When is a slut not a slut? When he’s a dude. So says the (He)artist(e) formerly known as Roissy, in yet another post of his trying to prove that his brand of Pick-Up Assholery is fully proven by SCIENCE!
His evidence in this case? A recent study of speed dating that showed that (straight) women, in addition to being attracted to attractive men (duh!), also seem to be attracted to men with high “sociosexuality” ratings. “Sociosexuality,” for those not fully immersed in the SCIENCE!! of dating, is basically someone’s propensity for casual sex.
In other words, the study found that guys who do a lot of casual dating tended to do better at casual dating.
Heartiste/Roissy puts it this way:
Men who have high sociosexuality (HSS) are more attractive to women because the suite of characteristics associated with HSS suggest prior experience bedding women and possession of mating skills that attract women.
It’s akin to a form of preselection for men, minus the actual women he’s banging being physically present at his side to aid in the alpha judging process that all women, consciously or not, impose on their suitors.
In a very loose sense, high male sociosexuality is male sluttiness.
If you strip out the PUA nonsense about the “alpha judging process,” all this seems fairly self-evident, if not simply tautological. Guys who’ve been with a lot of women will probably do better with women in the future than guys with no experience who view women as strange alien creatures. (Note: In all this, we’re only talking about straight people; PUAs don’t seem aware that gay people exist, outside of their own fantasies of hot bi girl threesomes.)
It’s at this point that Heartiste/Roissy amps up the assholery:
Male sluttiness is not equivalent to female sluttiness. It is more difficult for a man to be slutty that it is for a woman owing to the discrepancy in worth between sperm and egg, so people justifiably perceive male sluts to have higher quality mate value, and higher quality mating skills, than female sluts for whom the act of sexual conquest is merely synonym for being easy.
In other words, it’s bad to be a female slut, but great to be a male slut:
[T]he study results confirm the validity of game when its conclusions find that male sociosexuality is a relatively powerful predictor of attractiveness to women, even to women looking for long-term relationships.
Not only can this SCIENCE!! of game help to get dudes laid – it can basically save the world from evil fat chicks.
It’s vital to readers to get this scientific information validating game out there, because there are a lot of doubters and haters who are blinded by what they won’t see. Sometimes, men need to know that there is an experimental foundation supporting all these seduction techniques and peculiarities of female behavior. It’s not necessary to know this stuff to start gaming chicks out in the field right now, but for men with a cynical bent or shy disposition, it helps to know that there are rules that govern human interaction. It may be the boost they need.
Turning former nerds into wily lotharios will help to put those uppity female sluts in their place:
[A] moment of candor. This blog is first and foremost a source of self-amusement, but it is also a true and real desire to teach and to see men succeed sexually and emotionally with women. Men who become better at attracting women increase their options in the mating market. Men with increased options cause women to behave better. Women behaving better redounds to the benefit of families, and to society.
And by “behave better”, I mean the whole panoply of awful modern female behavior: cheating, cock carouseling, divorcing on a whim, eat pray loving, straycationing, spinstering, attention whoring, voting and fattening up into repulsive dirigibles.
Yep, he did slyly insert “voting” into all that. Sneaky!
So slut it up, fellas! It’s the only way to put those evil lady sluts in their place. And, thereby, save the world from sex-having, vote-casting slatterns.
Ami. AMI.
Look, honeybuns, we went over this. They don’t have separate genetics; most of their genetics is the same. But some people get a special extra thing called a “Y chromosome” that usually gives them traits we consider male.
(I don’t even want to explain gender identity to this asshole.)
Asshat, those were your words. Too bad you forgot about how much tools and technology can compensate for eh? Ladders have been around for millenia.. But I guess you forgot that?
I mentioned tools. Can you not read? MRAs acknowledge that short people need ladders. Feminists don’t.
Analogies. What the fuck are they?
MRAs believe that people should be treated based on REALITY, like acknowledging that people who are less intelligent, less tall, less strong, should not be treated and hired over people who are more qualified. That HAPPENS to be women (blame genetics, but oh wait, you don’t believe in genetics) Feminists want women to be hired in equal numbers regardless of physical differences.
Yeah! Just like them blacks! If they ain’t different to us, how comes they is black?
*Spits at spittoon and strums banjo*
Women are less intelligent than men? Citation motherfucking needed.
@Nephrite:
O_O
oookay then… Troll’s gonna troll I guess.
If we don’t have completely separate genetics, it means we could still have partially separate genetics. In other words, sex chromosomes. Are we done with the science lesson now?
My understanding is that most of the food in Africa is grown by women.
Because men are too busy fighting and DYING to protect them so they can grow that food.
Do you even fucking care about men at all?
That’s right! I call on you to defend things none of you ever actually said, or else I win! Forever!
Um…wat? I never said that.
Get back outside and dig a ditch! you is stronger than me!
“That HAPPENS to be women”
Citation seriously fucking needed.
Women are less intelligent than men? Citation motherfucking needed.
I’m citing this whole “motherfucking” thread.
Does this guy even know what he’s arguing about?
Oh, I get it! He’s one of those psychologically abusive assholes who change the goal posts and gaslight as a distraction from their own wrong thinking and stupidity.
Reminds me of my ex, really.
I’m guessing this guy’s favourite food is Oreos. xD Other non-black and white cookies would be too anger mongering for him.
You are citing this thread as evidence that MRAs are less intelligent than people in general? I can agree with that, after reading your silly assertions and inane drivel.
@Neph
LOLOLOL
You’d think they could do something about that pesky rape issue down there too. Why aren’t the men protecting them from that?
I like this troll. He’s lulzy.
Also, honey, riddle me this.
Let’s say we put a randomly selected half of society in dresses and encourage them to play quietly inside and, when they are older, tie their worth to being “attractive” and mostly unmuscled. Let’s say we put a randomly selected other half of society in pants and encourage them to run around outside screaming and climbing trees and, when they are older, tie their worth to their skill at sports.
Which group is likely to be stronger?
“I’m citing this whole “motherfucking” thread.”
The one where you completely misread everything and threw strawfeminists and red herrings everywhere?
“Reminds me of my ex, really.”
Unfortunately, me too.
Does this guy even know what he’s arguing about?
Oh, I get it! He’s one of those psychologically abusive assholes who change the goal posts and gaslight as a distraction from their own wrong thinking and stupidity.
Reminds me of my ex, really.
http://traitorsofmen.blogspot.com/2012/01/are-you-kids-ready-to-take-trip-to.html
False accusations. How nice.
I thought you feminists were against that? Now I’m an abuser?
The one where you completely misread everything and threw strawfeminists and red herrings everywhere?
Where?
@Nephrite:
“MRAs believe that people should be treated based on REALITY, like acknowledging that people who are less intelligent, less tall, less strong, should not be treated and hired over people who are more qualified. That HAPPENS to be women (blame genetics, but oh wait, you don’t believe in genetics) Feminists want women to be hired in equal numbers regardless of physical differences.”
Boom, we can settle all of this now. If MRAs believe that people should be treated based on REALITY, then they must believe that every person, whatever gender, should be treated fairly on an individual basis. That’s what feminists actually think should be the case.
But no, MRAs believe that since Females as an average are different in some ways then Males, then all men should be given preference over all women. See the difference?
How about this then. Sam, Harry, Lucy, and Delilah are being interviewed to be fire fighters. Who should be hired? (This is a question for you, btw.)
Hey, Nephrite, guess my gender.
Also, honey, riddle me this.
Let’s say we put a randomly selected half of society in dresses and encourage them to play quietly inside and, when they are older, tie their worth to being “attractive” and mostly unmuscled. Let’s say we put a randomly selected other half of society in pants and encourage them to run around outside screaming and climbing trees and, when they are older, tie their worth to their skill at sports.
Which group is likely to be stronger?
So, if we put girls in pants, they’re going to be stronger than men as adults?
Historically, hard labor goes to women too. The Triangle Shirtwaist Fire was unique in its scale, but it’s not like it’s the only factory accident to hit women or children as well as men. Only rich women ever had the potential to be idle, and most of them still engaged in pretty significant household management (much like most rich men, but without the prestige or credit for efforts taken, in most societies)
Men’s current overall dominance of some dangerous and utterly too low-status work is actually anomalous, and vastly overstated by most people who make the argument that men dominate it (Because hello sex work).
Women just didn’t historically get rights for their efforts alongside men, in most societies.
No, now you are even stupider than I originally thought. You think no one notices what you wrote less than half an hour ago.
“Where?”
Everywhere.
The Olympic women’s hockey teams play against junior boys to train for the Olympics, and they struggle against 16 year old boys. Unless you’re going to claim that female athletes are feminized too?