Oh boy. Over on The Spearhead, the good old trusty Spearhead, a fella called Rmaxd has some bold new ideas to share with the world.
Well, they’re not really new, or bold, or true, and some of them kind of seem to contradict each other. But they are, indisputably, ideas. And because he’s a dude, they’re automatically good, because dudes are the dynamic, creative force behind all historical progress. So it’s no wonder this comment of his got more than two dozen upvotes.
Rmaxd starts off by addressing the manginas of the world, and every man who might be considering the benefits of manginahood:
Grow some balls, be masculine, & these so called feminists have zero power
Because NATURE.
We always revert to our biology & nature, over idealism, this is why feminism is dead in the water
And NATURE says women should stay home and cook and pop out babies.
Women in our society are so fucked up, precisely because they rejected their biological need to be part of a society, through their children, husbands & a family
It’s time for a little thought experiment.
Imagine if men were no longer engineers & soldiers & scientists, imagine the biological havoc they would cause on society, all that intellectual brilliance channelled on society, on the loss of their biological roles, instead of as engineers, soldiers & scientists
I’m having a little bit of a hard time imagining, because that doesn’t make any fucking sense. Is he suggesting that the world would collapse if more dudes stayed home and tended the kids?
But never mind, because Rmaxd is on to his next point, which is that women are terrible at math and this makes them OBSOLETE!
In a technology based society, women are the first to be discarded, their lack of scientific & mathematical skills are a liability to our technological culture
Also, they’re lazy and don’t invent shit. Even though by keeping them at home and denying them education the men of the world gave them ample opportunity to invent all sorts of shit, they chose instead to sit on their fat asses and eat bon bons.
Women have in fact been stayathome moms for centuries, theyve NEVER had to work for centuries, they have now had centuries of shelter & protection from corporations, theyve had massive amounts of leisure, in fact more leisure then most working males through out history
& what did women do with that leisure, with all that time & opportunity to progress science?
Women became biological luddites, they became entitled, inbred & backwards & technologically liabilities in our present technologically based age
When women should’ve been developing technologies to makeup for their inability to logic & reason, in the same way men developed music & art in order for men to experience emotions, all they did was call for young men to destroying their own futures, to be used as walking wallets & chattle
You can tell how innovative Rmaxd is, because he’s totally just innovated a new way to spell “chattel.”
Anyway, QED, fuck women.
Women are liabilities, we no longer need women to maintain our social networks, we have everything from mobile phones to the internet
Huh. Declaring half of humanity expendable. I was under the impression that MRA dudes considered that sort of thinking to be the equivalent of committing GENOCIDE. Seems some of them were making a big stink about that the other day, when a couple of ladies made some similar remarks about men.
Weird. Because MRA dudes are upvoting this, instead of gathering together in angry mobs on the internet to EXPOSE this dude’s personal information and talk about Fucking His Shit Up.
Never mind, though, because Rmaxd isn’t done with his case against ladies.
We no longer need them to maintain morality, as theyre incapable of morality, a womans ability to destroy herself, in the same fat women destroy their own bodies, is unprecedented, give a woman enough leisure & freetime, & all she’s capable of is how to enslave all of society, to ensure society does the same for women everywhere, irrespective of the results
Damn. So women getting fat is part of a sinister plot to enslave mankind?
This all sounds pretty dire for us civilization-creating dudes.
Happily, as Rmaxd explains in another comment, the ladies are so crazily self-destructive that they will fail in their evil designs, despite “being bankrolled by the rich upper class.” Just like the evil radical blacks back in the 1970s:
[W]omen are following the black activism handbook of the 70′s. …
[N]ear the end of the black movement, as the more mainstream, publicly accepted part of black militancy was rejected & debunked, the more radical components of the movement, began attacking its own supporters, in particular the white supporters of black rights, & they also started attacking blacks who were sympathetic to white males
We see the exact same thing happening with feminism, as the more popular & acceptable parts of feminism have now been rejected by popular culture, ie the colossal failure of stayathome dads
Because nothing is more evil and against NATURE than stay-at-home dads! It’s like sodomy squared.
Anyway, the evil ladies are doomed.
They now start becoming more radical, their antagonism & alienation of men, especially manginas & feminists will inevitably destroy them
As we all know women & especially special rights movements, are always self destructive, as the solutions are never radical enough.
So back to the homes, ladies, where you can return to fulfilling NATURE’s role for the females of the species: sitting on your fat asses and eating bon bons and being terrible at math. Because that is nature’s way.
I had a
“MRAL, it is entirely possible to be dressed up and looking good and not get approached.”
Happens to me all the time.
NWO, it’s good to see you fail at sarcasm just as hard as you fail at everything else.
@Sniper
I’m not saying you’re gonna get prince charming. My point is that a bag lady can get sex more readily than an average guy if she doesn’t care who it is. The same can’t be said for a bum in the gutter.
What defines well-dressed, though? I think an issue in my understanding of this could be standards of what counts as dressed-up. I appreciate suits, tweeds, and that sort of thing, and tend to (gently) poke fun at friends who wear silk shirts that expose part of their chest or who wear their hipster-trilby-hats askew.
In my experience, men don’t get a lot of pressure to get dressed up, to the point that a buttoned shirt seems semi-formal (certainly better than a Metallica t-shirt worn by someone who doesn’t even like Metallica). Women’s clothing in similar situations tend to require a lot more effort (and look better, in my opinion).
@hellkell
Well it got your panties in a bunch. Didn’t it?
I went to a number of Halloween parties dolled up with makeup and wearing fairly little clothing. I consider myself average looking. I was at most of these parties alone, usually hanging out by the refreshments, and completely approachable. No one approached me. Granted, I didn’t want anyone to approach me, but they didn’t know this and it’s not as if I was growling at anyone who looked my way.
joanna, well sure, but look, at a certain point, it’s a matter of opinion, or dependent on the attributes of the man in question (like maybe tall girls like tall guys and vice versa). On weekends, once in a while, I will pass a gaggle of girls going to a party and they are all beautiful, but in different ways. Who would I “pick”? I don’t give a shit. It would depend on their personalities.
*jumps up and down waving like and idiot* Um…hello?? This is me! I have very rarely been approached…like maybe only 4 times in my life and I’m in my late 20s but I’ve been mistaken for a teenager before. It’s true, I was asked my age when I bought a lottery ticket :/ Anyway, two of those guys just wanted sex.
I dress nice. I wear make-up. I lost weight. And fuck, even if you want to use the “it’s probably cuz your a feminist” card it doesn’t matter, because I do not look like a stereotypical straw feminist. On top of that I’m nice. I AM INVISIBLE.
You may think the average girl looks beautiful, but why don’t you go see Roissy’s recent blog post with the picture of the 3 girls and see how he rated them?
Lol. No.
Actually, as it turns out, women are more likely to say no to random sexual propositions than men! But when they asked women why, it turns out that women are more likely than men to assume that people who randomly ask them out are unattractive, bad in bed, and liable to chop them up into little pieces and put them in the freezer.
Bit of a damper on a romantic mood, there.
@CassandraSays
“When men try to analyze this stuff they often seem to leave out that important little detail,”
i think a large part of that is because it’s much easier to notice the guy that’s approaching women and being shot down than it is to notice the girl who is not being approached.
“Your world is a lot different to mine, MRAL. In the world I live in nobody would describe the average young woman as beautiful just because she put on a nice dress.”
I think that’s untrue for both genders actually. As long as you don’t fall far outside the conventional beauty standards, it is very possible to use your clothing to enhance how close you conform to what’s considered beautiful. The stereotypical ones are the little black/red dress for women and tuxes/suits for men
In my experience, men don’t get a lot of pressure to get dressed up, to the point that a buttoned shirt seems semi-formal (certainly better than a Metallica t-shirt worn by someone who doesn’t even like Metallica).
Exactly! I go to the theater and the ballet fairly often, and the typical young couple is a woman in a cocktail dress, hose, heels, and evening-style makeup with obviously “done” hair accompanied by a guy wearing khakis or dark slacks, a button down shirt and loafers. It’s rare to see a man of any age match his date, although a few old couples do the whole evening dress look, which I think is cool.
” Who would I “pick”? I don’t give a shit. It would depend on their personalities.”
Um…ok well there you go… I think. A girl could look incredibly hot but be a total bitch. Sometimes sex isn’t that worth it =P
Look, what do you guys want me to say? I am 20 years old and I have never even touched a girl, and I want to very badly. It’s my own personal experience that women are kind of elitist gatekeepers. That’s just how it’s worked.
@ozymandias42
You’re telling me it’s just as easy for a man to have sex as a woman?
When I go to the theater I usually wear dark jeans and a buttondown shirt. So yeah. Masculine-presenting people definitely have easier outfits than feminine-presenting.
MRAL, I would have said that same about men at 20 years old. Sometimes getting it right takes a long, long time, and sometimes it never happens.
Nope, my panties remain bunch-free.
I do get compliments from women a hell of a lot more than men. But I guess that just means I’m “girl pretty” which we all know is not the same as what men view as attractive, thus rendering it void. *eyeroll*
and no, none of this means I expect compliments from men, or for them to ask me out. I’m just saying that according to this worldview of men only approaching women and notion that any average woman can be pretty…well, that sure as hell isn’t the world I’m living in >.>
I’m also not trying to say you’re necessarily wrong MRAL, but these things really are subjective. Everyone is going to have a different experience that will probably conflict with other’s experiences.
“I dress nice. I wear make-up. I lost weight. And fuck, even if you want to use the “it’s probably cuz your a feminist” card it doesn’t matter, because I do not look like a stereotypical straw feminist. On top of that I’m nice. I AM INVISIBLE.”
Whereas I’m apparently very visible, and I’m 38, and often hit on while in jeans and a tshirt (ie not dressed up, though I’m always well groomed and my clothes always fit well and yadda yadda). Why? I have no idea. Neither does anyone else, I don’t think. Part of it may be WHERE you are as much as WHO you are.
There are lots and lots of women in the same position you are. I have one friend who almost never gets hit on who I think is quite pretty, and another one who gets hit on all the time who is about 30 pounds overweight. Part of the difference is personality, I think, maybe part of it is sex appeal, which is about a lot more than looks. Why knows? But for sure it’s not as simple as “all young women of at least average appearance can have the relationship they want any time they feel like it”.
I don’t know about anyone else here MRAL, but I’m just trying to get you to see things from a different perspective. I know plenty of guys that haven’t touched a girl until their 20’s. You are not alone in this. You just need a clear head and a bit of patience.
NWO: Nope. All things considered, I think it’s easier for women to obtain random sex, if they want it. That’s because the market is skewed by the aforementioned “men who randomly hit on women are thought to want to chop you up in little bits” factor.
MRAL: I knew three guys like that… I’ve made out with two of them. XD But anyway it is not uncommon to get your first kiss in your twenties, especially if you’re shy, and it certainly doesn’t mean you’re going to be a failure at datng forever.
Tell ya what everyone. Take two of the manboobz crew, a guy and a girl of comparable looks. Go to some social singles event. Both of you say, “I’m willing to have sex” to the crowd of people. And tell them you want the phone numbers of any who approach for your offers.
I gauruntee the manboobz woman will have a wack of numbers by the end of the evening, and the manboobz guy will be nursing a crushed ego.
When I was 20 I never touched a guy either. I’m also pretty sure no guy would have wanted to touch me. Trust me, I looked like shit when I was 20.
Since you’re in college MRAL, why not try to go to more parties? or join some clubs? do you have any guy friends that can introduce you to any women?
A bum (male) in the gutter can get sex pretty much as easily if he doesn’t care who it is. It’s probably going to be with another homeless dude, or with a skeevy guy who’s paying him for sex, but he can get it if he has no standards whatsoever.
Wait, you didn’t mean “with other guys”??? Sorry NWO, but caring about gender counts as “caring who it is”. Still a standard, albeit a bare minimum one.