Is Reddit nothing more than a collection of rape jokes and pedophilia apologias?

Reminds me of the SNL video about sexual harrassment:

1) Be Handsome
2) Be Attractive
3) Don’t Be Unattractive

Yeah, how’s that working for you Sugar-tits?

“i’m not going back and reading the whole thread, did it turn out in the end that brandon’s issues were just another manifestation of a spoiled child throwing a fit because he thought someone was telling him what to do?”

Yep! But this time there’s a new twist – we’re jealous of Ashley. I mean, sometimes he fucks her with the lights on, how lucky can a girl be?

Where’s the off button on this remote? This show is boring.

That is such an insult to The Doors!

I’m trying to think of a band that would be a good stand in for Brandon. Maybe Limp Bizkit? Some sort of tedious nu metal crap, anyway.

By the way, nu metal?

Guys, please don’t ever do that again.

1) Rebecca sexualized herself by jumping to the conclusion that the guy was interested in having sex with her.

Hell, I even prefixed the paragraph with “My bet is that it…”. Any smart person can see that I am stating an opinion and not reciting hard facts

remember guys, when brandon speculates based on the meager facts he knows, that’s just stating his opinion and you can’t criticize him for it

when people with first hand knowledge make inferences based on the situation, that’s jumping to conclusions and it’s important to rant and rave about it for pages on end.

@Sharculese: Dude, do you come with a Sharculese-Meaningful English dictionary?

Also, I never said my opinion couldn’t be criticized.

all songs should sputter off into guitar feedback. everything needs more skronk.

Also, I never said my opinion couldn’t be criticized.

you could have fooled me with all your maundering about how, ‘it’s just my opinion man’ but w/e babby

@Sharculese: Well, I guess you are easily fooled.

@Cassandra

Oh limp bizkit lolllll One thing I’ll say about him though, he knew how to pick guest artists, and all of them came out with their A-game

@Cynickal

Do you read David Eddings by any chance? Your “it’s a kilt!!!” made me think of Redemption of Althalus

Brandon: What does probably mean to you? Because you seem to be using it in different ways in the same thread.

As in, “He was probably doing ‘x’, with the intent of ‘y’, but we can’t assume ‘y’ was what he was actually after, so we have to give him the benefit of the doubt.”

Something in that equation is fucked, if something is probably going to explode, I’m not going to benefit from doubting it. But, for reasons only plain to you, and the lurkers in meatspace, you think probably and doubt go hand in hand.

Care to explain this? I mean if the price of gold was suddenly going to tank, and you paid a pretty penny for it, it’s best to give that the benefit of the doubt, and not sell enough to cover your investment costs, because… well just because, right?

But then again, you have these plastic definitions. Slut is perfectly alright, unless you want to decide that someone who has been a slut isn’t ever going to be worthy of a relationship with you.

Respect is to be earned, but the least infringement of what you think are your entitlements and no respect remains to the person whom you think owes it to you.

Since you won’t explain how you use Respectable claiming it’s a word with changeable meaning; you aren’t being asked to define it for everyone, but to explain howyou use it so I can only assume that, like Humpty Dumpty you choose it to mean what you want it to mean, since (as with slut, previously), and are, probably, using it as suits your purpose to praise women you approve of, and denigrate those you want to show disapproval of, taking advantage of the social connotations of being respectable, in both cases.

Way to make your intent to equivocate obvious.

Which means, no one can trust you. You are admitting to engaging in practices of dishonest debate, but you think you are entitled to the respect someone who engages in honest debate has earned.

That, and you are, still, ignoring the actual point… people who are being foul to a 15 year old. I’ll bet that if this were your cousin, or sister, or some relative of Ashley’s you’d be all pissed off.

But since it doesn’t, in any way you can see, affect you, you don’t give a rat’s ass, and will use it to attack a woman who had the temerity to express her opinion about how men in general act; because that does affect you (and not probably) since you’ve said you think you have the right to be a dickhead anytime you feel like it; and pretending what she said was, “over the top, hysterical, and flat out ridiculous,” (which is why I am certain; beyond probably, that you didn’t watch the video; that or you are truly stupid. Since I don’t believe the latter I have to assume you are lying about having watched the video; because it was calm, rational and on-point).

Brandon:I don’t see my “beta” comment as baseless…and it is MY educated guess of what happened. I never said I had all the facts. But I don’t go around saying my hypothesis is the objective truth. It isn’t.

But you get all cranky-pants when people say they disagree: and with supporting evidence to justify their position. Your response, “But it’s my, opinion, so you have to admit I might be right.”

Which is wrong.

Looking at what she said, six months ago, when it was all fresh and relevant and shit, we thrashed it out. We came to reasoned conclusions. We watched lots of dudes make exactly the arguments you are making (right down to the, “if she had thought he was hot she’d have shagged him down to a stub and gone bowlegged and smiling”).

You are saying nothing new, but you want people to treat you as if you had.

Get over yourself.

I don’t watch SNL on TV. I do however watch some of the most popular skits on youtube.

You know, I saw in the other thread that Brandon is on moderation for the crime of tediousness which is hilarious. But I can’t help but point out that I said just last night that Brandon would claim that the television shows he references and posts that he clips wouldn’t count as “watching television” because he watches them on the internet.

Nobinayamu | December 29, 2011 at 12:57 am

It’s like saying you don’t watch television while simultaneously posting clips of South Park and saying that you like the show Scrubs. Let me guess: that doesn’t count because you watch those shows on the internet, right?

Brandon, I’ve said it before but it bears repeating: you’re so fucking dumb. Tedious, certainly, and dull as dishwater. But mostly you are just incredibly stupid in addition to being a lying sack of shit.