Categories
antifeminism armageddon beta males grandiosity misogyny PUA TROOOLLLL!! vaginas

The Withered, [obscene gender-related slur] Heart of Darkness. Or, Roissy does feminism.

The icy wasteland of discredited ideologues. With penguins.

Ladies, watch out! Over at the Chateau, the (He)artist(e) formerly known as Roissy has taken a good look at that thing we call feminism, and it seems that he doesn’t like it very much.

[F]eminism is, right down to its withered, cunty heart, a grotesque ideology mounted on a dais of lies. My goal is to mock it so ruthlessly that its practitioners and sympathizers, all of them, find it ever more difficult to pronounce in public life that they are feminists, to drive the true believers so far underground that only their raspy-throated, dusty-muffed sisters-in-arms are willing to entertain their insipid nostrums.

Woah, dude! Slow down for a moment and take a breath.

This is total war, and in total war where the weapons are words, the goal is utter destruction through social ostracism. The icy wasteland of discredited ideologues and crackpots mumbling self-medicating catchphrases and hitting themselves in the forehead is feminism’s inevitable destination.

Wait, let’s do that last sentence again.

The icy wasteland of discredited ideologues and crackpots mumbling self-medicating catchphrases and hitting themselves in the forehead is feminism’s inevitable destination.

Yeah, I thought that’s what he said.

Some other observations:

Marriage and kids are no amnesty from man-hating. Some of the worst ideological feminists are lantern-jawed fuzzfaced quasi-dykes married to mincing beta schlubs who confirm feminist prejudices by their mere existence, not to mention by their sycophantic suckuppery.

Oh and this:

Feminism’s leaders and spokeshos are, almost to a bitch, man-hating termagants who loathe male desire and cheer on third trimester vacuumings.

Nothing more charming than a PUA dickbag who’s against abortion.

Having dispensed with feminism, Roissy goes on to wax pompous about the future of the whole human race. Naturally, he thinks like a PUA version of Hitler.

Thanks to technology, diversity and cognitive stratification, America is entering the period of The Great Culling, a process which will create not only new classes, but even new races, broadly a snarky Eloi and a medicated Morlock, and slowly, as the government cheese runs out, the losers in this culling will begin to procreate less and less, until they are discarded by the invisible crotch of evolution as failed human experiments unable to adapt to the new reality.

The “invisible crotch of evolution?”

I cannot help but think of a certain memorable phrase from one of Man Boobz’ greatest trolls. I am referring, of course, to Arks’ description of the human vagina as a “slobbering crotch-maw.”

Is Arks … Roissy? Is Roissy … Arks?

I don’t think so, but it makes me wonder once again if this whole Chateau Heartiste thing is nothing more than an elaborate hoax.

EDITED TO ADD:

Toysoldier offers a withering critique of this post.

Wait, did I say “withering?” I meant “withered.”

349 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Wetherby
Wetherby
12 years ago

Does the PUA hat look anything like this?

BlackBloc
BlackBloc
12 years ago

From Toysolider’s blog post, Roissy is quoted saying:

Valenti’s “I just realize that I’m only wearing [makeup] because society tells me I’ll look ugly without it” is the dog-eared “deus ex societas” card that feminists always pull when they have run out of credible explanations for female behavior and are forced to confront the reality of innate sex differences. To demonstrate the bankruptcy of that card, try to imagine a man saying “I just realize that I’m only trying to get girls into bed because society tells me I’ll be depressed if I stay celibate. Ridiculous on its face, yet that is exactly the level of intellectual feminist thought.”

Oops. Roissy comes *this* close to epiphaneous introspection, then retreats from it at full speed.

That the PUA movement is not about sex but about social status and homosocial bonding is self-evident to every third party objective observer.

Pecunium
12 years ago

At least TS isn’t wasting our time here with his tediousness.

I’ll count that a win.

Dani Alexis
Dani Alexis
12 years ago

Valenti’s “I just realize that I’m only wearing [makeup] because society tells me I’ll look ugly without it” is the dog-eared “deus ex societas” card that feminists always pull when they have run out of credible explanations for female behavior and are forced to confront the reality of innate sex differences.

Wait, I’m confused. Is Roissy suggesting that “wearing makeup” is an “innate sex difference”? As in, “if makeup did not exist, women would create it because they are biologically incapable of not smearing tinted goo on their faces before they step out the front door”? (And the corollary, “men would never create makeup because they are biologically incapable of smearing tinted goo on their faces….”?)

*blink*

Pecunium
12 years ago

Dani: You got it. Ev-Psych is the “science” of showing that what the writer wants to be true is, “biology” and can’t be changed.

Molly Ren
12 years ago

As soon as I realized makeup and skirts wasn’t a big thing where I worked, I stopped doing it. Guess I’m actually a dude? 😛

Molly Ren
12 years ago

(And the corollary, “men would never create makeup because they are biologically incapable of smearing tinted goo on their faces….”?)

The guyliner trend was actually a feminist plot!

Dani Alexis
Dani Alexis
12 years ago

Pecunium: Guess I’m just used to my evo-psych being…not that patently absurd.

Molly Ren: You and me both. 😛 (I stopped wearing makeup because I couldn’t find a brand that didn’t make me break out, and I’m not wearing skirts right now because it’s winter and I like to Not Freeze. Wanting warm legs makes me a dude! Or a lady who doesn’t own legwarmers. You know, whatever.) 🙂

Dani Alexis
Dani Alexis
12 years ago

The guyliner trend was actually a feminist plot!

Well, *this* feminist thinks it’s kinda hot on a lot of guys (David Tennant in Fright Night, anyone?) But I can’t take credit for that particular feminist plot. I’m busy taking credit for other ones, like my Girl Scout troop.

(Delicious cookies are a feminist plot! Quick, eat six boxes of them before they brainwash you into thinking girls are people!)

ozymandias42
12 years ago

Ancient Egyptian men wore eyeliner.

I love how every culture except modern American culture is mistaken about what they’re genetically programmed to want to do.

Dani Alexis
Dani Alexis
12 years ago

Well, modern American culture *is* The Greatest Culture That Ever Cultured.

*eyeroll*

KristinMH
12 years ago

And men in Elizabethan England wore tights! And gaudily embroidered cloaks!

Ornamentation, it is not just for the ladies.

Jessonian
Jessonian
12 years ago

And I thought *I* was addicted to dashes. Egads.

I wonder if folks like Roissy intend readers to be distracted by his florid prose like blinded deer, unable to suss his true meaning from the chained-and-dashed and other made up adjectives (cunty? What does that even mean? Vaginas are as varied as any other body part. That’s like saying ‘stomachy’ or ‘chinny’).

It’s like how funnel-web spiders hide in their scary webbed corners and holes, except folks like Roissy hide in webs of words in scary holes and corners of the internet.

Kyrie
Kyrie
12 years ago

Wait, I’m confused. Is Roissy suggesting that “wearing makeup” is an “innate sex difference”? As in, “if makeup did not exist, women would create it because they are biologically incapable of not smearing tinted goo on their faces before they step out the front door”? (And the corollary, “men would never create makeup because they are biologically incapable of smearing tinted goo on their faces….”?)

As women our only goal is to have sex with the apla-iest men. For that purpose, we must make ourself as pretty as can be, so that we can date men higher than we are in the beauty scale and hide the ravages of Time. (aka being over 27) So using make up is in our nature in the same way using weapons is in men’s nature! If there were none, we would use substitutes such as pretty flowers or feather.

Wetherby
Wetherby
12 years ago

And men in Elizabethan England wore tights! And gaudily embroidered cloaks!

And codpieces. You really don’t want to forget the codpieces.

Especially not in this context.

BlackBloc
BlackBloc
12 years ago

As we all know, True Alpha men don’t wear colored pigments on their face.

http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-7QYQpiyCmZQ/Tp77R4XS3qI/AAAAAAAAAhw/L6pIOoxoJts/s1600/braveheart-3.jpg

http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-RMpTjcY6EJ4/TbcIBt7zoAI/AAAAAAAAADE/SD9l8rF9IcM/s1600/rob+zombie.JPG

Whereas women have been biologically wired to do so ever since they first learn in the Paleolithic to camouflage themselves while gathering berries, so the berries wouldn’t flee in fear at their approach.

karalora
12 years ago

Ancient Egyptian men wore eyeliner.

Yeah, and look what manginas they were, always giving jewelry to their mummies. Plus, look what they worshipped! Cats. Q. E. fuckin’ D.

Amused
12 years ago

Ancient Egyptian men wore eyeliner.

I love how every culture except modern American culture is mistaken about what they’re genetically programmed to want to do.

This is what irritates me more than anything about EvoPsych — it’s “science” for the ignorant, that is relentlessly American- and post 19th-century-centric. For “scientists” who claim that history is destiny, it’s really telling how blatantly they ignore history.

The Egyptians could be dismissed, I suppose, since they wore eyeliner for practical reasons — to reduce the sun’s glare. But look at the Middle Ages, the Renaissance and all the way down to 1800 in European fashions: men wore high heels and stockings. For about 500 years, men’s fashions were extremely unforgiving of physical imperfections, and there are numerous anecdotes and hints that have come down to us indicating just how much men obsessed over the shape of their legs. In the 1600’s and 1700’s, it was also primarily men who consumed perfumes and cosmetics (for women to rouge was considered “slutty”, so far fewer women than men did it). I wonder how evo psych people would explain all that.

ozymandias42
12 years ago

Amused: As far as I can tell, Roissysphere types believe in The Past, which is very different from any actual pasts that have actually existed. A few traits of The Past:

1) The Past is entirely monolithic. Sumeria and the Victorian Era had exactly the same sexual and gender mores.
2) The only people who existed in The Past were upper-middle-class white straight abled people. This explains sentences like “the average man had a wife and a mistress” and “the average woman stayed at home with her children and could cultivate the arts.”
3) In The Past everyone acted the way moralists thought they should act. Therefore, because premarital sex was condemned by preachers, it was unheard of.

ithiliana
12 years ago

@Blackbloc: Ha! I knew it! No Evo Psych explanation is true unless it has berries in it.

lowquacks
lowquacks
12 years ago

It’s okay. It’s not as if hats ever fit me anyway. And I get awful hat hair when they do. I’m not bitter.

While we’re on the make-up thing, isn’t every sexuality sort of automatically assumed to include 1970’s David Bowie. Straight men and gay women are into women and 1970’s David Bowie, gay men and straight women are into men, particularly 1970’s David Bowie, pansexuals into everything but again particularly ’70s Bowie, asexuals not really into anything but ’70s Bowie, and so on? Fella wore a lot of make-up and still gets that.

Bee
Bee
12 years ago

Okay, who’s up for writing the Roissysphere Book o’ Learnin? It’s kind of an inevitability at this point.

lowquacks
lowquacks
12 years ago

@Blackbloc

women have been biologically wired to do so ever since they first learn in the Paleolithic to camouflage themselves while gathering berries, so the berries wouldn’t flee in fear at their approach.

Women don’t think about strategy, costing the men of The Past thousands of berries with their refusal to use their ladybrainz efficiently. Make-up is a tradition stemming from berry-filled prototypes of the very first bonbons, which burst all over the eater’s face.
Upon discovering that even a fatso 4/10 could get her face licked by the tribe Alphas were it sweet enough, the collective rationalisation hamsters of the cavewomen attributed the effect to the colour. Since then, manatees have used it to cover their ugly whore faces. Real women look like they’re wearing make-up without going through all that girly crap.

zhinxy
12 years ago

Ozymandias42 -Excellent! but you forgot –

4. Whenever a society deviated from 1, 2, and 3, it was feminizing and sowing the seeds of it’s own destruction, just like the feminists and manginas want us to do now!

ozymandias42
12 years ago

Zhinxy: Of course! And

5) The gender and sexual norms of The Past all look like the myths the 1950s had about itself.

1 4 5 6 7 8 14