered-by-the-family-courts/ is the link):
In what way is this not an incitement to arson?
Look! He gave instructions on how to do it and everything! This man was not interested in a peaceful protest. Leaving aside any question of the validity of his political opinions, this is a blatant call for violence, and a movement that chooses him as its martyr tars itself with the same brush.
Guys. Fah Lo Suee.
Fallacy.
Calling troll on this one.
If having sex with a doll leads to necroplilia, then surely having sex with a shaved woman lead to pedophilia, and having sex with someone wearing that (NSFW) leads to bestiality! It’s all true!!!!1!
Do you have proof for your stupidity, can you pretend for a second that our not pulling it out of your ass, Fah Lo Suee? If it can be argued, then do it, show us the arguments.
I don’t care if he fucks a doll, as long as he puts it in the cupboard or out of sight. When he dresses each day, talks to it as if it’s real and thinks he’s in a relationship, then I do have a problem with it, because guess what, in most sane people’s understanding of reality, that ain’t normal. When he starts taking his fuck doll to the supermarket on the bus with him, yes, I am going to have a problem with that. Especially when children in public see that. Perhaps you don’t mind if your children go to his door to sell girl scout cookies to him and they see wifey fuck doll in lingerie on the lounge behind him, in their line of sight, but then perhaps you don’t mind what your children are exposed to, as long as you don’t offend anyone by not being completely tolerant of bullshit.
And having a Teddy bear leads to marry dead bears. Trufax.
Well Fallacy, considering the amount of thought and detail you’ve put into that little fantasy scenario, are you sure that you’re really repelled by the idea?
Won’t someone think of the chiiiiiiiiiiiiiiildren! That’s the best strawman I’ve seen in quite a time. Good effort.
How is seeing a fuck doll in lingerie more traumatizing that seeing lingerie on a dummy in a store, anyway?
LOL you people really ought to read about fuck dolls, and the “relationship” men have with them in Japan and many other countries before you start calling “BS” on my opinions. Don’t comment on stuff you all clearly have no clue about, makes you look like even bigger morons.
You know what? If it makes him happy and more pleasant to be around, I don’t think I have to worry for my childrens sake. As long as he’s not fucking the doll in front of them, its his business.
Because it’s not a store Kylie, derp. It’s a person’s home, on the lounge. And children aren’t as stupid as you seem to think they are.
Blow doll already exist, and have been for quite a time, so where are the report of increase in necrophilia and the traumatized girl scouts?
Thanks for assuming we all have NO IDEA.
Actually, I’m quite aware of the relationships some people develop with fuck dolls.
Kyrie, with a ‘R’. And how is that different? You can see them from the street. They also sell lingerie in supermarket. Where have I said children are stupid?
Well now, I wouldn’t know, not belonging to the lofty ranks of the sane; but I had no idea “normal” was such a crucial aspect of sex and sexuality.
Oh okay, now I see! You’re worried about the children! How noble of you. So, if someone forms an emotional attachment to their sex toys and no children see, that’s totally cool with you?
You sure seem to have spent a lot of time learning about all that, for someone who don’t care. You’re just like Christian fundies who obsess over anal gay sex all day long.