NOTE: The title of this post is sarcastic. If you found this post through a Google search because you’re actually looking for tips on how to exploit desperate young women, you’re a piece of shit, and this post is not for you. Go away, and go fuck yourself.
Fellas! Want sex, but don’t have the money to shell out on prostitutes? Hate the time and effort it takes to talk a non-professional sex-having women into having sex with you? A recent post by Advocatus Diaboli on the always delightful In Mala Fide offered an elegant solution for horny but frugal men. In a post titled Pooning on a Tight Budget, AD explained the technique that has worked for him:
Getting poor, but good-looking, young girls (18-23) to have sex with [you] in return for some timely financial help.
Turns out that women who are poor and desperate can be exploited for your own sexy purposes!
Of course, it’s not always quite as easy as it might seem.
I should be upfront that getting amateur women to have sex for money can be tricky as most of them believe that they are not whores. Moreover, poor young women often have “boyfriends” and white knight orbiters. So I created a set of filters and rules to screen out the most problematic types.
According to AD, all you have to do is to:
Avoid all girls who have obvious and serious drug and mental health issues or have lived on the street for over 6 weeks at a stretch.
Happily for you, that still leaves lots of girls ripe for the picking! AD suggests you focus your attention on:
Freshly homeless young girls, especially those who hangout in mixed groups.
The safest ones are those who are into pot, drumming, dreadlocks et cetera. You can find them in many larger cities in the spring and summer. While I would never trust them with any significant amount of money, many are reasonably decent human beings.
You might not think you’d have much in common to talk about with these women – what with them being “reasonably decent human beings” and you being a “completely reprehensible pile of shit” – but you’d be surprised.
Strike up a conversation with them, engage them and see where it leads. But you must make it plainly obvious that you are interested in them sexually, but that all favors require reciprocation. Once you get to know them, a decent round of drinks, snacks, money for pot, a small necessary item of clothing, decent dinner with booze will almost guarantee you a good lay (or at least a couple of BJs).
And if you crunch the numbers you’ll see it’s really quite a frugal solution.
Your initial financial hit for hanging out with them is very small, and once they are sleeping with you.. it will often work to about $30-60 (cash equivalent or cash) per session. You may also get freebies..
But girls don’t necessarily have to be literally homeless to be desperate enough to sleep with you for money. Nope! You may also find great cost-savings from targeting:
Girls who are not homeless, but are just hanging on.
How do you find these lovely ladies? Keep an eye out for women working really shitty jobs that don’t pay shit! You’ll find them conveniently located
in smaller retail stores or businesses that pay minimum wage with no tips. Build a rapport and be fairly upfront about your interest, but do not come across as desperate. Go to her workplace and talk to her when you are in that area, but do not stalk her.
Yep, it turns out that even desperate women can be creeped out. So play it cool! Stalking’s for fools!
There’s another possible hurdle: other dudes.
Such women often have “boyfriends,” however, they are often just as poor or poorer than her. You can get pussy as long as you are firm about the need for reciprocation. This category of girls might be more willing to give BJs than having ‘real sex.’ But do you really care?
Just remember to keep to your budget!
Restrict your help to less than $200 at any one time AND only after she has put out a couple of times.
And then there’s AD’s favorite category of desperate women:
Girls who are poor, but not homeless and have no “boyfriends” + have moved to the city within the last eight weeks.
You have hit the jackpot!
Just don’t get carried away. Remember: you’re in charge, and she should know it!
Remember these girls can become de facto GFs, but do not restrict yourself to one. While you do not have to rub it in their faces, they should know that you are always looking around for a better deal. But treat them a bit better than type 1 and 2, they do give more per dollar spent on them.
Your accountant will be so, so proud of you!
Just remember:
They will play by your rules as long as they are not too dehumanizing, and they are often cheaper than professional whores.
Now that’s a motto to live by!
Amazingly, not all of the readers of In Mala Fide appreciated AD’s little treatise.
Simon invoked the c-word, before tossing in some racism:
Mate you are one deadset sad cunt. It’s no surprise to know you’re Indian.
Cathater broke out the other c-word:
Pretty damn creepy. You sound like you have no soul. Actually, you might be the first member of a new species: the perfectly rational, purely selfish utility-maximizing agent (Homo Economicus) that Austrian economists and Randroids have always droned on and on about.
Yes, I was as surprised as you are to read an actually reasonable critique of the post on In Mala Fide.
Don’t worry, though, the rest of the comments mostly lived up to the foul standards of the blog.
Ryu worried about the old slippery slope. If you start by suggesting that PUAs target homeless women, the next thing you know they’ll advocate sex with children! And then down the slippery slope you’ll slide:
This is the direction that PU takes one in. I’m surprised that there haven’t been any PUAs who say that during a dry spell we should go to gay bars and pick up men. Just to keep your dick wet, you know.
Savrola returned to the theme of race:
There’s a problem WNs have yet to deal with. Well off second-generation foreigners like AD taking advantage of your impoverished women of older native stock, after they’ve taken your jobs.
Can’t keep ‘em here, can’t send ‘em back.
What to do?
Blog proprietor Ferdinand Bardamu waded in to take a shot at all the “white knights” sticking up for the gals.
ROFLMAO at all these white knights. …
If you want to blame someone, blame the morally debased white women who would rather blow a stranger for $200 then work honestly (pull yourself up by your bootstraps, slob! nobody owes you anything!).
We’re living in Soviet Amerika (and Soviet Kanada). All of your daughters are whores or will become whores, soon as the price tag gets high enough.
Meanwhile, Stoner With a Boner, who sometimes graces the comments section here with his always trenchant wisdom, took a stand on behalf of the real victims here: dudes paying their own hard-earned money to icky ladies for sex.
Personally, I find the idea of clocking more hours at a job I hate just to hand $200 to a prostitute who would probably leave me dying in the street rather than help degrading.
Men, the forgotten victims once again.
This post contains:
NWO is here and still vile. Good to know.
NWOslave
Just stop your bullshit for a moment. Please.
@Sharculese
I served my time for my crime of poverty. I did what I had to do to survive. I’ll do it again if I’m placed in that situation again. It’s either that or die.
Nope! It’s that, die, or suck dick! I promise you, it’s equal opportunity out there.
I expected a lot of what you said, but “survival sex is a female privilege,” I gotta admit, kinda caught me off guard.
NWO, seriously, did you get the “Republicans And Others Award for the guy best able to turn on other people who have it rough, cause he has it WORSE, and they’re whining?” You’re like the world Divide and Conquer Champion.
@Holly Pervocracy
I’d rather die than degrade myself into sodomy fetish. So burglary it is.
right. it all comes down to external factors. nothing is ever your fault, you never have to take personal responsibility for anything. that’s about what i’ve come to expect from you.
I’d rather have sex than steal, and you’re pulling the moral superiority card?
It doesn’t help that I don’t believe a word you say. I guess that’s unfair but based on your previous history as an amazing inventor who was rejected by Pepsi for not being a woman and also has friends who laugh at Manboobz with him… it’s a little too convenient for you to suddenly be a railyard-sleeping hobo.
Women steal too. And deal drugs. And men engage in survival sex. And yes, I did know a guy sleeping with a woman for shelter.
And btw, the “victims” rhetoric often doesn’t help the real women and girls who are victimized in sex work. Has a tendency to worsen it, in fact. So if you want me to see it as a good that they’re seen this way… Well, no. Just as seeing those driven to other forms of survival as “criminals” (And it’s not true that women in sex work are never seen as similarly vile criminals, the flip side of the poor victims rhetoric) isn’t helpful. You don’t seem to want any solidarity or action to change these things, so WHAT DO YOU WANT? Everybody to shut up?
@zhinxy
What? No sympathy for me? So if I disagree with ideology I deserve ridicule? Here’s a man who suffered but he isn’t pro-feminist. Ridicule him! He doesn’t agree with everything we say. Mock him! No homeless shelters for men unless they swear allegiance to feminism!
Tell me this isn’t the home of hatred. Read you own comments.
Cyas.
Oh this isn’t NWO’s first time at the “I went 200 consecutive days without food and ate snow”-rodeo. All of his inventions were stolen, all his businesses failed. He was repeatedly denied children. Read back through: a life filled with despair. That thing with Pepsi just proves that it was all the fault of feminism.
That’s why he’s not responsible for anything.
Liar.
This isn’t about you disagreeing with ideology, it’s about your willingness to turn on other people surviving on the streets and in poverty because they don’t have it as bad.
I can read my own comments for comprehension. Explain how hateful I am along with explaining how I’m pretending I don’t want more government XD
no, you deserve ridicule for being a liar, a bully, and a coward. that you disagree with us is dicta.
NWO is liar, but I totally believe he’s been to jail.
>>>From reading the comments on that post, I have deduced that “white knighting” means “asserting that women are human being and should not be treated like cattle.”
They use it to mean “foolishly thinking that by pretending to be nice to women and considering them as human beings, they’ll get some sex out of the deal”. They have actually deluded themselves into thinking that all men only care about women as sex dispensers, and that none is ever nice for its own sake.
Their objections to it is that it’s bad game, not that it’s being a horrible, horrible human being.
>>>I’m surprised more of them aren’t eating it up. I mean, it has everything! You get to treat women like the natural whores they are, plus save a few bucks in the process. Win!
The MRAs think they’re owed a free sex slave / home cleaner. Paying for a blowjob, even if it’s half price off from a regular street hooker, is overpaying in their opinion.
Homeless teen boys and girls are both frequently forced into prostitution, either by a pimp or by circumstance and trying to get enough to eat and survive.
Are you arguing that, in general, the fact that women tend to not hire prostitutes is a bad thing? Because again, in the most general terms, boys who are prostitutes are servicing men. They aren’t being hired by women.
I own a 37 unit apartment building that is dedicated to formally homeless men. You’re right that there are men that are excluded. Sex offenders, but not all of them.
My apartment building receives no government funding so I we are not under the radar of government guidelines. Obviously most sex offenders I would rather spit on but I’ve chosen to house more then a few. In my mind people deserve a second chance.
Er, what? Could someone explain what the connection between dying and burglary is? I’m drawing a blank.
“Haha, Sharculese, I used to date a B__don. (I mean, a guy named that, not a guy like that.) He was a nice guy, and the name always gives me a little dissonance.”
I dated one of those too. Spelled differently though.
Often when arguin with B__don i’ll slip up and spell the name like my ex’s because the pattern of circular logic and goalpost moving is *exactly the same*.
i think there’s some confusion, so to clarify, the professor i’m talking about literally went by b. don. he was from arkansas, it was short for billy don (sort of).
That’s an awesome name.
Kavette – Your awesome acts of helping formerly homeless men will not register to NWO. I think we have a 99 percent chance he will just ignore you. If he acknowledges it at all, I think he’ll say something about how all the men have to be profeminist, or that unlike his amazing inventions, it’s just you making up stuff on the internet.
“My apartment building receives no government funding so I we are not under the radar of government guidelines”
He will also possibly claim that you are lying about this. I know it sounds weird, but he recently told me to stop pretending I don’t want more government, so my guess is he will go for it and say you’re lying.
Holly, my respect for you grows every day.