Let’s celebrate this lovely February day with some random stupidity from Alcuin, a brave anti-misandrist intellectual titan who is single handedly bringing about what he calls “the Intellectual Renaissance of the Western Tradition.” Mostly by blathering on and on about how much ladies suck.
Some highlights from recent posts.
The history of achievement is, in fact, the history of male achievement to such an extent that, were women absent from human history, we might still be where we are today, but were men absent from history, da wimmin would be in the caves, screeching ‘n hollering at each other. …
Dante wrote the Divine Comedy. Feminists crafted VAWA, the beginning of the end of western freedom.
Shakespeare changed the English language. Sharon Osbourne laughs about the female mutilation of men.
Socrates established a way of thinking and reflection on the virtues that still inspires us. Women falsely accuse men of rape on a weekly or even daily basis.
Feminism is the KKK with tits. The only difference is that western women don’t have any shame, so don’t cover up with white bedsheets. They are openly supremacist. That is why their starting point parallels the KKK, but they tend towards Nazism as well. The Hitlerists were no more ashamed of their supremacism than western women are of theirs. Both bigoted groups, in fact, are quite proud of their prejudicial thinking.
Racial supremacists running around with bedsheets are cockroachy – they run to the darkness whenever light is shed on them. Feminists, like Nazis, prefer the limelight. Will we soon see Nazi-like rallies with tens of thousands of banshees and their manginic self-hating male bozos?
Everybody Loves Raymond, and your female supremacist mom
Men are made into buffoons by Hollywood because male buffoonery sells. Women eat it up as greedily as they inhale chocolate cake and buy useless luxury goods. “Everybody Loves Raymond” is Everyman. Why does your mother like that sitcom so much? Because she’s a female supremacist. Why does your girlfriend like that show? Because she’s a female supremacist.
That’s why the lady is a tramp
Life is too easy. It’s too easy for a woman to become a tramp, and experiment sexually and socially, so she does. What are the consequences? Our society has so much surplus that we’ve eliminated the consequences of bad or irresponsible behavior, at least for women. We are wealthy enough to reject the concept of shame. Thus, we have shameless hussies.
Perhaps because men are still the most creative movers and shakers of our society, men as a whole class have been pushed into being the responsible ones, the moral adults. Women are let off the hook, able to remain perpetual moral children, responsible for none of their behavior, such as drunken sex. Non-issues such as faulty breast implants or police warnings about slutware enrage these people because they face no real injustices or hardships.
Slutware?
Also, here are The Undertones, with “Life’s Too Easy.”
Pecunium, you’re asking tough questions.
I honestly believe NWO doesn’t know what a Libya even is.
Technically (and I say that because Vietnam and Korea), yes, you OD have to declare war, NWO.
I don’t know if we’re in a state of war, but we are highly militarized and our economy does/has depended on war and the readiness for it.
HOWEVER, wars could stop tomorrow and I think every woman except maybe Sarah Palin and Michelle Bachmann would be OK with that.
Oh… wait… that was supposed to be a response to the question about the Lusitania (were the one’s about Persia too hard?).
I see. So… it wasn’t Wilson, the war just happened. And it happened, not because Germany attacked us… it just happened.
Sort of like little girls just happen to arouse you, and you think they do it on purpose.
pecunium already said it, but thats irrelevant to who made the decision. and it wasnt her decision. because shes the secretary of state.
maybe the reason youre so angry at the government is that you dont understand basic facts about it
^DO have to declare war, that is.
I ANSWERED YOUR STUPID QUESTION NWO
Do you understand, in your spectacularly tiny brain, the difference between when people ask you a question repeatedly because you aren’t answering, and you asking me a question repeatedly after I’ve answered?
If you find fault in my answer, we can go from there. But you don’t have to show off your stupidity this ostentatiously.
@Rutee Katreya
My point is, you’ve unsuccessfully tried to pretend as if women are blameless in their lust for men death. You are in error.
Bah, I always do that. Izzy ran Castile and Leon, not Aragon, before the Spanish unification. Literally every single time.
Holly, his stupidity is all he’s got, he pretty much has to flaunt it.
ALERT! ALERT! Shaenon it’s time to add to The Book o’ Larnin’
North Africa is a continent.
Someone should also inform Rand McNally and National Geographic, so they can update their maps.
Rutee: Thanks, I’ve been trying to remember Wu (Zhao) Zetian’s name for something like a week!
@Holly Pervocracy
No, you haven’t answered my question. You simply denied that that’s what you’re promoting. The question wasn’t “if” you promote it, you do. The question is “why” do you promote it.
The original post offers little commentary about the quoted excerpts, except to designate them as “stupid.” But what moral or political standard is being applied in that designation? To me, it’s clear that the author considers the quotes to be reflective of stupidity because he fundamentally believes that men have no unique contributions to add to humanity, relative to women and children. This foundational premise he considers to be the self-evident embodiment of non-stupidity. Another premise, albeit implied, is that somehow it is bigoted to acknowledge the suffering that men have uniquely endured through history, as though this acknowlegment would undermine the well-being of women everywhere in the process.
Contrary to the author’s foundational premises, I think that it’s perfectly acceptable and worthwhile to recognize both the achievements uniquely made, and also the suffering uniquely endured, by men as a sex. What such recognition should culminate in is empathy, leading to real-world assistance for men in need. Unfortunately, people who share the author’s world view tend to prescribe to men the unattractive and untenable solution that if men seek an end to their suffering as a sex, they need only become less like men, and more like women. It’s not really an effective solution, nor in my opinion does it convey much empathy to the male sex.
What bothers me further still is that, in the blogosphere and in the associated comment threads, so much discussion is devoted to maligning one’s opponents that this overshadows what should have be the outcome of such discussion: tangible help being extended to people in need, regardless of their alleged historical privileges, regardless of their sex, regardless of their political (or any other peaceful kind of) orientation. Unfortunately, what happens instead is both sides hurling charges of bigotry and/or stupidity, never culminating in any real action, nor culminating in any real empathy.
This whole blog, its emphasis, and the bloggers and commenters that it mocks, are all part of one massive war of words and judgment between intractible enemies who have lost sight of what really counts, namely empathy leading to tangible action for any human being in need.
This that’s pollyannaish? Then go right back into your self-congratulatory snark war, and by the way, thanks for nothing.
NWO, why do you eat poop?
So much poop. It must make you sick. Your teeth are all brown.
Don’t deny it, TELLL MEEEE WHHHHYYYYY
God damn it, this is what happens when I stay up until 6 AM. I sleep through all the fun posts and wake up right in time for Poopsy’s rampage.
holly, on a related note, when did you stop beating your wife?
@Pecunium
You sound more and more like a tittering teenaged girl. A far cry from your former white night days. Too much ideology does that to a person.
Oh hello, Mr. Pretentious McNavelgaze
NWO: Any woman who lusts for the death of men is not blameless if they do things to bring about that death. That’s true, because it’s a tautology.
Sort of like people who are starving are hungry.
You have yet to say anything substantive on the subject. You were more clear on the subject of the Continent of N. Africa, and the Origins of the Russian Alphabet.
Wrong but clear.
Roscoe, them’s some fancy-ass words for “I went to Sociology class and I learned all the vocabulary and missed all the analysis.”
And NWO continues his run for the ‘most nonsensical word salad’ title!
Not Spanish; he doesn’t have a Cyrillic keyboard. Try Russian instead.
stupid isnt a moral or political judgment broheim. it has to do with alcuin not knowing anything about anything.
and chill the fuck out, nobody is impressed that it took you that long and that many trips to your thesaurus to say what you meant
Hey, NWO, we know your thoughts on WW1…how did WW2 start? Who was the innocent party?
(WAIT FOR IT…)
Hey, Roscoe, thanks for stopping by. The Department of Pretentious Wankery is thataway———->