Another day, another threat – sorry, prediction – of impending violence towards women from someone on The Spearhead. This time from a fellow called James, in his twenties:
The OLDER MEN simply do not understand what it is like to be a young man today.
I will say one thing though- a very big percent of young men of my generation do not believe in this feminism or white knight bullshit, and they have very little tolerance towards it.
Older men will allow themselves to get ass raped in divorce courts, but the younger men of my generation have no such tolerance.
So if the younger women think they are going to treat the younger men with the same level of hatred that the older women do to the older men, they have a big surprise waiting for them.
1. Either the men will just entirely boycott the younger women
or
2. They will actively fight for their rights, even with force, if it requires it
What I mean by that is, the younger generation of men are much more violent than the older generation. So in plain English, if women think they are going to treat the younger generation of men like shit, then we are going to see a huge increase in violence against women.
In short, the men of my generation are not as willing to tolerate the abuse from man hating women as the older men are. Young women would be very wise to take note of this.
Unfair quote-mining on my part? Not exactly. James got 72 upvotes for this bit of wisdom on The Spearhead, and only 8 downvotes.
Meanwhile, our old friend at the Pro-Male/Anti-Feminist Technology blog highlighted James’ comment in a post of his own, quoting the whole thing, and adding his own spin:
The younger you go on average you will find less tolerance for anything pro-female. This is not surprising. Even looking at my own life, I have been dealing with feminism since I was in elementary school especially if we define feminism correctly as feminine-ism. I remember (female) teachers being pro-female and anti-male going back to first grade. As bad as I had it, it is worse for men younger than me. They’re not going to listen to lies about how women are oppressed because all they have seen with their own eyes are the opposite. …
By 2020 the balance between men who are currently old vs. men who are currently young will have shifted. There will be less old men who remember life pre-feminism. There will be more young men who have spent their entire lives under the feminist jack boot. There will be more men who are completely fed up with women. Around 2020 there will be a lot more men willing to take radical direct action against feminism.
“Radical direct action against feminism?” What does this mean? Generalized violence against women, as James seems to suggest? Firebombing police stations and courthouses, as MRA “martyr” Tom Ball urged in his manifesto? Like most of those in the Men’s Rights movement who like to talk ominously about what they hope will be a massive anti-feminist backlash, the PMAFT blogger is vague about what exactly this might entail. But it’s not hard to connect the dots here.
Protip: MRAs, if you don’t want people to see the Men’s Rights movement as a hate movement — you need to stop posting, stop upvoting, stop even tolerating this kind of hateful shit.
I remain baffled as to why so many of these people think that they can make things happen just by saying I DECLARE IT SO! No, your name is not a trademark that you can sue people for using no matter how many capital letters and exclamation points you use, and no, threatening to kill judges isn’t OK just because you refer to the means of delivering your threat as a Lawful Notice. Also, legal judgements against people are not going to be paid in gold no matter how many times you insist that they must be.
@Katz
Thank you!
Cassandra: I know, right? Like I can’t just declare that I’m copyrighting the word “chicken” and everyone has to give me a chicken every time they say it. He really does think that the world works a certain way (by which I mean, revolves around him) because he feels like it ought to.
“Chicken.”
Damn, katz, I’m sending you your chicken. Curse your copyright!
I FIRMLY DECLARE that I have copyrighted chocolate. Every time a piece of chocolate is sold (which you need my permission to do btw – if you fail to respect this I may have to kill you) I expect a cut of the profits. To be paid in sashimi-grade maguro (since I already own all the chocolate I don’t need any more, thanks).
What do you mean, tuna is not a form of legal tender? YOU WILL PAY ME IN MAGURO, OR I WILL SUE YOU.
Also, under Australian copyright laws quoting under 10% a printed work is considered to be “fair dealing” for purposes of critique. So threatening to slap us all with copyright suits for quoting him and critiquing his work will get him precisely nowhere.
Chicken.
Chocolate.
*copyrights all kittens, puppies, bunnies, hamsters, and hedgehogs* MWHAHAHAAH I’ve cornered the market! Cute Overload will have to come begging to ME if they want any more photos!
This is high on my list of favorite MRA quotes ever. I can’t decide if it’s funnier if he’s just too stupid to realize that we will notice that dogs that never attempt to get close to you are not, by any definition, attacking you, or if he actually thinks the dogs were somehow attacking him with the power of their minds. HE IS SO BADASS THAT HE CAN DEFEAT TELEKINETIC DOGS, YOU GUYS.
Also, as of this moment, I have totally copyrighted the word “the.” Everyone who uses the word “the” must now pay me precisely 1 pound of fine European chocolate per “the.” I recognize this may cause some problems with Cassandra’s copyright, but you all should have thought of that before you said “the.”
PAN(c), what are you going to do about all this copyright violation? To make sure there’s no confusion, I’ll just go ahead and say right now that I’m attempting to violate your purported copyright on your name.
Peter Andrew Nolan
There, I did it. We know you’re on this thread and you said you’d pursue us to the ends of the earth. So what now?
My roommate has copyrighted tuna, and demands payment in chicken.
What a tangled web we weave.
You have no idea. I just copyrighted my roommate.
As bizarre as this new piece of Nolan Holocaust apologism is, I can’t seem to stop focusing on the fact that he’s sort of obsessing over me getting stuff from BOOKS when I cited the Holocaust Museum as a my source, not a book. Um, Nolan, the Holocaust Museum has traditionally be run and directed by Holocaust survivors, and documenting and studying the Holocaust is it’s entire reason for existing. So, yeah, your single bullshit anecdote claim is less than impressive.
Why is there a second Bee????? I am copyrighting BEE! Bee up there at 10:47 p.m. must pay me 1 million gluten-free cupcakes!
Well I’ve copyrighted red pandas, so I win.
And I never even once said “the.”
DAMN!
This will not end well.
Actually, Bee has commented FOUR times. That’s FOUR million gluten-free cupcakes.
I will be waiting here, tapping my foot.
Also, did Nolan just claim a Nazi as a better source than Holocaust survivors orgs? Because that’s totally what it looked like.
Even setting aside the issue of this “friends” existence, German soldier imprisoned by the US and British at the end of WWII sounds suspiciously like seriously suspected Nazi at best. Yo, Nolan, was your “friend” also put on trial at Nuremburg by the “criminal” US and British after the war?
@darksidecat Clearly the AMERICAN and BRITISH were the real criminals, not the Nazis WHO WERE THERE. Any other questions? (Also, I cited a quote from a book, not realizing those were all written by the Illuminati, silly me.)
dsc, in Nolan-land(c), being charged with something automatically means that it’s a lie and the opposite is true. If you beat your wife and get arrested, the judge is the criminal! If you’re a Nazi and you lose the war, the entire American and British armies are criminals! It’s the “I’m rubber and you’re glue” of sovereign citizenship.
Dammit, cloudiah! I hereby preemptively copyright the content and meaning of all my past and future posts, and anyone who ninjas me must pay me 100 kittens.
Katz – Oh, so then can we just determine that all copyright claims are, if actually enforced, Evil False Accusations?
…I demand that anyone who evilly false-accuses me shall pay me one million ounces of Choco Taco.
Falconer:
Ah, but a lot of Australian wildlife is out to get you, just not the marsupials. They prefer to run away or dig a burrow, but even they are dangerous when cornered. Even gentle playpusses and echidnas have poison spurrs that can make a person very ill indeed. The snakes and spiders are a nightmare (I live across the road from a big nature reserve and we get venomous snakes in out garden, they come in looking for water and if you’re wise you leave it out for them) and it’s sometimes difficult keeping them out of the house. I had a red back spider in my bath last night. She just sat there, glaring balefully at me and daring me to expel her from my bathroom. Eventually I caught her in a glass and put her outside. She was quite aggressive and if I hadn’t known how to deal with her, or stepped on her in the dark, she could easily have landed me in hospital (which in my current condition would be a reallyreally Bad Thing).