Oh boy. Over on The Spearhead, the good old trusty Spearhead, a fella called Rmaxd has some bold new ideas to share with the world.
Well, they’re not really new, or bold, or true, and some of them kind of seem to contradict each other. But they are, indisputably, ideas. And because he’s a dude, they’re automatically good, because dudes are the dynamic, creative force behind all historical progress. So it’s no wonder this comment of his got more than two dozen upvotes.
Rmaxd starts off by addressing the manginas of the world, and every man who might be considering the benefits of manginahood:
Grow some balls, be masculine, & these so called feminists have zero power
Because NATURE.
We always revert to our biology & nature, over idealism, this is why feminism is dead in the water
And NATURE says women should stay home and cook and pop out babies.
Women in our society are so fucked up, precisely because they rejected their biological need to be part of a society, through their children, husbands & a family
It’s time for a little thought experiment.
Imagine if men were no longer engineers & soldiers & scientists, imagine the biological havoc they would cause on society, all that intellectual brilliance channelled on society, on the loss of their biological roles, instead of as engineers, soldiers & scientists
I’m having a little bit of a hard time imagining, because that doesn’t make any fucking sense. Is he suggesting that the world would collapse if more dudes stayed home and tended the kids?
But never mind, because Rmaxd is on to his next point, which is that women are terrible at math and this makes them OBSOLETE!
In a technology based society, women are the first to be discarded, their lack of scientific & mathematical skills are a liability to our technological culture
Also, they’re lazy and don’t invent shit. Even though by keeping them at home and denying them education the men of the world gave them ample opportunity to invent all sorts of shit, they chose instead to sit on their fat asses and eat bon bons.
Women have in fact been stayathome moms for centuries, theyve NEVER had to work for centuries, they have now had centuries of shelter & protection from corporations, theyve had massive amounts of leisure, in fact more leisure then most working males through out history
& what did women do with that leisure, with all that time & opportunity to progress science?
Women became biological luddites, they became entitled, inbred & backwards & technologically liabilities in our present technologically based age
When women should’ve been developing technologies to makeup for their inability to logic & reason, in the same way men developed music & art in order for men to experience emotions, all they did was call for young men to destroying their own futures, to be used as walking wallets & chattle
You can tell how innovative Rmaxd is, because he’s totally just innovated a new way to spell “chattel.”
Anyway, QED, fuck women.
Women are liabilities, we no longer need women to maintain our social networks, we have everything from mobile phones to the internet
Huh. Declaring half of humanity expendable. I was under the impression that MRA dudes considered that sort of thinking to be the equivalent of committing GENOCIDE. Seems some of them were making a big stink about that the other day, when a couple of ladies made some similar remarks about men.
Weird. Because MRA dudes are upvoting this, instead of gathering together in angry mobs on the internet to EXPOSE this dude’s personal information and talk about Fucking His Shit Up.
Never mind, though, because Rmaxd isn’t done with his case against ladies.
We no longer need them to maintain morality, as theyre incapable of morality, a womans ability to destroy herself, in the same fat women destroy their own bodies, is unprecedented, give a woman enough leisure & freetime, & all she’s capable of is how to enslave all of society, to ensure society does the same for women everywhere, irrespective of the results
Damn. So women getting fat is part of a sinister plot to enslave mankind?
This all sounds pretty dire for us civilization-creating dudes.
Happily, as Rmaxd explains in another comment, the ladies are so crazily self-destructive that they will fail in their evil designs, despite “being bankrolled by the rich upper class.” Just like the evil radical blacks back in the 1970s:
[W]omen are following the black activism handbook of the 70′s. …
[N]ear the end of the black movement, as the more mainstream, publicly accepted part of black militancy was rejected & debunked, the more radical components of the movement, began attacking its own supporters, in particular the white supporters of black rights, & they also started attacking blacks who were sympathetic to white males
We see the exact same thing happening with feminism, as the more popular & acceptable parts of feminism have now been rejected by popular culture, ie the colossal failure of stayathome dads
Because nothing is more evil and against NATURE than stay-at-home dads! It’s like sodomy squared.
Anyway, the evil ladies are doomed.
They now start becoming more radical, their antagonism & alienation of men, especially manginas & feminists will inevitably destroy them
As we all know women & especially special rights movements, are always self destructive, as the solutions are never radical enough.
So back to the homes, ladies, where you can return to fulfilling NATURE’s role for the females of the species: sitting on your fat asses and eating bon bons and being terrible at math. Because that is nature’s way.
I had a
” I just have a really super duper hard time believing that an attractive woman, if she wants it, will have ANY trouble picking up men.”
She could attract a million men, but there is only a few that she would be compatible with. Relationships aren’t just about sex, they’re about companionship. No point being in a relationship with someone you hate or who hates you back.
Especially since the Spartans were more likely to go for other fellas, from what I’ve read.
@Joanna
Well you’re in a different league then say Lauralot, whose response to me saying men and women suffered different but equal hardships was……… “Life must be very different on your planet.”
See, women have to be victims and men have to be oppressors or life becomes unbearable.
I just have a really super duper hard time believing that an attractive woman, if she wants it, will have ANY trouble picking up men.
You’re moving the goalposts. Now you’re talking about only “attractive” women. In my experience, the standard is much higher for women than for men. A woman has to practically devote her life to her appearance to be considered attractive but a guy has only to put on a button-down shirt and get a good haircut. Now do I get to assume that my personal experience and opinions are a universal fact? Or shall I just act like a grownup and assume that there are no hard and fast rules.
By the way, I met my spouse online, but that was eons ago. Who knows what it’s like out there now.
NWO,
Go read the article. It very specifically talks about how they tried to keep women out of those professions but they were able to compete anyway.
Branding girls as sluts and raging on websites
Calling women whores, being hateful when they’re right
Telling feminists of the enslavement he’ll bring
These are NWO’s favorite things
Saying we’re liars for rape accusations
Warning of men’s uprising across the nations
Boasting that MRAs will clip our wings
These are NWO’s favorite things
Projecting on us all the hatred that he feels
Making theories that make us ask, “You for reals?”
Crowing about how men’s vengeance will sting
These are NWO’s favorite things
When a girl’s right, when the dumb stings
When he’s feeling sad
NWO remembers his favorite things
And they make him so, so mad
MRAL, Internet dating is weird, because you get assholes mass-messaging 300 women, which means women get significantly more messages and only slightly more good messages.
@MRAL
“I just have a really super duper hard time believing that an attractive woman, if she wants it, will have ANY trouble picking up men”
This is true for attractive people in general though. Physically attractive men don’t have trouble picking up women (in general) either. But, how successful they are in their romantic life is highly dependent on what they want out of their romantic lives. Case in point Joanna’s physically attractive friend who is looking for something that is dependent on more than just her physical appearance. So the fact that she is attractive, while helpful, does not help her with the lion’s share of what she needs.
MRAL: Lots of women aren’t able to pick up men–the problem is you don’t ‘see’ them or believe in them because they’re not ‘attractive’ by your definition–which is probably true for only a small percentage of women (and a lot of gorgeous women apparently so intimidate men that they don’t get have much success either). I really wish you could work out of the mindset that women have it easier than men in some magical super duper way and realize that it’s not easy for anybody.
And saying that those women who cannot pick up men can just lose weight or do some other magical b.s. and ZAP get men, well, right, and unicorns fart rainbows.
Why does NWO assume he gets to make the rules of discourse on a feminist blog? Entitled much?
“See, women have to be victims and men have to be oppressors or life becomes unbearable.”
I’ve never been oppressed myself and I’m doing ok.
*sigh* You’re even more delusional than I thought. And I think I see the problem now.
Your a fucking Randroid.
Let me rephrase: oppression can and does occur based on both gender and class. See, they don’t cancel each other out. They’re mostly additive.
Also, you keep neglecting to respond to my repeated efforts to point out the fact that women couldn’t vote. If women weren’t a special case, then why were they a special case? Why prevent them from participating in the political process?
Well… I think you’re exaggerating the “pump and dump” mentality men have. A lot of men I think want to have SEX, which is different than masturbation with a vagina, and often one-night stands lead to a relationship. I would be all over that possibility, personally. There is still a level of emotional connection, IMO.
Also, Joanna, so if it’s hard for the woman, picking and choosing amongst a wealth of plebians, how is it for the plebians themselves?
*sighs*
Ok MRAL, here’s where I think men and women tend to think a bit differently on this “who has a harder time getting laid/a date debate”. I know it sounds a bit generalizing so a disclaimer- this doesn’t apply to everyone. Its purely from what I’ve noticed.
Men think women have an easier time getting laid. But many women don’t just want a guy who’s going to basically use her as a hole then never see her again. This is why I, who gets very little male attention in the first place, have never had sex with the two guys who wanted that. Because they very clearly were player types and I knew they didn’t want a relationship, while I did. Obviously there are lots of women who don’t mind one night stands and that’s fine too. But when you’re looking for an actual relationship, it’s tough. Especially when you are a woman like me who is also shy and just average looking. Women like me get overlooked too, even if we wear make-up and try to “look hot”. Also I fail to see how looking hot for a woman would work, but looking hot for a guy wouldn’t. Both sexes enjoy attractive people. Also I agree that hearing the “be confident” line is annoying too. I hear it a lot as well. But it does have a grain of truth to it. Unfortunately obtaining confidence doesn’t come easy to a lot of people.
Anyway, what I’m trying to say is, is that it’s hard for everyone who isn’t blessed with good looks and a flawless personality, but also that it comes down to what each person is actually looking for too. In all honesty I’m sure a lot of these “nice guys” could find desperate, unattractive lonely women to have sex with, but do they want to sleep with a fat woman? an unattractive woman? an old woman? I doubt it.
@CassandraSays
“And even in that case, as Ozy is telling you, it’s not necessarily true.”
Total bullshit. Of course it’s true. There is no woman who can’t walk into a bar in a skeevy part of town and say, “I’m willing to fuck any man.” And not get an offer to oblige.
There is no way the reverse is true. The only reason you can’t admit this is because if you did, it would be tantmount to breaking with your precious ideology of men and women being sexually identical.
“how is it for the plebians themselves?”
Depends on what they’re looking for in a woman, I suppose.
” Physically attractive men don’t have trouble picking up women (in general) either.”
I keep trying to gently point this out. When men try to analyze this stuff they often seem to leave out that important little detail, so you have them going “well, that really hot girl I always see at the bar has no problems, but my totally average looking friend isn’t getting any attention even though he took a shower and everything”.
The really hot men I know have no difficulty at all picking up women unless they have noticeable personality issues, just like the equally hot women. Funny how that works.
“Total bullshit. Of course it’s true. There is no woman who can’t walk into a bar in a skeevy part of town and say, “I’m willing to fuck any man.” And not get an offer to oblige.”
Prove it.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Psychological_projection
@Quackers
“Men think women have an easier time getting laid. But many women don’t just want a guy who’s going to basically use her as a hole then never see her again.”
I agree completely. But that doesn’t change the fact that any woman who just wants the act of sex and doesn’t care who it’s with can get that. The reverse isn’t true.
MRAL, I think it would be a good idea for you to take women at their word on the difficulties of dating life.
Also, I did lose about 25 pounds recently and I’m still invisible to men so…yea. Its not just about looking good for women either.
MRAL, you think I’m exaggerating because you don’t seem to be close to many women, and you’ve never been on the receiving end of that mentality yourself. It happens, a lot. Just look at our friend NWO – he’s basically building a premise in which any woman who isn’t up for that is just being unreasonably picky.
” agree completely. But that doesn’t change the fact that any woman who just wants the act of sex and doesn’t care who it’s with can get that. The reverse isn’t true.”
You make it sound like all men have no standards in who they chose to fuck =P
I just don’t agree with this “using her as a hole” premise. Who actually does that? I think most men are looking for a relationship. I would far prefer one of those. And no, I would not limit myself to The Gorgeous or whatever, and I don’t think others would. I think maybe men are willing to do SEX, then RELATIONSHIP, while most women want vice versa, but I think that is not that big a disagreement.