When we first met Spearhead commenter Rmaxd, he was raving about how our technological society had rendered women obsolete. He’s back, this time taking on, well, women again, and welfare, and declining birth rates, and, well, it’s all a little bit hard to follow.
Let’s start with Rmaxd’s basic premises:
Women are serially monogamous or hypergamous & are infertile for the majority of their lives
While men are polygamous, & FERTILE for the majority of their lives
Marriage has always been used as the earliest form of birth contraception, limit the amount of children a fertile male can have, by forced mating with a single infertile woman for the rest of his life.
We are off to a bad start here. Is there anything in all that that’s correct? Among other things: marriage is most decidedly not a particularly effective form of birth control. (The show Eight is Enough was based on a real family, and I suspect we’ve all met people with enough siblings to fill a bus.) But let’s continue; Rmaxd is on a roll:
As the government can no longer force this sort of mating on infertile womens, especially in the lower moronic, under educated peasantry states,
As women want alphas,
Obviously sluts & whores, are simply mimicing infertile women, as only infertile dried up vaginas, can afford to sleep around with hundreds of men
This is why we have sluts & promiscuity, marketted to young girls today, imitate infertile women, imitate their habits, destroy your fertility, destroy your youth
A childhood of std’s & yeast infections
Yeah, I’m not even going to try to parse all that.
In any case, as Rmaxd argues, these “infertile” ladies somehow still manage to pop out a few kids when they’re young, and the evil welfare state rewards them for it:
It’s essentially birth control by sponsoring infertile women, most women have a couple of kids, basically enough to live off the welfare & free housing
As we all know, single mothers live lives of untold luxury and indolence.
What we have here is essentially welfare for infertile women, as they’re no longer able to siphon cash from enslaving men into walking wallets & their magical vagina’s a pit of std’s & warts
In the past, you see, women could enslave men by marrying them. Now they can’t get dudes to stick around, so instead they enslave men by not marrying them, raising their kids on their own with the help of welfare money. It’s all very devious.
Rmaxd would prefer that the welfare money go to the fathers:
If we had welfare for men who had kids, with different women, we would have a healthy birth rate, instead of the declining birth rate we have now … this is all about rewarding & protecting a womans sexuality over a mans sexuality
It all leads to what Rmaxd calls:
The new another dark age of female fanatical male hate,
sponsored & policed by the church of radical feminist mangina, & government
The dried up vagina, as a tool of the state & population control
This barely coherent spew of woman-hatred – and it’s even less comprehensible without my edits and annotations – still managed to draw a few upvotes from the regulars, proving that internet misogynists will upvote pretty much anything so long as it contains the requisite level of anti-woman vitriol.
In case you’re feeling especially bored this lazy Sunday, the whole Spearhead thread is a trainwreck of misogyny and racism – including some fairly obnoxious discussions of black “Welfare Queens” and Mexican immigrants from a fellow called Keyster. Does that (fake) name sound familiar? You may know him as a fairly regular contributor to A Voice for Men and the producer of the AVfM internet radio show.
Is your space bar broken?
Dude, you’re the one brought all this shit up to begin with. Unless you just really enjoy being a laughing stock, I can’t conceive of any reason you keep showing up here at all.
Meller: You talked about how you laughed at the thought of cancer patients in pain LONG before you opened your yap about your dollies. Maybe you should find a site where people won’t mock you if it bothers you that much.
ps – still waiting for an actual apology to those of us who have fought or lost loved ones to cancer. somehow, i doubt it’s forthcoming.
Dracula et al…February 5, 2012 @2;48PM
You are the laughingstocks! You poor, dried out, embittered, hate-filled, pseudo-masculinized, arch-competitive over educated, quarrelsome, and loathsome FEMINISTS!!
You are jealous of real women, you can’t even stand the thoughts that soft, feminine, lovely images and figurines of real women can give a man more happiness than your kind. You are inferior in every respect that counts to women as they were, or at least wanted to be two hundred years ago! Laughingstock!
All that you ‘modern women’ can do is admire freaks, mutants, and pseudomen! Women (so-called) who equal or surpass men in achievements outside the home, while having nothing to offer men in and around the home that is woman’s natural domain. Laughingstocks?
You compete with men in areas where men have always been dominant, been stronger, and far more numerous, while putting down activities that real women would be good at.
Tell ME how I’m a’ laughinstock”. You feminists are ridiculous when you are not pitiful, and pitiful when you are not ridiculous!
Meller: So go away and quit bothering us! If all you’re getting is aggravation, find somewhere people will agree with you and quit bothering us!
Oh wow, what’s going on here? Meller, none of that was at all insulting.
Meller, you’re basically a stock character. That we all laugh at. Seriously, you’re a buffoon. You’re just too wrapped in your fantasy life to see it.
And by now I really shouldn’t have to explain to you why it’s absurd of you to think I’d be jealous of your “real” women.
A classic example of an omega male dropping out of society. When the sexbot revolution happens there will be far more of his type.
He hasn’t dropped nearly far out enough for my tastes.
Meller: Leave my little lady lovelies alone, and I’ll leave youall alone!
Who brought them up?
Who decided to come to manboobz?
Who is it that wants to kill the feminists who won’t aren’t eager to become slaves and property?
Who wants to take children away from women if their partners abuse them?
Who says that women who are abused bring it on themselves?
Who laughs at women who are dying, in pain, from cancer?
Who thinks women who don’t want to get married, or remain abstinent, should be given to brothels?
Who can’t answer the simple questions about the subjects he brings up?
Who refuses to debate people on the subjects he claims to be expert in?
Who pretends none of those are true, despite them being in his own words, and on the internet?
To ask the questions is to answer them!
The answer is David K. Meller, Laughinstock (who seems to own neither a mansion, nor a yacht).
for starters there your hilarious little meltdown in the preceding paragraphs…
-your ridiculously thin skin
-the whore-based economy thing
-your hilariously overwrought prose
-whatever made you choose ‘david k. meller’ as a pseudonym
-your attempts to square you professed anarcho-libertarianism with your desire to live in a theocracy
do you need me to keep going?
Sharculese: There is also the way he is all butthurt about people making fun of him, through his dolls. It’s as if he thinks they are actually alive, with feelings and emotions and the ability to feel pain.
He can’t seem to grasp that people are making fun of him, not the dolls.
There’s also the fact that you use the word “hysterical” to describe people who used roughly 1/10 (If I’m being generous.) the exclamation points you do.
Ametabolic individuals, Pecunium… remember, they are people too, and they are softer, fluffier, and more feminine, ladylike, and adorable then the bitter and twisted termagant shrikes who call themselves women when posting their feminist lies on Manboobz!
Dracula: And the telling women to ‘take a tranquilizer’ and constantly telling us we’re on the rag or pmsing – despite the fact that many of us either don’t have periods or don’t have pms.
Hahahaha, Meller.
Seriously, why do you come here? You know we’re not amenable to your brand of batshittery, yet you persevere.
Dear Meller:
I can’t believe I missed this.
The question is what if one of his “little lady lovelies”… isn’t? -_o Then what does Mellertron do with them? : We haven’t heard from Evan in almost a week 😐
Tell ME how I’m a’ laughinstock”. You feminists are ridiculous when you are not pitiful, and pitiful when you are not ridiculous!
What if we’re being neither? o:
I love how Mellertron literally just told us to stop trying to recruit his dolls into feminism xD
Wow. Who is seriously mentally ill? You, (Meller) my sad little dude-bro. My mom had cancer…..and you’re a sick fuck. You don’t have any dolls for any of us to recruit. You’re obviously a virgin. There’s a good chance you’re still in high school, or possibly a full fledged adult with serious mental and emotional problems. You don’t have sex. Oh, and you’re hysterical…..seriously, could you be any more emotional? You should eat some chocolate, that would make you feel better. It’s OK if you have a small penis…..seriously, it is. Just stop trying to convince the rest of us that it doesn’t bother you. Dolls? Yeah….fantasy can actually be a sad thing.