Categories
$MONEY$ antifeminism armageddon chivalry disgusting women evil women I'm totally being sarcastic idiocy it's science! MGTOW misogyny MRA oppressed men precious bodily fluids sex the enigma that is ladies the spearhead vaginas

Uteruses Versus Duderuses

Apparently a lot of ladies have these things living in their lady regions.

Today, more insight into the enigma that is ladies. Our topic? The uterus and its discontents. The uterus, for those who  have not heard of it, is a lady organ that ladies who were born ladies have down in their lady regions. It is used for two purposes: making babies, and oppressing men.

Some ladies, you see, like to trick men into giving up their sperm (or to steal it from them without their knowledge). The ladies somehow use this sperm to grow babies in their uteruses — I’m not sure on all the details here — which they then use to extract money  from men. As is well known, it really doesn’t cost anything to raise a child, and the ladies use most of the so-called child-support they get from men to pay for bon bons and Cadillacs.

It gets worse. According to a dude called Joe Zamboni over on The Spearhead, some of these uterus-having ladies are at risk of developing something called Golden Uterus Syndrome, or GUS. First described by Dr. Tara J. Palmatier, Zamboni notes,

Golden Uterus Syndrome (GUS) occurs when a woman thinks she deserves special privileges just because she has given birth to a child. … Supposedly all sorts of things (like a mother not taking a job, and instead staying at home) are for the benefit of the child, when in reality they are simply a cover for the woman manipulating others to get her way. … So many of these mothers just take, take, take — like parasites.

Even worse, Zamboni explains, is that some women deliberately infect themselves with Golden Uterus Syndrome, thus guaranteeing them a life of ease as a stay-at-home or single mother:

[W]omen all over world are blatantly getting pregnant so that they don’t have to work at a job, so that they can be supported by a man. I’m not going to act like I approve of their behavior to ensnare and enslave a man, so that this man is then forced to pay eighteen years of child support at the very least.

GUS is rampant in the United States. And it’s time for an intervention.

Mothers now enjoy many unwarranted preferences, and it’s time to reestablish a new and more equitable balance.

Luckily, Zamboni explains, we can combat many of the evil effects of GUS simply by acting like assholes.

The fact is that other people, be they men or women, owe nothing to mothers. As the recent Italian ocean liner accident (Costa Concordia) dramatically revealed, chivalry is dead. I won’t give my seat on the bus to a mother who’s standing, and I certainly won’t give my sinking-ship lifeboat seat to a mother.

The social contract between men and women is dead, and feminist women are the ones who killed it. Mothers in general don’t do anything for me (although I appreciate my own, God rest her soul).

Men shouldn’t feel guilty for treating mothers badly. Because feminism.

Once upon a time, there may have been good reason to protect mothers, to support mothers, etc. (I don’t know, I wasn’t there). But that is one hundred or more years ago. Today’s American women claim to be the equals of men, if not better than men. At least in this instance, I am pleased to give them what they say they want (equal treatment).

Motherhood is, after all, a choice, and men really shouldn’t be burdened by any of the costs of human reproduction.

The fact is that modern mothers have a choice to have a child or not. When they have a child, it is their own personal burden that they are taking on — it is their decision to have that baby. I had no part in their past baby making decisions (unfortunately even if I was the contributor of DNA material), and I do not now agree to allow them to off-load the baby-related responsibilities and costs onto me. …

This is fundamentally a question of self-responsibility, and women in general seem loath to take on true self-responsibility. A friend of mine calls it “congenital female selfishness,” but I think it is more like an acculturated selfishness, and a “pussy pass” so that they can get out of trouble, so that they don’t need to grow-up. As long as we men keep playing the mangina and white knight roles, as long as we keep giving all sorts of special treatment to mothers, going out of our way to protect mothers, doing all sorts of special favors for mothers, we feed and perpetuate the GUS fantasy.

And really, why should men have to pay just because some lady wants to take up babymaking as a hobby?

The fact is: the world doesn’t need more children. … Women don’t need to have children. They want children. Having children is a preference, and men are supposed to endlessly indulge women in the fulfillment of this wish. It’s time that the women-having-babies conversation was brought into the realm of public conversation, and then dealt with rationally and responsibly.

It’s time that men got a backbone and refused to endlessly indulge women in their desire for, and rearing of children. In large measure, it is the continued willingness of men to indulge this selfish female desire that has led to our overpopulation problem.

Exactly! It has nothing to do with governments and religious institutions campaigning against birth control and abortion, or any of that stuff. It’s female selfishness, plain and simple.

It’s time for all men to say “no” to women that selfishly keep having babies. It’s time for third party men to say “no” to providing support and protection to mothers who have quite clearly rejected any sort of partnership with a man. It’s time for all men to say “no” to the exploitative demands of these GUS-infected self-serving mothers.

Stirring words indeed.

Naturally, Zamboni’s argument found receptive ears over at The Spearhead.

“Great article Joe,” wrote Pendelton.

The living hell a man goes through where the golden uterus lives on his back and shoulders 24/7, also using his children to dump on and chump off him has got to be comparably unbearable.

And it’s always to be remembered that this type of woman, being a natural mercenary and hostage maker, has the legal violence of the law to back up her nastiness.

Why do people put up with these nagging hoyhums ?

Stonelifter added:

woman have the golden everything syndrome. They think you owe them for life if you had sex with you once; sex which they also enjoyed as well as you.

They make you diner once, you owe them for life

Admittedly, if a woman builds you an entire diner, I think you probably do owe her for that.

Durandal worked in a bit of “we hunted the mammoth for you” as well:

Women’s value is defined by what they have. Which is a vagina, uterus, and babymaking capability. Hence the self-entitlement and the probable evolutionary adaptation of selfishness and reliance on emotional solipsism and manipulation.

Men’s value is defined by what they do. Which is build absolutely everything, provide everything and advance civilization through their effort, rationality, intelligence, courage and sacrifice.

When our fiat monetary system falls apart and our economy winds down (and it will, if it hasn’t already), watch as government mandated entitlements for women from education & employment quotas to divorce court payouts go up in smoke and an immediate desire to reinstate productivity and real wealth (brought to you by patriarchy) returns for good.

Orecret also predicted the end of the world as we know it (and he feels fine):

Sometimes I wonder how much of the tension between women and men and the consequent breakdown of the social contract between them are due to overpopulation on the planet.

A greater population is no longer needed. Babies and children thus have a lower social value… as do WOMEN… and the male-female bond generally.

Women have gained more power due to prosperity and technology. They are currently experiencing what to them seems like a moment of glory. Only they are poised for a great fall as the effects of overpopulation on the planet become more acutely felt.

As elbow room becomes significantly impinged, men will find themselves even less inclined to take on any sort of partnership with a woman, especially where children are concerned. This effectively frees up men to use their time as they see fit as they are not to be burdened with the expenses and responsibilities of marriage, etc.

Men will act less and less in the public sphere. Corporations will have a hard time hiring men to jobs that they neither need nor want having been freed from the burden of family. Armies will shrink due to the lack of will the everyman has in protecting a society where the social contract has broken down much to the detriment of men everywhere.

The society will crash around us. Women will find themselves without male partners in an increasingly harsh social and natural environment. Life will become increasingly difficult for them and they will be (evermore) unhappy.

The MEN will be free and feral. Returned once again to a natural state where the majority of them are the happiest.

It seems a collective Wile E. Coyote moment is about to take place on a global scale.

It’s a good thing that THIS roadrunner has already gone ghost.

Each of these comments got dozens of upvotes on The Spearhead. Spearheaders know good sense when they see it!

 

There is some here.
Subscribe
Notify of
guest

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

533 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
hellkell
hellkell
9 years ago

I don’t know if I’ve told you this lately, Little Lord Fucknut, but you’re really a disgusting human being.

Go back to whatever sewer you crawled out of.

Brandon
Brandon
9 years ago

@Hellkell: No, but I bet a man fucked you when you were crying.

Ah, yes all those imaginary women that I shouted down when they started yelling at me. I think the proper way to handle this from now on is to just start screaming at women that yell at you. Maybe they will stop doing it to other men.

hellkell
hellkell
9 years ago

No, dear, I only fuck considerate men.

Bostonian
9 years ago

So the random crying woman is now a feminist woman?

Yeah, that figures.

So, now that you have confirmed that you are indeed an awful person, why are you still here?

I still do not believe you have ever been within 10 feet of a food pantry, let alone a volunteer, or that you have ever been employed at one.

I am also pretty sure the “encounter” with the apocryphal feminist is completely fictional, as well.

hellkell
hellkell
9 years ago

Ah, yes all those imaginary women that I shouted down when they started yelling at me.

They have good drugs for that now.

Brandon
Brandon
9 years ago

@Bostonian: You jumped to that conclusion…not me.

I am only awful to feminists.

Bostonian
9 years ago

Fucking a crying person is awful. That stands on its own.

You added the additional detail of feminist, so you were the one going there.

I am sure you think you are clever and that you did not say what you actually said.

hellkell
hellkell
9 years ago

Bravo, then. You are officially awful.

Although I doubt it’s just to feminists. You can’t act, as proven by your lame sockpuppetry.

pillowinhell
9 years ago

Beloved says: brandon do you realize that you could be criminally charged for counseling to commit a felony? And, should some one follow what you just said about rape, you could be charged with accessory to crime?

Me: yes brandon, all feminists secrete a lethally toxic substance through our skins.

PosterformerlyknownasElizabeth

Amazing how every one of these types experiences were EXACTLY the same.

Bostonian
9 years ago

Please note that Brandon has not stopped metaphorically fucking the chicken either.

Ashley must be out for a cleaning.

hellkell
hellkell
9 years ago

Who even says “I’d rather fuck a crying woman” or “I bet a man fucked you while you when crying?”

A total fucking asshole, that’s who. Or, Brandon.

I mean, what? You think I’ve been raped? FYI, I haven’t been, but there’s plenty on this board who have been, so fuck you. Do you think that’s funny?

Your mom must be so proud.

Brandon
Brandon
9 years ago

@Bostonian: I have never fucked a crying woman.

I wasn’t conflating crying and feminism. Both comments stand separate from each other.

@Hellkell: Nope, it’s mostly just feminists. Since they hate men so much…who am I to deny them?

hellkell
hellkell
9 years ago

Bostonian: that poor chicken.

hellkell
hellkell
9 years ago

Ah, so you’re just, like, giving the people what they want, amirite, Little Lord Fucknut?

Why do you come here? Don’t you have a girlfriend to spank?

Brandon
Brandon
9 years ago

@Hellkell: I am sympathetic to rape victims…as long as they aren’t feminists.

@Pillow: And what crime should I be charged with?

pillowinhell
9 years ago

Reading comprehension Brandon. What is it?

Brandon
Brandon
9 years ago

@Pillow: It’s when you skim across text and notice a few predominate keywords. Right? No. Boo

hellkell
hellkell
9 years ago

Sure you are, Brandon. Unfortunately, they don’t ask rape victims if they’re feminists, so I’ll say you’re lying as usual. Filth.

PosterformerlyknownasElizabeth

Your mom must be so proud.

Apparently his mother is a feminist. Which makes his comments regarding his full throat support for men raping feminists even more disgusting if that is possible.

pillowinhell
9 years ago

Actually brandon, the crime you should be charged with is criminal stupidity. Unfortunately that one hasn’t made it into the law books.

Brandon
Brandon
9 years ago

@Hellkell: Oh, I just assume women aren’t feminists until proven otherwise.

@Elizabeth: Well, feminists are always saying men want to put them in their place…I just want to make you guys honest and not liars.

PosterformerlyknownasElizabeth

@Elizabeth: Well, feminists are always saying men want to put them in their place…I just want to make you guys honest and not liars.

You mean next to women and not above or below them?

How does that relate to you being in such favor of your own mother to be raped?

Brandon
Brandon
9 years ago

@Elizabeth: My mother doesn’t label herself as a feminist.

Molly Ren
9 years ago

Okay, I think this is the worst/best gaff Brandon has ever made. He supports raping feminists… which means he supports his mother getting raped. I feel evil for being amused by this.

Bostonian
9 years ago

So we have established, once again, that Brandon is a horrible person who hates women who want to vote and have bodily autonomy.

Why I am not surprised?

Molly Ren
9 years ago

You know we’re never going to let this die, Brandon? It’ll be like Meller laughing at cancer victims: we never, ever let him forget it whenever he shows up here.

hellkell
hellkell
9 years ago

Brandon, so you call your mom a feminist but she doesn’t label herself one? Who’s lying here?

I’m not the only who read you saying your mom’s a feminist.

hellkell
hellkell
9 years ago

Outside of feminist sites, do you loudly proclaim your support of raping feminists, Brandon?

Brandon
Brandon
9 years ago

@Molly: Whatever. In fact, please don’t. As long as you also remember the main keyword…feminists.

@Hellkell: My mother tries to adhere to feminist principles, but she doesn’t label herself as one. She’s like a feminist in denial.

PosterformerlyknownasElizabeth

@Elizabeth: My mother doesn’t label herself as a feminist.

But you labelled her as a feminist. Which means you want your own mother raped.

cloudiah
cloudiah
9 years ago

Brandon supports raping his own mother, because he’s decided she’s a feminist? What a vile piece of crap he is. Advocating for the rape of any class of people is beyond the pale, but when that class includes your own mother that is some truly world class psychopathy.

Brandon
Brandon
9 years ago

@Hellkell: Outside of feminist sites…I don’t really talk about rape. It seems only feminists (and a few MRA’s) are obsessed with rape.

darksidecat
9 years ago

@Hellkell: No, but I bet a man fucked you when you were crying.

Brandon needs banned for that. Directly attacking another commenter by mockingly suggesting they have been raped crosses a line.

Brandon
Brandon
9 years ago

@Elizabeth: She’s in denial…which means she can be swayed.

@Cloudiah: Family and friends excluded.

Brandon
Brandon
9 years ago

@Darksidecat: It’s not really “attacking”…more like making wild accusations.

Bostonian
9 years ago

She can be persuaded to accept second class citizenship! Because Brandon says so.

PosterformerlyknownasElizabeth

@Elizabeth: She’s in denial…which means she can be swayed.

That is not the relevant point here Brandon-you said and I quote “my mom is a feminist.” And then you said, again, I quote “I support feminists being raped.”

Which means that you do, in fact, support your own mother being raped.

@Cloudiah: Family and friends excluded.

Nope, you said it-you want your own mother to be raped because she is a feminist. I think you should do what you are probably incapable of doing and admitting this was a stupid and shitty thing to say.

I promise it will not hurt to say “I was wrong, I actually do not support that and I am sorry that I let myself get carried away to such extremes.”

hellkell
hellkell
9 years ago

Brandon, you can call that a a wild accusation, but look around at the venue, dipshit.

Brandon
Brandon
9 years ago

@Elizabeth: Umm…I get to make my own rules. My idea, my rules. And if I want to make exceptions, I can.

hellkell
hellkell
9 years ago

Just for posterity, Brandon’s stance this evening:

“I support feminists being raped.”

Yeah, this is his laughing at cancer moment.

Holly Pervocracy
9 years ago

Holy fucking fuckshit, Brandon just went from “I won’t open doors for women” to mocking rape victims in like ten seconds flat.

He can pretty much fucking go away now.

(I like to believe that MRAs are only so cavalier about rape because they somehow don’t understand that it’s a thing that happens to real people in the real world. It’s just this highly theoretical bargaining chip for gender arguments. This is what I try to believe so that I don’t have to think about worse possibilities.)

cloudiah
cloudiah
9 years ago

Seriously, what are the criteria for getting banned around here? This has crossed some big lines! Darksidecat is right.

Brandon
Brandon
9 years ago

@Hellkell: The venue? A bunch of feminists

PosterformerlyknownasElizabeth

@Elizabeth: Umm…I get to make my own rules. My idea, my rules. And if I want to make exceptions, I can.

Nope, you do not. Because you said “feminists being raped” and if you also say “mom is a feminist” it means you include her in the pool of women that you are gleefully saying should be raped.

Holly Pervocracy
9 years ago

Brandon, what in the hell do you think a feminist even is that she deserves this?

Because I stand pretty fast in believing that people who are in prison–like, people who are in prison for murder–shouldn’t be raped.

What the fucking fuck do you think a feminist is that’s worse than a murderer?

cloudiah
cloudiah
9 years ago

How are those rapists supposed to know which feminists are off limits? You are really vile, and illogical to boot.

Brandon
Brandon
9 years ago

@Elizabeth: And what part of “my mother does not call herself a feminist” are you not getting?

PosterformerlyknownasElizabeth

@Elizabeth: And what part of “my mother does not call herself a feminist” are you not getting?

Oh I get that you claim she does not call herself that. But you do. And you think she should be raped since you believe feminists should be raped and you say she is a feminist.

cloudiah
cloudiah
9 years ago

Brandon defined his mother as a feminist. Brandon thinks it is a good idea for men to rape feminists, if they can get away with it. These are the facts. I have a terrible sinus infection, but right now the shit that is draining from my nose is closer to being human than this dude. Sorry for the TMI.