Ladies, watch out! Over at the Chateau, the (He)artist(e) formerly known as Roissy has taken a good look at that thing we call feminism, and it seems that he doesn’t like it very much.
[F]eminism is, right down to its withered, cunty heart, a grotesque ideology mounted on a dais of lies. My goal is to mock it so ruthlessly that its practitioners and sympathizers, all of them, find it ever more difficult to pronounce in public life that they are feminists, to drive the true believers so far underground that only their raspy-throated, dusty-muffed sisters-in-arms are willing to entertain their insipid nostrums.
Woah, dude! Slow down for a moment and take a breath.
This is total war, and in total war where the weapons are words, the goal is utter destruction through social ostracism. The icy wasteland of discredited ideologues and crackpots mumbling self-medicating catchphrases and hitting themselves in the forehead is feminism’s inevitable destination.
Wait, let’s do that last sentence again.
The icy wasteland of discredited ideologues and crackpots mumbling self-medicating catchphrases and hitting themselves in the forehead is feminism’s inevitable destination.
Yeah, I thought that’s what he said.
Some other observations:
Marriage and kids are no amnesty from man-hating. Some of the worst ideological feminists are lantern-jawed fuzzfaced quasi-dykes married to mincing beta schlubs who confirm feminist prejudices by their mere existence, not to mention by their sycophantic suckuppery.
Oh and this:
Feminism’s leaders and spokeshos are, almost to a bitch, man-hating termagants who loathe male desire and cheer on third trimester vacuumings.
Nothing more charming than a PUA dickbag who’s against abortion.
Having dispensed with feminism, Roissy goes on to wax pompous about the future of the whole human race. Naturally, he thinks like a PUA version of Hitler.
Thanks to technology, diversity and cognitive stratification, America is entering the period of The Great Culling, a process which will create not only new classes, but even new races, broadly a snarky Eloi and a medicated Morlock, and slowly, as the government cheese runs out, the losers in this culling will begin to procreate less and less, until they are discarded by the invisible crotch of evolution as failed human experiments unable to adapt to the new reality.
The “invisible crotch of evolution?”
I cannot help but think of a certain memorable phrase from one of Man Boobz’ greatest trolls. I am referring, of course, to Arks’ description of the human vagina as a “slobbering crotch-maw.”
Is Arks … Roissy? Is Roissy … Arks?
I don’t think so, but it makes me wonder once again if this whole Chateau Heartiste thing is nothing more than an elaborate hoax.
EDITED TO ADD:
Toysoldier offers a withering critique of this post.
Wait, did I say “withering?” I meant “withered.”
Ugh, that last sentence was poorly phrased. The manginas in the racist’s imagination are only denying their Hitler-boner to get pussy. Which doesn’t work because women admire someone alpha enough to be openly racist? I’m not great at this.
I think I need to borrow Ozy’s hat for a bit.
Would a Hitler boner need a little mustache and a hat and a swastika penis-band?
So basically a cock ring for neo-Nazis?
You’re going to regret that suggestion when some enterprising PUA decides to start marketing them as the new way to pick up chicks, David.
Well, it certainly wouldn’t be circumcised. And would presumably be accompanied at all times by its trusty lieutenant Goebballs.
…I’m not off to a good start here, am I?
They can draw little pictures of evil women on each ball with a strikethrough to represent their rejection of feminism. It’ll match the cock ring.
They’ll have a woman on each ball at each time! Without having to ask the woman or pay any attention to her! GAME!
at all times*
Toysoldier is complaining about Futrelle not being civil and not taking Roissy seriously. THAT post of Roissy’s? Dear Toysoldier, rule #1 of Manboobz is it’s about mocking misogyny, and rule #1 of civil discourse is, well, completely broken by Roissy. It’s like Toysoldier has no self-awareness at all. He’s like the bully who gets sad when you hit back, except he’s a spectator whining about how unfair it is for the bully to be hit back.
Also, Bill Maher is actually incisive, not frothing at the mouth spouting his own dogma. And yet, even Maher believes some stupid shit, and verily doth he deserveth to be made funneth ofeth for it.
In all honesty I think Toy Soldier is mentally ill. There’s no way a rational person could come up with half the things he does – his perspective is completely distorted.
I bet most of these guys didn’t pay attention in English class because their teachers were uggo lesbos or poetry-loving manginas. 🙁
Others have already pointed out the flaws in his eugenics plan, but I hope Roissy realizes that he’s currently behaving like a Morlock. He dresses his bitter, hateful ass in the clothes of an Eloi (a high-quality male, in this case, a well-off, witty, well-adjusted person) in order to snatch up as many Eloi (what other PUAs deem high quality women) as he can.
I would say that Roissy has a soul like a prune, but prunes are at least useful for treating constipation (according to my granny). Roissy’s only use appears to lie in separating fools from their money.
It is almost as funny as “roosh’s” PUA trip to Poland and the flowery pose that followed of his “successful pickups” in a povo country…
OMG! Is that even English?
*prods it suspiciously*
@SaruGoku: It’s more like the Abbot’s “New Latin” from Men in Tights.
Roissy lost his job because of his blog two years ago. At that time he was renting an apartment and I’m not sure he had a car. He’s like Roosh the jobless PUA that travel around the world because he cannot get laid in the US and lives in the basement when he’s in the US. And his admirers are even worst than him. Yet, they all see themselves as Alpha because they have sex with completely drunk desperate women.
Someone left an hilarious comment a few years ago on various blogs that describe well Roissy/Heartiste and his fan-club :
http://ladyraine.wordpress.com/2010/02/10/more-lady-raine-stalking/#comment-5837
Here’s what I don’t get. Supposedly, men only act like “manginas”–you know, treating women like human beings–in order to get pussy. But if it works, doesn’t that mean “manginas” have good Game? Shouldn’t all these guys be trying it?
Here’s what I think is going on. These guys aren’t out for pussy, not really. Or they are, but as a means to an end. That end is being a Real Man, and nothing is more important. If you aren’t a Real Man, you might as well be dead. There are two qualifications for being a Real Man: 1) Getting pussy, 2) Being a badass macho lunatic with no empathy, softness, emotions other than anger, and certainly no weaknesses. They are led to believe that 2) is the key to 1), only to discover that in reality, it’s often an obstacle. This puts them in a pickle, because it means they can never simultaneously fulfill both criteria for Real Manhood. But instead of criticizing the social definition of a Real Man, they bawl out women for their “incorrect” tastes in men.
It would certainly explain the firestorm every time the young girls of the world find a new soft-edged heartthrob celebrity to admire.
…after his marriage to a 21-year-old virgin who was more than a decade younger than him rather famously didn’t work out (understatement). By all accounts, his second marriage is a roaring success, largely because it was through mutual choice rather than social/family pressure, and they had infinitely more in common to begin with.
Paul Newman (who could hardly be more alpha male) is another good example: he famously quipped “why go out for a hamburger when you can have steak at home?” whenever anyone raised the subject of a marriage that was in its fiftieth year when he died.
Mr. Nice Guy’s comment is fantastic lol.
Also, Toysoldier spelled “dose” wrong, therefore he loses all credibility.
Bang on, karalora. It isn’t about women at all – it’s all about impressing other men with your big, throbbing Real Manliness.
It’s hardly an original thought, but it seems to me that PUAs are sort of gay by proxy – they desire each other but are too homophobic to express it, so they work it out by impressing other men by fucking “high SMV” women. Women and women’s bodies are just a medium for their interactions with other men. Which would explain why they don’t treat us like fellow humans. :/
He spelled ‘Hitler’ wrong too – at least twice – which suggests he was referring to this:
LMAO @ no more mr nice guy’s post. The list of manginas just keeps growing don’t it? Stay strong my brethrens, we are overcoming!!!!! WE’RE COMING FOR YOU ALPHA ASSHOLE COCK CAROUSEL!!!
Actually, now that I’ve brought up Paul Newman, I wonder what the average MRA/PUA would make of him?
After all, it’s hard to imagine anyone more genuinely alpha male, what with being a major movie star and a professional racing driver and celebrated for decades for his drop-dead good looks – and yet I can’t imagine they’d get on too well with his views on marriage, women and giving vast amounts of money to unfashionable humanitarian causes.
No, Lowquacks, it is MY PUA hat! I stole it from Mystery in a club! (Theory: all of Mystery’s pickups are actually failed attempts to steal his giant fuzzy hat.)
(Ozy puts on PUA hat)
lowquacks: SWPL women, divorced as much from their gina tingles as they are from their second husband, often choose to date based on political affiliation (and that political affiliation is always liberal, because Big Government is a daddy substitute. A libertarian cute girl is a quality girl– unless her ego’s been puffed up by open-source betaboys sucking at her toes). The PUA’s art, of course, is to silence her thoughts and take her on a wild, gina-spurting rollercoaster of emotion: when she starts off about her anti-racist politics, put a finger to her lips, shush her, and say “that’s enough of that now. Tell me about your childhood.”
After sex, of course, revealing your political beliefs can only make her love you more.
Karalora: It’s not just about getting pussy– it’s about quality pussy. Quality pussy (by which I mean under 30 and BMI under 25) predictably tingles for assholes. Don’t be the beta in a This Is What A Feminist Looks Like T-shirt mouthing feminist slogans in the hopes of a hummer from a short-haired hairy-armpitted hippie chick on a cocaine bender. Be the alpha and enjoy bounties of pussy the beta could only dream of.
(Ozy takes off PUA hat)
apropos of the icy wasteland
You best come prepared son!
(puts on PUA hat)
Wetherby: Alpha status is marked by one thing– the amount and quality of the pussy you get. You can be a movie star, have good looks, be a racecar driver, but if some glaring personality flaw keeps you from your sexual destiny, the fat, unemployed fast-talker at the bar is more alpha than you.
Besides, he probably cheated on his wife with nineteen-year-old sluts. Darwinian imperative!
(takes off PUA hat)
Does the PUA hat look anything like this?
From Toysolider’s blog post, Roissy is quoted saying:
Oops. Roissy comes *this* close to epiphaneous introspection, then retreats from it at full speed.
That the PUA movement is not about sex but about social status and homosocial bonding is self-evident to every third party objective observer.
At least TS isn’t wasting our time here with his tediousness.
I’ll count that a win.
Wait, I’m confused. Is Roissy suggesting that “wearing makeup” is an “innate sex difference”? As in, “if makeup did not exist, women would create it because they are biologically incapable of not smearing tinted goo on their faces before they step out the front door”? (And the corollary, “men would never create makeup because they are biologically incapable of smearing tinted goo on their faces….”?)
*blink*
Dani: You got it. Ev-Psych is the “science” of showing that what the writer wants to be true is, “biology” and can’t be changed.
As soon as I realized makeup and skirts wasn’t a big thing where I worked, I stopped doing it. Guess I’m actually a dude? 😛
The guyliner trend was actually a feminist plot!
Pecunium: Guess I’m just used to my evo-psych being…not that patently absurd.
Molly Ren: You and me both. 😛 (I stopped wearing makeup because I couldn’t find a brand that didn’t make me break out, and I’m not wearing skirts right now because it’s winter and I like to Not Freeze. Wanting warm legs makes me a dude! Or a lady who doesn’t own legwarmers. You know, whatever.) 🙂
Well, *this* feminist thinks it’s kinda hot on a lot of guys (David Tennant in Fright Night, anyone?) But I can’t take credit for that particular feminist plot. I’m busy taking credit for other ones, like my Girl Scout troop.
(Delicious cookies are a feminist plot! Quick, eat six boxes of them before they brainwash you into thinking girls are people!)
Ancient Egyptian men wore eyeliner.
I love how every culture except modern American culture is mistaken about what they’re genetically programmed to want to do.
Well, modern American culture *is* The Greatest Culture That Ever Cultured.
*eyeroll*
And men in Elizabethan England wore tights! And gaudily embroidered cloaks!
Ornamentation, it is not just for the ladies.
And I thought *I* was addicted to dashes. Egads.
I wonder if folks like Roissy intend readers to be distracted by his florid prose like blinded deer, unable to suss his true meaning from the chained-and-dashed and other made up adjectives (cunty? What does that even mean? Vaginas are as varied as any other body part. That’s like saying ‘stomachy’ or ‘chinny’).
It’s like how funnel-web spiders hide in their scary webbed corners and holes, except folks like Roissy hide in webs of words in scary holes and corners of the internet.
Wait, I’m confused. Is Roissy suggesting that “wearing makeup” is an “innate sex difference”? As in, “if makeup did not exist, women would create it because they are biologically incapable of not smearing tinted goo on their faces before they step out the front door”? (And the corollary, “men would never create makeup because they are biologically incapable of smearing tinted goo on their faces….”?)
As women our only goal is to have sex with the apla-iest men. For that purpose, we must make ourself as pretty as can be, so that we can date men higher than we are in the beauty scale and hide the ravages of Time. (aka being over 27) So using make up is in our nature in the same way using weapons is in men’s nature! If there were none, we would use substitutes such as pretty flowers or feather.
And codpieces. You really don’t want to forget the codpieces.
Especially not in this context.
As we all know, True Alpha men don’t wear colored pigments on their face.
http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-7QYQpiyCmZQ/Tp77R4XS3qI/AAAAAAAAAhw/L6pIOoxoJts/s1600/braveheart-3.jpg
http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-RMpTjcY6EJ4/TbcIBt7zoAI/AAAAAAAAADE/SD9l8rF9IcM/s1600/rob+zombie.JPG
Whereas women have been biologically wired to do so ever since they first learn in the Paleolithic to camouflage themselves while gathering berries, so the berries wouldn’t flee in fear at their approach.
Yeah, and look what manginas they were, always giving jewelry to their mummies. Plus, look what they worshipped! Cats. Q. E. fuckin’ D.
This is what irritates me more than anything about EvoPsych — it’s “science” for the ignorant, that is relentlessly American- and post 19th-century-centric. For “scientists” who claim that history is destiny, it’s really telling how blatantly they ignore history.
The Egyptians could be dismissed, I suppose, since they wore eyeliner for practical reasons — to reduce the sun’s glare. But look at the Middle Ages, the Renaissance and all the way down to 1800 in European fashions: men wore high heels and stockings. For about 500 years, men’s fashions were extremely unforgiving of physical imperfections, and there are numerous anecdotes and hints that have come down to us indicating just how much men obsessed over the shape of their legs. In the 1600’s and 1700’s, it was also primarily men who consumed perfumes and cosmetics (for women to rouge was considered “slutty”, so far fewer women than men did it). I wonder how evo psych people would explain all that.
Amused: As far as I can tell, Roissysphere types believe in The Past, which is very different from any actual pasts that have actually existed. A few traits of The Past:
1) The Past is entirely monolithic. Sumeria and the Victorian Era had exactly the same sexual and gender mores.
2) The only people who existed in The Past were upper-middle-class white straight abled people. This explains sentences like “the average man had a wife and a mistress” and “the average woman stayed at home with her children and could cultivate the arts.”
3) In The Past everyone acted the way moralists thought they should act. Therefore, because premarital sex was condemned by preachers, it was unheard of.
@Blackbloc: Ha! I knew it! No Evo Psych explanation is true unless it has berries in it.
It’s okay. It’s not as if hats ever fit me anyway. And I get awful hat hair when they do. I’m not bitter.
While we’re on the make-up thing, isn’t every sexuality sort of automatically assumed to include 1970’s David Bowie. Straight men and gay women are into women and 1970’s David Bowie, gay men and straight women are into men, particularly 1970’s David Bowie, pansexuals into everything but again particularly ’70s Bowie, asexuals not really into anything but ’70s Bowie, and so on? Fella wore a lot of make-up and still gets that.
Okay, who’s up for writing the Roissysphere Book o’ Learnin? It’s kind of an inevitability at this point.
@Blackbloc
Women don’t think about strategy, costing the men of The Past thousands of berries with their refusal to use their ladybrainz efficiently. Make-up is a tradition stemming from berry-filled prototypes of the very first bonbons, which burst all over the eater’s face.
Upon discovering that even a fatso 4/10 could get her face licked by the tribe Alphas were it sweet enough, the collective rationalisation hamsters of the cavewomen attributed the effect to the colour. Since then, manatees have used it to cover their ugly whore faces. Real women look like they’re wearing make-up without going through all that girly crap.
Ozymandias42 -Excellent! but you forgot –
4. Whenever a society deviated from 1, 2, and 3, it was feminizing and sowing the seeds of it’s own destruction, just like the feminists and manginas want us to do now!
Zhinxy: Of course! And
5) The gender and sexual norms of The Past all look like the myths the 1950s had about itself.