Categories
feminism misogyny nice guys self-promotion sex

I’m giving a talk at Northwestern University on Monday. Topic: How to hate women and have terrible sex

Hot sex talk

Just a little heads up for any of you in the Chicago area: I’ll be speaking at Northwestern University on Monday, as part of its annual “Sex Week.”

My topic? “How to hate women and have terrible sex: Misogynistic sex myths, and how they ruin sex for everyone.” Nice Guys, Friend Zones, and the Alpha Asshole Cock Carousel will all make appearances.

The talk will be at 8 PM in Room G02 of Annenberg Hall on the Northwestern Campus in Evanston.

(Here’s a map.)

There will be free condoms and lube. (Apparently.)

For more about sex week, see the official website, or take a look at this piece in the Daily Northwestern.

Sex week is sponsored by the College Feminists; I’m talking at the invitation of Men Against Rape and Sexual Assault.

I’ll be writing the lecture over the weekend, so please feel free to offer suggestions as to which misogynistic sex myths I should talk about.

EDITED TO ADD: The Spearhead has discovered that I’m doing this talk. W. F. Price writes about it with his usual objectivity, by which I mean that his piece is filled with lies and weird projection.

Subscribe
Notify of
guest

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

780 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
princessbonbon
8 years ago

Princesbonbon, stop being a rape apologist.

You need a time out. Go to your corner.

indifferentsky
8 years ago

lake, not getting consent is rape. I know you like to pretend it’s all so confusing, but it’s not. Get consent, being wet or dry has nothing to do with getting consent.

I went way downhill in this thread. My first post is a dance. I think I’d better go download a movie or summat.

cloudiah
8 years ago

p.s. Good luck on the talk, I’m sure it will be great!

Polliwog
Polliwog
8 years ago

Lube ??? You mean the feminist mangina’s can’t get the girls natural lubricant flowing in a sufficient amount and need some artifical aid ? 😀

Thanks! I don’t think anyone had mentioned “physical arousal and mental arousal are totally the same thing, ergo, anyone who’s wet/erect wants to have sex with you, no matter how much they SAY they don’t, and anyone who’s not doesn’t, no matter how much they SAY they do!” on the list of things for David to mention yet. That is definitely an incredibly stupid and misogynist (and misandrist, seeing as it justifies mistreating men, too, not that you care) sex myth, so well done on coming up with it!

M Dubz
M Dubz
8 years ago

Congratulations Dave!

I’d really appreciate some mythbusting on the idea that “Women are never sexually frustrated, never lack for partners if they want one, and never get turned down by people they are interested in.”

Also, an old but good one, that all women want nothing more than penetration to achieve orgasm.

theLaplaceDemon
theLaplaceDemon
8 years ago

Seconding:

hellkell | April 7, 2012 at 12:19 pm

The myth that the more partners you have, the less likely you are to have a successful long-term relationship. This only seems to apply to women.

ithiliana | April 7, 2012 at 12:32 pm

THe myth that the only real sex is PIV and between a man on top and a woman on bottom!

kristinmh | April 7, 2012 at 1:42 pm

That virginity is a thing you can lose and a valuable concept.
The idea that sex is a thing that women have and men want, rather than an activity humans engage in with each other.
That consent us really complicated and it’s really hard to tell that someone wants to have sex with you.

cloudiah
8 years ago

Upvoting this myth:

Everyone is straight, cis, and monogamous.

nwoslave
8 years ago

This OT but since hating men and helping or glorifying women is always on topic, let’s take a little stroll to Canada.

http://www.theglobeandmail.com/life/health/new-health/health-news/youth-suicide-rates-rising-among-canadian-girls/article2389777/?utm_medium=Feeds%3A%20RSS%2FAtom&utm_source=Life&utm_content=2389777

It appears suicides amongst the privileged class in Canada has risen. Not nearly so high as the mook class, but it has risen. So now it’s time to throw resources at the problem. When boys/men die who cares? When it’s the blessed ones, it’s a problem needing a solution. Time and money is no object.
———————-
Or how about good old Obama.

http://www.politico.com/politico44/2012/04/obama-campaign-wants-to-train-army-of-women-119696.html

I mean, so what if at the bottom of the economic, political, media, education, homeless, diseased, injured, early death, jobless poll is an all mens club. Women must be catered to as the only class that matters.

As the article states, women are flocking to the Obama camp. Free birth control as oppossed to paying for youself. Quota’s for high paying employment and education instead of earning it. More help in divorcing your hubby and how much you can get. Why the list of “free” help Obama is offering women is endless. Even though it actually costs trillions in interest laden debt. Hmmmm, I wonder if that has anything to do with economic collapse?
———————
Speaking of divorce, remember, there are many ways to rake hubby over the coals and “have it all!” Since I care sooo much about women here’s a site called livestrong.com.

http://www.livestrong.com/article/183684-divorce-tricks-for-women/

See! There’s lotsa ways to totally destroy a mans life. The State is on your side.

drst
drst
8 years ago

Lube ??? You mean the feminist mangina’s can’t get the girls natural lubricant flowing in a sufficient amount and need some artifical aid ?

Someone apparently is too inexperienced to have heard of anal sex or anything that isn’t PIV.

David, I’d definitely talk about friendzoning and the commodity model. People aren’t vending machines, you don’t put in a certain number of coins (literal or figurative) and get sex as a result, don’t hang around pretending to be okay with just friends if you want more because that means you’re a lying asshole, nobody owes it to you to desire you or want to date you, etc.

Also as Holly said, if someone gets pissy with you for asking “Do you want to have sex” because it “killed the mood” don’t have sex with them.

burgundy
burgundy
8 years ago

That orgasms are both the point and the end of sex – which often manifests as the guy being done with sex as soon as he comes, and people thinking that they have failed as a sex partner if their partner doesn’t orgasm.

burgundy
burgundy
8 years ago

Oh, and “smells like fish.” It’s part of the larger “vaginas and their fluids are inherently disgusting” myth, but it’s so common and gross it deserves its own shout-out.

nwoslave
8 years ago

@Shaenon

Yes, yes, you’re so clever. You must feel so smug and superior. Just like being back in grade school when the teachers reaffirmed over and over how precious and clever girls are and all the worlds problems and evils are caused by men.

http://www.owensoundsuntimes.com/ArticleDisplay.aspx?e=3519117

It must be quite the heady experience to spend your entire life being told how superior you are. From empathy to parking cars, women are better!

hellkell
hellkell
8 years ago

NWO, if you’re tired of moderation, GO AWAY. You really won’t be missed.

You said this gem:

Men on the other hand have physical and intellectual power, (logic) they could wield over women.

Those men are not you.

burgundy
burgundy
8 years ago

It might be good to highlight the inherent contradictions in this whole mindset:

– women are gross and crazy, but men derive status from having sex with a lot of partners, and there are whole subcultures devoted to getting men more sex. And somehow, men are still considered more rational.

– women do not inherently desire sex, and it is purely an economic transaction, but women who’ve had a lot of partners are sluts and morally inferior (rather than economically savvy, for instance)

– men are incurable horndogs who can’t control their sexual impulses, but they are also almost universally more competent and rational than women

– it is perfectly acceptable to deride women for being shallow if they prefer only to date or have sex with men they find attractive, while simultaneously fat-shaming and otherwise insulting or disregarding women who do not meet societal standards of beauty.

And so on.

Quackers
Quackers
8 years ago

If you can’t see that Obama is doing all that to secure the female vote then you are dumber than I though.

But you know your republican candidates aren’t exactly making it that hard either since they want a US similar to the one you want. Namely with women shackled to the kitchen stove, barefoot and pregnant.

Quackers
Quackers
8 years ago

that above comment is for NWO btw

and while I’m at it, the Globe and Mail article said suicide rates for males HAVE DECLINED! you should be happy for this Slavey, especially considering its coming from socialist, feminized Canada!

MollyRen (@MollyRen)
8 years ago

luke123, stop thinking bodily fluids = consent.

khantron
khantron
8 years ago

NWO isn’t happy about suicide rates for men and boys declining, because he only wants suicide rates for women and girls to increase.

MollyRen (@MollyRen)
8 years ago

Yes, yes, you’re so clever. You must feel so smug and superior. Just like being back in grade school when the teachers reaffirmed over and over how precious and clever girls are and all the worlds problems and evils are caused by men.

I mainly remember grade school as a haze of confusion in math class, followed by a haze of humiliation when I got shut out of all the cliques in the lunchroom, but okay. 😛

nwoslave
8 years ago

@indifferentsky
“I think you should be moderated or banned next time you post shit like this without references.”

And here’s my reference. Your very own Big Daddy. How he loves his little girls and holds the in high esteem far above mere mortal man.

http://www.bwjp.org/files/bwjp/articles/Primary_Aggressor_Chart_Final.pdf

It goes State by State. Even if you go by the least discriminatory state, it still favors women far above men.

Let’s take the least discriminatory.

1) Prior complaint of DV

Of course a complaint is whoever makes a phone call. Boyfriend makes you mad, you call cops, prior complaint has been met. Whoever runs to Big Daddy first gets the turnpike easypass. Woman is the winner.

2) Severity of injury

Men are much stronger and bruise less easily. Woman hits man, does little damage, man retaliates, woman gets bruised. Woman is the winner.

3) The likelyhood of future injury.

How can that possibly be determined, and it also has no bearing on who the intiator is. Woman is the winner.

4) Wether one person acted in self defense.

Again, how can this be determined other than whose acting more hysterical and crying? Woman is the winner.

These are the least of them, and they all favor women having free reign.

They of course go on with such things as

(b) the extent of injuries.

If I attack the “rock” he’s gonna kick my ass. I will be more injured even though I’m at fault. Woman is the winner.

Or how about this one

“The dominant aggressor is the person determined to be the most significant, rather than the first, aggressor.

That puppy pretty much flat out says, “man” is the guilty party. Woman is the winner.
——————
I’ve backed up my assertation with facts. You’ve backed up yours with lies, manipulation and what you feel. I thought I just asked for women to stop trying to emotionally manipulate every situation to portray all women as victims?
——————
It seems the reason that you, as a woman, demand my moderation is because the truth hurts.

Jean-Renee
Jean-Renee
8 years ago

@NWO

Since I’ve been called every name in the book by the empathetic ones, (a trait men lack along with understanding and compassion). “I believe that women have a capacity for understanding and compassion which man structurally does not have, does not have it because he cannot have it. He’s just incapable of it.” Barbara Jordan; Former Congresswoman.

Ms. Jordan’s opinion is wrong. Men do not lack empathy, understanding, and compassion. Trolls like you, on the other hand…

pujeemuhs
pujeemuhs
8 years ago

If you find out about a podcast or something, let us know.

More on Jean-Renee’s point http://manboobz.com/2012/04/07/im-giving-a-talk-at-northwestern-university-on-monday-topic-how-to-hate-women-and-have-terrible-sex/comment-page-1/#comment-142969
I’ve also had more than enough of the myth that rape is worse for men and boys and the oft-repeated never-substantiated claim that male victims are less likely to report because they feel more shame and stigma than female victims. You’ve got plenty of material for your talk already though. I don’t know where you’d even begin or end on this subject.

LOL claudia http://manboobz.com/2012/04/07/im-giving-a-talk-at-northwestern-university-on-monday-topic-how-to-hate-women-and-have-terrible-sex/comment-page-1/#comment-143010
I know Roberta Sandoval from elsewhere. I could swear he’d claimed to be a lesbian. So much for his lucky boyfriend.

Tulgey Logger
8 years ago

Shorter Mags: feminists use words to describe things LOL that means they’re automatically wrong. Eye rape and patriarchy are exactly as valid as each other because I’ve put them in a list together!

Come to think of it, that’s actually longer Mags by word count…

nwoslave
8 years ago

@Quackers
“If you can’t see that Obama is doing all that to secure the female vote then you are dumber than I though.”

And yet women are flocking to Obama for the, “freebies” that have, and will continue to destroy the economy. He’s got your vote, so whose the dumber one? Mirror, mirror on the wall whose the dumbest of the all? Like the article says, virtually all women are going to vote for Obama. I’m dumber because you vote for Obama. Can your accountability fall any lower, oh empathetic one?

Tulgey Logger
8 years ago

Shorter Owly: All of society constantly glorifies women and trashes men! That’s why they make less than men even when they have the same or better education, position, and work the same hours as men: it’s just a small step towards giving men reparations for the constant damage they suffer at the hands of feminism. Arglebargleargle loyalty men are more logicalarglebargle.

ithiliana
8 years ago

@Jean Renee: OTOH, given how the white men in the Texas legislature treated Barbara Jordan, she probably had a lot of experience about their lack of empathy, understanding, and compassion.

I’ll give her more slack than I will white men who whine about how all the women hates them as shown by not sucking their dicks on command.

Kiwi girl
Kiwi girl
8 years ago

I would like it if you could address the myth that all women want is the “bad boy” who treats them mean in a relationship, so nice males who treat women considerately don’t get a look in. I would love to have it pointed out that people who are in a sick relationship have issues, possibly due to some type of mental or physical abuse in the past so they go for a relationship that they understand, and perhaps they think it is all they deserve.

At least part of the answer is having loving relationships, regardless of sexual orientation, and gently talking to any friends who appear to be in a abusive relationship, and – gasp – believing them, may help their friends get out. This is speaking from the experience of past abusive relationships, having come from a very dysfunctional family.

nwoslave
8 years ago

@Jean-Renee
” Ms. Jordan’s opinion is wrong. Men do not lack empathy, understanding, and compassion. Trolls like you, on the other hand…”

No woman, no womans organization, no woman reporter, no woman in any position of power made so much as a peep to stand up for men. In fact, just like every other vile thing that spews from the mouths of women, it was classified as funny. Lip service after the fact and no punishment.

Enlighten me with your wisdom. If a congressman had said the same about women, would he have been punished? That’s how you tell who the privileged class are and who the mooks are.

So here’s a question for you. If women are never willing to ever stand up for men, should any man give a flying damn about women?

hellkell
hellkell
8 years ago

Pujeemuhs: I think Roberta was busy stinking up Jezebel before she came here. Speaking of Jez, hey! I’ve seen your posts there, and you’ve made me laugh more than once.

nwoslave
8 years ago

@ithiliana
“I’ll give her more slack than I will white men who whine about how all the women hates them as shown by not sucking their dicks on command.”

How predictible that the self described man hater rolls in. Sucking their dicks on command? Sounds like a stereotype. But of course every stereotype about men is true, while stereotypes about women are always false. Except of course the superior empathy, sympathy, list all positive traits stereotypes. We get an earful of them from across the board everyday.

I guess I just don’t get in touch with my feminine side enough. That’s the side with all the positive traits. If it wasn’t, why would I need to get in touch with my feminine side? That’s where all the good is stored. Correct? If it isn’t correct, why would I need to get in touch with my feminine side?

Nanasha
Nanasha
8 years ago

@NWO- “Men, however, are forbidden to use their power over women, to the point that even using logic on a woman is considered DV.”

Unless you named your right fist “logic” and your left fist “reason,” it is not illegal to “use” logic and reason on women (or on anyone in general). Somehow, when you use this word, I do not think it means what you think it means.

Seriously, women are human beings. Some human beings are manipulative assholes who will use the extent of their behavioral and physical abilities to try and control other people. But this does not make all humans messed up pieces of shit. Imagine if you were judged by the worst person in the world at all times, and that someone would extrapolate everyone else like you to be EXACTLY THE SAME AS THAT OTHER PERSON because you randomly shared a few physical appearance attributes. You’d find it unfair and ridiculous, right?

Craziness is not a gendered thing. Neither is manipulation, sociopathic desire, or greed. Taking those who behave in this manner and extrapolating it to all members of a gender, race, religion, species, etc, is not logical unless you’re talking about a single-hive-minded species like the Borg or something.

Women as a group are not analogous to the Borg, ergo, they are not all “crazy bitches.”

Just as I would never dream to judge all men based on the shameful behavior of the misogynists in the MRA movement, I instead strive to create more in-depth testing regimens to properly identify people in my life (professional and personal) who are toxic in general and display characteristics that are problematic or unhealthy. In this way, I can mitigate the impact these people have on me, either by banishing them from my life, or by minimizing their impact to my life.

That’s really what being safe is for me as a woman- it’s identifying all the wolves in sheep’s clothing (male or female) and keeping myself emotionally, physically and psychologically safe, because I really don’t need to waste the limited time I have on this earth around toxic assholes.

So this is why I pay attention to what people like yourself say- I find many of these concepts to be untenable beliefs in regards to how I will be treated based on my own born gender. Therefore, it is imperative that I figure out how to sniff out people like this in the real world once they’ve put on their “nice guy/girl” skins and gone out to pretend to be decent individuals because honestly, I don’t want to waste my time on someone who thinks that I’m insane, money-grubbing, greedy and basically only worthwhile for access to my vagina as long as I shut up and make sandwiches and do what they say like some kind of child.

That person can have their beliefs, but I want my life to be free of that person.

nwoslave
8 years ago

@David Futrelle
“Also, you have literally posted 2900 + comments here, moderated man.”

Which doesn’t come close to the rest of the gang. Golly, was I specifically mean to individuals? If you go by either of those criteria, Dave, you’d have to ban everyone of your regulars.

In the spirit of equality, I demand you ban everyone here who has over 2900 posts, or has called me a pedophile, rapist or some such insult. There wouldn’t be anyone left to comment if you did that. Apparently, you aren’t as equality minded as you claim. Goes well with the unbiased conference you’ll be attending. I suppose.

Nanasha
Nanasha
8 years ago

@Shaenon-(RE: LIST OF CRAZY)

I’m not sure to laugh or cry-maybe I’ll laugh and then go cry in the street for awhile and see if people will give me free money and stuff. XD

I was reading these aloud to my husband, both of us were laughing so hard at the ludicrous nature of the statements, we both almost couldn’t breathe.

Someone needs to read these in a deadpan voice or something and upload it to Youtube-except for the fact that there would be a bunch of crazies who actually believed it, the Swift-ian nature of the content is simply breathtaking!

Next: let’s talk about the economic benefits of using babies as a food source!

nwoslave
8 years ago

@Nanasha
“Unless you named your right fist “logic” and your left fist “reason,” it is not illegal to “use” logic and reason on women (or on anyone in general).”

I’ve given you the State link showing that it is. It’s womens law. Plain and simple, woman will always be the victim.
—————
“Imagine if you were judged by the worst person in the world at all times, and that someone would extrapolate everyone else like you to be EXACTLY THE SAME AS THAT OTHER PERSON because you randomly shared a few physical appearance attributes. You’d find it unfair and ridiculous, right?”

The duluth wheel IS based on the worst man who committed DV.

http://www.theduluthmodel.org/training/wheels.html

The duluth wheel is the basis, the bible of predominant aggressor theory, which is used in training police officers. I, as a man, AM judged by the worst man ever. Visit the site, see the pretty rainbow colors, read about womens solidarity.

Here’s a quote.

“When women use violence in an intimate relationship, the context of that violence tends to differ from men. First, men’s use of violence against women is learned and reinforced through many social, cultural and institutional avenues, while women’s use of violence does not have the same kind of societal support. Secondly, many women who do use violence against their male partners are being battered. Their violence is primarily used to respond to and resist the controlling violence being used against them. On the societal level, women’s violence against men has a trivial effect on men compared to the devastating effect of men’s violence against women.”

Just heart warming, isn’t it? Womens violence is always justified, mens violence is evil. This is womens law. Take every single gender specific law, VAWA, Title IX, ect, ect, ect. Replace the word woman with white people and the word man with black people and you’d have the most horrifyingly racist hate laws ever concieved. Well guess what they are as they now stand. Hate laws of course. Womens law is hate law. It’s all it could ever be.
——————–
“That’s really what being safe is for me as a woman- it’s identifying all the wolves in sheep’s clothing (male or female) and keeping myself emotionally, physically and psychologically safe, because I really don’t need to waste the limited time I have on this earth around toxic assholes.”

If that’s the case there should be thousands of womens sites denouncing all those women who are toxic assholes. After all women get all the State funding. Yet the only place that does point out those toxic women are MRM sites, and YOU either defend those toxic women or remain silent. In fact, this entire blog is all about hating men who call out those toxic women.
——————–
Why should men as a whole do anything at all to assist women as a whole in any way, when in return women always only stick up for women? If you’re not willing to name the massive number of false acusers, liars and manipulative women. You deny women use sex as a weapon and manipulation. Women don’t cry and use weakness as a strength, more manipulation. You seem to have the vision of women as some superspecies of angelic beings.

Still not willing to shed or spill a little blood for men, after all that’s been spilled for women? Hell, women won’t even put forth the slightest effort of talking in favor of men. Oh, I forgot, women are more than happy to stand up for men being able to cry like infants, wear dresses and snuggle dollies, along with a little boy on boy action.

elusis
8 years ago

Here’s what I’d like to see covered:

1) Sex, even hetero sex, does not require an erection. If your erection isn’t working the way you want it to, or if you come but you and your partner aren’t ready to be done yet, there are all kinds of things you can do that are still fun and still “count” as sex. If you cover little else, please, please, please cover this.

2) Women don’t like being discussed with other men when you’ve had sex with them. Who are you more interested in cultivating favor with: the person you’re sexing, or the dudes you’re hanging out with? Gentlemen limit their comments to things like “yeah, we’re together. She’s really, really great.” and a smug look.

3) If you don’t like hanging out with women, you may want to work on that rather than working on having sex with them. Having sex with people you don’t like is really not that fun for anyone.

4) Along the lines of the other comments on consent and negotiation: Talking and negotiating is hot. If you can’t use your mouth to talk to the person to say “is this fun for you? Does this feel good? Would you ____ me?”, then don’t use your mouth to kiss them or go down on them or whatever. Just don’t.

Buttman
Buttman
8 years ago

Good luck. You should give some advice on guys how to avoid accusations of rape. I hope you don’t slip up and say something ableist or any other -ist and get run out for being a guy.

jenndesmarais
8 years ago

“You should give some advice on guys how to avoid accusations of rape. ”

I got one! don’t try to rape someone! and if you do get that rare asshole who decides to accuse you of rape, you could always talk to the police, or get legal aid.

“get run out for being a guy.”

Doesn’t happen.

katz
8 years ago

Yeah, “dudes having normal, consensual sex then get accused of rape” is a good one.

Quackers
Quackers
8 years ago

@NWO

I don’t vote for Obama because I don’t live in the US dumbass

Tulgey Logger
8 years ago

“Futrelle’s talk went great until he talked about avoiding rape accusations by taking a hidden camera to all of one’s sexual encounters, and then made a crass joke about retards and quadriplegics not needing to worry about that. That was when we ran him out of the room for being a man.”

chocomintlipwax
8 years ago

I think one really important idea to convey to the college set is that being in a relationship with someone (or perceiving yourself as being in a relationship with someone) does not entitle you to that person’s body.

Also the idea that just because your partner is up for something (sexually) doesn’t mean you have to want to try it. And if they’re going to end the relationship over it, you’re probably better off without them.

Quackers
Quackers
8 years ago

@NWO

also stop lying. Nowhere does that article state he’s giving “freebies”

also show me how the republicans are creating jobs and helping the economy? but you wont say anything negative about them. Afterall they fit with your agenda. Women preggers in the kitchen and the gays out of site. That benefits the economy so much.

nwoslave
8 years ago

@elusis
“1) Sex, even hetero sex, does not require an erection.”

An erection = sexual excitement. No erection, no excitment = no sex. I suggest you keep within reality.
————————
“2) Women don’t like being discussed with other men when you’ve had sex with them.”

You’ve got to be kidding me? Women are the masters of this very action. It’s just casually a part of womens repertoire. I mean c’mon, it’s not even a stereotype. There isn’t a media outlet where women don’t write countless articles along with legions of comments by women.
————————
“3) If you don’t like hanging out with women, you may want to work on that rather than working on having sex with them.”

So what you’re saying is, men need to change to accomodate women while women are perfect and don’t need to change. Why shouldn’t women change so they’re more pleasant to hang out with?
————————
“4) Along the lines of the other comments on consent and negotiation: Talking and negotiating is hot.”

If a man want’s that he can just call some phone sex number to talk and negotiate.

Christine Noble
8 years ago

Wish I could join, I especially like discussing the whole Nice Guy ™ phenomena. Also, I feel much better about not having my lecture for next month done yet, considering you are only writing yours for next weekend now.

nwoslave
8 years ago

@Quackers
“also stop lying. Nowhere does that article state he’s giving “freebies”

also show me how the republicans are creating jobs and helping the economy? but you wont say anything negative about them.”

If you’re getting something for doing nothing except existing as a woman, that’s a freebie. Creating jobs and helping the economy? You’re kidding, right? The only income the State posesses is by borrowing and passing that interest laden debt off to the public.

When a politician, “promises” to create jobs, all he/she has done, is promised to steal your wealth. The State only produces debt. The State does not produce wealth, ever.

Between your banker federal reserve tax, your State tax, your city tax, your sales tax, your property tax, your gas tax, and on and on it goes. You spend well over 50% of your income on taxes. Now if everyone had that 50% more each year, they’d spend it. Which would mean that many more jobs would be needed to accomodate the goods people would buy. Unless of course you don’t think everyones income doubling would spur the economy.

The State, however, will never do that because all their power is based upon stealing the wealth of the serfs. Which is why I’ve never voted because all politicians seek to enhance the power of the State.

Wanna hear something so strange you won’t believe I said it? The worst thing that could possibly happen in politics would be for the MRM to become an entrenched entity in the State like feminism is. Ya know why? Because the only way for men to achieve financial parity with women in State affairs would be to double the tax rate so we all enjoy the same entitlements.

drst
drst
8 years ago

No woman, no womans organization, no woman reporter, no woman in any position of power made so much as a peep to stand up for men.

…in all of human history? Citation needed.

I’d point out that Melissa Harris Perry has been advocating for Trayvon Martin for several weeks on her show, but I suspect that wouldn’t count for you for some mysterious reason.

Also Obama’s polling lead over Romney is 51% to 37% among women across 12 states. I wasn’t a big math fan but I’m pretty sure 51% /= all.

Jean-Renee
Jean-Renee
8 years ago

@NWO

So here’s a question for you. If women are never willing to ever stand up for men, should any man give a flying damn about women?

If men are never willing to ever stand up for women in the face of discrimination, sexual assault, domestic violence, pay inequity, etc., should any woman give a flying damn about men? It works both ways. Why should we care about you when it’s obvious you don’t care about us?

Yes, there are men who stand up for women. (Thanks, Dave!) But you are not one of them. You are a hateful little troll.

katz
8 years ago

I wasn’t a big math fan but I’m pretty sure 51% /= all.

In NWO-math the only numbers are 0%, 99%, and 100%. 51% rounds to 99%.

Tulgey Logger
8 years ago

Those poll numbers are just approximations, anyway.