Just a little heads up for any of you in the Chicago area: I’ll be speaking at Northwestern University on Monday, as part of its annual “Sex Week.”
My topic? “How to hate women and have terrible sex: Misogynistic sex myths, and how they ruin sex for everyone.” Nice Guys, Friend Zones, and the Alpha Asshole Cock Carousel will all make appearances.
The talk will be at 8 PM in Room G02 of Annenberg Hall on the Northwestern Campus in Evanston.
(Here’s a map.)
There will be free condoms and lube. (Apparently.)
For more about sex week, see the official website, or take a look at this piece in the Daily Northwestern.
Sex week is sponsored by the College Feminists; I’m talking at the invitation of Men Against Rape and Sexual Assault.
I’ll be writing the lecture over the weekend, so please feel free to offer suggestions as to which misogynistic sex myths I should talk about.
EDITED TO ADD: The Spearhead has discovered that I’m doing this talk. W. F. Price writes about it with his usual objectivity, by which I mean that his piece is filled with lies and weird projection.
@nwoslave:
So, even though there are countless examples of men swindling people (even women!) out of their money, the fact that they don’t do it by going on dates where the other person pays implies that… only women try to cheat people out of their money? And condoms are balloons?
I don’t even have rebuttles anymore… All I can do is point and laugh. And before you say it, yes. Since you are laughable and moronic, and you are a man, that definitely implies that all men who are not you are also laughable and moronic, and that all women are perfect and intelligent. Now if you’ll excuse me, I’m gonna go laugh at myself.
Oh hey kirbywarp, did your li’l Kirby avatar get so jaded because he just couldn’t stop all of the wolf divorce?
Pell: Nerve density isn’t the same as proprioceptive responsiveness. The nerves in the fingers are differently arranged. The sole of the foot has more pressure sensitive pain receptors than the fingers.
The fingers have more discriminating nerves.
The clitoris has a greater density, which is counterproductive to discrimination. Which is as it should be, because object recognition is not something women use their clits to perform.
The “mature” orgasm, is nonsense. The “semen induced orgasm” is nonsense. The “sex flush” is nonsense.
Your knowlege of female anatomy/response is sadly incorrect.
But thank you for playing.
Cassandra: The, “mature” orgasm is pure Freud, at his speculative best, i.e. utter rubbish, less silly when Freud was spouting it, than now, but still rubbish.
@Viscaria:
Ahh, Kirby remembers the days when he could take to a cause at the drop of a hat, fighting earnestly for justice. The world is a cruel place, driving a bright and happy youngster to seek the comfort of cynicism and the bottle.
Funny thing is, Kirby can’t actually consume enough alcohol to get drunk since his stomach is a black hole… I think he just swallowed a poet or something. He’ll be back to his old self in no time.
NWO, it’s more than one man. Read about state legislators or US congesscritters (even some women) getting in on the act? You’re an idiot.
By the way, Slave, what do think all the women here do for livings? Do you think we’re all in made up HR positions?
So Pell, is there a reason you used the racist term, “golliwog”?
Inquiring minds want to know.
Heh. When you’re sunk in a pit of misogyny, treating women with equal dignity does seem like placing them on a pedestal…
I also spot the employment of the dictionary fallacy in the claim that not actually hating women means Owly can’t be a misogynist –after all, maybe he only despises them, and despising is not hatred? The obvious contempt for treating women with respect and decency as human beings is shrieked loud and clear in most of those 2900+ posts of execration.
@Viscaria
Did I say YOU do that? I said women do that. I didn’t say ALL women do that. I gave you a link to a woman who does do that. A pretty vile and loathesome thing to do. Using her sexuality as a weapon, a means of coercion. As she states she does this 5 times a week to 5 different guys. 200 x a year, she can affect a lot of men. If 0.5% of women do this, they will affect every man in the country. There’s your stereotype.
I said it before, women can sexually and emotionally manipulate men. Men can physically and intellectually manipulate women. Both actions are equally evil. Mens acts of coercion are policed and forbidden in modern day society, womens acts of coercion are promoted and condoned.
NWO do you ever turn your lying and hate off? I’m sick of you always spitting out the same myths. They guy I currently like a barista. A FUCKING BARISTA. In what world does that imply high status?
People do enjoy sex for recreational purposes because it FEELS GOOD. Contraceptives enable people to have sex for fun while putting off parenthood. People may have natural instincts but we also have the capacity to choose things based on pleasure or a multitude of other reasons. Why are MRAs always so insistent on pushing the idea that we are animals with no capacity to make choices in our behaviors? if you’re so insistent on this why don’t you and the rest of your primitive MRA pals go live in the jungle and fling shit at each other. Its in your naaaature.
@Xanthë
Hey, I was right again. I said if I dared point out a flaw that was specific to women, the standard response would be, “And when one of your flaws are pointed out by a man like me, the response is always, misogynist.”
And of course you fired up with, “Heh. When you’re sunk in a pit of misogyny, treating women with equal dignity does seem like placing them on a pedestal…”
I was kinda right. I said misogynist, you took it several step further with, “sunk in a pit of misogyny.”
Thanks for playing, “are you predictable!” I dared to say women had a flaw. My bad.
re color photography: There have been various ways to make a color image since 1861. The best was three-plate filtered images, of which some splendid examples are to be found here and were taken in the Russian Empire, in 1910.
That, in fact, is the basis of Technicolor™.
So far the racist is wrong on everything.
Dear Owly,
The point of the anecdotes you refer to is not to prove that all women are superior to all men in any of the areas you have mentioned. The point is that women have a wide range of physical, mental, and emotional abilities, and that this range overlaps significantly with the range of abilities demonstrated by men, if you’d paid attention, you might have noticed that the stories about that one woman who could kick the ass of any man in her dojo, etcetera, are brought out to demonstrate the falsity of sexist assertions that woman can’t do this or that simply because they are women. Women have basically the same range of virtues and flaws as men; heralding women’s achievements and abilities is meant to fight against the assertions of misogynists like yourself that women can’t provide the same value and achieve the same feats just because they are women.
Signed,
Heywood J. Blome,
Director, Department of Reading Comprehension (Internet Division)
@Pecunium,
That’s freaking awesome!
Also, a balloon is something meant to blow up; a condom is meant to wrap a penis.
Also also, this damn itouch made me out a comma where I had meant to put a period. See if you can find it! Free brownies!*
*you are responsible for procuring your own free brownies.
NWO: You should be ashamed.
How have I borne false witness? Do tell!!!
You’ve accused people here of abusing you, of hating men, of treating you unfairly.
Not seventy-seven, seventy times seven. You do hate women. You say they deserve to be beaten, or killed, if they won’t be slaves.
That’s hatred.
It’s not all of a sudden that I know the Gospels (and the prophets, and the pentateuch, and the apocrypha, and the epistles, and acts, and revelation, and some of the gnostic writings, and several of the non-canonic gospels, and the writings of the early church (origen, and jerome, and augustine) and the theology of the middle ages (aquinas) and the reformation and counter-reformatin (Luther, Erasmus, Calvin, Michael Servetus), and the Freethinkers (the muggletonians, the quakers, the deists, the unitarians).
It’s the work of a lifetime.
Find me the passage in the New Testament where Jesus condems homosexuality, directly. Also, find me the one where he says it’s ok to not keep kosher.
I’ll wait (but I won’t hold my breath).
Jesus did preach tolerance. If he hadn’t he’d not have dined with tax collectors, prostitutes, lepers, etc.
He preached tolerance.
Matt: 5: 43-48
“You have heard that it was said, ‘Love your neighbor and hate your enemy.’ But I tell you, love your enemies and pray for those who persecute you, that you may be children of your Father in heaven. He causes his sun to rise on the evil and the good, and sends rain on the righteous and the unrighteous. If you love those who love you, what reward will you get? Are not even the tax collectors doing that? And if you greet only your own people, what are you doing more than others? Do not even pagans do that? Be perfect, therefore, as your heavenly Father is perfect.
Yes, he told people to “go forth and sin no more” but that wasn’t the lesson; you narrow-minded bundle of hate, the message was that all of us sin, and to condemn another for something we all do is to be less than the perfection we ought to be emulating.
Matt: 7: 1-2
Judge not, that ye be not judged. For with what judgment ye judge, ye shall be judged: and with what measure ye mete, it shall be measured to you again
Be not loving, and caring, and supporting of your fellow man, be hateful to those who are sufferring, or struggling and you will be numbered with the goats, “When did we see you a hungered, and not feed you, in prison and not visit you, etc.”
“Yea, as you have done to the least of my brethren, you have done it to me”.
Abused, beaten, killed, raped and slaves? My, my! That’s a lot of false witness bearing on your part. I’m quite used to it.
What… you deny your words? So you have renounced the “doctrine of escalation”? You think men and women can be equals now?
Because if you do, then good. But it’s not false witness to remember that you did.
And let’s be honest. The only reason I’m moderated is because I won’t swear allegiance to women, the lgbt, the feminist faith and basically everything that’s unholy. Besides, didn’t you convert to Judaism?
You are modereated because you do things like call people fuckdolls with a pulse.
And no, I’ve not converted to anything, but really, the anti-semitism works better if it’s a bit more subltle. Even if I had, that changes not a whit of the content of the books that guide the religion you claim to follow.
@Tulgey Logger
“And if a woman ever bought me a drink in a bar, I wouldn’t refuse it.”
I wouldn’t hold your breath waiting for that to happen. You’ll die.
Well… I’ve had lots of women buy me drinks. Some because I was in uniform*, some because they thought I was interesting. Some because they thought I was cute, some because we were friends.
*some of the one’s who were doing it when I was in uniform were also in the army, and we were buying rounds. Some were civilians, as I was passing through airports, etc.
@Tulgey
I wouldn’t be surprised if he makes balloon animals out of them -_-
Pecunium, I admire your patience at rebutting Owly, but for what it’s worth I think his particular interpretation of Christianity is rather like the Westboro Baptist’s kind.
Premise:
Women seek the best men they can find, but men will just have sex with anybody.
Logical extrapolation:
Thererfore, women who have sex with lots of men must be able to command the attention of lots of high quality men, and men who have sex with lots of women are just indulging in their base instincts with anybody they can find.
Owlylogic:
Women who have sex with lots of men must be easy/shameful, but men who have sex with lots of women must be really awesome.
Sadly, many people simply don’t question the ridiculousness of Owlylogic and accept the conclusion.
HEY I HAVE AN IDEA MAYBE SOMETHING’S WRONG WITH THE PREMISE
Now that I think about it, I’d really like to do that.
Here, kid, have a doggy, ribbed for her pleasure! Who wants a boa constrictor with ultra-thin skin?
The horror, the horror…
If women are hardwired by nature to seek the best man possible, while men will sleep with anyone… and nwoslave thinks this is the correct way to do things, why in hell does he care so much about marriage? Wouldn’t the logical conclusion be to have all the women in the world find the few ideal men that exist and marry them?
Pretty sad, huh? I guess he was hoping that if he couldn’t get me to say, “oh noes, I’m so hurt, you called me fat, let me prove my thinness” he could manage to get me with “oh noes, I’m so hurt, you purposely changed my name to a racist slur.”
For future reference, trolls of Manboobz, my name here suggests that I’m a tadpole, not a creepy racist doll. Please get it right. (Also, I am so pasty-white that I practically glow in the dark, so trying to be racist at me isn’t the most effective way to insult me. It IS a pretty effective way to make me and everyone else think you’re a dipshit, though, obviously.)
All of these women are checking in with one another so that they don’t ever con* a given man out of 3 drinks if another woman has already got him, yes? So every man gets their chance to be tragically tricked out of $24? Even the ones who don’t drink, don’t drink at bars, and/or aren’t into women? That is pretty sneaky!
But do you really think it’s 0.5% of women? If so, that doesn’t really say anything about women as a whole, it just says that a fraction of a percent of women do a moderately shitty thing on a regular basis. That’s a pretty easy pill to swallow. Somehow, though, I think you think a lot more than 0.5% of women do that. It seems to me that you think enough women scam men out of literally tens of dollars every week, that it’s reasonable to suspect any given woman of being a vicious drink thief. And, if that is what you think, then pointing out that a) lots of women get drinks bought for them without ever intending for that to happen and b) just because a woman doesn’t have a purse with her, does not mean she isn’t intending to pay for her own drinks, is a reasonable response.
I do appreciate that you’re willing to believe I’m One Of The Good Ones, though XD.
*If you can even call this a “con”, which I will, for dear Slavey’s sake.
@pericardium-I’m sure that Monty is well aware of when colour and the 3 filtre method was being used since hewas also an expert photographer but it’s amazing that you would harp on such a trivial point because all intelligent men would just assume that he was referring to when colour film was available to the public. This is why men think females are stupid.
Is this you, Golliwog?
http://ilpvideo.com/video.php?v=NjA2OQ
lol, Owly goes on about how intellectual manipulation is unique to men and then has the gall to call other people predictable.
Guess what, numbnuts! That’s misogyny.