So Alexander Ryking is a Tumblr blogger and one of Tumblr’s community “editors” for politics. He thinks of himself as a liberal.
He is also a raging misogynist who regularly calls women “cunts” and tells feminists to “kill yourselves you feminazi twats.”
In recent days he’s turned his douchebag-o-meter up to 11. As a result, there’s now a petition up on Change.org to have him removed as a politics editor on Tumblr. It’s already gotten more than 3000 signatures, with several hundred new signatures added in the time it’s taken me to write this post.
Here’s unknowable woman, a frequent target of his cyber-wrath, with more details on his recent meltdown. (Read the post on her Tumblr blog for links to the evidence of his douchebaggery.)
Alexander Ryking, who has a history of attempting to silence women bloggers (he told Jess of STFUConservatives and the other “feminazis” to “go kill themselves” several months ago, and has also been rude to women of color but I haven’t been on Tumblr long enough to have personally witnessed that), defended The Amazing’s Atheist’s violent rape threats on Reddit by tagging his posts with “I support TAA.”
I and many, many other Tumblr users were disgusted by this, so we decided to tag our criticisms of Ryking that night with “Ryking’s banana republic”—a reference to his co-opting of [social justice] concepts, NOT a homophobic dig, and the person who coined it was a queer man anyway. Someone also wrote a few jokingly romantic lines about Ryking’s blind defense of TAA and new atheism, and Ryking interpreted this as homophobic and misandric…it wasn’t, but because I reblogged it, Ryking insists that I am now a homophobe, which is hilarious given my own sexual identity but whatever.
We also responded to some of his posts with pictures of extreme close-ups of our eyes.
Seriously. That is what this guy is calling “abuse.”
We did NOT threaten him, make personal attacks against his sexuality, tell him to go kill himself, send him rude messages, or commit any other acts that could reasonably be interpreted as the “cyberbullying” Ryking claims it is. I did temporarily change my URL to rykingsbananarepublic and I make no apologies for that. Why should I? Why shouldn’t a group of feminists and their allies be allowed to respond creatively to misogyny? The only actual cyberbullying that has taken place was TAA’s initial rape threats on Reddit; I wouldn’t even go so far as to claim Ryking’s tweets to me and other Twitter users are cyberbullying, though I leave it up to the other people who were insulted by him to label their experiences as bullying or not.
Anyway, a few nights later, I tweeted something in defense of Whitney Houston’s legacy, and suddenly there was Ryking going ballistic. He found me on Twitter, called me a cunt right off the bat, and insisted that I claimed Whitney Houston’s death was “more important than the death of 5,000 Syrians” (I didn’t! Here is what I actually said!). I had never exchanged tweets with this man before, and was confused about his sudden interest in my thoughts about Whitney Houston and Syria. Naturally, I responded, told him how wrong he was, and the next day I screencapped some of the things he said and posted them … I never expected that post to get the amount of notes it did, but I think that just goes to show how widespread the dislike for him is.
Ryking, for his part, has responded to the widespread criticism by striking the pose of a victim, and pretending that it is somehow all related to race. Apparently, the evil feminazis are impugning his white manhood, though he’s not white.
So-called feminists have subjected me to white-bashing comments (even though I’m Hispanic) and sexist attacks impugning my manhood (slash-fiction scenes featuring me and heterosexual men; being called faggot; being told to man-up; insults about my body;) by people who don’t realize I’m gay. After nearly two decades online, I learned early on that when you’re attacked, you defend yourself by attacking right back and just as viciously, if not more so. And that’s what exactly what I’ve done. …
What’s really at issue here is not my rude behavior but that you and others like you want to punish any man who refuses to conform to your rancid, misandrist orthodoxy by discounting everything he says and using his gender and race as the excuse for doing so. …
You don’t want me stripped of my editorial privilege based on my behavior but because I reject your sick, bigoted, misandrist (per)version of feminism.
Yep, apparently the dude who loves to call women “cunts” is the final arbiter of what is and what isn’t “true feminism.” Who knew?
I signed the petition. How about you?
@Bostonian:
To be fair, AVFM would probably just ban you.
@Holly Pervocracy, but that’s not universally true. In some situations, or some circumstances, it would be better to be female than male. I don’t think you can make this case with other forms of oppression This is what I mean when I say gender is more give-and-take.
Again- deny all you want. Outside the little radical feminist bubble people know I’m correct. Even if many women do identify as feminist, most are not going to hold the ridiculous male-victim-erasing, misandry-erasing views that you hardcore dudez do here. Deal with it, dickhead.
Cassandra, again, I was just saying how I thought you had a good life. I don’t see the deeper meaning here.
Aaaaaaaaaaaaand you still are basically not listening to a god damn thing.
Honestly? Learning to use a proxy or spoof an IP is easy peasy. Forget the cassandra fetish, he’s repeating his David Foster Wallace rant nearly verbatim. I’m willing to let folks slide on “Male disposability”, which is where everyone else’s cockles raise (Because for real, it’s an idiotic argument by someone marginally more famous than MRAL) but now we’re at his favorite hunting grounds.
In what exact situations is it better to be female than male?
Shorther Nathan – If I backpedal hard enough about my little tantrum everyone will totally forget it and not notice what it indicates about my butthurt assumptions about feminists!
Also, there is no anti-gay backlash, and abortion isn’t worth discussing in the context of cultural misogyny. Because I have said so many times, so it must be true.
Why is everyone being so meaaannn to me?
Name one.
“Trying to get a job in a well-paid field” ain’t it. Nor is “trying to get taken seriously at your job.” And “trying to start a family while still advancing in your career” is right the hell out.
I wouldn’t try “trying to report a crime against yourself” either. “Trying to get basic health care?” Nope.
Definitely wouldn’t try “trying to be taken seriously as a writer, artist, or public figure.”
Okay, I’ve been ignoring this bullshit until now because it wasn’t relevant, but I’m not MRAL. Maybe you should stop publicly speculating and engage as a thinker.
@ Rutee
This one has a lot of MRAL’s verbal tics, actually. I think it’s him and he’s just gotten better at sockpuppeting. Apart from anyone else, I doubt that anyone who lives in CA would have come up with the idea that there’s no organized backlash against gay rights, given the whole ballot measure issue.
Wait… now we’re all dudez? Would it kill you to use the word “people” or “feminists,” Nathan?
“n some situations, or some circumstances, it would be better to be female than male. I don’t think you can make this case with other forms of oppression This is what I mean when I say gender is more give-and-take.”
Actually, you can certainly make this case with any other form of oppression. The world is so vast that you could take anybody of any makeup and find somebody who’s worse off than them.
Privilege… You keep using that word. I do not think it means what you think it means.
I’m thinking this is MRAL.
Aw, snookums, do you mean in DATING, pehaps? Dream the fuck on.
He’s going to use the draft of course, despite having heard the lecture on the impossibility of being drafted in the modern era a dozen times, and never offering a good argument against it.*
*WEll, you can be if you’re African or North Korean, but I know for a fact the africans press-gang women into their armies as well, so…
HAHAHA, I’ll speculate all I want about you, Nathan.
DEAL WITH IT, DICKHEAD.
Ah, yes, Rutee, the draft. Is that horse dead yet? It sure is beaten.
@Holly Pervocracy- Anything to do with child custody or being a parent.
It is in fact easier to be published as a woman, because the industry has a perception that women do most of the reading, and prefer the writing of other women (JK Rowling is a kid’s author; that’s a different beast, indeed, men are privileged there because the stereotype is that boys won’t read girls’ books).
These are just off the top of my head.
We’re not yelling dude, we’re laughing. And you have yet to show systematic bias that disadvantages a majority of men. The whole childcare thing a) doesn’t affect everyone, I have had to deal with it but others have not dealt with the same prejudices (I think Pecunium mentioned being an au pere and not having to deal with any paranoia) b) only affects those fathers that are looking to do a majority of the child care or those men that are looking to go into professional childcare which is by no means a majority of men. The flipside of that argument (that women are the ones that are competent enough to do childcare) has heavily disadvantaged a majority of women by putting them in a box as far as what they can and should do is concerned, and causing social pressure to do the majority of childcare.
Nathan: EVERYTHING IS RIGHT BECAUSE I SAY SO AND BECAUSE I IMAGINE THAT PEOPLE AGREE WITH ME
Well…ok, people agree with him on Feminism being this EEEEEEEEEEVIL thing, but that’s not an indication of that opinion being right. Truth isn’t a matter of a simple mathematics, dude.
>Stop speculating
>Engage as a thinker
My kingdom for a video of Jon Stewart saying “Go onnnnn” in his best patronizing voice XD
“It is in fact easier to be published as a woman, because the industry has a perception that women do most of the reading, and prefer the writing of other women (JK Rowling is a kid’s author; that’s a different beast, indeed, men are privileged there because the stereotype is that boys won’t read girls’ books).”
…
I’m sorry, where the fuck is this even from?
I am loling my ass off right now. I mean, seriously, what?
I’m smelling MRAL now.
And I have a high IQ.
@CassandraSays
I remember you mentioning talking to your ex again so when I saw you mention your husbands I thought you two crazy kids had gotten hitched and started doing a “WHEEE” dance for you, which I can’t seem to stop because I’m baked to shit. I anticipate a fun hour!
OK. I’ve ben getting a bit heated again. I still maintain that gender privilege is not a one-way street. Hellkell- dating, maybe in a sense harder for men, but then again women need to wait for an approach, so that has to be difficult. Let’s call that one even.
Nathan says he’s not MRAL, but at this point…yeah, there isn’t exactly a shortage of cluelessness in the world, but still.
Wasnt there a recent free thinking troll? Also Holly, just cause you have a high IQ doesn’t mean you can always tell who is and isn’t an MRAL!
And yes, that is misandrist
You all forget- I AGREE that misogyny is more prevalent. I just disagree that misandry is nonexistent. That’s ridiculous. Come on. Go outside.