Oh boy. Over on The Spearhead, the good old trusty Spearhead, a fella called Rmaxd has some bold new ideas to share with the world.
Well, they’re not really new, or bold, or true, and some of them kind of seem to contradict each other. But they are, indisputably, ideas. And because he’s a dude, they’re automatically good, because dudes are the dynamic, creative force behind all historical progress. So it’s no wonder this comment of his got more than two dozen upvotes.
Rmaxd starts off by addressing the manginas of the world, and every man who might be considering the benefits of manginahood:
Grow some balls, be masculine, & these so called feminists have zero power
Because NATURE.
We always revert to our biology & nature, over idealism, this is why feminism is dead in the water
And NATURE says women should stay home and cook and pop out babies.
Women in our society are so fucked up, precisely because they rejected their biological need to be part of a society, through their children, husbands & a family
It’s time for a little thought experiment.
Imagine if men were no longer engineers & soldiers & scientists, imagine the biological havoc they would cause on society, all that intellectual brilliance channelled on society, on the loss of their biological roles, instead of as engineers, soldiers & scientists
I’m having a little bit of a hard time imagining, because that doesn’t make any fucking sense. Is he suggesting that the world would collapse if more dudes stayed home and tended the kids?
But never mind, because Rmaxd is on to his next point, which is that women are terrible at math and this makes them OBSOLETE!
In a technology based society, women are the first to be discarded, their lack of scientific & mathematical skills are a liability to our technological culture
Also, they’re lazy and don’t invent shit. Even though by keeping them at home and denying them education the men of the world gave them ample opportunity to invent all sorts of shit, they chose instead to sit on their fat asses and eat bon bons.
Women have in fact been stayathome moms for centuries, theyve NEVER had to work for centuries, they have now had centuries of shelter & protection from corporations, theyve had massive amounts of leisure, in fact more leisure then most working males through out history
& what did women do with that leisure, with all that time & opportunity to progress science?
Women became biological luddites, they became entitled, inbred & backwards & technologically liabilities in our present technologically based age
When women should’ve been developing technologies to makeup for their inability to logic & reason, in the same way men developed music & art in order for men to experience emotions, all they did was call for young men to destroying their own futures, to be used as walking wallets & chattle
You can tell how innovative Rmaxd is, because he’s totally just innovated a new way to spell “chattel.”
Anyway, QED, fuck women.
Women are liabilities, we no longer need women to maintain our social networks, we have everything from mobile phones to the internet
Huh. Declaring half of humanity expendable. I was under the impression that MRA dudes considered that sort of thinking to be the equivalent of committing GENOCIDE. Seems some of them were making a big stink about that the other day, when a couple of ladies made some similar remarks about men.
Weird. Because MRA dudes are upvoting this, instead of gathering together in angry mobs on the internet to EXPOSE this dude’s personal information and talk about Fucking His Shit Up.
Never mind, though, because Rmaxd isn’t done with his case against ladies.
We no longer need them to maintain morality, as theyre incapable of morality, a womans ability to destroy herself, in the same fat women destroy their own bodies, is unprecedented, give a woman enough leisure & freetime, & all she’s capable of is how to enslave all of society, to ensure society does the same for women everywhere, irrespective of the results
Damn. So women getting fat is part of a sinister plot to enslave mankind?
This all sounds pretty dire for us civilization-creating dudes.
Happily, as Rmaxd explains in another comment, the ladies are so crazily self-destructive that they will fail in their evil designs, despite “being bankrolled by the rich upper class.” Just like the evil radical blacks back in the 1970s:
[W]omen are following the black activism handbook of the 70′s. …
[N]ear the end of the black movement, as the more mainstream, publicly accepted part of black militancy was rejected & debunked, the more radical components of the movement, began attacking its own supporters, in particular the white supporters of black rights, & they also started attacking blacks who were sympathetic to white males
We see the exact same thing happening with feminism, as the more popular & acceptable parts of feminism have now been rejected by popular culture, ie the colossal failure of stayathome dads
Because nothing is more evil and against NATURE than stay-at-home dads! It’s like sodomy squared.
Anyway, the evil ladies are doomed.
They now start becoming more radical, their antagonism & alienation of men, especially manginas & feminists will inevitably destroy them
As we all know women & especially special rights movements, are always self destructive, as the solutions are never radical enough.
So back to the homes, ladies, where you can return to fulfilling NATURE’s role for the females of the species: sitting on your fat asses and eating bon bons and being terrible at math. Because that is nature’s way.
I had a
If 95% of important inventions were manvented, I don’t think it’s a stretch to assume that the “unknown” inventions were, for the most part, also manventions.
Shadow, your post is commendable but I think it may need a few more exclamation points.
“As we all know women & especially special rights movements, are always self destructive, as the solutions are never radical enough.”
Could we please try to teach these guys enough grammar to allow us to at least understand what they’re trying to say? “Women & especially special rights movements” – in all seriousness, WTF is he even trying to say there?
How are we qualifying “important” inventions here?
Men have only rage. No other emotion is
acceptablenatural.@CassandraSays: I think he assumes that women – not feminists, but all women – are a special rights movement. All special right movements end up destroying themselves, either because their ideas aren’t radical enough, or the changes they cause aren’t radical enough.
Therefore, the entire female gender will eventually collapse and tear each other apart because they aren’t radical enough or something. And then men will die out, because there won’t be anymore children. I think.
Were they invented by men? Then they’re important!
QED!
MRAL,
Show your work. Unsupported assertions prove nothing.
No, by then we’ll have artificial wombs, as Zarat keeps telling us.
Well, not “we”, since we women will all be dead, having…I dunno, cannabalized each other like sharks in a feeding frenzy?
My lady-cat is currently sleeping on the couch. That whore, sitting there all high and mighty and getting fat off the sweat of the man-cat that labors for her wealth!
Wait, he’s asleep too. But he’s on the floor! Damn, lady cats are bitches.
Hmm… WordPress seems to have swallowed up my last comment O.o
My lady-cat is currently asleep on top of her scratching post with her head hanging off the edge. Sometimes I doubt her commitment to the radical man-destroying agenda.
Ray, I’m not interested in proving to you that men invented most shit, much like I’m not interested in proving to you the sky is blue.
Actually, the sky is currently black over here.
Anyway, are windshield wipers an important invention? I’d say so, considering how driving in rain or snow would be deadly or impossible without them. We’ve got a woman to thank for those.
@Lauralot:
Point taken. That you have a point clearly shows that you are just another overeducated feminist. Might I suggest putting down the textbooks for a while and allowing your brain to atrophy back to it’s natural, feminine, cuddly size.
As for special rights, I’m assuming that Rmaxd is from the States, though I have seen this attitude in people from all over. Rights in America were created by white men for white men. It is women and us coloured folk that seem to want to fight our natural place in God’s/Poor Evo Psych’s green earth as the enslaved and oppressed. Soon though, all will be right again as we implode like mini supernovas in our attempt to find equality over quality
This man clearly thinks women are…basically useless. Yet he wants these fat, dumb, useless, talentless slobs running households and raising children? YIKES!
How about a nontoxic, fireproof, and indestructible replacement for asbestos in buildings? Is that important? ‘Cause that was the ladies too.
@Shadow: How can one be “overeducated”?
Then there’s also discovering radium. I guess that wasn’t important either.
Nah, it would have been fine for people to keep dying of asbestos poisoning. Men do not experience emotions except through art and music, so as long as it was quiet and the walls were bare no one would have cared.
If women only invent useless stuff designed to keep people alive, who cares? They should focus on important stuff like ray guns and hovercars if they want to be taken seriously.
Also unimportant: the algorithm for the first computer program.
“Also unimportant: the algorithm for the first computer program.”
Ada Lovelace is my favorite ^_^ Though if all women took to computer programming it would probably be dismissed as “woman’s work” like cooking and sewing.
Just think what Mary Somerville could have invented if they had only permitted her in the door to study at the college where they used her text books and named a Hall after her.
His argument that wasting the brain power of half the human race is a waste is demonstrably true. The rest of it seems to contradict itself.
Unimportant: Gunpowder packages for the Swedish army. So unimportant that the Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences offered a reward for such an invention.
Actually, I’d think in time past, anonymous was more likely to be female. Men risk little by taking credit for something; in the past, women risked much more.