Men’s Rights Activists and manosphere misogynists love to complain that I “cherry pick” quotes in an attempt to make them look bad. Which makes it especially ironic that all too often when I call them out on some particular bit of bullshit, they more or less double down on that bullshit, reiterating and in many cases amplifying the terrible things they originally said.
Several days ago, I wrote about a Spearhead post from W.F. Price with the priceless title “After 25, Women Are Just Wasting Time.” It was appalling even by Spearhead standards. Price used the untimely death of a talented young writer named Marina Keegan as an opportunity to rehash the belief, widely held in the manosphere, that women over the age of 25 who haven’t managed to snag themselves a “good husband” are “just wasting time,” growing older and uglier and less appealing to men. (Evidently, women’s appeal to men is the only thing that really matters about them.)
Price’s article inspired numerous comments from Spearheaders that were even more grotesquely misogynistic and cruel than his own post; Price at least pretended to care about the dead girl, even though his post was a crass and opportunistic insult to her memory.
And it inspired one regular Man Boobz commenter, a 26-year-old woman, to wade into the muck that is the Spearhead’s comments section to point out that Price’s grand narrative of female decline after age 25 has no relation whatsoever to her own life story:
I’m 26 years old. 27 terrifyingly soon. I am nothing like the person I was when I graduated college.
After originally getting a film degree, I’ve just started nursing school.
I’m living on the other side of the country and loving the different culture here.
I’m dating a wonderful guy who mysteriously didn’t dump me on my 25th birthday.
I’m doing difficult, not always fun, but ultimately socially useful work, work I couldn’t imagine myself doing when I graduated college.Since I graduated college, I’ve read more books, worked on more movies, learned more skills, lifted more weight, traveled more places, marched in more protests, gotten published more times, saved more lives than I thought I ever would.
And I’m still only 26.
You think I’m going to stop protesting and writing and working the wild Saturday midnight shift in the ER before I’m 30? Before I’m 60?
Or do you think it doesn’t matter because I might not be as fuckable then?
Well then fuck you. I’m 26 and I got miles to go.
–
(Oh, and I’m way better at sex now. Guys who thought I hit my “expiration date” just around the time I was first learning what a Kegel was, you are missing out.)
The Spearheaders responded, predictably enough, with downvotes and insults and a lot of mainsplainy comments suggesting that she’s regret it forever if she doesn’t get married ASAP and start popping out children.
The strangest comment of the bunch came from a Spearhead “Shieldmaiden” (that’s what they call female commenters on The Spearhead, for reals) by the name of Andie, who launched into a barely coherent tirade that somehow revolved around, er, SCENTED CANDLES!
Price, after seeing Andie’s rant mocked by the commenters here, decided to feature it today as the Spearhead “Comment of the Week.” So without further ado, here is what Price considers to be the Spearhead community at its best:
@26 year old woman
Let’s see how you feel when you’re 29 and the end of everything possible is right at your doorstep. Hell, lots of women are infertile at 26. Done. You won’t do everything. You won’t be a mother.
And if that doesn’t bother you, darlin’, you ain’t a woman.
And if your plans are to actually BE a mother (as in do the damn work), you are already in very deep water.
Your resume will never put his chubby little arms around you and tell you he loves you, like a child will. Your resume will never give you grandchildren, like your children might. Your resume will never share in all your joys, all your sorrows, all your triumphs, all your tragedies, like your husband will.
But you WILL be able to rape that resume of HUNDREDS OF THOUSANDS OF DOLLARS over your lifetime. Yay!
The fastest growing consumer product category: scented candles. SCENTED FUCKING CANDLES.
Yes, 26 year old woman, all your education and opportunity and rights have resulted in millions of children raised without fathers, the total destruction of the family, the rise of GIANT ASS government to give all those wymyns a place to work (doing utterly useless shit) and what was it for? What did we gain?
SCENTED FUCKING CANDLES!!
Nicely done, ladies. Really good job.
Fuck you, bitch. My daughters are coming for you. And millions of daughters just like mine. We see you, you superficial piece of trash. You have cost us our lives. For patchouli candles.
You will pay.
Go back and read @26 year old woman’s comment, then read Andie’s again. Quite a contrast, wouldn’t you say?
I should note that when Price first posted the quote, he evidently left out the last few paragraphs; perhaps even he realized they were a tad over the line as a response to a woman whose only real “crime” was telling the Spearheaders that her life was interesting and fulfilling to her, and that she wasn’t planning on having any babies in the foreseeable future. (And if they didn’t approve of her life, too fucking bad for them.)
In the comments to Price’s “Comment of the Week” post, HL offers this thought:
Every time something like this comes up, it becomes ever more apparent that the ignorance, hate mongering, bigotry and fallacies rests so much more heavily on the side of the feminists.
To paraphrase Rick James, lack of self-awareness is a hell of a drug.
It is what it is. I don’t recall anyone promising me an easy life. It would have been a foolish thing to do, my being so headstrong and all.
I’m disappointed P-A:N(C) didn’t vault the rail.
Gah. Finally read the whole thing. Think I get it: Mr. Copyright
1 Doesn’t understand what ‘Common Law’ means (hint – its made by judges, not you)
2 Doesn’t understand what sovereignty means
2a Doesn’t understand what sovereignty means in the specific context of a constitutional monarchy
3 Doesn’t understand what a court is
4 Possibly doesn’t understand what a ship is, and how it might be distinct from a court (hint – ships tend to be pointy at front, and have poorer disabled access)
5 Thinks the best way to win a case is by taking all of his arguments and putting them in a pdf of the transcript after the case is settled.
@pillowinhell, I have nothing but admiration for your strength, resiliency, and kindness towards others. We see every day in the MRM how people can take adversity — real or imagined — and let it turn them toxic.
Back to p-a:n(c), I just want to share the text of my very favorite copyright statement ever, from a Nigerian book that I cataloged:
Next to that, p-a:n(c) is a rank amateur.
It may be mean of me, but I’m sorely tempted to mess with sovereign citizens by making up new bullshit things they need to do to circumvent the law. Like “You only count as being in the country if your feet are touching U.S. ground, so the law doesn’t apply if you stand on your head!”
I lied! Woody Guthrie wrote my real favorite copyright statement ever:
And the great Woody Guthrie actually wrote things worth yodeling, unlike p-a:n(c).
I actually tried yodeling some of p-a:n(c)’s words, but it’s making my cats really upset. Science.
Here is a video of the the infamous nolan case. XD
Oh wow, I didn’t realise that was in response to a specific commenter called “26 year old woman”. Andie isn’t a very nice person.
Clearly Andie doesn’t know about Man Candles.
http://www.yankeecandle.com/yankee-candles/man-candles
That’s, uh, riveting footage and all, but all I can think is “omg! he really is Dwight Schrute!”
Huh. Apparently I can’t watch it in Australia. I know there’re workarounds for this, but frankly, I can’t be arsed.
I’m suprised this Nolan guy is having legal problems. He seems SO level headed and well adjusted.
Charlotte: People do say stupid things in the height of their anger. That’s not what Peter Nolan© is doing. He’s had years to mellow… he hasn’t.
Why? Because it’s not about his losing, it’s about his being challenged. It’s about him not being the God-king of his piece of the world.
And for lots of MRAs, that’s what it’s about. The Mellers, the NWOs of the world, they aren’t angry about what they’ve lost. They are angry about what they were never entitled to have.
Can’t watch it in Australia “due to a legal complaint”
There’s a whole other court case he could be having 🙂
@magpie:
Send the Queen a troy ounce of gold and tell her that it is payment for a rental of that video. If she doesn’t reply, she assents by acquiescence to your watching that video. If you still can’t, stamp your feet, like, really, really hard.
Jumbofish: OMG it is awesome that he took footage of that. I love how he keeps correcting himself; I assume every time there’s some sovereign citizen rule that he almost broke. “If I say ‘name’ instead of ‘calling,’ then this video can’t be legally proved to really be of me! If I say I ‘asked’ instead of ‘told,’ then they are under no legal obligation to honor my request!
I was queueing up Netflix in another tab, so 30 seconds in the Arrested Development theme started playing. That made it inexpressibly more awesome.
(On a serious note, though, I do feel sorry for him. It must be so stressful living with that kind of mental disconnect.)
(But I feel WAY more sorry for his wife and kids.)
(And everyone else who has been forced to interact with him.)
as far is i can tell, that’s backwards. his corporate strawman ‘name’ is mr. peter nolan. peter-andrew:nolan(c) is his ‘calling’
Sharculese — that seems to be it?
This video is intolerably bad, you can’t hear anyone but him, so it’s mostly paper rustling >.< (Those of you who can't view it aren't missing much)
I just kind of wanted to see the magistrate. In the transcript, he came across like a teacher or a parent deliberately ignoring attention seeking behaviour, I was curious as to how closely he resembled my mental image.
That poor judge. However much he’s getting paid, it’s not enough to have to deal with Mr The Courtroom Is A Ship.
I feel kind of bad for mocking this guy, though, since if you watch the video it’s quite clear that he’s not well.
Sir Bodsworth — idk, does your mental image have an excellent moustache? (Screen captures are way easier than watching that was!)
Very fuzzy, but I did get some of that “exasperated authority figure pretending not to be exasperated” that I was imagining.
That does seem to be an excellent mustache.
In the video, he says the Queen and the first minister agree that the court has no authority over him. Does someone understand how he comes to that conclusion?