So Alexander Ryking is a Tumblr blogger and one of Tumblr’s community “editors” for politics. He thinks of himself as a liberal.
He is also a raging misogynist who regularly calls women “cunts” and tells feminists to “kill yourselves you feminazi twats.”
In recent days he’s turned his douchebag-o-meter up to 11. As a result, there’s now a petition up on Change.org to have him removed as a politics editor on Tumblr. It’s already gotten more than 3000 signatures, with several hundred new signatures added in the time it’s taken me to write this post.
Here’s unknowable woman, a frequent target of his cyber-wrath, with more details on his recent meltdown. (Read the post on her Tumblr blog for links to the evidence of his douchebaggery.)
Alexander Ryking, who has a history of attempting to silence women bloggers (he told Jess of STFUConservatives and the other “feminazis” to “go kill themselves” several months ago, and has also been rude to women of color but I haven’t been on Tumblr long enough to have personally witnessed that), defended The Amazing’s Atheist’s violent rape threats on Reddit by tagging his posts with “I support TAA.”
I and many, many other Tumblr users were disgusted by this, so we decided to tag our criticisms of Ryking that night with “Ryking’s banana republic”—a reference to his co-opting of [social justice] concepts, NOT a homophobic dig, and the person who coined it was a queer man anyway. Someone also wrote a few jokingly romantic lines about Ryking’s blind defense of TAA and new atheism, and Ryking interpreted this as homophobic and misandric…it wasn’t, but because I reblogged it, Ryking insists that I am now a homophobe, which is hilarious given my own sexual identity but whatever.
We also responded to some of his posts with pictures of extreme close-ups of our eyes.
Seriously. That is what this guy is calling “abuse.”
We did NOT threaten him, make personal attacks against his sexuality, tell him to go kill himself, send him rude messages, or commit any other acts that could reasonably be interpreted as the “cyberbullying” Ryking claims it is. I did temporarily change my URL to rykingsbananarepublic and I make no apologies for that. Why should I? Why shouldn’t a group of feminists and their allies be allowed to respond creatively to misogyny? The only actual cyberbullying that has taken place was TAA’s initial rape threats on Reddit; I wouldn’t even go so far as to claim Ryking’s tweets to me and other Twitter users are cyberbullying, though I leave it up to the other people who were insulted by him to label their experiences as bullying or not.
Anyway, a few nights later, I tweeted something in defense of Whitney Houston’s legacy, and suddenly there was Ryking going ballistic. He found me on Twitter, called me a cunt right off the bat, and insisted that I claimed Whitney Houston’s death was “more important than the death of 5,000 Syrians” (I didn’t! Here is what I actually said!). I had never exchanged tweets with this man before, and was confused about his sudden interest in my thoughts about Whitney Houston and Syria. Naturally, I responded, told him how wrong he was, and the next day I screencapped some of the things he said and posted them … I never expected that post to get the amount of notes it did, but I think that just goes to show how widespread the dislike for him is.
Ryking, for his part, has responded to the widespread criticism by striking the pose of a victim, and pretending that it is somehow all related to race. Apparently, the evil feminazis are impugning his white manhood, though he’s not white.
So-called feminists have subjected me to white-bashing comments (even though I’m Hispanic) and sexist attacks impugning my manhood (slash-fiction scenes featuring me and heterosexual men; being called faggot; being told to man-up; insults about my body;) by people who don’t realize I’m gay. After nearly two decades online, I learned early on that when you’re attacked, you defend yourself by attacking right back and just as viciously, if not more so. And that’s what exactly what I’ve done. …
What’s really at issue here is not my rude behavior but that you and others like you want to punish any man who refuses to conform to your rancid, misandrist orthodoxy by discounting everything he says and using his gender and race as the excuse for doing so. …
You don’t want me stripped of my editorial privilege based on my behavior but because I reject your sick, bigoted, misandrist (per)version of feminism.
Yep, apparently the dude who loves to call women “cunts” is the final arbiter of what is and what isn’t “true feminism.” Who knew?
I signed the petition. How about you?
“DSC, as I’ve said, I reject the notion that gender privilege exists in such absolutes. That’s simply wrong- and most people agree with me.”
Most people agree with me when I say that Dark Chocolate + Rasberries = Yum.
Deal with it, philistines.
/makes just as much sense.
I also like how you assume I’m privileged, despite the fact that you know fucking nothing about me.
Cassandra, I referenced your life as being privileged, one of which may includes a successful social life, whiteness, straightness, or whatever. Of course, I don’t actually know that- it was a dumb tangent.
@Holly Pervocracy- It’s an antifeminist resentment, not an anti-woman resentment. You guys just spent hours explaining how misandry isn’t valid when it only affects “a subset of the male population”; you don’t get to turn it around here. Deal with it, bubba.
So Nathan, are you saying that you are something other than a cis white dude with access to a computer and a regular source of income?
So your basis for deciding that feminism has gone too far is that a lot of MEN are opposed to it?!!!
A lot of White people were opposed to ending slavery as well. And a shit ton of heterosexuals are opposed to the idea that homosexuality is not a perversion.
You are a man. Therefore, you are the privileged gender.
If you are a man of less privileged race, class, economic status, disability status, and sexuality… you are still the privileged gender.
“Privileged” isn’t some insult that everyone either is or isn’t. Everyone has some privileges and not others. You have, at a minimum, the privilege of being the gender whose basic human rights aren’t controversial.
I just don’t believe that, BlackBloc.
Nathan in a nutshell.
Well, I don’t have access to a regular source of income, but that’s really none of your business.
And Shadow- the difference is, these guys aren’t *against women’s rights*. What is there to be against? Women aren’t enslaved; no one thinks women are a perversion. It’s not ABOUT women, it’s about this movement. They dislike what they see as basically a political tool to prioritize females above others.
Folks, watch out, Nathan used a YOUTUBE VIDEO to prove us wrong.
He is so educated.
Also, are we sure this isn’t MRAL? I notice he’s steering the conversation towards “But what about meeeeeee?”
Also, I note that you have not answered CassandraSays about what actual feminist literature you have read. Tigerbeatdown is a good blog, but you were asked about books specifically.
Nathan, feminism is a political tool to reduce violence and discrimination against women.
Deal with it, bubba!
Deal with it, bubba!
DEAL WITH IT BUBBA
@Holly Pervocracy- Are you telling me that, in a modern society, women’s “basic human rights” are not controversial? And please point to something other than the abortion debate. This is the kind of ridiculous overstatement that people point to when they talk about how feminism sucks.
“Gay opposition comes from a rapidly dwindling conservative sect, and it’s terrible- don’t get me wrong- but it’s not the same thing.”
Gay marriage; still not legal. Don’t Ask Don’t Tell, reversed but with a political candidate (Santorum) vowing to restore it if he were elected. Gay bullying and suicides in certain areas of the country, still a big fucking problem. This is what the concept of privilege is supposed to point out to you; if you are not living in an area where this stuff is going on (and it is going on), you don’t have a right to say it isn’t a big issue not only because it is untrue, but because you won’t be able to see it from your position.
Re The steak derail, yep, steak is still a luxury food to a lot of people. My Dad grew up working class in Scotland and still sees it as a treat food, as do most of his family. Including my stepmother, which led to an amusing incident in which we were eating in a fancy Peruvian place and she refused to let Dad order the pork chop on the grounds that pork chops aren’t fancy enough to justify those prices (but it was fine to order the steak, which was more expensive). My husband got the pork chop, which Dad tasted a bit of and then spent the rest of the meal staring at and coveting, because it was better than the steak. Which everyone else tried to convince my stepmother that it probably would be, but nope, in her mind steak is fancy food and pork chops are plain, cheap food that you don’t order in a restaurant.
Ooo, ooo, I know this one: Is it that you’re making shit up from your opposite world? 😀 😀 😀
Reality is that which does not go away just because you stop believing in it.
You can reject it all you want, but until you actually provide some evidence, you’re still just a clown X3
It’s so cute when ickle nathan pretends he’s established ‘misandry’ to the level misogyny has, isn’t it?
Don’t worry, soon we can give you babby’s first research engine and maybe you can work out what a fact is 😀
“the difference is, these guys aren’t *against women’s rights*. What is there to be against? Women aren’t enslaved; no one thinks women are a perversion. It’s not ABOUT women, it’s about this movement. They dislike what they see as basically a political tool to prioritize females above others.”
I’m butting in, and I’m probably be ignored, but…
How is denying the right to an abortion NOT about women?
How is slut-shaming NOT about women?
How is grading a woman’s ability/intelligence, based on their sex/gender, NOT about them being a woman?
Because that’s the type of shit that’s flying, and which you’re defending when talking about how ALL MEN (according to you) are resentful towards feminism.
*previous statement and quote directed @Nathan
Wait, because something is disliked, it should be prohibited or what exactly are you saying?
Feminism is disliked because it still is the radical notion that women are people. And too many people think that is unfair to have to treat women as people.
Also, there fucking is a lot of widespread animosity towards the LGBT activists. Rolling Stone magazine had an article on it this week.
Nathan, stop saying that everyone agrees with you. Unless you have national poll data, you are just making a meaningless, empty claim. Anyone could say that.
Here, I’ll make a counter-claim. Most people actually disagree with everything you say they agree with and I know this for a fact. What now? It’s your word against mine. It appears that we are at an impasse.
So there is no fight for abortion rights, or OTC birth control? Women are no longer seen as inferior when it comes to leadership? All rape victims are treated fairly, none are blamed for bringing their rape upon themselves. There is gender parity in rape stats and DV stats. Right?
“Women as people”, come on dude. No one thinks women aren’t people, at least nowhere that any of you guys live.
@katz:
Actually you have more evidence for your side at the moment, given that pretty much everyone here who has been speaking disagrees with Nathan. 😛
Wahahahahahaha
Ahahahahahahahaha
Oh man, this twit is gold.
““Women as people”, come on dude. No one thinks women aren’t people, at least nowhere that any of you guys live.”
Have you been watching/reading/listening to the news at any time this week?
Or even at all?