Oh boy. Over on The Spearhead, the good old trusty Spearhead, a fella called Rmaxd has some bold new ideas to share with the world.
Well, they’re not really new, or bold, or true, and some of them kind of seem to contradict each other. But they are, indisputably, ideas. And because he’s a dude, they’re automatically good, because dudes are the dynamic, creative force behind all historical progress. So it’s no wonder this comment of his got more than two dozen upvotes.
Rmaxd starts off by addressing the manginas of the world, and every man who might be considering the benefits of manginahood:
Grow some balls, be masculine, & these so called feminists have zero power
Because NATURE.
We always revert to our biology & nature, over idealism, this is why feminism is dead in the water
And NATURE says women should stay home and cook and pop out babies.
Women in our society are so fucked up, precisely because they rejected their biological need to be part of a society, through their children, husbands & a family
It’s time for a little thought experiment.
Imagine if men were no longer engineers & soldiers & scientists, imagine the biological havoc they would cause on society, all that intellectual brilliance channelled on society, on the loss of their biological roles, instead of as engineers, soldiers & scientists
I’m having a little bit of a hard time imagining, because that doesn’t make any fucking sense. Is he suggesting that the world would collapse if more dudes stayed home and tended the kids?
But never mind, because Rmaxd is on to his next point, which is that women are terrible at math and this makes them OBSOLETE!
In a technology based society, women are the first to be discarded, their lack of scientific & mathematical skills are a liability to our technological culture
Also, they’re lazy and don’t invent shit. Even though by keeping them at home and denying them education the men of the world gave them ample opportunity to invent all sorts of shit, they chose instead to sit on their fat asses and eat bon bons.
Women have in fact been stayathome moms for centuries, theyve NEVER had to work for centuries, they have now had centuries of shelter & protection from corporations, theyve had massive amounts of leisure, in fact more leisure then most working males through out history
& what did women do with that leisure, with all that time & opportunity to progress science?
Women became biological luddites, they became entitled, inbred & backwards & technologically liabilities in our present technologically based age
When women should’ve been developing technologies to makeup for their inability to logic & reason, in the same way men developed music & art in order for men to experience emotions, all they did was call for young men to destroying their own futures, to be used as walking wallets & chattle
You can tell how innovative Rmaxd is, because he’s totally just innovated a new way to spell “chattel.”
Anyway, QED, fuck women.
Women are liabilities, we no longer need women to maintain our social networks, we have everything from mobile phones to the internet
Huh. Declaring half of humanity expendable. I was under the impression that MRA dudes considered that sort of thinking to be the equivalent of committing GENOCIDE. Seems some of them were making a big stink about that the other day, when a couple of ladies made some similar remarks about men.
Weird. Because MRA dudes are upvoting this, instead of gathering together in angry mobs on the internet to EXPOSE this dude’s personal information and talk about Fucking His Shit Up.
Never mind, though, because Rmaxd isn’t done with his case against ladies.
We no longer need them to maintain morality, as theyre incapable of morality, a womans ability to destroy herself, in the same fat women destroy their own bodies, is unprecedented, give a woman enough leisure & freetime, & all she’s capable of is how to enslave all of society, to ensure society does the same for women everywhere, irrespective of the results
Damn. So women getting fat is part of a sinister plot to enslave mankind?
This all sounds pretty dire for us civilization-creating dudes.
Happily, as Rmaxd explains in another comment, the ladies are so crazily self-destructive that they will fail in their evil designs, despite “being bankrolled by the rich upper class.” Just like the evil radical blacks back in the 1970s:
[W]omen are following the black activism handbook of the 70′s. …
[N]ear the end of the black movement, as the more mainstream, publicly accepted part of black militancy was rejected & debunked, the more radical components of the movement, began attacking its own supporters, in particular the white supporters of black rights, & they also started attacking blacks who were sympathetic to white males
We see the exact same thing happening with feminism, as the more popular & acceptable parts of feminism have now been rejected by popular culture, ie the colossal failure of stayathome dads
Because nothing is more evil and against NATURE than stay-at-home dads! It’s like sodomy squared.
Anyway, the evil ladies are doomed.
They now start becoming more radical, their antagonism & alienation of men, especially manginas & feminists will inevitably destroy them
As we all know women & especially special rights movements, are always self destructive, as the solutions are never radical enough.
So back to the homes, ladies, where you can return to fulfilling NATURE’s role for the females of the species: sitting on your fat asses and eating bon bons and being terrible at math. Because that is nature’s way.
I had a
Does anyone else read NWO comments with a dramatic voice?
Yes! I imagine him as sounding like this guy:
I read this post about Nice Guys and Girls tee em at NSWATM the other day, and it was good, but it undersells the one massive difference between the Guys and the Girls. There are of course, just as many Nice Girls, but the sickness is quick. They operate on the same principles men operate on- if I only was hot, or funny, or submissive, I’d get a boyfriend. So the Nice Girls get all made up, and in shape, or whatever… and here’s the thing, it works. A horndog man will usually- poof- appear out of thin air and her Nice Girlism is cured. With Nice Guys, since women don’t really approach, it doesn’t work that way. And the Nice Guyism festers, and that’s the worst, when it’s festering- otherwise, it’s just a phase. That’s the first step to MRA-town. But is it their fault? There’s nothing the Nice Guy can do, except “lol be more confident”, well, that’s for the useless tip shithead.
MRAL, how do you know the Nice Girl-ism is cured and that she’s not an insecure mess on the inside? You’re focusing entirely on the external, and that’s part of your problem right there.
NWO has admitted several things that make him happy, including horse racing and Star Wars novels.
Why he doesn’t do those things instead of commenting here is anyone’s guess.
MRAL, your view of women’s experience is truly odd and deluded. Please stop thinking of women as a separate species.
NWO – Read the link closely, the women who applied to the Guild didn’t generally come to it through apprenticeship, most did through marriage or widowhood. Meaning that they picked up the trade from their husbands. It was very common for women to help out with their husband’s trade though they didn’t always have the even footing they did in the American colonies. Apprenticeship was a widespread practice that spanned centuries in Europe and America, there were difference over time and different regions, it changed over time however for the vast majority of the time it was difficult for women to enter trades and most didn’t unless they worked with their husband.
We don’t know how many innovations in these trades were due to women (or men) because we don’t know the names of the vast majority of the inventors. They would develop a new tool or technique and it would be passed along to the apprentices who would spread it if they moved on to a new town after their apprenticeship was over.
Being able to get laid doesn’t cure anything. In fact, from what I’ve seen, it just reinforces the messed up thinking, since what the Nice Girl has now learned is that her ability to form relationships depends on not being herself and making sure that no partner ever sees her in a more natural way.
@Shadow
Don’t play the people of color card.
There was no great mass movement of white women to free the slaves. On the contrary, white women were quite happy with slaves. No doubt many a white woman had her slaves punished severely.
“That slave looked at me lustily, have him whipped!”
What? Like that never happened? No doubt the delicate flower didn’t dole out the whipping herself. No. No. Noooooo! Heaven forbid a woman does any of the blood-letting herself. I’m sure she enjoyed the show and the power of having a man whipped.
Don’t even think for a minute it never happened. I wonder how many good black men were hung until they were dead on a white womans word? Or didn’t that ever happen either? Stop pretending like women are these moral creatures of high spirtuality.
MRAL: Not necessarily. I know roughly equal numbers of straight men who can’t get laid and straight women who can’t get laid. (Occasionally I threaten to create an Ozy’s Acquaintances speed-dating service.) While it’s more common for women to be hit on than men, there is a significant proportion of women who do not get hit on at all. Sexual invisibility sucks for everyone.
@Naodi: It’s no use. Ada stole programming from men. Women were never oppressed.
Also, seriously, MRAL, you really need to stop assuming that what you see of women externally reflects the truth of their inner lives. Does any random person looking at you know how you feel about all this relationship stuff? Probably not, so it’s stupid to assume that you can tell any more about a woman just by looking at her.
Am I wrong? Women’s own statements seem to corroborate this. Men approach women more often than the other way around. I’m not saying this is some horrible oppression, but it’s just a fact. And it can, I think, be hard on the Nice Guy tee em.
Actually if you look at rates of both suicide attempts and successful suicides women have a slightly higher rate of trying to kill themselves (but only slightly and depression seems about evenly distributed). Men however are more likely to use methods like guns that are successful more often. So no, men and women are about equally unhappy.
“Heaven forbid a woman does any of the blood-letting herself.”
Why do you want women to be violent? O.o
There is so much WRONG here. First, women were very active in the abolition movement. Second, not all women had slaves. Third, have you been eating the paint chips again?
I am confuse. Why does NWO think that we think that women never do shitty things?
Branding girls as sluts and raging on websites
Calling women whores, being hateful when they’re right
Telling feminists of the enslavement he’ll bring
These are NWOSlave’s favorite things
Saying we’re liars for rape accusations
Warning of men’s uprising across the nations
Boasting that MRAs will clip our wings
These are NWOSlave’s favorite things
Projecting on us all the hatred that he feels
Making theories that make us ask, “You for reals?”
Crowing about how men’s vengeance will sting
These are NWOSlave’s favorite things
When a girl’s right, when the dumb stings
When he’s feeling sad
NWO remembers his favorite things
And they make him so, so mad
@ozymandias42
Oh puuuulease, Ozy. Women who can’t get laid?
If I may be as vulgar as you for a moment. If there’s an open hole, somebody’ll fall in.
It might not be the white knight in shining armor, but it’ll happen. The reverse ain’t true. Why does every word out of your mouth have to be a lie?
” Men approach women more often than the other way around.”
From my experience, I’ve noticed it to be quite equal. I have even come across women displaying the “creepy” insistent behavior when trying to get with a guy. It’s bad form.
NWO think that feminism means never, ever criticizing another woman at all. Which is clearly full of shit, but he’s not exactly cookin’ on this planet.
It’s funny how little Slavey actually knows about the history of feminism, given his vendetta against it. Seneca Falls, anyone?
@MRAL
The thing is though, dry spells should not equal misogyny. I am not conventionally attractive by any means, pretty insecure romantically and absolutely against the idea of getting into a relationship… I go through a shitload of dry spells. But throughout my life I’ve always had a shitload of girls and women as friends. If you interact with the opposite sex in a platonic manner, it’s really hard to go all “women ain’t shit” through life, even if you have a really shitty romantic life. It’s possible to say misogynistic shit about women because it’s easy to lash out when you’re hurting, but it’s really hard to believe that shit about your friends and loved ones, The same is true of women who go the “Why are all men bastards” etc route, some of them may believe it, but I can guarantee you will find that these women don’t really give a shit about men as anything more than dicks and/or romantic trophies.
Well Ozy, what I’m saying is that the Nice Girls, like the Nice Guys, look at dating like a script. They say, okay, point one, look hot. And so the Girls make themselves look good, through losing weight or dressing a certain way. Okay, point two, go to a hotspot. A bar or whatever. And then they say WHERE’S MY MAN? And then, give a little while… a man appears. Because the script works for women in a way it doesn’t for men, or the Nice Guys. Because the Guys do whatever it is they do, go to bars and hang around the jukebox in a cool shirt and are like WHERE’S MY WOMAN? And then, give or take a little while… nothing happens. And they get all peeved.
MRAL, I’m a woman, and my experience is very much like yours, or rather, it was in my teens and 20s. Things didn’t gel for me until fairly late, mostly because of confidence, oddly enough. My experience is hardly unique. I know women who are not as conventionally attractive as I who were hit on all the time, and women more attractive who are never approached. I know plenty of women who have made the first move and been rejected with varying degrees of tact. I had the unpleasant experience of being “led on” by a guy who was actually angling for another woman. Yes, in our society men are encouraged to approach women and women who do so run the risk of being labeled “aggressive” or “bitchy” or “nymphomaniacal” but rejection and frustration are part of life for many people, men and women.
@Lauralot
I’m sorry. Did I not give love in return? I turned the other cheek the first 77 times when I first commented on this site. Now you get hate in return for all your hatred. Don’t like it? Tough shit.