Another day, another threat – sorry, prediction – of impending violence towards women from someone on The Spearhead. This time from a fellow called James, in his twenties:
The OLDER MEN simply do not understand what it is like to be a young man today.
I will say one thing though- a very big percent of young men of my generation do not believe in this feminism or white knight bullshit, and they have very little tolerance towards it.
Older men will allow themselves to get ass raped in divorce courts, but the younger men of my generation have no such tolerance.
So if the younger women think they are going to treat the younger men with the same level of hatred that the older women do to the older men, they have a big surprise waiting for them.
1. Either the men will just entirely boycott the younger women
or
2. They will actively fight for their rights, even with force, if it requires it
What I mean by that is, the younger generation of men are much more violent than the older generation. So in plain English, if women think they are going to treat the younger generation of men like shit, then we are going to see a huge increase in violence against women.
In short, the men of my generation are not as willing to tolerate the abuse from man hating women as the older men are. Young women would be very wise to take note of this.
Unfair quote-mining on my part? Not exactly. James got 72 upvotes for this bit of wisdom on The Spearhead, and only 8 downvotes.
Meanwhile, our old friend at the Pro-Male/Anti-Feminist Technology blog highlighted James’ comment in a post of his own, quoting the whole thing, and adding his own spin:
The younger you go on average you will find less tolerance for anything pro-female. This is not surprising. Even looking at my own life, I have been dealing with feminism since I was in elementary school especially if we define feminism correctly as feminine-ism. I remember (female) teachers being pro-female and anti-male going back to first grade. As bad as I had it, it is worse for men younger than me. They’re not going to listen to lies about how women are oppressed because all they have seen with their own eyes are the opposite. …
By 2020 the balance between men who are currently old vs. men who are currently young will have shifted. There will be less old men who remember life pre-feminism. There will be more young men who have spent their entire lives under the feminist jack boot. There will be more men who are completely fed up with women. Around 2020 there will be a lot more men willing to take radical direct action against feminism.
“Radical direct action against feminism?” What does this mean? Generalized violence against women, as James seems to suggest? Firebombing police stations and courthouses, as MRA “martyr” Tom Ball urged in his manifesto? Like most of those in the Men’s Rights movement who like to talk ominously about what they hope will be a massive anti-feminist backlash, the PMAFT blogger is vague about what exactly this might entail. But it’s not hard to connect the dots here.
Protip: MRAs, if you don’t want people to see the Men’s Rights movement as a hate movement — you need to stop posting, stop upvoting, stop even tolerating this kind of hateful shit.
There’s this antique store by my house called Voorhees Antiques. Nothing to do with anything, I just think it’s funny.
With all due respect everything you said as well as David is total bullshit. I’ll feel bad for women when they are the majorty of the unemployed and homeless.
Uh oh, caution no longest name ever ever ever.
I do not feel respected. :-O
Seriously it is hilarious that you keep saying incredibly offensive things, but feel like you can weasel out of owning it with phrases like this.
Um, the most common reading of Solanas’ SCUM (the purported acronym of “society for cutting up men” is not included anywhere in the work) is as satire, that she was trying to show what it would look like if women talked about and thought about men the way men do women (a view that also makes sense given her history of satirical works).
And Solanas’ violence is viewed threw a double standard lens, not that what she did was okay, because it wasn’t, but we as a society don’t fucking talk about men’s violence in this same way, including men who have a history of vicious speech and behavior towards women.
Why aren’t you talking about the men who raped and beat Solanas as a child and their woman hating ways? The injustice of men destroying or intentionally “loosing” her works? You are so very quick to condemn her violence, but so very slow to acknowledge the oh-so-common brutalities committed against her. I want to see you calling out violence when it’s a little girl being beaten and raped and not only when it’s a rich famous man being shot.
Its not my fault the truth hurts and I love how feminists like to weasel out of all the hate quotes, hate literature and murder attempts.
Also, caution, you fuckbrain, Solanas was homeless for extended periods as both a child and an adult, but, of course, women’s suffering isn’t worth shit to your type.
Hahaha, you are terrible.
Zombie Solanas and Dworkin made me post it
It’s in the Geneva Convention!
Caution, take a look at my question at the top of the page. When you’re punishing women for our collective sins, do women like me get punished? How? I’m curious.
Seriously the so called MRA that went gunning down women mentioned here was abused by women as a little boy. why aren’t you going after all those women who abused an innocent little boy? I mean seriously you go after MRA’s and not the abusive women in their lives. Hell all my abusers were female you don’t see me bitching about it and trying to write literature condoning mass murder and genocide. To blame men for their actions but give women a way out because a man did them wrong is hypocritical. I only hate feminist for the abuse and victim blaming they put on me. As for someone like Solanas being homeless for most of her life guess what thats the story of most men these days. As for women’s suffering don’t confuse feminists with all women. Hell Andrea Dworkin knew nothing of opression or poverty her whole life yet she is allowed to spew misandry. If you think solana’s hard life gives her an excuse for violence against all men you are a sick fuck.
Shorter Caution:
How come you do not do all the work in fixing people?!
James from the OP did not mention being physically abused by women. His exact words were “So in plain English, if women think they are going to treat the younger generation of men like shit, then we are going to see a huge increase in violence against women.” He did not define what “treat the younger generation like shit” even means. It’s vague. It could mean he thinks that men should react with violence if women laugh at him, are rude, or ignore him. You are the one assuming he is talking about using force in self defense against physical violence. You are the one trying to weasel out a meaning that makes the Spearhead guys look like victims instead of dangerous misogynists.
Um, because that’s not the topic at hand? It doesn’t excuse what she did one whit. When we’re talking about a child molestor we don’t ask ourselves to “talk about” the perpetrator’s own victimization (victimization which is, of course, extremely common among such people).
Most men? Like, 1% of the population is homeless at any given time, an a disproportionate number of those people are queer people and people of color. Quit pulling stats out of your foolass asshead.
I just want to know what precisely Caution wants done to all the evil women. I bet it’s juicy but I’m afraid he’s too cowardly to spell it out.
Well for one feminist have done all they can to punish men for their father’s collective sins, why is that so unfair when its done to you? Its not fair to punish women for collective sins nor should men be punished for collective sins but its happened already.
That is funny. I wonder if they’ve seen the Friday the 13th movies. I bet a dozen people have asked them that, too.
HAHAHAHA you didn’t even fucking google her, did you?
Also, caution, their violence against you should be condemned, it doesn’t excuse what you do, but it does deserve to be condemned. You are making up some very bizarre shit if you don’t think any of us have ever condemned child abuse. Also, if I was going to obsess endlessly about your fucking life and writings, I’m pretty sure I wouldn’t leave that shit out either.
So holly wants to know what evil women should get for their sins, give them the same treatment as society gives evil men.
MRA CHALLENGE QUESTION TIME!
You have the opportunity to do only one of two things:
1) Give a homeless man a permanent home and a good job
2) Resurrect Andrea Dworkin and do anything you like to her without fear of any reprisal
CHOOSE FAST!
How are men punished for other men’s collective sins? Please be specific.
Bailouts?
How the hell did I miss this?
Andrea Dworkin’s parents were wealthy american citizens born in the lat 1800s she had a nice home and went to an ivy league school, yeah that is such a horrible life.