Irony alert: MRA who cannot master simple punctuation attacks black women as “ignorant.”

I have cited a lot of material that I have read since 1985, here on this blog, mostly to zhinxi, since she was the one who asked. I have also cited a number (not a complete list) of books, periodicals, and websites that have been influential in the evolution of my thought regardless of when it was written or published. I thought, mistakenly, that she would be happy with at least some of them, my antifeminism notwithstanding. Beyond that, I don’t know how she presumes to know the contents of my library anyhow,since she has never been to my residence, where my books, periodicals, and tapes are located, but never even had any sort of discussion with me about it.

No a few suggestions of recently publsihed works on her part citing her “libertarian feminuttery”, a kind of merger between standard feminism and libertarian thought doesn’t count as a discussion of anything, least of all when they are offered, not for purposes of knowledge-sharing, but simply to score debating points against me!

On encountering a person, even a woman, whom I believed to be a libertarian, I was very warmly and eagerly disposed to be friendly. We could–and would–disagree with feminism, but there were so many other areas for discussion that I didn’t imagine that it would be much of an obstacle for mutual understanding. I was wrong!

And you imagined that I thought that Ami (girlygiggles xD) Angelwing’s posts served no purpose but cheerleading! They don’t, but nevertheless, they exposed Zhinxi’s outlook and temperment regarding all communications with me regarding not only feminuttery, but also anarchism and polycentric law.I have better things to do than be ms.represented by a she-demagogue who is a feminist first, and an anachist or a libertarian last, if at all!

There is nothing but goodwill toward Africans in my posts. I hoped for, and continue to hope for, changes that will make their success more likely and more widespread. I also recognise that “swimming against the tide”, as many, perhaps most, have had to do, is IMMENSELY difficult and the prospects of success, even for individuals, will be severely limited. Any advances attained, in prosperity, education, manners, marriage and family integrity, have to be secured by working against both:

1) a (white) majority” culture” that is becoming more present-oriented, more filthy and just plain toxic with each passing day…

2) an”internal” enemy within who sees any attempt at material, moral, or intellectual success as “acting White”, being “oreo cookies”, or “selling out”…If you doubt what I am saying, simply reread what some of you manboobzettes have said about my examples of brilliantly successful Africans, from Booker T. Washington to Anne Wortham, from Dr. Charles Drew to Zora Neale Thurston, from Walter Williams to Thomas Sowell et al. ALL of them–and countless others–have been accused by a truly renegade element in THEIR society of being “traitors” or sellouts.Those disgusting poverty-pimps do nobody any good, and the Whites who listen to them and their guilt-slinging are just as bad!

People evolve–at different rates–by type! The direction and the rate is strongly and continuously influenced by countless variables, both the directions in which the larger society is moving, the presence or absence of opportunity for individual initiative and enterprise, the technological level prevailing in their environment, their adaptability(or lack of it) to new challenges, and perhaps most imporantly, their capacity to internalize norms which favor both individual, family and household, and eventually group, national and racial well-being! It may be a lot of things to argue that Africans–in the USA, in Brazil, in the Carribean, in Western Europe, or in Africa itself–have had their difficulties with all of the above, over a very long period of time, but it is certainly NOT racist!

“Pokemon”-whatever that is-has NOTHING to do with it!

At bottom, when all is said and done, calling me a ‘racist” for repeating these observations, when I (and people who agree with me) have absolutely no power to reverse White decline, still less to facilitate any of the attitudes, memes, and customs which will eventually act to generate African (or anybody else’s) progress is absurd. You are simply blaming a thermometer for the cold snap, or blaming a fire alarm for the fire (or the arsonist).

As far as the “list” of stereotypes cited in a post above, all of them were, or are, true, at their time, place and circumstances. It didn’t mean that ALL blacks demonstrated the (mis)behavior indicated, just enough to make a long-lasting impression. Once this impression is widespread and often strongly held, others act upon it. It is a truism that people act, not so much on the facts, but their impressions about the facts (which are sometimes mistaken).

The last point which I shall make here is that NOWHERE have I said that Africans were “inferior”, not on manboobz, and not anywhere else. You critics have! You may have been trying to set up a straw man, being unable or unwilling to come to grips with the problems of our civilizational decline impose, not only upon Africans–or other nonwhites–but upon the immense majorities of Whites as well.These pathologies, and the symptoms created are at their most visible along racial, and perhaps geographical lines, but they are certainly are not limited to race or origin. Neither, however, are the impressions, stereotypes, and attitudes generated by the widespread misbehavior symptomatic of the general, perhaps almost worldwide civilizational decline.

Lastly, a person who believed that Africans (or any other group) was “inferior” wouldn’t bother to talk about civilizational declline, still less wish all the best for the most negatively affected groups. She would simply attribute pathologies to “stereotyping” by evil white folks the way all of you egalitarians have been doing and let it go at that. Who are the REAL bigots? Look in the nearest mirror, all of you!

Human’s evolve, Meller, but not by race. You see evolution is based on genetic mutation, adaptation and migration. Genetically speaking, there is little difference between a white person and a black person, or any other person for that matter. There are black people who are more genetically similar to me as a white person than other white people out there, and vice versa.

Even if your standpoint does not come from a racist place, it doesn’t change the fact that it’s wrong. The fact that you have other people agreeing with you, doesn’t make your standpoint any less incorrect. From a sociological standpoint, your evolution by race idea is harmful. I strongly recommend you look up “eugenics.”

People evolve–at different rates–by type!

DKM, you’re a fucking racist and all, but I just want to throw in:

“Evolution” does not mean “getting better.” Someone who is more “civilized” or “cultured” by whatever standards is not more evolved. That’s not evolutionary biology. That’s Pokemon.

As the human race originated at the same time, all humans have been evolving for exactly the same amount of time. So we’re the same amount “evolved.”

It’s like asking if a cat or a dog is “more evolved.” How the hell would you answer that?

Or more precisely, it’s like asking if a cat or another cat is “more evolved.” They’re both cats, dude.

—

Also, it’s kind of weird and creepy how you keep calling black people “Africans.” A lot of black families have been on this continent two hundred years longer than mine has. But you’re not calling me a European.

” It may be a lot of things to argue that Africans–in the USA, in Brazil, in the Carribean, in Western Europe, or in Africa itself–have had their difficulties with all of the above, over a very long period of time, but it is certainly NOT racist! ”

Hey, Meller? Just repeating things over and over, sometimes with extra capslock, doesn’t make them true. Your entire rant was racist.

(Well, apart from the sexist bit in which you were willing to give zhinxy a chance even though she’s a mere woman, but she betrayed you by making jokes about you with Ami.)

To summarize Mr. Meller: “Blah blah blah I’m massive fucking racist asshole blah blah I’m also a fascist with libertarian pretensions blah blah women suck.”

I have better things to do than be ms.represented(sic) by a she-demagogue who is a feminist first, and an anachist or a libertarian last, if at all!

Meller’s insistence on gendered nouns is sort of hilarious. Is demagoguery inherently male, and that’s why a “she-demagogue” must be distinguished from your ordinary, run-of-the-mill demagogue?

By the way, David K. Meller, you are so, so racist. Every time you come here to post about how totally not racist you are, you come off looking even more racist. I don’t mind, because it’s kind of hilarious to see you keep digging yourself deeper, but I just thought I should tell you in case you thought you were actually convincing people.

You know what makes me happy? The thought that nasty old men like you with your hateful baggage will die out, and no one will really mark your passing. Must drive you nuts to know that your day in the sun is pretty much over.

And that is people like Meller in a nutshell; mean old men resentful to “inferiors” because their ideals of their superiority are not only demonstrably false but shopworn. Meller is a rotting old man, a rotting old decadent man at death’s door whose creativity has long expired.

Meller, you are no libertarian. If you were a libertarian, you wouldn’t be a vile, bigoted cunt who constantly tells other people to live by your petty, narrow, and dogmatic standards. If you were a libertarian you would see past petty labels and stereotypes and be accepting of people as they are. If you were a libertarian, you would actually know something about oppressed and disparaged groups of people rather than making ideological rants which only prove how little you know of real, flesh-and-blood people. If you were a libertarian, you would care about and understand the misunderstood and the downtrodden and not just straight, white males who “can’t be wrong about anything”. If you were a libertarian, you wouldn’t be a pretentious dickbag whose hate-filled propaganda is indistinguishable from the vile ideologies of right-wing authoritarians.

You are not a libertarian, you are a wolf in sheep’s clothing. You wouldn’t know libertarianism if it bit you. Actual libertarianism, not the right-wing bullshit you constantly inure yourself in, is anarchy and the death of “white, male civilization” to you.

P.S. Did you, Meller Boy, that the founders of libertarianism were women? Three women in fact.

Rose Wilder Lane
Ayn Rand
Isabel Patterson

“[Rose Lane] is noted (with Ayn Rand and Isabel Paterson) as one of the founding mothers of the American libertarian movement.”

Lane:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rose_Wilder_Lane

Rand:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ayn_Rand

Patterson:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Isabel_Paterson

Now go shit somewhere else.

DKM is a racist, misogynist, and all around terrible human being.

FACTS.

NOT LIES.

“I have better things to do than be ms.represented by a she-demagogue who is a feminist first, and an anachist or a libertarian last, if at all!”

*dies laughing*

Oh, Meller, you go tell all the dollies and white supremacist what a bad fake libertarian you beat on the internet. I’ll go have a birthday party with my family and then organize some real-world libertarian stuff.

Hmph, imagine a line break in between TROLLING and OR.

Zhinxi, there are quite a few “white supremacists” who are both more consistant and more knowledgable libertarians than you have shown yourself to be. For all of your venom directed against what I have said on manboobz, you can’t cite ONE case where I have argued for, or pushed for coercion in any form, whether with “houses of entertainment”, police and courts–no, Pecunium, they are not, and could not be, “hired bully boys”, they are all well-paid, prestigeous, multidisciplinary experts in conflict resolution. They are selling their EXPERTISE in a free market environment, and their income, as well as the integrity of their ‘brand name’ depends upon how well they avoid the use or threat of force, except as a last resort–insurance services, defence services, a part, but only a small part, of conflict resolution/arbitration that makes up a market based, as opposed to a government monopoly, provision of police, army, or courts, that defaces our current types of society.

How would they be funded? The same way that the provider of ANY goods or services would be “funded” in a laissez-faire, private property based society! Gone shopping lately?

girlygiggles xD–I never said that I was an “expert” in libertarianism! I introduced myself (and liberty) to these pages, and to you manboobzettes, as one who was basically nonpolitical (which I am), and as an admirer of libertarian thinkers, e.g. Murray Rothbard, Ludwig von Mises, Thomas Szasz. et al… which I also am. I am also a resolute supporter of gold as money, which is a sine qua non for devotion to peace, liberty, and prosperity, and you, zhinxi, are the first–and ONLY–libertarian whom I have met anywhere (if you are even one) who is not singlemindedly and wholeheartedly pro-gold 100%! I also have come out for peace, civil liberties, and INDIVIDUAL rights whenever I could. Maybe you think it is “racist” to deny “black rights” or “sexist” to deny “womensrights”, as not existing at all, but it is the most libertarian application of rights theory (and one endorsed by our friend Rothbard), as you would easily know if you had ever read ANYTHING he had written on the subject!

Girlygiggles xD, I hate to “burst your bubble”, but your friend zhinxi, whether I spell her name correctly or not, is either no libertarian at all, or one who is in no position to comment upon another’s supposed ignorance of the subject. If I have been reluctant to point this out before, it is precisely because I have more important things to do, then to defend what shouldn’t have to be defended.

I could go on, but I think that I have made my point. I would put my libertarian

It’s not as if Mellertron had even mentioned “Candlejack” or someth

The guy who directly advocates forced prostitution introduced freedom? That is not freedom by any definition in the real world.