Categories
$MONEY$ antifeminism evil women hypergamy I'm totally being sarcastic idiocy manginas men who should not ever be with women ever misogyny MRA reactionary bullshit the spearhead white knights

Misogyny to the Maxd: Women are “liabilities in our technological culture.” Also, they’re fat.

Eeerything started going to hell when we let them wear bloomers and ride bicycles.

Oh boy. Over on The Spearhead, the good old trusty Spearhead, a fella called Rmaxd has some bold new ideas to share with the world.

Well, they’re not really new, or bold, or true, and some of them kind of seem to contradict each other. But they are, indisputably, ideas. And because he’s a dude, they’re automatically good, because dudes are the dynamic, creative force behind all historical progress. So it’s no wonder this comment of his got more than two dozen upvotes.

Rmaxd starts off by addressing the manginas of the world, and every man who might be considering the benefits of manginahood:

Grow some balls, be masculine, & these so called feminists have zero power

Because NATURE.

We always revert to our biology & nature, over idealism, this is why feminism is dead in the water

And NATURE says women should stay home and cook and pop out babies.

Women in our society are so fucked up, precisely because they rejected their biological need to be part of a society, through their children, husbands & a family

It’s time for a little thought experiment.

Imagine if men were no longer engineers & soldiers & scientists, imagine the biological havoc they would cause on society, all that intellectual brilliance channelled on society, on the loss of their biological roles, instead of as engineers, soldiers & scientists

I’m having a little bit of a hard time imagining, because that doesn’t make any fucking sense. Is he suggesting that the world would collapse if more dudes stayed home and tended the kids?

But never mind, because Rmaxd is on to his next point, which is that women are terrible at math and this makes them OBSOLETE!

In a technology based society, women are the first to be discarded, their lack of scientific & mathematical skills are a liability to our technological culture

Also, they’re lazy and don’t invent shit. Even though by keeping them at home and denying them education the men of the world gave them ample opportunity to invent all sorts of shit, they chose instead to sit on their fat asses and eat bon bons.

Women have in fact been stayathome moms for centuries, theyve NEVER had to work for centuries, they have now had centuries of shelter & protection from corporations, theyve had massive amounts of leisure, in fact more leisure then most working males through out history

& what did women do with that leisure, with all that time & opportunity to progress science?

 Women became biological luddites, they became entitled, inbred & backwards & technologically liabilities in our present technologically based age

When women should’ve been developing technologies to makeup for their inability to logic & reason, in the same way men developed music & art in order for men to experience emotions, all they did was call for young men to destroying their own futures, to be used as walking wallets & chattle

You can tell how innovative Rmaxd is, because he’s totally just innovated a new way to spell “chattel.”

Anyway, QED, fuck women.

Women are liabilities, we no longer need women to maintain our social networks, we have everything from mobile phones to the internet

Huh. Declaring half of humanity expendable. I was under the impression that MRA dudes considered that sort of thinking to be the equivalent of committing GENOCIDE. Seems some of them were making a big stink about that the other day, when a couple of ladies made some similar remarks about men.

Weird. Because MRA dudes are upvoting this, instead of gathering together in angry mobs on the internet to EXPOSE this dude’s personal information and talk about Fucking His Shit Up.

Never mind, though, because Rmaxd isn’t done with his case against ladies.

We no longer need them to maintain morality, as theyre incapable of morality, a womans ability to destroy herself, in the same fat women destroy their own bodies, is unprecedented, give a woman enough leisure & freetime, & all she’s capable of is how to enslave all of society, to ensure society does the same for women everywhere, irrespective of the results

Damn. So women getting fat is part of a sinister plot to enslave mankind?

This all sounds pretty dire for us civilization-creating dudes.

Happily, as Rmaxd explains in another comment, the ladies are so crazily self-destructive that they will fail in their evil designs, despite “being bankrolled by the rich upper class.” Just like the evil radical blacks back in the 1970s:

[W]omen are following the black activism handbook of the 70′s. …

[N]ear the end of the black movement, as the more mainstream, publicly accepted part of black militancy was rejected & debunked, the more radical components of the movement, began attacking its own supporters, in particular the white supporters of black rights, & they also started attacking blacks who were sympathetic to white males

We see the exact same thing happening with feminism, as the more popular & acceptable parts of feminism have now been rejected by popular culture, ie the colossal failure of stayathome dads

Because nothing is more evil and against NATURE than stay-at-home dads! It’s like sodomy squared.

Anyway, the evil ladies are doomed.

They now start becoming more radical, their antagonism & alienation of men, especially manginas & feminists will inevitably destroy them

As we all know women & especially special rights movements, are always self destructive, as the solutions are never radical enough.

So back to the homes, ladies, where you can return to fulfilling NATURE’s role for the females of the species: sitting on your fat asses and eating bon bons and being terrible at math. Because that is nature’s way.

I had a

522 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Joanna
12 years ago

@Lauralot: Nah, he’d know our willingness to be slaves was not entirely genuine.

Lauralot
Lauralot
12 years ago

NWO invented his incredibly stupid theory of male vs. female sexuality. Does that count?

Kyrie
Kyrie
12 years ago

Seeing a cow or a milk machine is an accomplishment now?

Polliwog
12 years ago

I know this thread is now far past the gender wars of my cats, but I just wanted to report that Loki wandered into the room, saw Athena sleeping on top of the couch, and immediately had to jump on the furniture until he was seated higher than she was. And that wasn’t enough for him, apparently, because now he’s on top of the TV and trying to transition to the mantle.

Totally irrelevant, but the boyfriend’s cat is also named Loki (a.k.a. Mr. Grumpyface, The Poopster, Fearsome Doom Tiger, and Kitty Kitty Fang Fang). Huzzah for obnoxious chaotic kitties. 🙂

Joanna
12 years ago

NWO, get back in the lab and make me a flying car!

nwoslave
12 years ago

@Noadi

And women had equal opportunity to compete equally in those trades.

Could you compete equally with the best of men who were blacksmiths? For the same rate of piece work? Would you want to?

If the answer to any of these questions in no. Then women weren’t oppressed.

ithiliana
12 years ago

In order to help the poor menz do better in college, a recent study seems to imply we’d best get rid of football:

http://pages.uoregon.edu/jlindo/BigtimeSportsAndStudentAchievement.pdf

Spearhafoc
12 years ago

I feel like doing this again.

Hate is all you know.

What do you like, exactly, NWOslave?

Here’s a partial list of things that make me happy, in no particular order:

Comic books (particularly DC and Vertigo)
Doctor Who
Norse mythology
Breasts
Drawing
Painting
The Pogues
Cartoons (Animaniacs, Pinky and the Brain, Venture Brothers, Looney Tunes, Futurama, etc)
Red hair
Women with glasses
Gilbert and Sullivan
Various Internet review shows (Nostalgia Chick, Linkara, Phelous, Cinema Snob, etc)
Movies (and other media) with over the top Nazi stereotypes in villain roles
The Room
19th century vampire literature
Sherlock
Etymologies

Lauralot
Lauralot
12 years ago

If the answer to any of these questions in no. Then women weren’t oppressed.

You’re not a big fan of logic, huh?

CassandraSays
12 years ago

Slavey really needs some new material, this whole “you are wedded to an ideology of hate” stuff is getting old.

Quackers
Quackers
12 years ago

@Lauralot

Well generally inventions have to benefit society positive way somehow, so no it doesn’t x)

ithiliana
12 years ago

And let’s not forget that only recently have the laws for patents existed — so that ‘credit’ for inventions was actually made a part of the record.

MRAL, a lot of the inventions that you take for granted as minor and in the past and not counting were the foundations of the later work–a friend of mine once showed me an 800 page on the invention of the stirrup and how it revolutionized warfare and made possible a shitload of later developments, but who would go “wow stirrup cool man”? in this day and age.

And while the guys are creaming their pants over the industrial revolution and technological developments since, the ONLY way those developments could be supported was by an economic system of chattel slavery that allowed surpluses to be built up PLUS a colonial system of exploitation that got cheap raw materials and labor out of oppressed peoples.

Shove the “great man of history” up your collective asses–because nothing important is done by an individual apart from familial and social support systems that the “great man of history” methodology (which has been fairly well debunked by current historical methodologies and theories) refused to acknowledge in the past.

Ray Percival
12 years ago

NWO,

Actually… Historically that’s just what happened. Granted it wasn’t horribly common but female blacksmiths did exist and were held to the same standards as the male smiths. The guilds made sure of this.

http://www.history.org/foundation/journal/spring04/women.cfm

ithiliana
12 years ago

800 page BOOK, i.e. historical monograph.

Lauralot
Lauralot
12 years ago

Some things that make me happy:

DC Comics (Particularly post-relaunch Supergirl, Batgirl, and Batwoman)
Christopher Nolan movies
Gingers/redheads (Unite, my brethren!)
Disney films
Harry Potter
Knitting
Baking
Snowfalls
Writing
Improving my drawing abilities
The Nostalgia Critic/The Cinema Snob/Linkara
Gail Simone
Lady Gaga
The Simpsons
Throbbing Gristle
Tom Waits
They Might Be Giants
Horror films
Girls in white dresses with blue satin sashes
Musicals
South Park
Positive representations of asexuals in fiction
Manboobz
The legalization of gay marriage
Chopped
Making fun of Sandra Lee
Stephen King
Brown eyes
Supervillains
Well-written fanfiction
Mittens
Getting someone a gift that makes their face light up
Hufflepuff House
Chocolate cake
Really bad movies
Star Wars

Lauralot
Lauralot
12 years ago

And also the movie Caligula. Watching it is my birthday tradition (I share a birthday with him).

Crumbelievable
Crumbelievable
12 years ago

@Lauralot: Nostaglia Critic is great

Didn’t NWO once expand his “women were never oppressed” theory to say that no minority groups have ever been oppressed? I’m hoping I imagined that.

ithiliana
12 years ago

I don’t know if it’s possible to get an answer for this: but WHY is the “men invented everything important” so important to…..men?

I mean, the vast majority of mass and serial murderers as far as we know are men, but you don’t hear the “we are murderous thugs who are more likely to be murderers than women are” that often.

Why not? One seems as applicable as the other.

The vast majority of people (MEN and WOMEN) neither invent anything nor murder anyone.

What need does this “we hunted the mammoth”/”we invented everything important” serve for you all (especially since the feminists aren’t buying it and can supply lots of counter evidencee)?

Lauralot
Lauralot
12 years ago

@Crumbelievable: Well, considering his comments about the Holocaust, that sounds plausible…I really hope not, though.

ithiliana
12 years ago

Should have said: to SOME of the men, the ones who keep dragging it into the discussion.

Noadi
12 years ago

And women had equal opportunity to compete equally in those trades.

Could you compete equally with the best of men who were blacksmiths? For the same rate of piece work? Would you want to?

If the answer to any of these questions in no. Then women weren’t oppressed.

No they didn’t, women were generally barred from the apprentice system. If you aren’t allowed to become an apprentice in a trade then you don’t have the opportunity to learn it do you? Some women did learn men’s trades, from their fathers since they couldn’t be apprenticed out, but most women were stuck with the trades that were allowed to women such as weaving, dressmaking, etc.

By the way you picked the wrong person to make that challenge to. I work with my hands every single day as a jewelry designer (as girly as that sounds it involves a lot of physical work, including forging metal). The only blacksmith I know, who used to shoe my family’s horses back when my grandfather was alive is a woman. I grew up working in my grandfather’s leather shop, I was throwing around full cowhides of tooling leather and helping build saddles and harnesses by the time I was 10 years old. I love working with my hands, blacksmithign would be right up my alley.

CassandraSays
12 years ago

“I don’t know if it’s possible to get an answer for this: but WHY is the “men invented everything important” so important to…..men?”

Well, in MRAL’s case, given what we know about him, I’d guess that he probably defaults to this when for whatever reason he’s feeling insecure and needs to bolster his self esteem. That may be applicable to men as a group too – certainly in my experience none of the really accomplished men who’re happy with their lives that I know ever talk this way, only the ones who’re insecure for one reason or another, and who feel a need to have something that gives them an advantage over women.

nwoslave
12 years ago

@Ray Percival

But if there were women who competed equally in these fields. Doesn’t that contrary to ideology which tells us women didn’t have that opportunity? I guess women weren’t oppressed after all. There were just far less of them in a given field due to either being unable to compete equally or because of personal choice.

So which is it? Were women oppressed or weren’t they?

Leni
Leni
12 years ago

NWO invented his incredibly stupid theory of male vs. female sexuality. Does that count?

He plagiarized it from some some man, so no.

Could you compete equally with the best of men who were blacksmiths? For the same rate of piece work? Would you want to?

Could you compete equally with the best of women who worked in textiles? For the same rate of piece work? Would you want to?

If the answer is no, then men weren’t oppressed.

Lauralot
Lauralot
12 years ago

What makes you happy, NWO?

I should at MST3K to my list.

1 6 7 8 9 10 21