When we first met Spearhead commenter Rmaxd, he was raving about how our technological society had rendered women obsolete. He’s back, this time taking on, well, women again, and welfare, and declining birth rates, and, well, it’s all a little bit hard to follow.
Let’s start with Rmaxd’s basic premises:
Women are serially monogamous or hypergamous & are infertile for the majority of their lives
While men are polygamous, & FERTILE for the majority of their lives
Marriage has always been used as the earliest form of birth contraception, limit the amount of children a fertile male can have, by forced mating with a single infertile woman for the rest of his life.
We are off to a bad start here. Is there anything in all that that’s correct? Among other things: marriage is most decidedly not a particularly effective form of birth control. (The show Eight is Enough was based on a real family, and I suspect we’ve all met people with enough siblings to fill a bus.) But let’s continue; Rmaxd is on a roll:
As the government can no longer force this sort of mating on infertile womens, especially in the lower moronic, under educated peasantry states,
As women want alphas,
Obviously sluts & whores, are simply mimicing infertile women, as only infertile dried up vaginas, can afford to sleep around with hundreds of men
This is why we have sluts & promiscuity, marketted to young girls today, imitate infertile women, imitate their habits, destroy your fertility, destroy your youth
A childhood of std’s & yeast infections
Yeah, I’m not even going to try to parse all that.
In any case, as Rmaxd argues, these “infertile” ladies somehow still manage to pop out a few kids when they’re young, and the evil welfare state rewards them for it:
It’s essentially birth control by sponsoring infertile women, most women have a couple of kids, basically enough to live off the welfare & free housing
As we all know, single mothers live lives of untold luxury and indolence.
What we have here is essentially welfare for infertile women, as they’re no longer able to siphon cash from enslaving men into walking wallets & their magical vagina’s a pit of std’s & warts
In the past, you see, women could enslave men by marrying them. Now they can’t get dudes to stick around, so instead they enslave men by not marrying them, raising their kids on their own with the help of welfare money. It’s all very devious.
Rmaxd would prefer that the welfare money go to the fathers:
If we had welfare for men who had kids, with different women, we would have a healthy birth rate, instead of the declining birth rate we have now … this is all about rewarding & protecting a womans sexuality over a mans sexuality
It all leads to what Rmaxd calls:
The new another dark age of female fanatical male hate,
sponsored & policed by the church of radical feminist mangina, & government
The dried up vagina, as a tool of the state & population control
This barely coherent spew of woman-hatred – and it’s even less comprehensible without my edits and annotations – still managed to draw a few upvotes from the regulars, proving that internet misogynists will upvote pretty much anything so long as it contains the requisite level of anti-woman vitriol.
In case you’re feeling especially bored this lazy Sunday, the whole Spearhead thread is a trainwreck of misogyny and racism – including some fairly obnoxious discussions of black “Welfare Queens” and Mexican immigrants from a fellow called Keyster. Does that (fake) name sound familiar? You may know him as a fairly regular contributor to A Voice for Men and the producer of the AVfM internet radio show.
AND THEN A WALL OF TEXT RESPONDING TO POSTERS ONE BY ONE BY NAME.
B_don, just give it up. No one believes you. Please find another forum to impose your narcissistic personality disorder upon.
Cassandra – LOL. XD
*Psst! Brandon! You’re not good at this. Quit now.*
Actually, scratch that – I shouldn’t be using mental illness as an insult. Sorry, that was ableist.
B_don, take your head out of your ass and go.elsewhere, please.
Is it time again for things more interesting than Blandon?
Since I am at his house right now, our IP’s should match.
There’s a much simpler explanation…
(And how did you accidentally click a checkbox that’s on the opposite side of the screen?)
Wow, Ashley, I mean Brandon, you really should change the writing style when you sockpuppet. You’re fooling no one.
Is there anything you don’t suck at?
Oh holy shit wow this is awesome. I waited for the Ashley to arrive, like Linus for the great pumpkin, and she has!
I love that writing from the perspective of a fake girlfriend and using a proxy is easier for B__don than the herculean just not referring to himself.
This is the most ridiculous bull-shit ever. Seriously.
Although it’s pretty hilarious how he’s given “Ashley” a fake personality that’s a mindlessly dull as his own:
@Nobinayamu: Not only is his imaginary girlfriend boring as fuck, she also uses “just to name a few,” which I’m fairly certain Brandon said at least a thousand times.
David, can “Ashley” please go on the “not talking about Brandon or Ashley” challenge?
It would makes sense that “Ashley” be submitted to the same “don’t talk about Brandon/use I” challenge for a few posts. Heck, we could all do it, but it would be over in instants for most.
Wow, Ashley-Brandon, just … wow. How did your ex’s abuse you? By not showing you enough love through slapping and name-calling?
Person POsting as Ashley: Now I can go after this.
If you actually do, you’ll be the first troll to stay the flounce. I ain’t holding my breath.
I’m 21 and what is this
No, seriously, what in Brandon’s mind convinced him that this whole act is a good idea?
uh hunh. I’ve been in a few cases of Sprezzaturi too, and I’d say you’re on target for convincing people.
There is no need to sockpuppet. That implies you are important enough to warrant the extra time spent doing it, which you arent. Plus, sockpuppeting is for pussies who have to hide behind a fake name. Believe what you want. It is a waste of time trying to prove otherwise.
Oh my lord. Brandon made a comment in which he did not directly refer to himself. (It did indirectly refer to himself, but I’ll let that pass for now.)
Let’s see if he can make a comment in which he does not refer to himself directly or indirectly!
ahahaha OMG he did it, I knew he’d be back!
I have $10 on no, he cannot make a post without self referencing.
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
*wipes tears* sorry, that was hilarious. No, Brandon is not a catch. He is a selfish, self absorbed, whiney, immature, illogical and sad little man.
Awww, is widdle Bwandon sad he cannot do a decent sock puppet?
Well you should be.
FWIW, Ashley and Brandon have been posting from similar but not identical IP addresses, but the locations have been all over the Mass/Connecticut/Rhode Island area, and Brandon’s last one supposedly came from somewhere a thousand miles away from that.
Also, FWIW, Brandon didn’t use the “just to name a few” phrase earlier. You guys must have been thinking of soemthing else.
This shit is too funny. Oh yeah, you totally don’t care what any of us think. And of course you’d never use deception to prove a point. Sure, I’ll buy that.
I see Brandon has demonstrated that he’s above David’s games by…following the rules of them just so he can tell us how much he doesn’t care.
Oh, what a beautiful morning.
Glad to hear it, but gridiron isn’t big in my part of the world… the Pats is Boston, right?