So W. F. Price of The Spearhead has made a momentous discovery: there is a television show called Glee. In a recent post, he shared some of his findings with the regular crowd:
I’ve only recently heard of the teen drama Glee, which is evidently a big hit with the teenybopper crowd. The other day, I came across it while flicking through channels and forced myself to watch some of the show.
Apparently, it is really, really gay.
First, I have to say that I now do believe the conservative Christians are correct in saying that the media is pushing a gay agenda. Of course, I don’t really care (one can always change the channel), but it was so blatant on Glee that I couldn’t help but laugh. The show revolved around a “glee club” (an insipid American high school institution for you Brits), cheerleaders, football players, gay football players, football players in drag, football players with cheerleaders, with gay cheerleaders, etc. There was even Broadway-style singing and dancing.
The horror!
Glee is about the gayest show I’ve ever seen on TV. Even the name is gay.
So, you’re saying it’s gay.
Still, Price did have one little complaint about the show:
The gay issue aside, there was one thing about the show that, although unsurprising, was still obnoxious: it features the same old negative stereotypes about normal males. The teen sluts (both gay and straight) are the heros, while the villains are generally straight or straight-acting males … .
It’s true. No one in American society is more oppressed than “normal” dudes. How dare Glee add to this bigotry!
Shockingly, it turns out that there aren’t any Glee fans amongst the Spearhead set – at least none willing to speak up.
In the comments, Meistergedanken explained that Glee was just a part – a loud, singing part — of a devious queer conspiracy:
It’s all part of the plan. Just like “Desperate Housewives”, “American Horror Story” or “Dawson’s Creek”, or any of those other shows created by the queers, straight couples – particularly married ones – are inevitably shown to be the most hypocrital, intolerant, ignorant, mentally unbalanced and emotionally dysfunctional characters. In this way normality is portrayed as a sorry sham. …
It’s so strange to see the progressives insist on marriage for gays, while at the same time showing married couples (and the husbands/fathers especially) as the worst people out there. They want to tear down marriage so they can scrounge the tattered remains for themselves, I guess.
Towgunner, for his part, delivered up a long, rambling manifesto of sorts on the subject of the gays. Some highlights:
Is it a tragedy that gay people suffer? I honestly used to think so, but I don’t really think they suffer all that much. They seem pretty happy at their parades. Matter of fact, I’d say that a balding women (regardless of her sexuality) or a poor black family or an orphan in Africa suffer thousands of times more than some sappy fruit.
In that light homosexuals have proven to be one of the most selfish groups in all of history, right up there with women – after all they want to be women anyway. …
Furthermore, it says something about our culture that gives only homosexuals and other sluts special treatment. … All this to facilitate a small group’s ego so they feel only slightly less guilty at themselves when they orgasm. That’s where your taxpayer money goes to…to make a pervert feel good about itself.
So, apparently, the government is giving out gay orgasm grants, or something?
Andybob, meanwhile, spoke up for the gays. Or, at least, the gays who hate Glee. And women.
The first time I saw “Glee” I wanted to punch my flatscreen through the wall. Here again, gay men/teens are being shown as shallow, trite, superficial, dismissable, malleable, silly, flippant cretins with nothing to offer the world except fashion advice and sloping shoulders for whiny bitches to cry on. …
Those of us [gay men] who live far from Hollywood and have no connection whatsoever to Broadway musicals are very likely to be very aware of issues confronting men. Some of us are even vocal MRA’s. … [We’re] not handicapped by the need for sex from women. We can recognise their manipulative BS from miles away. The female psyche laid bare is an ugly thing.
Gay men like men, identify with men, actually are men. We watch men we care about like our brothers (I have a straight twin brother), fathers, and mates get ground down by a system created and maintained by feminists and their pussy-begging lackeys – and yes, some poodle-carrying flamers along for the ride. Women are always shocked to learn that most gays side with men. That’s not what they see on the telly. …
The bitchy gays who discriminate against straight men … are the manginas of the gay world. …
Women don’t like gays and straights to collaborate because they don’t want us to compare notes. I have seen women try to shame my straight friends out of hanging out with me. They are threatened by our mutual support. Together, we are able to construct a composite picture of women that would peel paint for sheer gruesomeness.
Gay men and straight men – together, united in hatred of whiny bitches!
Ami: by oppression I assumed he was saying that there are many who are. cis and straight who seek to treat those that are not as second class citizens.
If you believed that he was saying “there are many” why did you get worried that he was saying “all”?
xD
What do you define as being treated “as second class citizens”
specifically… :3
Did I fuck up my terminology? I thought “oppressor class” was commonly used in SJ communities (my knowledge about SJ is pretty minimal)
katz | January 18, 2012 at 9:13 pm
In fairness, the name is immaterial if it’s obvious who it is.
Except he believes that it has nothing to do with how he talks, or what he says. Just his name, because ppl are irrationally angry at him because of past history, so it has nothing to do with the way he presents himself, or writes, or what he says o:
Ppl need to take my challenges 😀
Well Dan, good luck proving I ever claimed you were harassing me in a pm.
In any case, I wasn’t trying to hear your sad story bro. I was telling you a fact. No one is obligated to like you, no matter what the blog is about. You’re doing things that many people here don’t like. If you want us to like you, stop doing those things. If you don’t care, keep on keepin’ on.
No one is obligated to like you, no matter what the blog is about.
I am! 😀
It is why David created me and what he programmed me for 😀
If you don’t understand something, sometimes the best way to be an ally is to shut the fuck up. Not asking your concerny questions and getting butthurt when people don’t like your tone.
viscaria: my first real conversation on the blog involved the existence of a rape culture. At the time I doubted it. Somewhere in that thread I was convinced of it because of an argument made. However, in the post I questioned the existence of rape culture I also stated that there is no “false rape culture” either (a feeling I still hold). Someone was shocked I would say that because my username (when I am posting from my computer and not my phone like I am now) links to my blog about my false accusation. I had stated my opposition to the idea of a false rape culture because i did not want to be mistaken as an MRA. So, that is where ithiliana came in and kept repeating many lies about what I said. So it was a combination of that plus an argument over how I rejected the use of a particular word that led to my problems here. (my problems with snowy and jumbo stem from earlier on the forum and the bizarre harrasment claim that even David said both sides overreacted)
Ami: being treated as a second class citizens includes but is not limited to no right to marry the consenting adult one wishes to marry, feeling the need to be closeted in order to be employed or advance in that employment, the refusal of the law to treat one the way one feels as it pertains to gender instead of how one was born. I am sure I could list more and that i am ignorant of other ways.
And the reason I asked is because instead of just assuming it was meant in the worst way, I assumed it was not meant in the worst way but that jumbo could correct me if i was wrong (unlike jumbo who automatically assumed the worst about what i said)
What I most remember from your first appearance here, Dan, was an unwillingness to sacrifice your pride a bit and let the topic go even when you were told your centering yourself was hurting victims.
If you want acceptance while carrying on as you are, maybe you should found concernedcookieseekingstraightdudes.com. I’m sure you could find a community of like-minded individuals.
snowy: you claimed one more message by me would be considered harassment. I will post the exact messages to show how they were in no way harassing.
Except he believes that it has nothing to do with how he talks, or what he says. Just his name, because ppl are irrationally angry at him because of past history, so it has nothing to do with the way he presents himself, or writes, or what he says o:
Right, but if we can tell who it is, we can connect him to his past history even if he’s using a different name. What he needs to do is make a sockpuppet that conveys the same ideas juuuuuust differently enough to not seem like the same person.
You’re right, I did. I’ve said I did. How is that a “claim of harassment” exactly?
viscaria; why was I supposed to let it go while allowing others to get away with continued misrepresentations? why couldn’t they have been told to stop misrepresenting? and this is a blog with a huge trigger warning on the front. and while I never seek to trigger anyone, the boots is represented as being a no holds barred type atmosphere…. yet I am being asked to refrain? that is a huge double standard
snowy: seriously?
why was I supposed to let it go while allowing others to get away with continued misrepresentations?
Who is misrepresenting you. What did you say say, and what do they claim you said?
k, I am done on this thread. I am not making sock puppets either. Not my style.
@LJ it really sounds like Jumbo doesn’t have a grudge against you, YOU have a grudge against him. xD You’re the one who can’t let go of your past, and it colours the way you see how OTHERS (many of whom don’t even KNOW you) react to the way you are writing and what you write. xD
Yup! David is super tolerant of people being assholes. But we still get to say you’re an asshole. Dan, I think you are a huge asshole.
Ami: all the misrepresentations on the thread being discussed
Yes, seriously. You kept pming me after I told you several times that the conversation was over, I finally told you that if you didn’t stop I would consider it to be harassment. Nowhere did I say that you were harassing me. You’re obviously really obsessed with this incident, might I suggest you move on? I’m concerned about you.
For a person who wants to learn you seem to be absolutely adamantly against the idea xD
lj4adotcomdan | January 18, 2012 at 9:47 pm
Ami: all the misrepresentations on the thread being discussed
Which is?
Let’s lay it out so we can be clear, a convo can be confusing, esp the way this thread has been going xD
You seem to have the clearest idea what’s happening (and you’re the one making the allegation), that’s why I’m asking you 🙂
LJ, I’ll ask you again:
What. Do. You. Want.
Nice and specific, sil vous plait, so it’s there. You think you’re being treated unfairly, and you allege that people aren’t treating you the way you want to be.
So what, specifically, do you want?