NOTE: The title of this post is sarcastic. If you found this post through a Google search because you’re actually looking for tips on how to exploit desperate young women, you’re a piece of shit, and this post is not for you. Go away, and go fuck yourself.
Fellas! Want sex, but don’t have the money to shell out on prostitutes? Hate the time and effort it takes to talk a non-professional sex-having women into having sex with you? A recent post by Advocatus Diaboli on the always delightful In Mala Fide offered an elegant solution for horny but frugal men. In a post titled Pooning on a Tight Budget, AD explained the technique that has worked for him:
Getting poor, but good-looking, young girls (18-23) to have sex with [you] in return for some timely financial help.
Turns out that women who are poor and desperate can be exploited for your own sexy purposes!
Of course, it’s not always quite as easy as it might seem.
I should be upfront that getting amateur women to have sex for money can be tricky as most of them believe that they are not whores. Moreover, poor young women often have “boyfriends” and white knight orbiters. So I created a set of filters and rules to screen out the most problematic types.
According to AD, all you have to do is to:
Avoid all girls who have obvious and serious drug and mental health issues or have lived on the street for over 6 weeks at a stretch.
Happily for you, that still leaves lots of girls ripe for the picking! AD suggests you focus your attention on:
Freshly homeless young girls, especially those who hangout in mixed groups.
The safest ones are those who are into pot, drumming, dreadlocks et cetera. You can find them in many larger cities in the spring and summer. While I would never trust them with any significant amount of money, many are reasonably decent human beings.
You might not think you’d have much in common to talk about with these women – what with them being “reasonably decent human beings” and you being a “completely reprehensible pile of shit” – but you’d be surprised.
Strike up a conversation with them, engage them and see where it leads. But you must make it plainly obvious that you are interested in them sexually, but that all favors require reciprocation. Once you get to know them, a decent round of drinks, snacks, money for pot, a small necessary item of clothing, decent dinner with booze will almost guarantee you a good lay (or at least a couple of BJs).
And if you crunch the numbers you’ll see it’s really quite a frugal solution.
Your initial financial hit for hanging out with them is very small, and once they are sleeping with you.. it will often work to about $30-60 (cash equivalent or cash) per session. You may also get freebies..
But girls don’t necessarily have to be literally homeless to be desperate enough to sleep with you for money. Nope! You may also find great cost-savings from targeting:
Girls who are not homeless, but are just hanging on.
How do you find these lovely ladies? Keep an eye out for women working really shitty jobs that don’t pay shit! You’ll find them conveniently located
in smaller retail stores or businesses that pay minimum wage with no tips. Build a rapport and be fairly upfront about your interest, but do not come across as desperate. Go to her workplace and talk to her when you are in that area, but do not stalk her.
Yep, it turns out that even desperate women can be creeped out. So play it cool! Stalking’s for fools!
There’s another possible hurdle: other dudes.
Such women often have “boyfriends,” however, they are often just as poor or poorer than her. You can get pussy as long as you are firm about the need for reciprocation. This category of girls might be more willing to give BJs than having ‘real sex.’ But do you really care?
Just remember to keep to your budget!
Restrict your help to less than $200 at any one time AND only after she has put out a couple of times.
And then there’s AD’s favorite category of desperate women:
Girls who are poor, but not homeless and have no “boyfriends” + have moved to the city within the last eight weeks.
You have hit the jackpot!
Just don’t get carried away. Remember: you’re in charge, and she should know it!
Remember these girls can become de facto GFs, but do not restrict yourself to one. While you do not have to rub it in their faces, they should know that you are always looking around for a better deal. But treat them a bit better than type 1 and 2, they do give more per dollar spent on them.
Your accountant will be so, so proud of you!
Just remember:
They will play by your rules as long as they are not too dehumanizing, and they are often cheaper than professional whores.
Now that’s a motto to live by!
Amazingly, not all of the readers of In Mala Fide appreciated AD’s little treatise.
Simon invoked the c-word, before tossing in some racism:
Mate you are one deadset sad cunt. It’s no surprise to know you’re Indian.
Cathater broke out the other c-word:
Pretty damn creepy. You sound like you have no soul. Actually, you might be the first member of a new species: the perfectly rational, purely selfish utility-maximizing agent (Homo Economicus) that Austrian economists and Randroids have always droned on and on about.
Yes, I was as surprised as you are to read an actually reasonable critique of the post on In Mala Fide.
Don’t worry, though, the rest of the comments mostly lived up to the foul standards of the blog.
Ryu worried about the old slippery slope. If you start by suggesting that PUAs target homeless women, the next thing you know they’ll advocate sex with children! And then down the slippery slope you’ll slide:
This is the direction that PU takes one in. I’m surprised that there haven’t been any PUAs who say that during a dry spell we should go to gay bars and pick up men. Just to keep your dick wet, you know.
Savrola returned to the theme of race:
There’s a problem WNs have yet to deal with. Well off second-generation foreigners like AD taking advantage of your impoverished women of older native stock, after they’ve taken your jobs.
Can’t keep ‘em here, can’t send ‘em back.
What to do?
Blog proprietor Ferdinand Bardamu waded in to take a shot at all the “white knights” sticking up for the gals.
ROFLMAO at all these white knights. …
If you want to blame someone, blame the morally debased white women who would rather blow a stranger for $200 then work honestly (pull yourself up by your bootstraps, slob! nobody owes you anything!).
We’re living in Soviet Amerika (and Soviet Kanada). All of your daughters are whores or will become whores, soon as the price tag gets high enough.
Meanwhile, Stoner With a Boner, who sometimes graces the comments section here with his always trenchant wisdom, took a stand on behalf of the real victims here: dudes paying their own hard-earned money to icky ladies for sex.
Personally, I find the idea of clocking more hours at a job I hate just to hand $200 to a prostitute who would probably leave me dying in the street rather than help degrading.
Men, the forgotten victims once again.
This post contains:
Om NOM: shut the fuck UP. Neither are boo-hooing, but thanks for stopping by and telling us How It Should Be. Asshole.
I’m kinda surprised B_don didn’t do that.
Katz, if I were still in Seattle, you’d have an escape hatch.
hellkell, I’m not talking to you young lady. And being an asshole is my job! Someone’s gotta do it. 😛
^.^
There is no such job anywhere in the world.
Since the job you claim to exist does not, in fact, exist, no no one has to do it.
@Kendra, the Bionic Mommy:
I’m glad to see that Amnesia adequately covered how ridiculous your suggestion is. If women spent their time volunteering who’s going to tell the men to go kill?!
@Lauralot:
“Need help figuring that out? I could draw some pictures, if you like.”
I think you’re lying, NWO thinks you’re lying, everyone thinks that you’re lying. Therefore I demand that you provide us with these pictures or forever be branded a liar!!! (colour optional but highly encouraged)
Om Nom, fuck off.
NWO, probably the most homophobic person in the world aside from Fred Phelps, called someone else hateful. That’s rich.
Oh top of being a really extreme homophobe, I’m pretty sure NWO also hates teh Jews. Or at least he thinks they were lying about that whole “Holocaust” thing.
I’d love to find his rantings on truthdig or prisonplanet, I’m sure they’re much funnier than what he posts here.
Having read many (about 150) of the 345–at the time of this posting–replies, I can’t help noticiing two small points:
Firstly, nowhere is there any mention of the self-evident, obvious, and glaring fact that these unfortunate women were spouseless! They were all alone in the world as single women, all alone in the world as women with nobody to care for them, nobody to help them, and nobody to provide them with a home!
They were all daughters,or by now, granddaughters of the “Ms. Having-it-all, a woman-needs-a man-like-a-fish-needs-a-bicycle, ain’t women’s empowerment GRAND” theory of life in feminist (or post-feminist) America! Gee, somewhere along the line, however, the 2 million dollars a year ‘ca-ree-ah” for an often single, if not unmarriageable harpie; for real women, the position of Corporate CEO, Real estate bigshot, or hardass butch lawyeress (followed by a Madelyn Allbright/Condoleeza Rice/Hillary Clinton-type political career, or top-level academic superstar, or Federal Judge NEVER materialized!!
What a shame! )ne percent of women get the dream, and the other 99% the nightmare.
Oh well, NOT exactly “other 99%” , but youall know what I mean.
If those women, and millions like them, in the past few decades, had concentrated upon being SOFGs–primarily home, marraige, and motherhood type of women–and the men in the larger society had every opportunity to fall in love with them, care for them (there would be SOME chances of that if the onrushing flood of women invading and polluting mens’ jobs and career choices from the mid ’70s to today hadn’t depressed wages and promotion opportunties for EVERYONE). What happens to wages when the same quantities of jobs are competed for by almost twice the number of applicants–especially when the message comes down from DC’s Kommisars of Equality that “You BETTER hire some women over the male breadwinner applicants OR ELSE!–and more and more families, even with a full-time breadwinner, slide into poverty.
Of course, even the flood of women into both entry-level and management level positions couldn’t depress wages enough and so unlimited third-world immigration was enacted and enforced, along with NAFTA, the WTO and large-scale corporate outsourcing (which has barely even begun).during those years, with cheers for the “progress” that women were making in the “new information-based economy”.
The chickens are coming home to roost. These women have no homemaking skills to speak of, no husbands to take care of them, and all of their (and their mates’ would-be employers have taken off for parts unknown–perhaps China, perhaps Vietnam, perhaps the Phillipines, Mexico or Brazil, or perhaps have been themselves put out of business by the progressive deindustrialization policies by the WTO, Federal Reserve, the EPA, or God knows who–and these beneficiaries of more and better “education” for women in the modern world all have NO place to go… Nice work!!
IF, and this is a reluctant IF, women ARE going to earn a livelihood on their own, the least one can do is provide an environment most conducive to both their cleanliness and to their physical–and medical–safety, some screening of both women–and clientele–with an eye toward both having an enjoyable and satisfying evening together.
Especially If it offers opportunities for some of the more ambitious or conversely, the more traditional-minded of the women, to cultivate new skills– erotic, entertainment, or hostessing for the more sexually “advanced”–as well as perhaps learning, or relearning, homemaking, childcare, and domestic skills which would be indispensible to their successful marriage and household lives later on, if that is what the more traditionally minded wanted to do.
Sex Slavery” is the reply that you feminists whose policeis played such a big part in putting these unfortunates in the hopeless and bitter mess that they are in the Feminist States of America?? Not at all–but a way out, maybe even the only way out, of a shamelessly eltiist women’s “guild” that offers a well-entrenched ten perent or so the life of a Hillary Clinton, a Corporate CEO, a University President, or a cabinet minister, but for the other 90 percent or so…
Legalized,, profit making, and safe Houses of Men’s Entertainment. Sounds better than starving in the streets, put there by “egalitarian’ social and sexual reformers whose ideas, when implemented, resutlted in everything for an upper crust of some ten percent–and hopeless misery for a LOT of other women–and the men who would have loved them!
Feminuttery–I MOCK IT! Except that the consequences for real live people, especially women, are too damned tragic!!
Just when you think it can’t get worse, here comes the Mellertoad hopping down the path to prove you wrong.
Dude, we get it, you want to force women into brothels. You think it’s a good thing, and we think you are batshit insane.
Okay then. Nice to see you back, Meller. You still have yet to tell me why the “breadwinner” wage labor model is at all desirable or neccessary in the first place, for starters.
I’ll talk about this with you in more detail later, if you want, but first please tell me what the bitter manhating comments I’ve said that would provoke violence from a man gentle as a lamb are. Also, have you changed your mind about me provoking my abuse or not.
Mellertoad, I would rather starve and have survival sex than be in one of your slave pens. Suck on that, you nasty man.
Ah, so we should set up formalized systems in which women exchange sex for security, instead of all the risks that come with ad hoc exploitation.
If only I could have had someone legally sell me into prostitution, my cares would surely have drifted away.
Also, come on, you really think that whole “blame the wimminz” for your low wages thing is totally sound thinking and not a divide and conquer excuse? You remain quite the credulous paranoiac.
Holly – “my cares would surely have drifted away.”
YOU WOULD HAVE BEEN TRAINING FOR THE FUTURE!
“Hah, at least a dakimakura has got more warmth than you frigid icequeens …”
“Her name is Kumiko, and she understands me. Of course she’s only 11, like that girl who got raped by all the tentacles in my favorite hentai, so I have to remember not to use any big words. But still, when her empty printed-on-cotton eyes gaze up at me as I hump her soft polyester fiber-filled body*, I know that this is what true happiness looks feels like.”
*I was too cheap to spring for real down.
DKM, I have a question. I only had survival sex the one time, although I was homeless on several different occasions.
On one of these occasions, I was taken in by a mother who gave me a place to stay in exchange for nannying her child and making a website for her home business. This wasn’t a totally non-exploitative arrangement–I was working illegally and without any monetary pay–but it was still a hell of a lot less emotionally difficult than survival sex.
Why do you never consider solutions where women could do non-sex work in exchange for security? Why don’t you want to divert wayward women to Houses Of Babysitting And Web Design?
I mean, the answer is obvious–women are for sex! they’re not people who are capable of anything people can do!–but I’m curious how you justify it.
Meller, I’m sure NWO is thanking you right now for turning up and making him look slightly less stupid. Also, I’m thanking you. Your missive is the best laugh I’ve had all day.
At you, not with you, in case you were wondering.
Holly – He said I could have a cupcake baking business or a farm once, but informed me that people would have to BUY MY GOODS for it to be profitable. He’s so smart! Also he made some odd noises about insurers and risk abatement… I think he was trying to imply that the public would turn up their nose at LADY cupcakes and LADY grown produce? And it would be difficult to get insurers to underwrite this, because everybody knows about the dangers of LADY cupcakes and LADY grown produce?
Also, any answer or excuse as to why you were on Manboobz talking about how ladies stole our beautiful hovercar future, without even mentioning the fact that they actualy did, (no conspiracy, no shit, no feminists to blame) take away Habeus Corpus, while every other libertarian on the planet was busy ’cause of NDAA? If you’re gonna try to do the “I am an involved elder anti-statesman” thing again, you’re gonna really have to at least try to explain that one.
Haha, cupcakes, because ladies aren’t up to the challenge of baking full-size cakes.
Meller’s kind of amusing sometimes.
What happens if your husband is what you’re running from?
@Holly:
“I mean, the answer is obvious–women are for sex! they’re not people who are capable of anything people can do!–but I’m curious how you justify it.”
1. Women have an “extra” hole
2. Hole is empty
3. Hole needs to be filled with allmighty penis
4. Women working as cashiers, lawyers, doctors or (heaven forbid) soldiers whilst attached to a dick are a tad disturbing, therefore keep them out of the public eye at home or in homes of entertainment
5. ????????????
6. All woman are deliriously happy with their new lot in life (I suspect because of the aforementioned mighty penes)
7. Peace and Freedom!!!!!!!!!!!!
I’m glad both of them are in the same thread to remind impartial observers that our trolls truly are the dregs of society. 😀
@Voip:
“What happens if your husband is what you’re running from?”
You will be gently but firmly advised to strive harder to become someone that your husband will not feel the need to chase and returned home properly chastised and thus (obviously) a better wife. Meanwhile your fathers, brothers and any other concerned male relatives will write strongly worded letters to your husband (possibly in RED font if the situation is dire enough)
This is a bit late, but I’m thinking Whatever needs to go on moderation.
Sorry, Holly, I can delete his shit if you want.
David – I don’t mind, I knew the trolls would be jerks to me when I posted.
After they’ve tried so hard to say The Worst Thing A Human Can Say so many times in these threads, I don’t really shock anymore.