Ladies, watch out! Over at the Chateau, the (He)artist(e) formerly known as Roissy has taken a good look at that thing we call feminism, and it seems that he doesn’t like it very much.
[F]eminism is, right down to its withered, cunty heart, a grotesque ideology mounted on a dais of lies. My goal is to mock it so ruthlessly that its practitioners and sympathizers, all of them, find it ever more difficult to pronounce in public life that they are feminists, to drive the true believers so far underground that only their raspy-throated, dusty-muffed sisters-in-arms are willing to entertain their insipid nostrums.
Woah, dude! Slow down for a moment and take a breath.
This is total war, and in total war where the weapons are words, the goal is utter destruction through social ostracism. The icy wasteland of discredited ideologues and crackpots mumbling self-medicating catchphrases and hitting themselves in the forehead is feminism’s inevitable destination.
Wait, let’s do that last sentence again.
The icy wasteland of discredited ideologues and crackpots mumbling self-medicating catchphrases and hitting themselves in the forehead is feminism’s inevitable destination.
Yeah, I thought that’s what he said.
Some other observations:
Marriage and kids are no amnesty from man-hating. Some of the worst ideological feminists are lantern-jawed fuzzfaced quasi-dykes married to mincing beta schlubs who confirm feminist prejudices by their mere existence, not to mention by their sycophantic suckuppery.
Oh and this:
Feminism’s leaders and spokeshos are, almost to a bitch, man-hating termagants who loathe male desire and cheer on third trimester vacuumings.
Nothing more charming than a PUA dickbag who’s against abortion.
Having dispensed with feminism, Roissy goes on to wax pompous about the future of the whole human race. Naturally, he thinks like a PUA version of Hitler.
Thanks to technology, diversity and cognitive stratification, America is entering the period of The Great Culling, a process which will create not only new classes, but even new races, broadly a snarky Eloi and a medicated Morlock, and slowly, as the government cheese runs out, the losers in this culling will begin to procreate less and less, until they are discarded by the invisible crotch of evolution as failed human experiments unable to adapt to the new reality.
The “invisible crotch of evolution?”
I cannot help but think of a certain memorable phrase from one of Man Boobz’ greatest trolls. I am referring, of course, to Arks’ description of the human vagina as a “slobbering crotch-maw.”
Is Arks … Roissy? Is Roissy … Arks?
I don’t think so, but it makes me wonder once again if this whole Chateau Heartiste thing is nothing more than an elaborate hoax.
EDITED TO ADD:
Toysoldier offers a withering critique of this post.
Wait, did I say “withering?” I meant “withered.”
Love the Tesla “quote,” zhinxy! He’s perpetually indignant, so I guess perpetual flouncing isn’t far behind.
Seriously, he should be banned for his own good.
@Katz: I tried it without the quotes first — but got some ‘fake’ positives — still, you’re right, the results are probably more accurate without the quotes. I kept the quotes on “acne scars” as well–but I didn’t put either of their names in quotes.
Thanks–that does make a huge difference.
Goes to do some comparative searches.
Re; Google results for data
This is why we need to develop new programs to use in gathering and analyzing data from the internet (which is the largest corpus of natural language in writing evah):
Megan Fox ugly thumbs
6,830,000 results
Brad Pitt acne scars
133,000 results
Megan Fox “ugly thumbs”
4,510 results
Brad Pitt “acne scars”
622,000 results
“Megan Fox ugly Thumbs”
299 results
“Brad Pitt acne scars”
59,400 results
“Megan Fox has ugly thumbs”
852 results
“Brad Pitt has acne scars”
61,200 results
KristenMH: I did forget about codpieces! Pecunium, since you’ve worn one, maybe you can tell me – did/do men pad their codpieces like some women pad their bras? Enquiring minds, etc.
I’ve never worn a codpiece (I’ve word decorative plackets, but never a formed cod). By their very nature, they are padded. To make them project/stand out, they need to be stuffed.
As a means of display some men had, “pumpkin slops”, which were hugely padded. This was, oddly, a fashion that moved from the middle classes in (late Elizabeth I) where it was a way to engage in conspicuous consumption without violating sumptuary laws, to the upper classes (Charles I).
With those, to make them seen at all, codpieces could be really large.
Some men did, however, have really large codpieces. They looked stupid, IMO, unless they were in some way proportional to the shorthose to which they were attached.
MRAL challenged CassandraSays to find ONE blog that wasn’t a joke site making fun of Megan Fox’s thumbs.
He seemed to think it would be INCONCEIVABLE (I do not think that word means what he thinks it means).
While 6 million hits doesn’t mean that many separate sites, I think the Raving Researcher has conclusively proved him wrong about the idea that nobody is noticing/commenting about/publishing in the online media a lot of shit about her thumbs.
Pitt gets attention for his acne scars too, and I cannot say whether one is ‘worse off’ than the other, though I’m sure MRAL will think it’s worse to be Pitt, because MANPAIN is more horrible than the little bit of grief women get, not really that much, they’re just whining because they’re not all manly.
MRAL: as usual, you are wrong wrong wrong wrong wrong wrong.
There’s also the fact that “Brad Pitt has acne scars” is, if correct (I’d honestly never noticed), simply a statement of fact. “Megan Fox has ugly thumbs” is a criticism (what would an objectively ugly thumb even look like? are we having thumb beauty contests now?).
*headsdesk* Sorry, html fail. Oh, well, it’s ONE big link back to MRAL’s challenge.
BTW, challenged him to write four posts about certain topics, and he thought he could get away with a few numbered lines in one post, and changing “issues women face” to “women have issues” (which is ambiguous and could mean something entirely different than noting actualtrufatcct discrimination women face).
He failed to answer my challenge–amazing how the Trolls so often fail the actual challenges.
For fairness, the numbers need to be normalized against how often each celebrity is mentioned overall.
Brad Pitt: 306mil
Megan Fox: 191mil
Not a huge difference, but you’d have to multiply the Fox results by about 1.5 to compensate for it.
@Katz: Makes sense–this is why the sort of research I’m doing is done by teams because I have no training in quantitative analysis. I keep telling the psychologist we need to get ourselves a statistician sometime soon.
Oh for fuck’s sake. Really, MRAL? Really? No one makes fun of Megan Fox’s thumbs beyond pointing out that they’re weird but she’s still amazingly hot?
Do me a favor. Google “Megan Fox thumbs.” Go to any blog/newspaper articles (because clubbed thumbs were somehow NEWSWORTHY what the fuck is the world coming to) about Megan’s thumbs and read the comments. You will be treated to countless statements along the lines of “her thumbs are disgusting I would throw up if she touched me with her nasty thumbs,” “I used to think she was hot but that’s just fucking sick,” “Why the fuck doesn’t she get plastic surgery.” “ugly bitch,” and “No wonder they used a hand model why would anyone want to look at those hideous thumbs.”
On a related note, I have clubbed thumbs. I have had multiple people stare, comment, or even grab my hands to get a better look at my creepy-ass thumbs.
So in conclusion, people are dicks about everything, including the appearance of female celebrities. Quit pretending that your gender is the cause of your many, many problems. Get offline and get help.
In all the wall of ME MY PROBLEMS FUCK EVERYONE ELSE WHAT ABOUT ME that MRAL has posted on this thread the bit that really sticks out as particularly weird is the comment about me “fawning” over Quackers.
Fawning : present participle of fawn (Verb)
Verb: 1.(of a deer) Produce young.
2.(of a person) Give a servile display of exaggerated flattery or affection, typically in order to gain favor.
OK, so…in what way is expressing sympathy and going “you can do it!” servile? In what way were any of my comments to Quackers about her romantic woes exaggerated, or theoretically being done to gain favor? Why would I want to try to be servile to gain favor from Quackers, or the commentariat at large? Nobody here is mad at me except MRAL. So, in context, what does his use of that particular word mean?
I really think that he finds any display of niceness, friendliness, or any sort of positive attention given to women/girls enraging. That’s why he keeps badgering us to “bash” various groups of women, like the women who PUA’s pick up. It’s really wierd. Anything nice said to a woman seems to be interepreted by his twisted little brain as exaggerated, unreasonable, over the top, unjustified, and unfair both to him personally and men as a group. And I think that’s what he wants – for us to treat him the way that he perceives us as treating women.
Which would already be ridiculous enough given how warped his perceptions are, but he also expects us to do so after having spend months trolling and saying awful things to people here, then briefly promising to change, and then going right back to saying nasty, abusive, sexist things to the female commenters here.
Huh?
I can’t believe no one’s said anything about Megan Fox’s pointy knees.
MRAL: And sex is about two people. For it to be any good they have to be each thinking about the other having a good time. That’s why Heinlein’s comment in The Notebooks of Lazarus Long that, “Sex should be friendly, otherwise stick to mechanical toys” is all about.
If you don’t like them, don’t treat them as a human being with legitimate wants and desires, then it’s just wanking with a partner.
While we are discussing female poses, I really like this Lj post. Male vs. Female images on covers, which has comparisons of how males on covers look when someone tries to emulate them, compared to women; as well as some interesting takes on the relative takeaway from the postures.
@Pecunium
That post was quite awesome, thanks for the link.
Why do these idiots keep booing things that make their supposed hunt for pussy easier? Why would you engage in slut shaming if you actively desire sex? Why would you want to make abortion sound terrible? Does he protest birth control despite wanting to eliminate child support?
Is the answer the simple “Because they’re idios” I think it is?
Rutee: You see, abortion lets women ignore their “natural” gatekeeper function in favor of having sex with people they want to have sex with. Men are horny beasts who can’t be expected to control themselves and will go as far as women “let” them. Therefore, civilization depends on women having huge incentives to not want sex.
…yes, really.
@MRAL
Exsqueeze me? Baking powder?
Put someone in a box. Have person with red hat hit person in the box with a stick, twice a day for a month. Get different person with different red hat to hit person in the box with a stick twice a day for an additional month. Ask person afterwards how they feel about people with red hats.
The moral is: Compassion. Get some. Especially if you expect other people to have compassion for what you’ve had to go through, or the issues you think are important.
I don’t think it’s necessarily rational for someone to reject all people with red hats because they had bad experiences with a couple. But would I take it personally if they reject me because I’m wearing a red hat, and not because of anything I have or will do to them? No. Because it’s not about me. Instead of blaming someone who avoids people who wear red hats, speak out against red hat abusers. Listen to people who are fearful. Try to understand. Believe it or not, not every reaction someone has to you is personal, or controllable.
Crumb: “Is Roissy someone who is “well respected” (term used lightly) in the PUA community? Or does his brand of misogyny just stand out more than other PUAs’ misogyny?”
No. He’s virtually unknown in the world of PUA.
Feminism is like a smoke in the air, it is not practical at all. But stupid men are promoting and protecting it.
Between the above and the
from the other thread, I’m starting to think that Explore Nature is the MRA Magic Eightball or a MGTOW Fortune Cookie. Do you in fact get your posts from an online generator, EN?
@ MRAL
MRAL, you will continue to be an embittered, angry loser until you form some relationships with women. You need to explore your sexuality with a woman and stop being so afraid. This will not happen so long as your obvious fear of women continues. There are many, many women who want to explore their sexuality. They have personal fears and personal desires. I imagine in real life you are shy and sensitive – why not try, really hard, to meet a woman, don’t bring your MRA baggage with you. Just treat her how you’d like to be treated yourself. Keep in mind that she probably just wants someone to have some fun with.
Your current, sad, argumentative, typical MRA lifestyle is going nowhere. You are a pathetic figure. Look 10, 20 years into the future. Do you want to be like one of the bitter clones on AVfM or do you want to be able to look back on this year and last and the phase in your life when you eventually dragged yourself out of the attention seeking quagmire you’re in and addressed your wants and fears.
There’s two obvious paths. Right now, you’re walking down the one marked “MRA” and glancing at the other one enviously.
Women frighten you because you view yourself as pathetic. You are pathetic. Stop being pathetic. Start treating others with consideration and be honest with yourself.
To those manboobzers who will object to what I write, I agree with you, to some extent. MRAL doesn’t deserve any sympathy or anyone’s time. He’s obviously got severe issues and projects them onto women in general. This will continue until he realizes that they are normal human beings like him.
If he doesn’t realize this, well, he’ll fit right into the MRM and live a very sad and lonely life.
It’s up to him.
@Sorka
It really does seem a bit like his posts consist of randomly generated, uh, “insights”.
I think it makes his posts somewhat endearing.
He’s just trying so hard, I actually feel a bit bad for not getting upset by his comments ):
Another late arrival, but… Does Roissy… actually have any clue what he’s referencing? The Eloi started off as the beautiful, cultured elite, and the Morlocks as the ugly slaves, yes… but the Eloi became utterly mindless and useless due to not actually doing any work for themselves, and the Morlocks took over, raising their one-time oppressors as cattle and devouring their flesh.
I mean, characterizing himself as useless and mindless is pretty accurate, but I don’t think it’s what he was going for.