Categories
dozens of upvotes evil women false accusations girl germs I'm totally being sarcastic misogyny MRA oppressed men paranoia reddit shit that never happened

Reddit MRA: My eminent businessman friend who is totally not made-up refuses to be alone in a room with a woman

This seems like a completely reasonable course of action:

Oh, by the way, I know a guy who’s a CEO of a Fortune 500 company, and he can fly and turn invisible.

Not at the same time, though. When he forgets and turns invisible while flying, he plummets to earth.

244 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
hellkell
hellkell
12 years ago

The latter is part of wide spectrum male disposability.

Not THIS shit again, Joe.

Bagelsan
Bagelsan
12 years ago

hellkell, you laugh, but would you believe how many haploid males get disposed of in wads of tissue every day?? It’s horrible!

hellkell
hellkell
12 years ago

Bagelsan, I forgot. WON’T SOMEONE THINK OF THE HAPLOIDS?

Bostonian
12 years ago

So are we sure that Joe is not MARL, yet again, proving that he has no life?

Bagelsan
Bagelsan
12 years ago

Luckily, female-produced haploids are being well-protected, thanks to laws aimed at banning birth control! Yaaay… -_-

Hershele Ostropoler
12 years ago

I’ve seen that before.

I want to say it was a Miss Manners column, reprinted in a book years ago, though that would imply MRAs would take etiquette advice, and from a woman besides. In any event, the specific sentence “if a women is in his office, the door will remain open, with his assistant as witness” looks extremely familiar.

Ithiliana
12 years ago

Yeah, Joe’s theory of male disposability is ringing a bell! An MRALish bell.

Ithiliana
12 years ago

Andie: It is quite common to see male students and professors sitting together in the pub or cafeteria, but a male prof would have to be mad to ever take a female student out for a beer to discuss methodology or theory. Even a hint of impropriety can derail a professor’s career. I admit that even I shy away from anything less than totally public, formal interactions with female students, particularly the ones who come to class half-naked.

I’m not sure where you and your husband teach, but I’m a faculty brat (born in 1955 to a professor who became dept. head and Dean when I was in graduate school), professional student (kept taking graduate degrees because it was hard to find a job, so multiple schools, etc), then took my doctorate and have worked 19 years at a small university in NE Texas.

The blurring of the boundaries between student/faculty member back when most were men (i.e. hanging out at pubs together, bringing male student home for dinner that wife fixed because godforbid there were many women faculty, let alone any who dared bring home male students, etc.) were common in the US in the 195s, 1960s, etc. Things did begin to change when more women were being admitted, and there are still some hangovers from that tradition–recent debate about The APA’s (American Philosophical Association)’s “Smoker” (http://www.insidehighered.com/news/2011/12/12/women-job-candidates-philosophy-appalled-smoker) make that clear. (Philosophy btw in the US at least is still the most sexist and racist of the humanities.)

I remember being a grad student under such circumstances, before the regulations against sexual harassment were instituted, and the bullshit that went on at professors’ houses and in such “social” circumstances.

With power inequalities, ‘socializing’ between faculty and grad students (especially) has to be handled carefully–the fact that some faculty are treating male students differently than female and somehow blaming the women (omg they are half naked! they dress whatever), and the changes that have led to some (very) flimsy protections against sexual exploitation of graduate students (a very vulnerable population esp. in some disciplines and departments) pisses me the hell off.

I’m a faculty member. I’m a queer woman (and it’s fairly well known on my campus, well enough so that rude graffitti was written up in the women’s room accusing me of making a pass at an unnamed student). Amazingly enough, a report was made, the graffitti cleaned off, and my dept. head (woman) who has known me since we were hired together did not in fact throw me off campus and ruin my career (no doubt it’s my pussy pass privilege).

Generally speaking: I would not meet in my office with a student after hours or on a weekend (male or female); I’d meet with them in the library. I often meet with students, and the door is open (because it’s office hours); if a student is horribly upset or freaked out, then with their permission I close the door. I would never meet a student at a bar (not in the Bible Belt), nor would I have public meals with students–though I’ve gone out with a group. I wouldn’t students to our home (my partner is a woman, and a dept. head on campus) for many reasons (mostly, who wants to clean up all the cat hair). That is true of most of my faculty colleagues–and yet my dept. is known for close and good mentoring or ALL our students, male and female, through a variety of ways, including a grad student organization that invites faculty to speak to any who are interested; through faculty working with groups of students to help them submit to conferences, and get published (a lot of that gets done by email, btw, with drafts–I don’t have time to spend a lot of time meeting with individual students). I run a weekly support group for students working on their thesis or dissertations. I have at least ten office hours a week, and I have no problems with getting a group together to mentor on a topic (I gave a workshop on human subjects issues a few weeks ago). We do guest lectures in other faculty’s classes, and we have a welcoming reception and end of term reception for ALL faculty and ALL graduate students, and when we have candidates on campus, grad students are invited to all the events EXCEPT the committee interview (including the meals). So there are all sorts of opportunities that do not involve one/one interactions in a place where alcohol is sold or in a home.

If women students are being disadvantaged by the academic culture, the fault is in that culture, not in the students nor in the changes that came about because of very real issues (when I began my first MA degree, at the same program I got my BA, one of the two women faculty who kept her door locked after hours and on weekeneds when she worked because of male colleagues met with me privately–first time ever, despite a whole lot of mentoring–and warned me against specific male colleagues by name that she knew would make passes at me based on her observations of them in the past–several were on their second or third graduate student wife–ex-grad student, more appropriate to say. She was right to every single one. This was when the men took female students sexual availability as a job perk, and the private warning system she embodied was known among the faculty wives and wives of graduate students and the largely female staff at my dad’s university-the women looked out for each other, as best they could, and warned each other about the predators).

Joe
Joe
12 years ago

You’re all very much missing the point. You’re all busting an organ trying to convince me that false accusations of sex crime are not a problem for men. I’m not going to be convinced, because I know your assurances would be utterly useless to me, or any man, should the cops ever come kicking the door in. “But… but…. Holly and Molly and Rutee said this never happens!!” Nope. Not helping.

My point:
A great many men, (far more than those who are even aware of the existence of the ridiculously named “manosphere”) are very, very worried about this issue of pedo/sexcrime-hysteria. This is NOT something restricted to MRA-land or whatever you call it. It’s society wide, and gets more and more entrenched with every poster demonising men (e.g. NSPCC’s recent campaign) and every cry of “rape culture” (as though rape was somehow approved of, rather than greviously punished in the Anglosphere).

Manboobz tried to claim these men don’t exist. Yet even idon’trememberherhandle said she witnessed a bunch of men expressing their fear about this, and discussing their tactics to protect themselves from it.

This fear has CONSEQUENCES:

As I’ve pointed out upthread, (with links), already a little girl has DROWNED because a bloke was too scared of false accusation to help her when she got lost. Apparently no-one here cares!?! – not one of you has said anything about it. If any of you had bothered to read the linked articles you’d find that pretty much no men who heard about that tragedy were surprised that the bloke felt that way. That’s really fucking sad. And should worry, oooh, pretty much anyone who is sane, as an indicator that our society is in deep shit.

Men have fled teaching / mentoring of kids in droves. There are very few men in primary teaching in the UK for instance. Surely you can see that it’s a very bad thing for kids of both sexes not to have trustworthy, decent adults of both sexes in their lives? If not as parents, then at least as teachers / mentors / group leaders whatever?

These consequences will continue to get worse as the fear gets worse, as the hysteria / propaganda gets worses, as men become increasingly isolated from women and children. It’s a vicious cycle and it will damage prettty much everybody as it continues to ratchet up.

Bostonian
12 years ago

Yeah, it is MARL.

Holly Pervocracy
12 years ago

Men are far more likely to be the victim of sexual violence than to be falsely accused of it. Worry about that.

…Except that all too often gets you worrying about kids and queer men and (non-false-accused) prisoners, and, you know, God forbid the men’s rights movement spare a single instant for any man who isn’t living the “my life is so hard, I won’t even get to golf this week” lifestyle.

Ithiliana
12 years ago

Someone mentioned Miss Manners: one of my fave writers. She has a lot to say about how ‘business’ events have to be different from (and understood as different from) social events with friends, and how the two should never mix (she’s usually talking more about corporate/business things, but I think there’s a lot that academics could learn from that).

Crumbelievable
Crumbelievable
12 years ago

MRAL must have a LOT of email accounts.

MollyRen (@MollyRen)
12 years ago

Ithiliana: yeah, there seems to be a LOT of confusion here as to what’s not a good idea because it’s just not professional, vs. what’s not a good idea because it violates personal boundaries. Taking a student to a bar might *not* violate their personal space, but it’s definitely not what I’d think of as professional.

Joe
Joe
12 years ago

And the societal disposability of men is not a “theory” it’s fact, certainly in Western cultures*. Only the deaf, dumb and blind could fail to see it.

During WWI while the suffragettes** were handing out white feathers and campaigning for conscription (in collusion with the ruling class / the 1%) nearly a million British men (and boys) – the majority of whom did not have the bloody vote either!! – were slaughtered in Flanders and the Somme. That’s male disposability, in a nutshell.

I could fill endless books with stats (99% of combatant deaths = men, 95% of work deaths = men, 80% of suicides = men, 90% of homeless= men) and examples current / modern and ancient (conscription, the pressgang) but it seems pretty redundant – just open your eyes!

(*Not so much in India and China – see the mass gendercide of female babies/infants out there, in response to mandated population reduction measures.

**Emmeline and Christabel Pankhurst were the warmongering ruling-class-collaborators who, inspired by Lord SomebodyOrOther, led the transformed suffragette / then White Feather movement to encourage / mandate male sacrifice to serve their own ends.
Sylvia Pankhurst, in contrast, gets honourable mention for taking a pacifist stance and allying herself and her suffragette group with the union movement. She became estranged from her mother and sister due to her stance.
It was Emmeline who got the fame, power and glory of course. There’s a statue of her in London. Winning is easy when you ally yourself with Kings and Lords and get the common man to serve your purpose.)

MollyRen (@MollyRen)
12 years ago

Not so much in India and China – see the mass gendercide of female babies/infants out there, in response to mandated population reduction measures.

I’d love to hear your theory as to why one gender is being targeted in this instance.

Wetherby
Wetherby
12 years ago

I don’t think Joe is MRAL – his writing style is quite different, and to my ear he sounds as though he genuinely is from my side of the Atlantic.

Holly Pervocracy
12 years ago

Wait, the suffragettes were the same as the white feather women?

…What?

In what universe besides “paranoid, complicated, and increasingly self-referential MRA fantasies” does that make sense?

Next we’ll be hearing that the white feather suffragettes were all Titanic survivors.

Nobinayamu
Nobinayamu
12 years ago

Yeah… Women have been both accused and convicted of child abduction too.

Wouldn’t stop me from offering help to a toddler I saw wandering around a park/lake/city street.

But, hey, if you’re convinced that there’s a significant population of men who won’t help children because of the chances of false accusations, so be it. I’ve seen, and continue to see, men who help kids, work as teachers, volunteer with youth groups, etc.

Obviously, I have a much higher opinion of men than you do, Joe.

Ithiliana
12 years ago

Well, if JOE isn’t MRAL, he’s certainly every bit as boring and more so as MRAL!

Old, stale, talking points.

so, Joe, tell me what you think about hard library chairs: misandry or not?

Kyrie
Kyrie
12 years ago

More to the point, what do you think about heels, Joe? Especially for tall women. 🙂

hellkell
hellkell
12 years ago

MRAL is pathetic enough to try to sound like he’s from somewhere else.

Yes, Joe! We have it on good authority that your libraries across the pond are full of hard, misandric chairs. Tell us!

hellkell
hellkell
12 years ago

Joe, do women spit on you?

Holly Pervocracy
12 years ago

I actually don’t think Joe is MRAL. MRAL might have the wit to throw a few “bloke”s in there, but he wouldn’t remember to “demonise” men or to refer to UK politics.

I don’t want to believe there’s more than one of these guys either, but sadly…

1 4 5 6 7 8 10