Another day, another threat – sorry, prediction – of impending violence towards women from someone on The Spearhead. This time from a fellow called James, in his twenties:
The OLDER MEN simply do not understand what it is like to be a young man today.
I will say one thing though- a very big percent of young men of my generation do not believe in this feminism or white knight bullshit, and they have very little tolerance towards it.
Older men will allow themselves to get ass raped in divorce courts, but the younger men of my generation have no such tolerance.
So if the younger women think they are going to treat the younger men with the same level of hatred that the older women do to the older men, they have a big surprise waiting for them.
1. Either the men will just entirely boycott the younger women
or
2. They will actively fight for their rights, even with force, if it requires it
What I mean by that is, the younger generation of men are much more violent than the older generation. So in plain English, if women think they are going to treat the younger generation of men like shit, then we are going to see a huge increase in violence against women.
In short, the men of my generation are not as willing to tolerate the abuse from man hating women as the older men are. Young women would be very wise to take note of this.
Unfair quote-mining on my part? Not exactly. James got 72 upvotes for this bit of wisdom on The Spearhead, and only 8 downvotes.
Meanwhile, our old friend at the Pro-Male/Anti-Feminist Technology blog highlighted James’ comment in a post of his own, quoting the whole thing, and adding his own spin:
The younger you go on average you will find less tolerance for anything pro-female. This is not surprising. Even looking at my own life, I have been dealing with feminism since I was in elementary school especially if we define feminism correctly as feminine-ism. I remember (female) teachers being pro-female and anti-male going back to first grade. As bad as I had it, it is worse for men younger than me. They’re not going to listen to lies about how women are oppressed because all they have seen with their own eyes are the opposite. …
By 2020 the balance between men who are currently old vs. men who are currently young will have shifted. There will be less old men who remember life pre-feminism. There will be more young men who have spent their entire lives under the feminist jack boot. There will be more men who are completely fed up with women. Around 2020 there will be a lot more men willing to take radical direct action against feminism.
“Radical direct action against feminism?” What does this mean? Generalized violence against women, as James seems to suggest? Firebombing police stations and courthouses, as MRA “martyr” Tom Ball urged in his manifesto? Like most of those in the Men’s Rights movement who like to talk ominously about what they hope will be a massive anti-feminist backlash, the PMAFT blogger is vague about what exactly this might entail. But it’s not hard to connect the dots here.
Protip: MRAs, if you don’t want people to see the Men’s Rights movement as a hate movement — you need to stop posting, stop upvoting, stop even tolerating this kind of hateful shit.
Oh no, not the swedish SCUM video. The one that advertises a play. Whatever will we do.
DSC, a disproportionate number of homeless folks are queer? Do you have statistics to back that up? Not that I’m doubting you, I’m just genuinely interested, becauseI’ve never heard that before.
I’d choose 1 Holly, and I am sure I can find over a dozen MRAs who would, I care more about the living than I do the dead so long as the truth about the dead is spoken.
The sad thing is, Rutee, the Swedish government is using a play, that a bunch of college kids put together, as a planned out solution. He hasn’t specified what for, but I’m assuming a solution for their lack of cheesy trailers.
Seriously ya’ll, it’s no suffering or hardship at all to be molested in a theater as a nine year old, to be subject to anti-semitism, to be physically and sexually abused in a prison setting, to be raped and brutally beaten by your spouse, to be homeless and fleeing in a foreign country and to feel as if you have been coerced into sex work…nope, no hardship at all, not if you are a woman!
That’s a fucking lie. You’ve done nothing about or for the living and tried to Gotcha us with dead people for almost every post you’ve made.
O rilly? Dude, I don’t even know you, and I’m already sick of you bitching about it. That’s how much you bitch about it.
I’m sorry — how have “feminist” done all they can to punish men? Let me guess: voting, no-fault divorce, making marital rape a crime … that sort of thing? WOW, you men have sure been through a lot. Feminists: “TAKE YOUR PUNISHMENT, MEN!!!” Men: “No, no, we don’t wanna live in a world where women go to college and have jobs, and where rape shield laws exist n stuff! The pain!!! Make it stop!!!!” Feminists: “Muahahahahahahahaha!”
Let this be a lesson to everyone: When you talk about Solanas and Dworkin, everyone loses.
GENDER
Most studies show that single homeless adults are more likely to be male than female. In 2007, a survey by the U.S. Conference of Mayors found that of the population surveyed 35% of the homeless people who are members of households with children are male while 65% of these people are females. However, 67.5% of the single homeless population is male, and it is this single population that makes up 76% of the homeless populations surveyed (U.S. Conference of Mayors, 2007).
http://www.nationalhomeless.org/factsheets/who.html
i know it goes against your whole incoherent rage shtick, but could you do some proofreading. maybe everyone else here is patient enough to decipher your unhinged ranting, but i’m not sure why i’m supposed to put effort into understanding you if you won’t put effort into making yourself understood.
DSC is better familiar with this than me, but I’m just going to go ahead and bold the part of this that you’re missing, first.
The other thing to bear in mind is that a lot of shelters for women, but only those that count for women, technically count as being in a ‘home’, despite being completely equivalent to similar services that default to men or are solely oriented to them.
No silly feminist have done all tehy can to punish men by condoning violence against men forcing fathers out of their childrens lives and opposing the fathers count act. Other ways they have harmed men is by enforcing the FBI’s deffinition of a rapist as a man and a victim as a woman. Get your facts straight.
Um, Dave, why are you approaching everything up to and including potential rape as if the most important consideration is whether or not “incel” guys get laid? It’s honestly rather alarming.
HAHAHAHA.
That still doesn’t change the fact “67.5% of the single homeless population is male, and it is this single population that makes up 76% of the homeless populations surveyed”
Facts and feminist go together like a fish and a bicycle hell feminist you statistics like a fish uses a bicycle.
Tell me what else these evil feminists have done, Caution, because as a feminist, I’d never heard of any of this.
I also think it’s sort of pathetic that you have to use things like calling police enforcement of court orders “violence against men,” while women (and men that you don’t care about so much) have to face literal violence.
That particular definition actually does count forced envelopment by women as rape, actually.
That’d be dads doing it on their own, by leaving all the work for women and then expecting to be counted as primary caretakers at the divorce.
Seeing as you call “That’s not what Solanas said” as this, I doubt this is a widespread thing.
Although I suspect it’s ‘families’ rather than just women. DSC knew a lot more about this than me.
Men are more likely to be homeless than women.
It doesn’t therefore follow that it’s women’s or feminists’ fault.
Anyway, you don’t want to give men homes. You just want to punish women. If women are properly and thoroughly punished, services for homeless men will just happen, right?
Caution, Derek, whatever, with all due respect, and no offense, but eat a bowl of bees and grow a brain.
I think she just hated men as a group- in a sort of immature sense- and dehumanized them in her mind, and so when the time came to shoot Warhol, she found it easier to do.
Kind of like the immature hatred for women MRAs have?
Incorrect look up the case of Derrick K Miller that man was forced out of his kids lives and took his own. Tell me what have feminist done to spread awearness about the growing number of women commiting domestic violence?
Do I even live on the same planet as this person?
No, they aren’t. I know you’ve seen the post by DSC that laid out how VAWA-established shelters that still help some men remove a *lot* of women from the count of homeless people, despite not granting more services than a lot of homeless men receive. Accounting for this makes it women, which would surprise nobody given that the lower end of the poverty range is dominated by women
Hellkell, I keep meaning to ask: Can I steal “eat a bowl of bees?”