So Alexander Ryking is a Tumblr blogger and one of Tumblr’s community “editors” for politics. He thinks of himself as a liberal.
He is also a raging misogynist who regularly calls women “cunts” and tells feminists to “kill yourselves you feminazi twats.”
In recent days he’s turned his douchebag-o-meter up to 11. As a result, there’s now a petition up on Change.org to have him removed as a politics editor on Tumblr. It’s already gotten more than 3000 signatures, with several hundred new signatures added in the time it’s taken me to write this post.
Here’s unknowable woman, a frequent target of his cyber-wrath, with more details on his recent meltdown. (Read the post on her Tumblr blog for links to the evidence of his douchebaggery.)
Alexander Ryking, who has a history of attempting to silence women bloggers (he told Jess of STFUConservatives and the other “feminazis” to “go kill themselves” several months ago, and has also been rude to women of color but I haven’t been on Tumblr long enough to have personally witnessed that), defended The Amazing’s Atheist’s violent rape threats on Reddit by tagging his posts with “I support TAA.”
I and many, many other Tumblr users were disgusted by this, so we decided to tag our criticisms of Ryking that night with “Ryking’s banana republic”—a reference to his co-opting of [social justice] concepts, NOT a homophobic dig, and the person who coined it was a queer man anyway. Someone also wrote a few jokingly romantic lines about Ryking’s blind defense of TAA and new atheism, and Ryking interpreted this as homophobic and misandric…it wasn’t, but because I reblogged it, Ryking insists that I am now a homophobe, which is hilarious given my own sexual identity but whatever.
We also responded to some of his posts with pictures of extreme close-ups of our eyes.
Seriously. That is what this guy is calling “abuse.”
We did NOT threaten him, make personal attacks against his sexuality, tell him to go kill himself, send him rude messages, or commit any other acts that could reasonably be interpreted as the “cyberbullying” Ryking claims it is. I did temporarily change my URL to rykingsbananarepublic and I make no apologies for that. Why should I? Why shouldn’t a group of feminists and their allies be allowed to respond creatively to misogyny? The only actual cyberbullying that has taken place was TAA’s initial rape threats on Reddit; I wouldn’t even go so far as to claim Ryking’s tweets to me and other Twitter users are cyberbullying, though I leave it up to the other people who were insulted by him to label their experiences as bullying or not.
Anyway, a few nights later, I tweeted something in defense of Whitney Houston’s legacy, and suddenly there was Ryking going ballistic. He found me on Twitter, called me a cunt right off the bat, and insisted that I claimed Whitney Houston’s death was “more important than the death of 5,000 Syrians” (I didn’t! Here is what I actually said!). I had never exchanged tweets with this man before, and was confused about his sudden interest in my thoughts about Whitney Houston and Syria. Naturally, I responded, told him how wrong he was, and the next day I screencapped some of the things he said and posted them … I never expected that post to get the amount of notes it did, but I think that just goes to show how widespread the dislike for him is.
Ryking, for his part, has responded to the widespread criticism by striking the pose of a victim, and pretending that it is somehow all related to race. Apparently, the evil feminazis are impugning his white manhood, though he’s not white.
So-called feminists have subjected me to white-bashing comments (even though I’m Hispanic) and sexist attacks impugning my manhood (slash-fiction scenes featuring me and heterosexual men; being called faggot; being told to man-up; insults about my body;) by people who don’t realize I’m gay. After nearly two decades online, I learned early on that when you’re attacked, you defend yourself by attacking right back and just as viciously, if not more so. And that’s what exactly what I’ve done. …
What’s really at issue here is not my rude behavior but that you and others like you want to punish any man who refuses to conform to your rancid, misandrist orthodoxy by discounting everything he says and using his gender and race as the excuse for doing so. …
You don’t want me stripped of my editorial privilege based on my behavior but because I reject your sick, bigoted, misandrist (per)version of feminism.
Yep, apparently the dude who loves to call women “cunts” is the final arbiter of what is and what isn’t “true feminism.” Who knew?
I signed the petition. How about you?
$10 says the ways women are privileged over him is that we all look like Katy Perry and have the privilege of wantonly and maliciously not being attracted to insufficiently Brad-Pitt-like men.
I just went outside. Didn’t see any misandry. I did meet my new neighbor, though. Nice guy. If course as an evil misandrist I totally didn’t say hi to him or let him know that he’s free to come find me if he needs anything while settling in.
Also! He was painting the house, since his wife/girlfriend wasn’t able to get the day off work (she’s going to help tomorrow). Misandry! This means that companies favor women, somehow!
@ Shadow
Not yet, but maybe! I dunno, lots of things to consider, it’s a complicated decision. But we do spend all our days off with each other, so…
Better off? Well, I probably wouldn’t have this shitty ass job, for one, because without going too much into it women around here do different work, part-time stuff while they’re supported by their husbands working 9 hour days. And then of course the media demonizes them for not spending all their time with their kids…
@ Belle
Thank you! “Deep seeded” is one of those really common mistakes that annoys the hell out of me. Also see “looser” instead of “loser”.
Not MRAL… that is a good way to dismiss me, though.
Nathan, you have a high IQ, surely you can do better.
Oh, come on. Even if you’re not MRAL, everything you say is not grounded in Earth reality so it’s easy to dismiss you.
Heehee. He thinks that even if we were wrong about his exact identity, it wouldn’t be damning to be mistaken for the village idiot’s sockpuppet.
Well, if you’re not gonna go into it, there wasn’t much point in bringing it up was there? Fair warning, we have posters from Cali right here so if you DO go into it, you best be ready to back shit up
@CassandraSays
Here’s hoping! 😀
Well, no, because feminists have a funny habit of dismissing any objection to their dogmatic bullshit as “trolling”. I’ve read some of MRAL’s comments on A Voice for Men and a few here; he didn’t seem like a village idiot.
HEEHEEHEEHEE. OK, stop. You’re killing me.
MRAL didn’t seem like the village idiot? OK, true, our village is large and has more than one, but COME ON, SON.
MRAL, your sockpuppet is weak sauce at defending you. He just damned you with faint praise.
Hello mra
Your privileged is showing, you might want to put that away….
Well, again, I haven’t read the comments here much, but his posts at A Voice for Men were intelligent, in my opinion. He was critical of them, more often than not, and I generally agreed.
HAHAHAHAHAHAHA OMG mral stoppppp you are killing meee
MRAL, a hint for the next time you sockpuppet: 9 hours 4-5 days a week is a pretty ordinary work week. It’s certainly respectable, I’m not saying it’s slacking or anything, but if you want to sink to NWO-like depths of “I WORK 800 HOURS A WEEK BECAUSE WOMEN,” you have to aim a little higher than that.
Another hint: Don’t sockpuppet again. The problem with you is the way you act, not just that we flipped a coin and randomly decided to dislike people named MRAL, and a million new names and stories won’t change the way you act.
All right, this has devolved into people accusing me of being someone else, and there’s no longer any point to debating. I’m never seen such a dogmatic internet community in my life. Enjoy your victim complexes, they don’t hold up in the real world. At least Sady fucking Doyle is funny in her stupidity. Good fucking riddance.
Also, mral posts on AVFM?
BYE, MRAL! Don’t call, don’t write.
LOLLLLL. Particularly funny for someone that claims to have read more AVfM than manboobz.
Well said laddy buck, well said
MRAL has posted there, Jumbofish, and he said it was critical.
So I’ve been imagining all the sexist, homophobia, racism, abelism, and transphobia I’ve seen?and the ones I’ve faces myself?
*faced
Nathan, I’ll give you the benefit of the doubt just because, and assume you don’t know MRAl that way.
He trolled us at first and then admitted to doing so. I thought maybe he was just misguided and had some anger issues to work out. For a little while he made average posts contributing as others did to the conversation. Then he said some stupid things. And refused to acknowledge his error. The more he was reminded of his mistakes, the angrier he became, until he was back to square one with his trolling. And I’m not saying “He argued against feminist dogma”. He was being very erratic and saying things he obviously didn’t mean.
that well*
My brain is fried today. I just started a temp. job where I’m basically a data monkey pressing Ctr C, Crtrl V for 8 hours a day.
Minor point of interest: “MRAL” is an acronym, not the poster in question’s actual username. Nathan did not hesitate for a moment in knowing whom we were talking about, despite this. Which is kind of odd – I mean, if I’d only read “a few” comments here, I would be very unlikely to know who “DKM” or “DSC” or “PFKAE” or any other poster whose name is routinely shortened to an acronym were off the top of my head. That almost seems like something someone who was here regularly would do, doesn’t it? Hmm…who was here regularly, likes to snipe about Cassandra’s love life, whines about “male disposability,” thinks his life would be easier if he were a woman, and thinks MRAL is a smart guy?