Here’s a preview of the talk I’ll be giving at Northwestern tonight.
Remember, the talk — on “How to hate women and have terrible sex: Misogynistic sex myths, and how they ruin sex for everyone” – will be at 8 PM in Room G02 of Annenberg Hall on the Northwestern Campus in Evanston.
(Here’s a map.)
See you there!
Oh, and also, The Spearhead has discovered that I will be giving a talk. W. F. Price writes about it with his usual objectivity, by which I mean that his piece is filled with lies and weird projection.
EDITED TO ADD: And now the Men’s Rights Subreddit gets in on the fun! Apparently they are also very concerned about my weight.
Oh Meller! Rocks have more capacity for self-reflection than you do. Tell me, do you recognize your reflection in the mirror, or do you think it’s someone that just creepily watches you?
Meller: some do, some teach some teaches to teachers. (and some presumably do several of them. Sex is not one of those thing you need to be an expert in, not even good at, you just need someone who want to do it with you) You do none of it, you pretend that the subject is both inexistent and evil and you replace any potential partner in your life by toys.
Which, don’t get me wrong, is a gift to humanity. But it also means that virtually anybody, up and inclunding your dolls, is more qualified than you to give advice on sex and relationship.
Um… Meller? You are aware that people have sex in college? Including feminists? Including WOMEN feminists? Oh right, your idea of a healthy relationship is a bunch of porcelain “lovelies” locked in a cupboard. I’m pretty sure that the most man hating feminist is closer to “sexual redemption” than you.
Meller, what about the sexual redemption of men who play with dolls?
Sexual Redemption sounds like a Shawshank Redemption parody on Playboy Channel.
Maybe, but that’d just make Mark Twain wrong. Teachers have a hard fucking road ahead of them, and doing it is vital; it *is* doing, cutesy little phrases to the contrary.
So, then, the fact that you spend so much time lecturing us all on how to have proper relationships means that you know nothing about the subject of how to have a relationship, or else you would be in one? It’s nice to see you finally admitting it.
Sexual Redemption sounds like a Shawshank Redemption parody on Playboy Channel.
“Coming up next: Shaving Ryan’s Privates, followed by Sexual Redemption and Cumdog Millionaire.”
“After all, if he knew the subject, he would be enjoying himself (and his women would be enjoying themselves) and wouldn’t have either the time or inclination to give such a talk to college feminists, most of whom are probably beyond sexual redemption anyhow!”
Meller, sweetie, I can’t help but notice that you have a lot of time available to spend trolling feminist-leaning blogs and playing with your dollies. You last had sex with a carbon-based lifeform in what, maybe 1965?
Run along now, before the dolls stage an escape.
Cassandra, I thought we’d established at the start of the year that
David K. Melleruhh, Roger T. Cramwell was a 17th century vampire, so that it’s quite possible he hasn’t consorted with carbon-based, modern flesh-covered women (?) since he (presumably) consummated the marriage (?) in 1638.Where’s Evan, Meller?
@katz
“Those who can, teach; those who cannot, pass laws about teaching!”
My post has pic of that brilliant button if you want to see it:
http://ithiliana.dreamwidth.org/1651596.html
““Coming up next: Shaving Ryan’s Privates, followed by Sexual Redemption and Cumdog Millionaire.””
AHAHAHAHAAH!!!
Things I didn’t know: if you’re good at sex, you do nothing but have sex ALL THE TIME. Man, sometimes I just want to eat some chocolate and watch ponies.
@ithilania- as the daughter of two teachers, YOU ARE SO RIGHT AND IT GIVES ME A SAD.
Men and women who can love each other, do, Those who can’t, pass (feminist) laws about it and ruin it for everybody else! Those who can’t even pass laws, howl and rant their gender-equaltiy nonsense until legislators and judges give up, and ruin things for real people just to shut up the feminoids!
One way or another, real men are going to love real women again!! I don’t know what will become of you “womenbenghateful” here, and on similar feminazi (thank you, RL) blogs and websites, and frankly, I don’t care.
Yeah, you just keep telling yourself that. Also, why are you creeping around leaving comments on threads that are like weeks old hoping no one will notice? Do the new threads intimidate you or something?
He does not want to be reminded that he advocates domestic violence. Or how utterly racist he is.
In Mellerland, love is like Gor, only with more locked cupboards.
“One way or another, real men are going to love real women again!!”
And the South will rise again! Hey, it’s Meller, the shoe fits.
I dunno, man, my girlfriend and her boyfriend seem to love each other just fine. And they’re definitely real. I checked. They’re not made of ectoplasm or ANYTHING.
Snowy, I think Meller thinks new threads are too modern, or something.
Whatever, Meller. You’ll still be alone and miserable with nothing but your dolls. It’s what you deserve.
Well, if he’s redefined “real women” to mean “Madame Alexander dolls”, then his statement is technically correct for his specific circumstances – he will indeed love them no matter what, since they’re unable to run away like an actual woman would once he started dressing them up like Victorian children and spritzing them with homemade perfume.
Oh my glob, Meller, you’re fucking pathetic. Stop pretending you understand anything about love, you sad fool.
And he’s also a necromancer! Unsurprising.