Here’s a preview of the talk I’ll be giving at Northwestern tonight.
Remember, the talk — on “How to hate women and have terrible sex: Misogynistic sex myths, and how they ruin sex for everyone” – will be at 8 PM in Room G02 of Annenberg Hall on the Northwestern Campus in Evanston.
(Here’s a map.)
See you there!
Oh, and also, The Spearhead has discovered that I will be giving a talk. W. F. Price writes about it with his usual objectivity, by which I mean that his piece is filled with lies and weird projection.
EDITED TO ADD: And now the Men’s Rights Subreddit gets in on the fun! Apparently they are also very concerned about my weight.
That post was my very favorite. It’s the “Edit” that does it – it’d be funny enough if it was purely unconscious, but consciously pausing and saying to oneself, “I think he’s a bigot, but that doesn’t seem harsh enough. I know, I’ll call him a bigot AND insult him based on his perceived membership in a group of people I find unappealing! I’m so smart!” just takes it to an extra level of hilarious.
Oops, I failed at blockquotes again.
Oh, and inevitable MRA nonsense aside, your talk sounds really interesting, David!
Would you consider posting your notes/a summary here? I’d love to see it.
The group that brought you “Age of consent laws are a feminist conspiracy!,” “Men are genetically programmed to want to have sex with children!,” “Men don’t have enough of a vocal presence in education!,” and “Why are there all these stupid social myths about men being pedophiles and not being trustworthy around children!” now wants to warn parents that a man is coming to a college campus and will possibly talk to someone’s daughter.
Ok, I’ll state the obvious. They’re dying, They’re absolutely GREEN and we all know it. And David gets to talk about SEX to their coveted demographic, and he is going to bad mouth them in the process. Come ON, they’re dying, they’re going out of their minds. HE’s FAT! He’s Dangerous and creepy!
WAT!
I mean this is so delicious. Also… isn’t it true that they don’t really know what David looks like at this point and are going off some photo they think is him, but really isn’t? That’s what I thought anyway, but I can’t remember why I think that.
BTW, not saying they’re jealous to get under their skin, I think it’s obvious.
HEH.
I mean this is so funny.
Of course Paul Elam is going to speak at… oh wait… nowhere.
Well, you get jewwatch.com as the second search result on Google for “jew” and “manboobz.com” as the first search result for “boobz”.
They link to a great article that explains that because David supports abortion rights, Peter Singer supports abortion rights, and Peter Singer has argued in favor of infanticide in some circumstances before, therefore David supports infanticide.
I mean. Jeez. At least pin it on someone who actually follows Peter Singer’s ethical philosophy. (Hi!)
If Rush Limbaugh’s recent meltdown has taught us anything, it’s that the very existence of women at colleges still freaks social conservatives the hell out. Educated young women! Studying things! Probably having sex! With other young people! And not having babies! Also, liberals!
When you say “women in college,” they hear “orgy.” Specifically, “orgy to which you are not invited, creepy guy.”
Ok, I’ll state the obvious. They’re dying, They’re absolutely GREEN and we all know it. And David gets to talk about SEX to their coveted demographic, and he is going to bad mouth them in the process.
I’m tempted to start a collection to get the Northwestern group to also hire W.F. Price to speak. Because can you imagine?
@Shaenon:
“As we all know, you women have absolute control over who you have sex with. I mean, how unfair is that? All the poor men that you are squashing under your high-heeled shoes in the name of “equality” will rise up eventually, and you really don’t want that to happen. So if there’s anything you should take away from this talk, it is to go and have sex with some betas. It’s the least you could do.
By the way, my number is XXX-XXX-XXXX. Just saying.”
Please can we have Price, or Elam, give a similar speech? And can someone film it? I’d love to see their reactions to the disgusted, appalled response from the audience.
I still don’t understand why I’m supposed to care that David isn’t thin. What does that have to do with what he writes? I guess it could be relevent if the subject of his blog was “fashion advice for skinny people” or something like that, but I’m not seeing what it has to do with the idea that misogyny is ridiculous.
‘antimra’? It’s so cute that they try to copy feminism XD
Sometimes the internet searches hide things from me. Likely the fault of feminists.
http://msmagazine.com/blog/blog/author/davidfutrelle/
Mr T. comes up for me when I google for photos of him.
I’m surprised kitty photos don’t come up.
What I want to know, is what does Paul Elam look like? I thought he used to make videos with his images on them, but I might be mistaken. I thought I saw a pic of him with a Pedo beard.
Just sayin. You know… because it’s so relevant and all.
We all know the REAL issue is Penis size, and I’m not betting on a good average in the MRM team. Pretty sure this fatso commentary is compensation.
And anyone trolling for cherry picking the petty insults, I have just one thing to say that makes all of this ok….
They started it!!!
OH yeah here… pretty much every pedo wanted pic you have ever seen.
http://thehappymisogynist.blogspot.com/2009/06/letter-to-women.html
So gross…
and remember folks it’s OK! HE started it!!!
Hide your kids! Hide your wife!
Don’t worry David, I am very concerned about my weight as well. If I could once again find the discipline to drop to 137 lbs (that’s kinda thin for a 5’10” male bodied person), I’d be very Very VERY happy. If you’ll notice David, my (ma99ie) weak defense of you has upvotes in r/mensrights.
@Mags:
Yeah, you were very brave in clarifying that David is, in fact, not Hugo Schwyzer.
@indifferentsky:
See, I don’t think we have to perpetuate the idea that you should judge a person’s merit on their appearance to criticize Elam and the rest. The only people that lose out if we do is those who don’t have a conventionally attractive appearance.
Think of it this way. They can complain that David is ugly all they want, but their argument falls as soon as anybody attractive makes the same argument. Meanwhile, David will keep hammering away at the MRM’s ideas, and those criticisms will hold up no matter who holds them.
“See, I don’t think we have to perpetuate the idea that you should judge a person’s merit on their appearance to criticize Elam and the rest.”
right, because I was clearly seriously doing that.
@indifferentsky:
Alrighty then. My mistake.
I always thought in certain pics he looked like a nice grandpa and in this picture he doesn’t really strict me as that creepy looking. I mean thats the thing about misogynists, pedophiles, racist, ect there is no way to tell if they are one by their looks. It seems kinda silly to say “oh you started it” even if joking.
I really hate the “haha ur fat!” argument. It works just as well as the rubber/glue dichotomy.
“They started it it” isn’t really a good argument for anyone after the age of seven.
I’m pretty sure the MRAs are just extremely jealous that there will be actual people attending this event, and not 5 internet phantoms, like their events.