Let’s celebrate this lovely February day with some random stupidity from Alcuin, a brave anti-misandrist intellectual titan who is single handedly bringing about what he calls “the Intellectual Renaissance of the Western Tradition.” Mostly by blathering on and on about how much ladies suck.
Some highlights from recent posts.
The history of achievement is, in fact, the history of male achievement to such an extent that, were women absent from human history, we might still be where we are today, but were men absent from history, da wimmin would be in the caves, screeching ‘n hollering at each other. …
Dante wrote the Divine Comedy. Feminists crafted VAWA, the beginning of the end of western freedom.
Shakespeare changed the English language. Sharon Osbourne laughs about the female mutilation of men.
Socrates established a way of thinking and reflection on the virtues that still inspires us. Women falsely accuse men of rape on a weekly or even daily basis.
Feminism is the KKK with tits. The only difference is that western women don’t have any shame, so don’t cover up with white bedsheets. They are openly supremacist. That is why their starting point parallels the KKK, but they tend towards Nazism as well. The Hitlerists were no more ashamed of their supremacism than western women are of theirs. Both bigoted groups, in fact, are quite proud of their prejudicial thinking.
Racial supremacists running around with bedsheets are cockroachy – they run to the darkness whenever light is shed on them. Feminists, like Nazis, prefer the limelight. Will we soon see Nazi-like rallies with tens of thousands of banshees and their manginic self-hating male bozos?
Everybody Loves Raymond, and your female supremacist mom
Men are made into buffoons by Hollywood because male buffoonery sells. Women eat it up as greedily as they inhale chocolate cake and buy useless luxury goods. “Everybody Loves Raymond” is Everyman. Why does your mother like that sitcom so much? Because she’s a female supremacist. Why does your girlfriend like that show? Because she’s a female supremacist.
That’s why the lady is a tramp
Life is too easy. It’s too easy for a woman to become a tramp, and experiment sexually and socially, so she does. What are the consequences? Our society has so much surplus that we’ve eliminated the consequences of bad or irresponsible behavior, at least for women. We are wealthy enough to reject the concept of shame. Thus, we have shameless hussies.
Perhaps because men are still the most creative movers and shakers of our society, men as a whole class have been pushed into being the responsible ones, the moral adults. Women are let off the hook, able to remain perpetual moral children, responsible for none of their behavior, such as drunken sex. Non-issues such as faulty breast implants or police warnings about slutware enrage these people because they face no real injustices or hardships.
Slutware?
Also, here are The Undertones, with “Life’s Too Easy.”
@NWO
It may surprise you to hear this, but in most cases of gay men kissing, neither Holly nor Ozy are present.
You know, given NWO’s weird fascination with sodomy, I’m think it’s his fantasy.
I’m thinking, I mean.
@blitzgal
And feminists want young boys taught to be sodomized.
Lauralot: That’s possible. We know he has a fascination with little girls and he does rant on pedophilia.
You’re full of shit, as usual.
Come to think of it, NWO doesn’t give a shit about slaves either, does he?
I can’t remember, is he as ridiculously racist as DKM? I mean, he’s definitely a racist fuck, but how racist is he?
Teaching that some people engage in sodomy and that’s fine if both are willing, and here’s how to do it safely: MAKING ALL LITTLE BOYS FOREVER ENGAGE IN SODOMY.
OF COURSE.
It’s like in Disney’s Hunchback of Notre Dame, when Frollo is obviously aroused by Esmeralda while he’s ranting about how filthy and immoral she is, and then he decides that he’s totally going to have her, his way, and if she disagrees he’ll put her to death.
Only Frollo actually had a position of authority.
NWO, find the comments you said you could find.
@lowquacks
NAMBLA is a feminists wet dream, as is NAWGLA and butterfly kisses. That’s what the promotion of sodomy’ll get ya.
I like it when everyone kisses! 🙂 So long as they want to be kissing, that is important!
I also like it when boys kiss girls, you know! They just generally don’t have to fight for that one.
Clarification, although only NWO needs it and he won’t believe it: Little kids cannot want to be kissing the way grown-ups kiss!
Kissing is a very fun thing for grown-ups to do! No matter which grown-ups do it! 🙂
Having men kissing and debasing themselves for your entertainment is manna for you. I get it already. It’s all about your entertainment.
NWO, speaking for myself as a heterosexual female, I’m not particularly into voyeurism. Watching two people of any gender having sex tends to make me feel less “entertained” and more “vaguely uncomfortable.” So, to be clear, if two handsome gay men came up to me and said, “We would like to have sex with each other right now, and we don’t care if you watch!” I would be like, “That’s cool, but I think I’ll go somewhere else. You two have fun, though.”
So, given that I explicitly do not derive entertainment from watching men have sex with each other, why do you believe I support men consensually having sex with each other if they choose to?
Rutee: He doesn’t give a shit about anything other than men being in charge and women being second class citizens and property.
Recall the “doctrine of escalation” he preaches. He doesn’t have any standing to complain about anything any woman, anywhere, does to any man. He claims to be a Christian, so he has to accept the Golden Rule of Jesus, and as he wants to hurt, even kill women, he has to accept that they kill men (or at least that they get to hate him, and that if he raises his hand it’s fair game to go one better than he ever does to any woman).
I will openly admit I find seeing men kissing and having sex with each other really fucking hot. However what I find even sexier is the fact that those men WANT to kiss and fuck each other whether I or anyone else is watching. Considering that most of them probably have no interest in women sexually what I or other women find hot doesn’t really matter to them (it probably doesn’t even matter for bi men in the moment either unless it’s an MMF threesome).
Funny how you’re the one who is spending all this time thinking about pedophilia, then.
How is consensual sex between two adult men harmful?
NWO: What the fuck does a butterfly kiss have to do with sex? (or am i showing astounding ignorance of modern sexual slang?)
Rutee, I think NWO’s more of the “Jews are evil” school of racism, not necessarily the “sunset town” racist fuckery of DKM.
Same ridiculous neighborhood, different street.
NWO, this isn’t a hate-site, it’s a mockery site. Although you probably do hate to be mocked, and that’s a shame, but you could always stop giving us such rich material to work with.
Well, there is that “Butterfly Kisses” song that some people interpret as incestuous…and his mind is perpetually in the gutter.
Here is something I do not understand: (please understand all “boys and girls” here are willing adults)
If a girl kisses a boy, that is good for her. So why would kissing a boy be bad for a boy?
It seems like if “kissing a boy” is a good thing to do then it is a good thing for anyone to do.
I have met gay and bi men, and found that they enjoy ‘kissing and debasing’ with other men pretty entertaining for themselves. And not because a band of yaoi fangirls were getting aroused by it either.
(I’m going to get ranted at now, aren’t I?)
NWOslave, I think I have figured out what you are not understanding. You see when the commenters read Alcuin listing good things particular men have done and bad things particular women have done as an indictment of all women and praise of all men they rightfully found this silly. The then attempted to point out this silliness by doing the same thing with the genders reversed. The commenters here do not think that being a man is bad and being a woman is good. They were using a rhetorical device. I think you should be able to understand this since you yourself typed the words, “Woman = perfect.
Man = vile.” and you presumably do not agree with this. Can you see how the other commenters hers can type words in order to show that they are ridiculous? If you still do not understand, say so and I will try to help you to comprehend.
Fatman: Good luck, that way lies madness.