Some things I learned on MGTOWforums today. (Each headline links to the comment’s source.)
women gain a sexual satisfaction from lying. the bigger the lie, the greater the thrill.
Don’t fall for that old “lipstick” ploy. Her lips aren’t really that red!
EVERYTHING relating to female appearance in based on deception. Women put blush on their face and lipstick to suggest that they’re sexually aroused thereby causing men to get stupid and malleable in their presence. Twats wear heels in order to not only appear taller but also to elongate the appearance of their legs. They wear spanx to conceal their flab. They shoot botox into their face to appear to have that last vestige of fertility. They put hideous silicone filled sacs onto their chest to create a more alluring figure (although as any man who’s actually ever felt these knows it’s like playing with a skin wrapped basketball). They paint their nails to create the illusion they’re always clean. They shave and wax and pluck to show off as much bare skin as possible – to conceal the fact that they’re hairy beasts.
DO NOT fall for it when marriage legislation is once more made rational. It’s simply a trap to lure men back in, and when there’s enough suckers in the Ponzi scheme, those at the top will abscond with it all once more.
Hunting the mammoth prepared men to be CEOs, but women?
most women simply can’t hack it at that high of a professional level. Their minds and bodies are simply not designed for that. Not surprising given how nature has clearly designed them to bear and raise children.
Vaginas are doin’ it for themselves:
They are organized into cunt coalitions. we are fucked.
Too many women spoil the everything:
It has already been said in several posts in this thread but it bears repeating since it is the simple quintessential truth: Women. Ruin. Everything.
Ha, ha, you’ll get yours, pretty lady who some day won’t be so pretty:
Mother nature is the ultimate bitch to all aging females. Most women don’t have her slim body type(easier to trap a man), so what’s a girl to do? What’s the ‘moral of the story’ for the average LADY with ‘high’ expectations but not much to really give a man in return??? Easy, find a clueless blue pill sucker(who has never been to this site)….er husband material as soon as possible before your looks really start to take a dive. You ladies can call me an asshole all you want but I’m only speaking the truth.
Let’s spread some racism on this misogyny sandwich:
How about you get your expanding ass off your chair and go visit the ghettos where there are no men. Hey, at least they are ‘matriarchies’ where women are ‘free,’ boys grow up to be feral animals, and emotions run high without logic!
Also, I learned that the new go-to derogatory term for women is “ankle.” Why? Because, according to the Online Slang Dictionary, “[a]n ankle is two feet beneath a cunt.” Here’s an example of the term in use, courtesy of MGTOWforums:
Dealing with an ankle that don’t understand the phrase “Not my child not my problem, ‘ya ankle bitch”?
It pays to increase your word power!
EDITED TO ADD: If you have trouble visualizing the “twats wearing shoes” mentioned in the second quote, regular Man Boobz commenter Polliwog has helpfully provided this [NSFW] picture.
@ Polliwog
Wait, you’re right. Obviously I should have taken the fact that men can’t possibly be expected to understand basic things about human biology into account.
Men of London, I apologize for that period of time where I had my hair dyed dark purple. I didn’t intend to lie to you, but now I realize that there’s no way you could possibly have looked at that and thought “That girl must be dyeing her hair, since purple hair does not exist in nature. In fact since she’s a goth I bet that’s Manic Panic she’s using”. No, it was unfair of me to assume that my strange and unnatural hair color would automatically signal “dyed” to anyone who saw it, and I’m sorry. If any of you who pursued me at the time did so in the hopes of having naturally purple haired offspring, you have my deepest apologies.
My feeling with a lot of MGTOWs and MRAs is that their whole view of women (and men, probably) is based on TV and pop culture in general. I mean, they bring up Sex in the City so often it’s ridiculous.
About the “two feet” thing, I just did the math and for me my vagina is closer to 3 feet from my feet (my inseam is 31 inches, and I’m assuming a couple of extra inches either way for the distance from top of the leg to vagina, and ankle to foot). And I’m just over 5ft2. If a woman of average height had a vagina that was only two feet from her feet she would be very oddly proportioned.
I just grabbed a tape measure, and… actually, my ankles are almost exactly two feet from my vagina.
Whoa.
I’m unusually short and stubby, though.
“Ankle” isn’t even a good pun. “Women, you have two feet under your vagina in TWO DIFFERENT SENSES!” Not the stuff of brilliant comedy here.
Wouldn’t men also be ankles? Because an ankle is two feet beneath a dick? o.O?
Considering the length of the average dick, and that Cassandra got 31″ (and I’m measuring 30″) … 30 – 6 = 24 …
Oh, wait, we’re only measuring to the ankles? OK then – 2.67 feet. And as previously stated, I’m shorter than the average woman unless we’re talking about East or SE Asia.
Personally if we’re going for degrading misogynistic slurs “ankle” has yet to reach the dehumanizing glory of “the flap of skin around a warm hole.”
It’s just so random. If someone called me that I wouldn’t be offended, just baffled.
“You elbow, you!”
Soooooo…..I’m confused. Since I don’t wear make-up, avoid shaving unless there’s a special event, don’t dye my hair, hide my age, or have any plastic surgery, then I’m being good and truthful, but then I thought doing that counted as “letting myself go.”
I have done what will really piss them off though. I developed a personality. Bet they didn’t see that one coming.
When I hear ankles, all I can think of are ankle-biters…the little dogs that go yip, yip, yip, yip…..incessantly.
Actually that’s a perfect metaphor for the relationship between MRAs and feminism – they are the yippy little dogs that keep biting at feminism’s ankles and attempting to hump feminism’s leg.
I dunno…even the most annoying of yippy little dogs generally manages to be at least a little bit cute. I think they’re more like…yippy little mosquitoes, or something. I’m not sure how a mosquito would yip, but somehow they’ve figured out a way.
Maybe they’re one of these dogs.
http://www.synthstuff.com/mt/archives/ugly-dog.jpg
Sorry. Still too cute.
They’re the spam of feminism: annoying, easily ignored, and occasionally good for a laugh.
Hah. I make it a policy never to wear shoes I can’t run for my life in. Not being a horror film protagonist, that means heels are out.
Another clue that most of the information that these guys have comes not from interaction with actual women, but from magazines, TV and the internet.
MRA dudes? I hate to break it to you, but those “natural” beautiful women that you see in magazines without a drop of makeup, stray hair or flaw? It’s not real. Those women sat through hours of makeup for that “natural” look. The photos are photoshopped to conceal flaws and those zits, stray hairs and other little things. Those models have flaws too and they’re not letting themselves go because of it. They’re human beings and they have physical flaws, just like you do.
I figure that most of us don’t need to be told this, but if they can’t figure out nail polish… maybe they’re due for the “reality 101” lecture.
Cue Reality 101 lecture. And those are runway models, no photoshop, just hair and makeup dept working their magic.
Another reality 101: [youtube http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=omBfg3UwkYM&w=420&h=315%5D
It really does take this much, if not more, to go from the model walking into a studio, to a finished product. Print media is perfected to such an extreme and it’s to a point where the models hired to create said media can’t live up to the standards that it creates.
This is why I appreciate companies who use real human beings, rather than fake Photoshopped plastic dolls, to sell their products.
Speaking of misogyny and the Avengers, someone made a joke with two pie charts, one called “Why your girlfriend Loved the Avengers” with the names of the male leads in variously sized pies and one called “Why your girlfriend hated the Avengers” where the largest slice was “Scarlett Johanson”.
Here’s the link (sorry, I don’t know html): http://weknowmemes.com/2012/05/reasons-why-your-girlfriend-loved-and-hated-the-avengers/
I don’t like it, because it really reinforced the idea that women can’t get along with each other, and especially that women don’t like beautiful women. Which is funny, because most of the women I’ve read online or talked to in the real world who saw the Avengers really liked Black Widow. I just saw the movie yesterday, and I also quite liked her. I personally don’t mind the joke about the leads, because while I probably would have seen it anyway, having a movie with a lot of male eye candy was definitely a plus and not particularly common.
However, the chart maker also made a mistake by not including Loki.
(Also, put me down for sharing Tony, Thor, and Hawkeye.)
I bet it’s less than two feet from this woman’s vagina to the ground.
Heteronormativity strikes again! I like seeing Scarlett Johannsen on screen. Why do I like seeing Scarlet Johannsen? Because I’m attracted to women, and she’s hot. It’s hilarious that this possibility never occurs to people when talking about women’s reactions to female celebrities.
Wordspinner: Ugh. Who in the universe didn’t like Black Widow? And Titanic 3D?
Also, “your girlfriend,” because women don’t look at memes on the internet.
Today I learnt that I am in one of the MRAs most hated demographics, I am a female soccer player…. Bwahahaha!!!
Ozy – “They’ve almost approached the amount of time I spend thinking about how much I want to bang Loki.”
Just want to say how much I appreciate this comment and the belly laugh it gave me. I’ll fight you for Loki though…