People manipulate each other no matter the gender. You don’t think men manipulate women? What universe are you living in anyway?

We could make a Book of Meller just out of that last post.

Not when they, or their wife’s family, or their trusts, owns the majority of common shares, they don’t!

If that’s the case, they are the shareholders. The market in action.

Viscaria, its exactly this kind of thinking that never ceases to be a wonder to me. I dount doubt for a moment that DKM thinks women are as dumb as a bag of hammers, I suppose the puppet master thing is just paranoia or his need to justify his shoddy treatment getting the better of him. But when you take his two statements side by side and at face value, it is a singularly strange phenomenon.

What kind of woman would pledge her support to the MRM?

Ruby Hypatia–March 15, 2012 @3:17 pm: ”

What kind of woman would pledge her support to the MRM? ”

The kind of woman, or women, who can love real men for being what we are; the kind of woman who appreciates male strength, wisdom, and (where necessary) dominance, the kind of woman who cherishes her feminine identity and “loves being a girl”. The kind of woman to whom it is a pleasure and a joy to make her man happy, and tend to her home and children, and to whom it is her greatest satisfaction for her femininity to complement, support, and reinforce her mate’s masculinity, NOT fight with him, denigrate him, or prefer others (her career, her goofy girlfriends, or her family over him!

The kind of woman who wants the world to be one of order, cohesiveness, and decency for herself, other women like herself, and, perhaps most importantly, her daughters and granddaughters. The kind of world where she can love and adore the primary man in her life, where she can manage her home, and where she, and other women like her, will bring up her children in love, safety, and prosperity.

In short, what used to be considered ‘normal women” before the feminist dementia took over!

The kind of world where “the mad, wicked folly of woman’s rights” pace Queen Victoria, was understood for what it was-and is!

I hope this all too brief reply helped to answer your question.

Even shorter DKM: Dolls.

Also, for newcomers to the site, who might not realize, here is what DKM thinks should be done to women who don’t follow HIS rules: murder ’em, gentlemen!

http://manboobz.com/2012/02/09/alcuin-and-out-or-the-kkk-with-tits/comment-page-8/#comment-123827
Ithiliana–February 12, 2012 @2:31pm

“graduate student “murdered” by ex-husband”

Take post cited above. Could woman who talks like that (over the ‘net) have such an unpleasant, unfeminine, and just plain horrid personality that she could say something that MAY provoke an unpleasant response from a nearby man who may already be troubled about something else. Look at all of the cases you read about where a murder or vicious assault or rape was committed by a man whose entire life was coming apart, and the very person—his wife–whom he was relying upon to keep what was left of his sanity was turning on him…

Did graduate student take her “how to handle men” or something like that from YOU?

I was explaining that a man who loved his nearest and dearest would do anything to avoid the spousal abuse so often cited on feminuttery websites and blogs like this, because it wouldn’t get him what he wanted! I would rather be kind, gentle, and loving to a woman than beat,rape, or kill her, and so would most men, for obvious reasons!

Gee, Ithiliana, for an intelligent woman, you sure have a lot of trouble understanding ordinary common sense, don’t you?

@Ithiliana, I love you for your dedication in exposing DKM for the sexist, horrible person he is every damned time he posts. Thank you. 😀

Either murder them or send them to brothels.

Ithiliana, I was only trying to show what can happen when a feminist allows the rage and frustration of an already unbalanced and destructive man spirils out of control. I didn’t say that killing was justified–AND NEVER WOULD—but that people could explode with tragic consequences for everybody concerned. Nothing in that post ever said that “disobedient or quarrelsome women should be murdered”, or anything like it!

Molly Ren–You’re on the wrong blog, or at least responding to the wrong post. I have nothing against lesbians. They can love other women to their hearts content, as far as I am concerned! However, this doesn’t do men any good! Lesbianism is alright, I suppose, for anybody who wants it, but it has nothing to offer women who love men, who feel blessed in making a special man happy, and who want to raise up their family (with her husband’s help) in the ways of the Lord. You Lezzies now have your “gay” marriage, go to it, have fun, but it has nothing to do with traditional families, Sweet Old-fashioned girls, or normal male-female relations.

There are MRMs who deeply resent the responsibilities of supporting women, or the strictures of monogamy, but I don’t think that I have ever addressed my posts to them. It is an honor to be a family breadwinner, but the man should be regarded as the Patriarch and “master of the house and king of his castle”, NOT the ‘ ATM with legs” the way too many modern women, even if they marry and have child(ren) too often feel. Again, while a man may stray, most traditional men will, if encouraged by a good woman, return to a monogamous home and appreciate what he has “keeping the homefires burning”.

Even if he should break his marraige vows, at least he KNOWS that it is wrong, and if she is a good wife, will try to do better by her and their marriage. Contrast that with modern women, who don’t really place him at the center of their lives anyhow, and put him behind, among other things, her career. her family, her goofy girlfriends, most of whom are likely to be feminists, or at least spinster old-maids anyway, and do everything that they can to undercut her attachment to her nearest and dearest, and even her children, who may even be those fathered by another man…No man worthy of the name is going to be faithful to a woman who puts her husband (or “significant other”) down near the bottom of her personal concerns. She should make him, at the very least, her “nearest and dearest”.

Many MRMs would be happy and satisfied regarding the obligations of a man’s financial support and monogamous commitment–in return for HER sweet submissiveness, love and adorability. They won’t commit to, or support, a “woman?” who can’t, even at her best, offer him much more than a male room-mate, and at worst, inflict upon him, or any man like him, an experience of hell compared with which, even being alone for the rest of his life, or even, one suspects, doing time in jail, would still be preferable! Almost all of the resentment expressed by MRMs on these pages, and other blogs and websites as well, is due to the unwillingness, or even the inability of modern women to love men the way that they should. One is proud to support a helpmate, but certainly NOT an adversary or competitor!

My husband financially supported me through most of our marriage so far, and he never felt the need to have more power than me. BTW, I filled out our census paperwork in 2010. I love that there was nothing about any, “head of the household.”

@Gem: Thank you! *internet hugs*

I am well known to my family and friends for being somewhat *ahem* stubborn!